PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Formularies, Hospital as Topic”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 163 records · Page 9Linked to original sources
PubMed2004

Tirofiban and eptifibatide treatment of patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome with non-ST segment elevation.

OBJECTIVE: This retrospective study was conducted to determine the usage patterns and tolerability of tirofiban and eptifibatide during the first year of their use. METHODS: We have assessed the appropriate use of these drugs according to the criteria implemented by the Clinical Institute of Cardiovascular Disease as part of a protocol for treating acute coronary syndrome with non-ST segment elevation. RESULTS: 37 patients received tirofiban and 19 patients received eptifibatide. These patients were at high risk of poor outcomes such as myocardial infarction or death. Tirofiban and eptifibatide were used according to the indication criteria: only one case fell outside them. Dosing, time for drug initiation (from last chest pain) and time of infusion were considered appropriate. Tirofiban was involved in two cases of minor bleeding complications and eptifibatide in one case of thrombocytopenia (80,000 platelets per millimeter). These mild adverse drug reactions were reversible with the early withdrawal of the drugs. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that tirofiban and eptifibatide have been used optimally, with a close adherence to the pre-established protocol. Both drugs have shown a good level of tolerability.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2003

Use of unlicensed and off-label medications in paediatric gastroenterology with a review of the commonly used formularies in the UK.

BACKGROUND: Use of unlicensed and off-label medications is common in hospital based paediatric practice. Whilst inpatient prescription can be closely monitored within the hospital setting, it is subspecialties like paediatric gastroenterology, caring for chronically ill children on an outpatient basis that require administration of regular medications in the community. Local practitioners rely on available paediatric formularies or information provided by the tertiary unit for monitoring and dispensing further prescriptions. AIM: To assess the proportion of unlicensed and off-label medications prescribed in a paediatric gastroenterology unit to children discharged to the community and assess adequacy of information about these medications in commonly used British formularies. METHODS: All prescriptions prescribed over a six-month period (Jan-Jul 2002) either in the paediatric gastroenterology outpatient department or for children discharged home after an inpatient stay, were retrieved from the pharmacy database. The main outcome measures were to assess the proportion of medications prescribed for unlicensed or off-label use. RESULTS: 308 patients received 777 prescriptions of which 384 (49%) were for unlicensed or off-label use. Of these 291 (76%) were off-label; 208 in relation to indication and 83 to child's age. 93 of the prescribed medications were unlicensed; 37 were due to manipulation of formulation. Of the commonly used formularies in the UK, only 'Medication for Children(R)' contained dosage information on more than half (9/13) of the most often prescribed off-label/unlicensed medications in paediatric gastroenterology. CONCLUSIONS: Use of unlicensed and off-label medications remains a problem in paediatric practice. Until licensing laws change and more drugs are licensed in children, paediatric gastroenterologists remain responsible for provision of information to families, local practitioners, nurses and pharmacists. Of the commonly used formularies, 'Medicines for Children' is the most detailed and comprehensive, and should be available to all general practitioners and pharmacists in the UK. Clear communication between specialist units and local practitioners is imperative to ensure safe and effective prescribing to children.

Ambulatory Care↗
PubMed2000

Dutch hospital drug formularies: pharmacotherapeutic variation and conservatism, but concurrence with national pharmacotherapeutic guidelines.

AIMS: This research examines current hospital drug formularies (HDFs) of all Dutch general hospitals. It assesses the extent to which they recommend the same drugs, the breadth of their coverage in terms of therapeutic areas, drug groups incorporated and individuals drugs included, and their extent of conservatism by considering the year of introduction of the drugs included within groups. Furthermore, it considers the extent to which their recommendations concur and comply with those of national pharmacotherapeutic guidelines and the WHO Essential Drugs List (EDL). METHODS: Seventy-eight (81%) out of all 96 current Dutch HDFs were received of which 62 were suitable for study. Differences between HDFs and eventual associations with hospital characteristics were researched by statistical testing and case-control studies. To evaluate HDFs' concurrence with national guidelines and compliance with the WHO EDL, nine drug groups were studied in detail: benzodiazepines, calcium channel blockers, beta-adrenoceptor blocking agents, ACE-inhibitors, angiotensin-II inhibitors, NSAIDs, H2-receptor antagonists, 5HT3-antagonists, and H+-pump inhibitors. Concurrence and compliance with national guidelines and the WHO EDL was defined as inclusion of recommended drugs. Non-concurrence was defined as inclusion of nonrecommended drugs. RESULTS: The total number of indications addressed and drug groups incorporated within HDFs varied from 28 to 72 (median 56) and from 30 to 123 (median 97), respectively. The total number of individual drug entities (pharmacological substances) included ranged from 239 to 658 (median 430) and the total number of drug products, including all different dosage forms, from 412 to 1121 (median 655). Within drug groups, drug entities first marketed were most frequently included. Teaching hospitals were most likely to include recently marketed drugs. Depending on the drug group, HDFs' concurrence and compliance with national guidelines and the WHO EDL ranged from 35% to 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate that Dutch HDFs are rather uniform in the indications addressed and the drug groups incorporated. However, the number of individual drug entities and drug products included within groups varies considerably. Furthermore, Dutch HDFs are considered rather conservative, as older drugs are favoured over more recent drugs. Generally, with some drug exceptions, Dutch HDFs concur and comply with recommendations in national pharmacotherapeutic guidelines and with the WHO EDL over 90%.

Chemistry, Pharmaceutical↗
PubMed1995

Antibiotic therapy intervention at a community hospital. Opportunities for cost and quality improvements.

In a one-year study, thirty-two physicians' antibiotic costs decreased significantly and were lower than those in a comparison group. The quality of patient care was not adversely affected, and the hospital's overall rate of nosocomial infection decreased. The success of the program led to its being adopted throughout the hospital. The dynamics of pharmacies' implementing cost-reduction strategies with voluntary medical staffs are discussed throughout the article.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed2002

Removing meperidine from the health-system formulary--frequently asked questions.

Meperidine is FDA-approved for relieving moderate to severe pain and has been widely used since its introduction in the 1930s. However, the drug is no longer considered a first-line analgesic. Many clinicians recommend that meperidine be removed from health-systems or that its use be restricted, due to concerns about adverse reactions, drug interactions, and normeperidine neurotoxicity. In addition, clinical evidence shows that meperidine has no advantage over other opioids for biliary colic or pancreatitis. The formulary status of meperidine has been extensively discussed at University of Utah Hospitals and Clinics. The Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee has been working with hospital staff to assess the impact of either removing meperidine from the formulary, or limiting its use. The Drug Information Service developed this document to help pharmacists respond to prescribers' questions and to alleviate the prescribers' concerns about these changes. Information is provided comparing meperidine with other opioids, including dosage equivalency, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, cost, adverse effects, and drug interactions. Where available, alternatives to meperidine are suggested for various indications.

Analgesics, Opioid↗
PubMed2003

Routine cycling of antimicrobial agents as an infection-control measure.

Antimicrobial cycling is the deliberate, scheduled removal and substitution of specific antimicrobials or classes of antimicrobials within an institutional environment (either hospital-wide or confined to specific units) to avoid or reverse the development of antimicrobial resistance. True antimicrobial cycling requires a return to the antimicrobial(s) that were first used. Testing of the hypothesis that cycling will result in a lower prevalence of resistance is ongoing, mostly occurs within intensive care units, and largely involves cycling regimens targeted for treatment of suspected gram-negative bacterial infections. Unfortunately, there has been insufficient study to determine whether any meaningful impact on resistance has occurred as a result of a cycling program. Mathematical models question the usefulness of cycling as an infection-control method. Published studies demonstrate that cycling may be one way to change prescribing practices by clinicians without sacrificing patient safety. However, optimizing antimicrobial use through traditional and novel methods (e.g., computer decision support) should not be abandoned.

Anti-Infective Agents↗
PubMed2004

Long-term antibiotic cost savings from a comprehensive intervention program in a medical department of a university-affiliated teaching hospital.

We tested a low-cost, multifaceted intervention program comprising formulary restriction measures, continued comprehensive education, and guidelines to improve in-hospital use of antibiotics and related costs. In a short-term analysis, total antibiotic consumption per patient admitted, which was expressed as defined daily doses (DDD), decreased by 36% (P < .001), and intravenous DDDs decreased by 46% (P < .01). Overall expenditures for antibiotic treatment decreased by 53% (100 US dollars per patient admitted). The 2 main cost-lowering factors were a reduction in prescription of antibiotics (35% fewer treatments; P < .0001) and more diligent use of 5 broad-spectrum antibiotics (23% vs. 10% of treatments; P = .001). Quality of care was not compromised. A pharmacy-based, prospective, long-term surveillance of DDDs and costs over 4 years showed an ongoing effect. This comprehensive intervention program, which aimed to reduce antibiotic consumption and costs, was highly successful and had long-lasting effects.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Practices to improve antimicrobial use at 47 US hospitals: the status of the 1997 SHEA/IDSA position paper recommendations. Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America/Infectious Diseases Society of America.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the status of programs to improve antimicrobial prescribing at select US hospitals. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Pharmacy and infection control staff at all 47 hospitals participating in phase 3 of Project Intensive Care Antimicrobial Resistance Epidemiology. RESULTS: All 47 hospitals had some programs to improve antimicrobial use, but the practices reported varied considerably. All used a formulary, and 43 (91%) used it in conjunction with at least one of the other three antimicrobial-use policies evaluated: stop orders, restriction, and criteria-based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). CPGs were reported most commonly (70%), followed by stop orders (60%) and restriction policies (40%). Although consultation with an infectious disease physician (70%) or pharmacist (66%) was commonly used to influence initial antimicrobial choice, few (40%) reported a system to measure compliance with these consultations. CONCLUSIONS: In most hospitals surveyed, practices to improve antimicrobial use, although present, were inadequate based on recommendations in a Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America and Infectious Disease Society of America joint position paper. There is room to improve antimicrobial-use stewardship at US hospitals.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed2002

Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella species: risk factors for colonization and impact of antimicrobial formulary interventions on colonization prevalence.

OBJECTIVE: The incidence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESbetaL)-mediated resistance has increased markedly during the past decade. Risk factors for colonization with ESbetaL-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella species (ESbetaL-EK) remain unclear, as do methods to control their further emergence. DESIGN: Case-control study. SETTING: Two hospitals within a large academic health system: a 725-bed academic tertiary-care medical center and a 344-bed urban community hospital. PATIENTS: Thirteen patients with ESbetaL-EK fecal colonization were compared with 46 randomly selected noncolonized controls. RESULTS: Duration of hospitalization was the only independent risk factor for ESbetaL-EK colonization (odds ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.02 to 1.21). Of note, 8 (62%) of the patients had been admitted from another healthcare facility. In addition, there was evidence for dissemination of a single K oxytoca clone. Finally, the prevalence of ESbetaL-EK colonization decreased from 7.9% to 5.7% following restriction of third-generation cephalosporins (P = .51). CONCLUSIONS: ESbetaL-EK colonization was associated only with duration of hospitalization and there was no significant reduction following antimicrobial formulary interventions. The evidence for nosocomial spread and the high percentage of patients with ESbetaL-EK admitted from other sites suggest that greater emphasis must be placed on controlling the spread of such organisms within and between institutions.

Academic Medical Centers↗
PubMed2006

Limiting the emergence of extended-spectrum Beta-lactamase-producing enterobacteriaceae: influence of patient population characteristics on the response to antimicrobial formulary interventions.

BACKGROUND: Effective methods to control the emergence of extended-spectrum beta -lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella species (ESBL-EK) remain unclear. Variations in the patient populations at different hospitals may influence the effect of antimicrobial formulary interventions. METHODS: To examine variations across hospitals in the response to antimicrobial interventions (ie, restriction of ceftazidime and ceftriaxone) designed to curb the spread of ESBL-EK, we conducted a 5-year quasi-experimental study. This study was conducted at 2 hospitals within the same health system: Hospital A is a 625-bed academic medical center, and Hospital B is a 344-bed urban community hospital. All adult patients with a healthcare-acquired clinical culture of ESBL-EK from July 1, 1997 through December 31, 2002 were included. RESULTS: After the interventions, the use of ceftriaxone decreased by 86% at Hospital A and by 95% at Hospital B, whereas the use of ceftazidime decreased by 95% at Hospital A and by 97% at Hospital B. The prevalence of ESBL-EK at Hospital A decreased by 45% (P < .001), compared with a 22% decrease at Hospital B (P = .36). The following variables were significantly more common among ESBL-EK-infected patients at Hospital B: residence in a long-term care facility (adjusted odds ratio, 3.77 [95% confidence interval, 1.70-8.37]), advanced age (adjusted odds ratio, 1.04 [95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.06]), and presence of a decubitus ulcer (adjusted odds ratio, 4.13 [95% confidence interval, 1.97-8.65]). CONCLUSIONS: The effect of antimicrobial formulary interventions intended to curb emergence of ESBL-EK may differ substantially across institutions, perhaps as a result of differences in patient populations. Variability in the epidemiological profiles of ESBL-EK isolates at different hospitals must be considered when designing interventions to respond to these pathogens.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Reduction in the incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and ceftazidime-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae following changes in a hospital antibiotic formulary.

In 1995, changes in our hospital formulary were made to limit an outbreak of vancomycin-resistant enterococci and resulted in decreased usage of cephalosporins, imipenem, clindamycin, and vancomycin and increased usage of beta-lactam/beta-lactamase-inhibitor antibiotics. In this report, the effect of this formulary change on other resistant pathogens is described. Following the formulary change, there was a reduction in the monthly number (mean +/- SD) of patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (from 21.9 +/- 8.1 to 17.2 +/- 7.2 patients/1,000 discharges; P = .03) and ceftazidime-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (from 8.6 +/- 4.3 to 5.7 +/- 4.0 patients/1,000 discharges; P = .02). However, there was an increase in the number of patients with cultures positive for cefotaxime-resistant Acinetobacter species (from 2.4 +/- 2.2 to 5.4 +/- 4.0 patients/1,000 discharges; P = .02). Altering an antibiotic formulary may be a possible mechanism to contain the spread of selected resistant pathogens. However, close surveillance is needed to detect the emergence of other resistant pathogens.

Acinetobacter↗
PubMed2002

Emergence of resistant microbes in critical care units is transient, despite an unrestricted formulary and multiple antibiotic trials.

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance is a growing problem in the intensive care setting. This study was designed to evaluate the trends in bacterial prevalence and changes in antibiotic resistance at a large university hospital over the past decade. Antimicrobial resistance data were compared among the surgical intensive care unit (SICU), medical intensive care unit (MICU), and burn unit (BNU). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A large database was created using hospital-wide data from 1989 to 2000. A retrospective analysis of the evolution of organism prevalence, antibiotic resistance, and response to study protocols was evaluated. The formulary was relatively unrestricted. All positive cultures were examined, focusing on wound, blood, and sputum cultures. Six primary antibiotics were targeted specifically to follow resistance patterns. RESULTS: There were 847 identified positive wound cultures, 2,862 positive sputum cultures, and 2,252 positive blood cultures. The incidence of gram-positive and gram-negative organisms changed little in the SICU and BNU; however, there was a large increase in gram-positive organisms and yeast in the MICU over the past 5 years. Anaerobic bacteria and yeast were nearly nonexistent pathogens in the SICU and BNU. The resistance pattern of most organisms changed little following the introduction of a new antibiotic. However, the effectiveness of study antibiotics after formal clinical study periods decreased dramatically, albeit transiently. CONCLUSION: Hospital-wide antibiotic resistance data may be misleading and may not reflect individual critical care units throughout the hospital. Bacterial flora, including resistant organisms, changed little over 10 years, despite an unrestricted formulary. The emergence of resistant and opportunistic organisms is related to antibiotic usage and can vary significantly over time. This suggests that a policy of administering limited duration, narrow spectrum antibiotics may reduce drug resistance.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗