SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Pathologists”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 163 records · Page 9Linked to original sources

PubMed2000

Ubiquitin immunochemistry as a diagnostic aid for community pathologists evaluating patients who have dementia.

Alzheimer's disease is the most common cause of dementia It is associated with genetic risk factors and at least three autosomal dominant mutations. Community pathologists are frequently asked by families to evaluate autopsy material for Alzheimer's disease. Neuropathologic diagnosis is based on technically difficult silver impregnation stains that may not be readily available to community-based pathologists. Because immunohistochemical techniques are more widely accessible, we evaluated the practical utility of using a single immunohistochemical stain for diagnosing Alzheimer's disease. The ubiquitin antigen was selected because of its presence in morphologically distinct deposits characteristic of several neurodegenerative diseases. Paraffin blocks were obtained from the Bryan Alzheimer's Disease Research Center Brain Bank, a repository of approximately 900 brains. Tissues from 16 individuals who exhibited the entire range of Alzheimer's-type neuropathology were selected. Ubiquitin immunostains, evaluated blindly and independently by four pathologists ranging from first-year resident trainee to experienced neuropathologist, reliably stained both neuritic plaques and neurofibrillary tangles essential for diagnosing and staging Alzheimer's disease. Nondemented controls with early Alzheimer's-type changes were easily distinguished from cases of definitive Alzheimer's disease. The stains also highlighted characteristic inclusions of Parkinson's disease or Lewy body dementia Ubiquitin immunohistochemistry is a reliable, reproducible, and readily available diagnostic aid for distinguishing Alzheimer's disease from other causes of dementia.

Aged↗

PubMed1982

Speech-language pathologists' connotations of stuttering.

In a study to elicit clinicians' connotative meanings regarding stuttering, 206 practicing speech-language pathologists participated. A semantic differential technique was utilized for gathering responses to seven concepts in the domain of stuttering on five meaning dimensions. The background variables of clinicians' age, academic degree, clinical experience, ASHA certification, and academic coursework in stuttering were also measured. Results indicated that increasing age, higher degrees, more coursework, or more clinical experience did not produce more positive connotations among speech-language pathologists. Those holding the Certificate of Clinical Competence in Speech-Language Pathology showed more positive connotative responses than the noncertified group. Speech-language pathologists do respond differently on meaning dimensions for concepts in the domain of stuttering. The concept stuttering was evaluated more positively than all others, whereas the concept stuttering therapy was evaluated more negatively than any of the other six. Concepts which referred to individuals who stutter were viewed in a similar negative way regardless of age or sex. The subjects did not respond to the concept parents of stutters as negatively as they did toward those who stutter.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Implications of pathologist concordance for breast cancer assessments in mammography screening from age 40 years.

Three pathologists reviewed slides and reports of cancers arising in both the study and control populations of the U.K. trial of annual mammography screening from age 40 years. A total of 875 cases were scored independently as noninvasive, microinvasive, or invasive cancer, with the last also evaluated for histology grade, type, and lymphatic vascular invasion. Of these, 870 (99.2%) were confirmed malignant, 1 case had cytology only, and 5 were judged by all reviewers as benign. Reviewer complete concordance for the three classes of malignancy was achieved in 826 (95%) and majority agreement in 31 (3.6%) of 870 with complete data. All three readers recorded grade in 736 cancers, giving a kappa statistic of 0.69, 0.52, and 0.66 for grades I, II, and III, respectively, and 0.61 overall. Agreement that the cancer was special type or not was obtained in 671 (89.0%) with complete concordance in the nature of the type in 504 and majority view in 167; another 58 (7.7%) were characterised as "part special" pattern, with type disagreement in 23 (3%). The kappa statistic for single type subcategories in those cancers was substantial, at 0.68 overall. This improved to 0.76 for the last 230 invasive cancers after the pathologists agreed more explicit criteria for type discrimination. There was almost perfect agreement between original and review diagnosis of breast malignancy for both noninvasive/microinvasive and invasive cancer (kappa 0.84 and 0.91, respectively), justifying confidence in the diagnosis of breast cancer by U.K. pathologists. The specialists agreed substantially on qualitative histology features of type and grade of cancers, and improved further for typing by defining criteria. These consensus data, along with invasive size and node status, are reliable for use as surrogate measures of outcome, and to enhance interpretation of effect, when the trial case population sources are disclosed.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

The speech-language pathologist's role in stuttering self-help groups.

This article reviews definitions of self-help and support groups, describes some basic views that speech-language pathologists and self-help groups have of each other, then comments on ways in which professionals are relating to self-help groups. These comments are based on answers to a questionnaire distributed to a sample of speech-language pathologists who interact with self-help groups. It is recommended that speech-language pathologists should relate to the self-help movement in stuttering as consultants.

Cooperative Behavior↗

PubMed2003

A head and neck cancer patient dies! Why perform an autopsy: for the relatives, for the clinicians or for the pathologists?

It is no secret that autopsy rates at most hospitals worldwide--both teaching and community hospitals--have declined precipitously in recent decades, but is this a desirable state of affairs? This article explores this issue from three viewpoints: that of the family members who grant permission for autopsies; that of the clinicians who seek permission for the autopsy to be carried out; and that of the pathologists who actually perform the post-mortem examination. Family concerns about (the sometimes tangential) matter of organ retention following autopsy have recently been highlighted in Europe, with an accompanying negative overall impression of the autopsy being conveyed by many outlets of the popular media. Clinicians will often concede that they feel somewhat distanced from the whole process of autopsy, and so do not hold it in such high esteem as their predecessors once did decades ago. Pathologists at present often perform autopsies as "additional duties" to be fitted in around their central functions, and so do not see them as a primary task to be accomplished. However, there are reasons why this may be detrimental to patient care, including in particular the fact that clinical/radiographic diagnoses are sometimes not confirmed by the results of a complete autopsy. Suggestions for improving the autopsy rate--in particular amongst head and neck cancer patients--are discussed, and include performance of a more rapid limited autopsy and the designation of specialist pathologists in head and neck cancer to carry out autopsies of these patients as an extension of their clinical duties. One conclusion seems inescapable: to increase autopsy rates, the status of the procedure will necessarily have to be upgraded from that of "afterthought/perfunctory task" to that of "consultation", with all of the shifts in attitude such a modification would entail.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

PubMed1995

Surgical pathology examination of lymph nodes. Practice survey by American Society of Clinical Pathologists.

The American Society of Clinical Pathologists surveyed 363 pathologists to determine practices used in processing and reporting lymph node specimens submitted for surgical pathology examination. This topic is of interest because lymph nodes are some of the more common organs biopsied for diagnostic purposes and the constant change in and diversity of classification systems in the past 30 years. The definition of newly recognized entities and the use of sophisticated diagnostic tools also have made it difficult for there to be a solid consensus of pathologists in diagnosing lymphoproliferative disorders for correlation with clinical behavior and response to therapy. The survey, conducted in November 1992, contained 79 questions. Participants were selected to represent a variety of practice settings and 179 (49%) responses were received.

Biopsy, Needle↗

PubMed1986

The pathologists' assistant. Distribution, use, and employer perceptions.

Pathologists' assistants have been formally trained since 1969 to assist in technical anatomic pathology procedures. The authors surveyed 165 assistants who are members of their national organization to determine the actual demographic distribution and patterns of use. One hundred respondents were slightly more concentrated in the eastern United States, usually in pathology groups larger than the national average. Assistants generally performed a large percentage of the autopsy and surgical specimen dissections and various ancillary functions: teaching, supervision, administration, or research. Sixty-six of 82 employer pathologists responded to a companion survey. They were satisfied with the assistant's work. Most hired assistants to free themselves from technical functions or to replace residents, believed that assistants' numbers will remain small, and favored a national certification program. Thus, pathologists' assistants are effectively filling a need for ancillary anatomic pathology personnel in selective situations, primarily in larger pathology practices.

Allied Health Personnel↗

PubMed1988

1987 H. P. Smith award lecture. Eyes for the epidemiologist: the pathologist's role in shaping our understanding of the asbestos-associated diseases.

Asbestosis was first recognized as an entity at autopsy by a pathologist in 1900. Pathologists also discovered the unique relationship of mesothelioma and bronchogenic carcinoma with exposure to asbestos. The observations of preceding pathologists have provided insights that have served as the basis for epidemiologic studies associating asbestos with disease in humans.

Asbestos↗

PubMed1989

The virtuous pathologist. An ethical basis for laboratory medicine.

The profession of pathology is a practice in the technical sense used by many philosophers. Such practices have internal goods, which, it is hoped, lead to the attainment of a certain end. The ultimate end of the practice of pathology must be the good of the patient in terms of restoring health. Key internal goods in pathology are technical competence, the proper pathologist-patient relationship, and the proper pathologist-clinician relationship. Virtues are predispositions to act so as to attain the end of the practice and further the internal goods. Technical growth in the practice of pathology must be accompanied by continued attempts to articulate the goals and internal goods of the practice. Only if pathologists are predisposed to act in accordance with proper goals will an ethical practice be assured.

Ethics, Professional↗

PubMed1989

Professional attitudes toward the autopsy. A survey of clinicians and pathologists.

One hundred six clinicians and 20 pathologists at a pediatric hospital and an adult general hospital in Halifax, Nova Scotia, were surveyed by way of a mailed questionnaire on their attitudes toward the autopsy. Approximately two-thirds of both groups rated the overall usefulness of the autopsy as high, but most limited its benefits to ascertaining the cause of death and as a tool for medical education. The autopsy was rated more highly by pathologists; those who worked in the pediatric hospital; medical rather than surgical specialists; and medical staff rather than housestaff. Personal attitudes toward authorization of an autopsy on a member of the respondent's family or on his or her own body did not differ from declared professional attitudes. It is unclear whether clinicians' and pathologists' negative attitudes toward the autopsy are related to lack of knowledge, lack of hospital and community support of the autopsy, or barriers to the practice of autopsy pathology.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

PubMed1993

The reliability of autopsy diagnostics: inter-observer variation between pathologists, a preliminary report.

The aim of the study was to analyse the agreement between pathologists regarding macroscopic autopsy diagnostics. Four pathologists examined 35 autopsies and determined the principal disease and its complications, the immediate cause of death, other major diseases and their complications, and minor diseases. The participants were paired and their diagnoses were analysed by using kappa statistics for interobserver variation. The agreement on the principal disease was almost perfect between the participants (kappa values between 0.83 and 0.97), whereas that on the immediate cause of death was moderate/substantial (kappa values between 0.43-0.75). The list of all other major diseases and their complications was almost complete for each observer, but that of the minor diseases showed a more considerable variation. In spite of the high level of agreement it is recommended that the autopsy findings be discussed among pathologists if the clinical picture cannot be explained satisfactorily, and that the cause of death be determined by the clinicians after the demonstration of the autopsy.

Autopsy↗

PubMed1988

Analysis of agreement among findings of pathologists in ED01 experiment.

The ED01 experiment, which involved determination of the effective dose to produce a 1% tumor rate, was carried out by the National Center for Toxicological Research (NCTR). The study involved greater than 20,000 BALB/c female mice exposed to various doses of 2-acetylaminofluorene, a chemical known to produce bladder and liver carcinomas. After death, tissues from each animal were evaluated for the presence of several types of tumors by one of a team of NCTR pathologists. After the ED01 experiment was completed, the Society of Toxicology commissioned another pathologist to carry out an independent review of the bladder and liver specimens from a stratified sample of the mice. There were substantial differences in the diagnoses of both tumor types by the pathologists, but the implications for detection of a dose-response relationship are important only for liver carcinomas.

2-Acetylaminofluorene↗

PubMed2001

Survey of forensic pathologists.

A survey of board-certified forensic pathologists (from a list of board-certified forensic pathologists supplied by the American Board of Pathology) was conducted to determine their current practice situations. The purpose of the survey was to provide information useful to the public in general and to those organizations that represent forensic pathologists in particular to better understand and meet the needs of the forensic pathology community. A total of 773 surveys were mailed, and 18 were returned as undeliverable. There were 337 replies (45%). Responses were as follows: In terms of age, 7% were in their 30s; 32% were in their 40s; 29% were in their 50s; 19% were in their 60s; and 13% were 70 years of age or older. In terms of gender, 79% were male and 21% were female. For pathology practice status, 72% worked more than 30 hours per week; 11% between 5 and 30 hours per week; 5% less than 5 hours per week; and 12% no longer practice pathology. For percentage of pathology practice that is forensic pathology, 69% of respondents were more than 80%; 6% were 50%-80%; 5% were 25%-50%; 8% were 5%-25%; and 12% were less than 5%. In terms of forensic pathology practice setting, 54% were employed by medical examiner or coroner systems; 13% worked under contract to medical examiner or coroner systems; 27% worked in private practice or consultation; and 6% responded as "other."

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Evaluation of gastric biopsies for neoplasia: differences between Japanese and Western pathologists.

Cited variations in the evaluation of gastric endoscopic biopsies for neoplasms between pathologists in Japan and those in the United States and Europe (the West) may have stemmed from several causes. The five-tiered group classification of the Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer (JRSGC) for interpretation of biopsies is not used in the West. Some differences may also exist in the morphologic criteria to reach a diagnosis of dysplasia or carcinoma. The goals of this study were to test the Western and Japanese classifications of gastric dysplasia and adenocarcinoma and to assess the differences between four Japanese and seven Western pathologists. One hundred biopsies, 20 from each of the five categories of the JRSGC scheme as determined by one observer, were collected. The Japanese observers used the JRSGC system, expressed in Roman numerals, whereas Western pathologists used a five- or six-tiered scheme expressed in diagnostic terms. Pairwise agreement was evaluated using k statistics within both groups. Consensus diagnosis on each biopsy was accepted as the opinion of the majority. The sensitivity and specificity of each reviewer for a certain diagnosis were also assessed. The intragroup agreements were moderate for both the Japanese (mean k = 0.663) and the Westerners (mean k = 0.652). The pairwise agreements between Japanese and Western observers were low (mean k = 0.542). Overall, the sensitivity was low for all Japanese observers for the diagnosis of dysplasia (38.7% vs 92.5%), and the sensitivity for the diagnosis of adenocarcinoma was high in both groups but higher among the Japanese observers (93.9% and 85.2%, respectively). Overall, the Japanese-Western interobserver agreement was moderate. The JRSCG scheme did not translate into higher interobserver agreement among Japanese observers. The sensitivity for the diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma was high for both groups, but the specificity was low among the Japanese. The cause seemed to be centered around the diagnosis of dysplasia in the Western system, which was a lesion frequently interpreted as carcinoma in Japan because of the different definitions of carcinoma in each system. Such a discrepancy might be important because it may explain some of the differences in the prevalence and prognosis of early gastric cancer between Japan and the West. An international effort is needed to harmonize morphologic criteria and analyze whether therapeutic consequences may stem from such discrepancies.

Biopsy↗

PubMed1996

Speech outcome following palatoplasty in primary school children: do lay peer observers agree with speech pathologists?

The aim of this study was twofold: (1) to test the ability of normal children to discriminate the speech of children with repaired cleft palate from the speech of unaffected peers and (2) to compare these naive assessments of speech acceptability with the sophisticated assessments of speech pathologists. The study group (subjects) was composed of 21 children of school age (aged 8 to 12 years) who had undergone palatoplasty at a single cleft center and 16 matched controls. The listening team (student raters) was composed of 20 children who were matched to the subjects for age, sex, and other variables. Randomized master audio-tape recordings of the children who had undergone palatoplasty were presented in blinded fashion and random order to student raters who were inexperienced in the evaluation of patients with speech dysfunction. The same sound recordings were evaluated by an experienced panel of extramural speech pathologists whose intrarater and interrater reliabilities were known; they were not direct care providers. Additionally, the master tape was presented in blinded fashion and random order to the velopharyngeal staff at the cleft center for intramural assessment. Comparison of these assessment methodologies forms the basis of this report. Naive raters were insensitive to speech differences in the control and cleft palate groups. Differences in the mean scores for the groups never approached statistical significance, and there was adequate power to discern a difference of 0.75 on a 7-point scale. Expert raters were sensitive to differences in resonance and intelligibility in the control and cleft palate groups but not to other aspects of speech. The expert raters recommended further evaluation of cleft palate patients more often than control patients. Speech pathologists discern differences that the laity does not. Consideration should be given to the utilization of untrained listeners to add real-life significance to clinical speech assessments. Peer group evaluations of speech acceptability may define the morbidity of cleft palate speech in terms that are most relevant to the patients themselves and may safeguard against the possibility of offering treatment that may be unnecessary.

Child↗

PubMed2000

Mammographic densities and the prevalence and incidence of histological types of benign breast disease. Reference Pathologists of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study.

There is now a large amount of evidence indicating that women with extensive areas of mammographic densities are 4-6 times more likely to develop breast cancer than those with little or no density in the mammogram. We have examined one potential biological explanation for this association by estimating the incidence of various histological types of benign breast disease in relation to mammographic density. We studied the large cohort of women taking part in the National Breast Screening Study (NBSS), a randomized trial of screening with mammography. Mammograms from subjects with biopsies (n = 423) and from a comparison group of subjects randomly selected from the NBSS (n = 465) were included. Histological slides from biopsied subjects (n = 353) were classified independently by the pathologists of the NBSS and by a review pathologist (H.M.J.). Mammographic density in more than 75% of the breast area was associated with an increased risk of incidence of hyperplasia without atypia, and of atypical hyperplasia and/or carcinoma in situ. The classifications of the review pathologist showed that, compared to women with no density, the relative risk of incident lesions for women with density in more than 75% of breast was 13.85 (95% CI 2.65-72.49) for hyperplasia, and 9.23 (95% CI 1.66-51.48) for atypical hyperplasia and/or carcinoma in situ. These findings suggest that the association between extensive mammographic density and breast cancer risk may, at least in part, be attributable to biological processes in the breast that give rise to these histological features that are known to be related to breast cancer risk.

Adult↗

PubMed1987

Inter- and intra-pathologist variability in histologic diagnoses of lung cancer.

To estimate variability and reliability in histologic diagnosis (Dx) of lung cancers, lung cancer preparations were divided into eight equal sets and diagnosed independently by an eight-man pathology panel. Majority Dx (Dx affirmed by more than 4 panelists) was regarded as the consensus Dx of each cancer. The consensus rate of each panelist ranged from 78.8% to 96.1% with an average of 89.4%. The consensus rates were not significantly different among the panelists. Relatively high inter-pathologist agreement was observed in squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and small cell carcinoma. However, regarding large cell carcinoma, there was occasional disagreement among the panelists. Forty-seven cancers were reexamined by the same panelists, with no preliminary announcement, 7 months after the first examination to study the intra-pathologist agreement. The rate of the intra-pathologist agreement ranged from 76.6% to 93.3%. Dx of large cell carcinoma was the most intra-changeable. It was concluded that the histologic Dx of large cell carcinoma was the most inter- and intra-changeable, and the most frequent dissenting Dx from it was poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed1990

Pulmonary tuberculosis. An occupational hazard for pathologists and pathology technicians in Japan.

The incidence of pulmonary tuberculosis among pathology workers in Japan is elevated, presumably due to frequent exposure to tubercle bacilli in the work place. To demonstrate the etiological significance of the association between this disease and occupation epidemiologically, a questionnaire survey was performed to assess the incidence of pulmonary tuberculosis among 1,201 pathologists and 1,187 pathology technicians throughout Japan. Pathology department workers other than pathologists and technicians, such as secretaries (n = 207), and workers in university departments of preventive medicine and public health (n = 732) served as control groups. While non-occupation-related tuberculosis was found in both departmental groups with nearly equal incidence, the incidence of pulmonary tuberculosis among pathologists and pathology technicians after engagement in their current specialist work was significantly higher than that in the control groups (odds ratio = 6.08-10.98). The incidence of disease among pathology technicians who assisted in autopsies was markedly higher than among those not involved in autopsies (odds ratio = 6.65). This elevated incidence was significantly related to the duration of work in pathology activities, and showed little change over the last decade. These findings indicate that specific environmental conditions in pathology departments, particularly autopsy of cadavers harboring active tuberculosis, constitute a serious occupational hazard.

Adult↗