PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “ROOT CANAL OBTURATION”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 163 records · Page 9Linked to original sources
PubMed2006

Completeness of root canal obturations: Epiphany techniques versus gutta-percha techniques.

This project was designed to determine how a new resin based obturation material compared with traditional gutta-percha techniques in its ability to fill the prepared root canal space. Eighty single-rooted palatal and distal roots of extracted human first molars were used. The root canals were instrumented with hand and rotary files and divided into four groups. Gutta-percha and the new resin based material was used with lateral condensation or continuous wave obturation. The roots were sectioned at 1, 3, and 5 mm from the apex and examined under magnification. Using a computer program, the surface areas of voids were calculated and compared. The gutta-percha, lateral condensation method was the only group that demonstrated significantly more voids. There were no statistically significant differences among any of the other three groups.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed1992

Microleakage comparison of apical seal of plastic versus metal Thermafil root canal obturators.

This study compared the apical seal of plastic versus metal Thermafil obturators in extracted human teeth. The obturated teeth were evaluated radiographically for the extent and adaptation of the filling obturator. No difference was seen between plastic and metal for over- or underfilling. Voids were seen more often in smaller sizes of both plastic and metal obturators. Obturated teeth were stained in India ink, decalcified, and cleared. Microleakage evaluation of the transparent teeth showed no statistical difference between metal and plastic obturators.

Dental Leakage↗
PubMed2006

Assessment of the sealing ability of a new root canal obturation material.

This study was designed to compare the leakage allowed by different obturation materials, using a fluid-transport method. Sixty-six single-rooted human anterior teeth were fully instrumented by using the "step-back" technique and irrigated with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite. The smear layer was removed by washing in 10 ml of 17% EDTA. The specimens were randomly divided into three experimental groups of 18 teeth each, plus two groups of 6 teeth each for positive and negative controls. The specimens were obturated by the lateral condensation technique, with gutta-percha and AH 26 or AH plus sealers, or Epiphany sealer and Resilon core material. The fluid transport method used in this study gave quantitative results and allowed nondestructive evaluation of the specimens. The teeth filled with gutta-percha and AH 26 exhibited the most leakage. The least leakage was seen with Epiphany sealer and Resilon core material. The differences in leakage among the groups were statistically significant (p < 0.05). It was concluded that of the materials tested under the conditions of this study, Epiphany allowed the least leakage.

Dental Leakage↗