PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 163 records · Page 9Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

Subthalamic GAD gene transfer in Parkinson disease patients who are candidates for deep brain stimulation.

This gene transfer experiment is the first Parkinson's Disease (PD) protocol to be submitted to the Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee. The principal investigators have uniquely focused their careers on both pre-clinical work on gene transfer in the brain and clinical expertise in management and surgical treatment of patients with PD. They have extensively used rodent models of PD for proof-of-principle experiments on the utility of different vector systems. PD is an excellent target for gene therapy, because it is a complex acquired disease of unknown etiology (apart from some rare familial cases) yet it is characterized by a specific neuroanatomical pathology, the degeneration of dopamine neurons of the substantia nigra (SN) with loss of dopamine input to the striatum. This pathology results in focal changes in the function of several deep brain nuclei, which have been well-characterized in humans and animal models and which account for many of the motor symptoms of PD. Our original approaches, largely to validate in vivo gene transfer in the brain, were designed to facilitate dopamine transmission in the striatum using an AAV vector expressing dopamine-synthetic enzymes. Although these confirmed the safety and potential efficacy of AAV, complex patient responses to dopamine augmenting medication as well as poor results and complications of human transplant studies suggested that this would be a difficult and potentially dangerous clinical strategy using current approaches. Subsequently, we and others investigated the use of growth factors, including GDNF. These showed some encouraging effects on dopamine neuron survival and regeneration in both rodent and primate models; however, uncertain consequences of long-term growth factor expression and question regarding timing of therapy in the disease course must be resolved before any clinical study can be contemplated. We now propose to infuse into the subthalamic nucleus (STN) recombinant AAV vectors expressing the two isoforms of the enzyme glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD-65 and GAD-67), which synthesizes the major inhibitory neurotransmitter in the brain, GABA. The STN is a very small nucleus (140 cubic mm or 0.02% of the total brain volume, consisting of approximately 300,000 neurons) which is disinhibited in PD, leading to pathological excitation of its targets, the internal segment of the globus pallidus (GPi) and substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNpr). Increased GPi/SNpr outflow is believed responsible for many of the cardinal symptoms of PD, i.e., tremor, rigidity, bradykinesia, and gait disturbance. A large amount of data based on lesioning, electrical stimulation, and local drug infusion studies with GABA-agonists in human PD patients have reinforced this circuit model of PD and the central role of the STN. Moreover, the closest conventional surgical intervention to our proposal, deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the STN, has shown remarkable efficacy in even late stage PD, unlike the early failures associated with recombinant GDNF infusion or cell transplantation approaches in PD. We believe that our gene transfer strategy will not only palliate symptoms by inhibiting STN activity, as with DBS, but we also have evidence that the vector converts excitatory STN projections to inhibitory projections. This additional dampening of outflow GPi/SNpr outflow may provide an additional advantage over DBS. Moreover, of perhaps the greatest interest, our preclinical data suggests that this strategy may also be neuroprotective, so this therapy may slow the degeneration of dopaminergic neurons. We will use both GAD isoforms since both are typically expressed in inhibitory neurons in the brain, and our data suggest that the combination of both isoforms is likely to be most beneficial. Our preclinical data includes three model systems: (1) old, chronically lesioned parkinsonian rats in which intraSTN GAD gene transfer results not only in improvement in both drug-induced asymmetrical behavior (apomorphine symmetrical rotations), but also in spontaneous behaviors. In our second model, GAD gene transfer precedes the generation of a dopamine lesion. Here GAD gene transfer showed remarkable neuroprotection. Finally, we carried out a study where GAD-65 and GAD-67 were used separately in monkeys that were resistant to MPTP lesioning and hence showed minimal symptomatology. Nevertheless GAD gene transfer showed no adverse effects and small improvements in both Parkinson rating scales and activity measures were obtained. In the proposed clinical trial, all patients will have met criteria for and will have given consent for STN DBS elective surgery. Twenty patients will all receive DBS electrodes, but in addition they will be randomized into two groups, to receive either a solution containing rAAV-GAD, or a solution which consists just of the vector vehicle, physiological saline. Patients, care providers, and physicians will be blind as to which solution any one patient receives. All patients, regardless of group, will agree to not have the DBS activated until the completion and unblinding of the study. Patients will be assessed with a core clinical assessment program modeled on the CAPSIT, and in addition will also undergo a preop and several postop PET scans. At the conclusion of the study, if any patient with sufficient symptomatic improvement will be offered DBS removal if they so desire. Any patients with no benefit will simply have their stimulators activated, which would normally be appropriate therapy for them and which requires no additional operations. If any unforeseen symptoms occur from STN production of GABA, this might be controlled by blocking STN GABA release with DBS, or STN lesioning could be performed using the DBS electrode. Again, this treatment would not subject the patient to additional invasive brain surgery. The trial described here reflects an evolution in our thinking about the best strategy to make a positive impact in Parkinson Disease by minimizing risk and maximizing potential benefit. To our knowledge, this proposal represents the first truly blinded, completely controlled gene or cell therapy study in the brain, which still provides the patient with the same surgical procedure which they would normally receive and should not subject the patient to additional surgical procedures regardless of the success or failure of the study. This study first and foremost aims to maximally serve the safety interests of the individual patient while simultaneously serving the public interest in rigorously determining in a scientific fashion if gene therapy can be effective to any degree in treating Parkinson's disease.

Cell Nucleus↗
PubMed2000

Gene therapy for cancer.

The basic strategies for gene therapy that have been explored include immunogene therapy such as cytokine gene transfer, selective prodrug activation, so-called suicide genes, transfer of a tumor suppressor gene, and inhibition of activated oncogenes by antisense mechanisms. Many therapeutic protocols have so far been registered in the office of the Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee, NIH, as of June 1999. Regarding the basic research in gene therapy, we planned a clinical application of gene therapy for an esophageal cancer patient at our institution. We review herein the present status of gene therapy for cancer overseas, and describe a protocol of clinical trials for gene therapy for esophageal cancer at our institution.

Clinical Protocols↗
PubMed1994

Regulatory review of cellular and gene therapies: an overview of the process.

Cell and gene therapies, using several different approaches, have been proposed for a variety of genetic diseases, cancer and AIDS. The major regulatory review process in the US consists of an institutional review board, the recombinant DNA advisory committee (RAC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Within the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, the Division of Cellular and Gene Therapies has been formed to primarily review investigational new drug applications (INDs) for cellular and gene therapies. Several appropriate "points to consider" documents have been prepared and the RAC has approved over 40 clinical protocols. Advances in biotechnology and the scientific basis for these advances are changing rapidly. Although a flexible, case-by-case approach is necessitated by these rapid changes, regulatory concerns common to all biologicals administered to human subjects remain unchanged. These include safety, efficacy, purity, potency, quality control and assessment, and reproducibility of individual lots. The goal of the review process is a prompt, complete and meticulous review. The emphasis of a pre-IND meeting is toward a working relationship between the sponsor and the FDA prior to the phase I, II and III clinical trials. A timely and ongoing evaluation of pre-clinical testing cannot be overemphasized in this rapidly growing and changing field. The development of a working relationship at this stage will ensure a seamless integration of the IND process with the product and establishment license applications. Because replication-competent retrovirus (RCR) represents a potential for pathogenicity, the FDA is recommending a conservative approach to RCR testing.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Cancer gene and oncolytic virus therapy.

By far, cancer accounts for the majority of gene therapy trials that are being carried out worldwide. Seventy percent of the gene therapy protocols that have been reviewed by the National Institutes of Health Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee (NIH RAC) are for the treatment of cancer. Of these, two thirds involve immunotherapy, with transfer of genes for cytokines, immune accessory molecules, or tumor antigens into a variety of cellular targets. Other clinical protocols include chemoprotection, prodrug activation, or tumor-suppressor gene replacement. Either local or distal bystander effects may mediate antitumor effects. These bystander mechanisms may help to overcome poor transduction efficiencies by currently available vectors. Replicating oncolytic viruses entering the clinic include herpes virus, Newcastle disease virus, reovirus, and others. These viruses have been shown to replicate selectively in cancer cells, albeit by different mechanisms. Reovirus, for example, requires the presence of an activated Ras signaling pathway in order to replicate and destroy cells. Tumor selectivity can be achieved by placing an essential viral gene under the control of a tumor-specific promoter. The tumoricidal effects of replicating viruses may be enhanced by genetic modification-for example, by the insertion of a cytokine gene to elicit antitumor immunity. Clearly, much work needs to be done both in the laboratory and in the clinic in order to exploit the full potential of these novel gene and viral therapies.

Animals↗
PubMed1997

Safety studies of the intraperitoneal injection of E1A--liposome complex in mice.

The HER-2/neu (also called c-erbB-2) proto-oncogene is overexpressed in many human cancer cells, including those of breast cancer and ovarian cancer. We have previously shown that adenovirus 5 E1A inhibits HER-2/neu transcription and functions as a tumor suppressor gene in HER-2/neu-overexpressing cancer cells. Liposome-mediated E1A gene transfer suppresses tumor development and prolongs survival of tumor-bearing mice. In support of a phase I clinical trial of an E1A-liposome complex administered to patients with HER-2/neu-overexpressing breast of ovarian cancer, we conducted a series of studies to evaluate the safety of intraperitoneal injection of E1A in normal mice. The cumulative doses used were from five to 40 times the DNA-lipid starting dose proposed for the phase I clinical trial. In this dosing range, the administration of the E1A-liposome complex had no adverse effects on renal, hepatic and hematological parameters studied. No major organ pathologic changes were observed. We concluded that intraperitoneal administration of E1A-liposome complex at the proposed dose would not be expected to produce significant toxicity. The E1A-liposome clinical trial was recently approved by the Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee and Food and Drug Administration for a phase I trial in patients with HER-2/neu-overexpressing breast and ovarian cancer.

Adenoviridae↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Lack of toxicity of EGFR antisense gene therapy.

PURPOSE: EGFR is overexpressed in many human cancer cells, including head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). We have previously shown that elevated EGFR levels in the primary HNSCC tumor are associated with decreased survival. Reduction of EGFR tumor expression levels using an antisense EGFR sequence under the control of the U6 small nuclear RNA promoter abrogates tumor growth in a head and neck xenograft model. In support of a phase I clinical trial of an EGFR antisense gene-liposome complex administered to HNSCC patients, we conducted a series of studies to evaluate the safety of intralesional injections of EGFR liposomal antisense gene therapy in normal mice. METHODS: Three dose tiers were examined including the starting DNA-lipid dose for the clinical trial. RESULTS: Tissues and blood were harvested from mice treated with the liposome-mediated gene therapy and control mice at several time points for analysis. In this dosing range, administration of the antisense EGFR DNA-liposome complex had no apparent adverse effect on renal, hepatic and hematologic parameters studied. No major organ pathologic changes were observed. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the toxicity of intralesional EGFR antisense DNA plus liposomes is restricted to a self-limited inflammation at the injection site, and may be well-tolerated in the clinical setting. EGFR antisense gene therapy was reviewed by the Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee and the Food and Drug Administration, and a phase I clinical trial is currently underway in patients with advanced HNSCC.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Rewriting the "points to consider": the ethical impact of guidance document language.

Human gene transfer research has been under way for nearly 10 years, with few clinically significant results to date; yet public and professional expectations still run high. Exaggerated expectations and misconceptions about gene transfer research are attributable in part to the terminology used to describe this research, which is misleading but, in the absence of more precise language, is commonly used. In particular, use of the term "gene therapy" to describe gene transfer research and use of the term "patient" in place of "subject" tend to cause both professionals and the public to confuse research with proven effective treatment. Investigators preparing to engage in human gene transfer research must use the NIH guidance document, "The Points to Consider in the Design and Submission of Protocols for the Transfer of Recombinant DNA Molecules into the Genome of One or More Human Subjects," written by the Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee, to prepare for the submission of a research protocol. Several corrections in the terminology employed by this guidance document could help to avoid misconceptions about gene transfer research and clarify both the promise and the limits of the research enterprise for investigators and subjects.

Ethics, Medical↗
PubMed1997

Phase I evaluation of interleukin-2-transfected irradiated allogeneic melanoma for the treatment of metastatic melanoma: appendix 1: protocol.

A cell line (UISO-H-MEL-2) was established from the neoplastic cells of a patient with malignant melanoma during the natural course of the patient's treatment. The melanoma cells express defined MHC Class I histocompatibility determinants including determinants specified by the HLA-A2 Class I allele, along with a common melanoma-associated T-cell epitope derived from the tyrosinase gene. The gene for human interleukin-2 (IL-2) was transduced into the cells with a provirus (pZipNeoSVIL-2), packaged in GP + envAM12 cells. Integration of the IL-2 gene into genomic DNA of the transduced cells and its expression were established. The IL-2-secreting cell line (UISO-H-MEL-2-IL-2) was found to be free of recombinant retroviruses and other infectious agents. The IL-2-secreting cells will be subjected to 5000 rads X-irradiation and administered to 12 informed patients with metastatic malignant melanoma in a Phase I toxicity study. The dose of X-irradiation was sufficient to inactivate one hundred percent of the cells, but insufficient to completely inhibit IL-2 synthesis during a fourteen-day period of analysis. Patients who have failed all standard forms of treatment will become eligible for inclusion in the study if they develop metastatic melanoma, and if their tumor cells express products of the tyrosinase gene. The patients will differ with the cellular immunogen at no less than three of six MHC Class I alleles, but will share identity at the HLA-A2 Class I allele. The patient's antimelanoma immune response to the injected cells will be determined by both in vivo and in vitro parameters. Background studies performed in inbred mice indicate that X-irradiated IL-2-secreting cells that express both melanoma-associated antigens and allogeneic Class I histocompatibility antigens are more antigenic in terms of their capacity to induce an antimelanoma response than X-irradiated IL-2-secreting melanoma cells. Of significance for the future potential of this form of therapy in melanoma patients, the period of survival of mice was established melanoma treated with the IL-2-secreting allogeneic cells was significantly (P < 0.001) longer than that of untreated animals, or animals treated with X-irradiated melanoma cells. An analogous protocol was reviewed and approved by the Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee of the National Institutes of Health.

Cancer Vaccines↗
PubMed1997

Gene therapy for neurologic disease: benchtop discoveries to bedside applications. 2. The bedside.

Important advances in basic research have made it possible to examine the safety, toxicity, and efficacy of gene therapy in humans for over 5 years. The development of sophisticated gene delivery systems has resulted in approval by the Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee (RAC) of 125 gene therapy or gene marking studies. One of the primary applications of current retroviral-mediated gene insertion technology has been for malignant brain tumors. Studies are therefore underway to examine the efficacy of "suicide" gene therapy in children with recurrent brain tumors and adults with newly diagnosed or recurrent gliomas. Since a high proportion of genetic disorders produce neurologic dysfunction, gene therapy is likely to impact the management of neurologic disease in the foreseeable future. Patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), Gaucher's disease, and Hunter syndrome are now enrolled in gene therapy trials. It will be challenging for the child neurologist to stay abreast of rapid developments in the field of gene therapy. By participating in the design and implementation of clinical trials in gene therapy, the neurologist may reduce the intense toll that several neurologic diseases take on children and their families.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Gene Therapy 2000.

This article reviews 1) the use of gene transfer methods to genetically manipulate hematopoietic stem cell targets, 2) recent advances in technology that are addressing problems that have prevented widespread successful translation of gene transfer approaches for the cure of disease, and 3) recent regulatory issues related to human gene therapy trials. In Section I, Dr. Nienhuis describes the use of alternative viral envelopes and vector systems to improve efficiency of transduction of hematopoietic stem cells. Major limitations of stem cell transduction are related to low levels of viral receptors on the stem cells of large animal species and the low frequency of cycling stem cells in the bone marrow. Attempts to circumvent these limitations by exploiting non-oncoretroviral vectors and pseudotyping of Moloney vectors with alternative envelopes are discussed. In Section II, Dr. Hawley addresses new strategies to improve the expression of transgenes in cells derived from long-term reconstituting hematopoietic stem cells. Transgene silencing in transduced hematopoietic stem cells remains an obstacle to gene therapy for some gene sequences. New generations of retroviral backbones designed to both improve expression and reduce silencing in primary cells are explored. In Section III, Drs. Smith and Cornetta update regulatory issues related to human gene therapy trials. Increased scrutiny of human trials has led to changes in requirements and shifts in emphasis of existing regulations, which apply to human gene therapy trials. The current Food and Drug Administration's structure and regulations and the roles of the Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee of the NIH and other sponsors and partners in gene therapy trials are reviewed.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1996

Gene therapy: basic concepts and recent advances.

After years of preliminary in vitro and in vivo modeling, the first human gene therapy clinical trial was initiated approximately 5 years ago. The experience gained from this trial, and the others that have come after it, has shown that effective and efficient human gene therapy remains a tantalizing but elusive goal. Nevertheless, interest in this area of therapeutics continues to grow and over 100 gene therapy protocols have now been submitted to the Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee ("RAC") of the National Institutes of Health for approval. The goal of these protocols vary, but include correction of inherited gene defects, engineering new traits into cells such as diminished chemosensitivity in the case of bone marrow cells, or, in the case of tumor cells, expression of new immunophenotypes. Marking cells with a gene whose function can easily be detected, thereby rendering the cell traceable in vitro and in vivo is also the goal of several clinical trials. At the same time, different means of gene transfer are been investigated for the efficiency with which they deliver "therapeutic nucleotides" into their cellular targets. In this review, we recount some of the major developments that have occurred in these various areas and discuss their impact on progress in the field.

Animals↗