PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “TENTS”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 163 records · Page 9Linked to original sources
PubMed1995

Dilapan tent-gemeprost regimen vs. combinations of extra-amniotic Rivanol-Laminaria/Lamicel and oxytocin for second trimester abortion.

OBJECTIVE: To compare a new regimen for second trimester abortion using Dilapan and vaginal gemeprost suppositories with extra-amniotic Rivanol instillation and oxytocin i.v. immediately or 16 h after instillation. METHODS: A prospective study was performed in 153 women to analyze the induction-abortion interval, the use of analgesics and the complication rate. Wilcoxon's rank sum test was used for statistical evaluation. RESULTS: The mean induction-abortion interval was significantly shorter in the Dilapan-gemeprost-treated women than in the immediate or 16-h Rivanol-oxytocin-treated women, 12.5 vs. 23.3 and 26.8 h, respectively. The 24-h cumulative abortion rate was 91% in the former group vs. 49% and 61%, respectively. The use of analgesics was less frequent among the Dilapan-gemeprost-treated women, whereas the complication rate did not differ. CONCLUSIONS: The Dilapan-gemeprost treatment was advantageous with respect to a shorter induction-abortion interval and ease of handling. However a minority of women do not respond to this treatment and it is therefore necessary to employ alternative methods to complete the abortion in these cases.

Abortifacient Agents↗
PubMed2004

The Controlled Substances Act: how a "big tent" reform became a punitive drug law.

The 1970 Controlled Substances Act was part of an omnibus reform package designed to rationalize, and in some respects to liberalize, American drug policy. While the legislation provided additional resources for law enforcement and a systematic means for regulating the use of most psychoactive drugs, it also did away with mandatory minimum sentences and provided more support for treatment and research. Over the next three decades, and in response to public alarm about drug abuse, the US Congress continuously amended the law to produce a more punitive system of drug control. The amendments, which gave the Drug Enforcement Administration greater control over scheduling and maintenance and which substantially increased penalties for illicit trafficking, transformed the law into the legal foundation of America's "drug war," as the stricter criminal approach came to be known. By the 1980s, the flexibility and innovative spirit of the original Controlled Substances Act (and that of Nixon-era drug strategy generally) had largely disappeared from American drug policy.

Drug and Narcotic Control↗