PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Translational repression”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 163 records · Page 9Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

The RING domains of the promyelocytic leukemia protein PML and the arenaviral protein Z repress translation by directly inhibiting translation initiation factor eIF4E.

The promyelocytic leukemia protein (PML) is a mammalian regulator of cell growth which is characteristically disrupted in acute promyelocytic leukemia and by a variety of viruses. PML contains a RING domain which is required for its growth-suppressive and antiviral properties. Although normally nuclear, in certain pathogenic conditions, including arenaviral infection, PML is relocated to the cytoplasm, where its functions are poorly understood. Here, we observe that PML and arenavirus protein Z use regions around the first zinc-binding site of their respective RING domains to directly interact, with sub-micromolar affinity, with the dorsal surface of translation initiation factor eIF4E, representing a novel mode of eIF4E recognition. PML and Z profoundly reduce the affinity of eIF4E for its substrate, the 5' 7-methyl guanosine cap of mRNA, by over 100-fold. Association with the dorsal surface of eIF4E and direct antagonism of mRNA cap binding by PML and Z lead to direct inhibition of translation. These activities of the RING domains of PML and Z do not involve ubiquitin-mediated protein degradation, in contrast to many RINGs which have been observed to do so. Although PML and Z have well characterized physiological functions in regulation of growth and apoptosis, this work establishes the first discrete biochemical mechanism which underlies the biological activities of their RING domains. Thus, we establish PML and Z as translational repressors, with potential contributions to the pathogenesis of acute promyelocytic leukemia and variety of viral infections.

Arenavirus↗
PubMed1998

Translationally repressive RNA structures monitored in vivo using temperate DNA bacteriophages.

The RNA challenge phage system enables genetic selection of proteins with RNA-binding activity in bacteria. These phages are modified versions of the temperate DNA bacteriophage P22 in which post-transcriptional regulatory events control the developmental fate of the phage. The system was originally developed to identify novel RNA ligands that display reduced affinity for the R17/MS2 coat protein, as well as to select for suppressor coat proteins that recognize mutant RNA ligands. During the course of evaluating whether the HIV-1 Rev protein could direct lysogen development for bacteriophage derivatives that encode Rev response element (RRE) RNA sequences, two examples of RRE RNA ligands that interfere with challenge phage development were identified. In the phage examples described, RRE RNA secondary structure prevents Ant protein biosynthesis and lytic development. Phage lysogen formation occurs efficiently in recipient cells, independent of the expression status of the Rev protein or trans-acting competitor RRE RNA ligands. These studies provide the first example whereby RNA challenge phages may be applied to study RNA folding events and RNA structural interactions in an in vivo context.

Bacterial Proteins↗
PubMed2001

Translational repression: not just a Puf of smoke.

Proteins containing Puf domains interact with cofactors to form complexes that bind RNAs and control diverse developmental events. Recent studies have shed light on how the Puf family of proteins regulates mRNA activity.

Animals↗
PubMed1994

Rapamycin selectively represses translation of the "polypyrimidine tract" mRNA family.

The immunosuppressant rapamycin blocks p70s6k/p85s6k activation and phosphorylation of 40S ribosomal protein S6 in Swiss 3T3 cells. The same net result is obtained when the macrolide is added 3 hr after serum stimulation. In stimulated cells p70s6k/p85s6k inactivation is achieved within minutes, whereas S6 dephosphorylation requires 1-2 hr, supporting the concept that S6 dephosphorylation results from kinase inactivation. In parallel, rapamycin treatment causes a small, but significant, reduction in the initiation rate of protein synthesis, as measured both by [35S]methionine incorporation into protein and by recruitment of 80S ribosomes into polysomes. More striking, analysis of individual mRNA transcripts revealed that rapamycin selectively suppresses the translation of a family of mRNAs that is characterized by a polypyrimidine tract immediately after their N7-methylguanosine cap, a motif that can act as a translational modulator. This family includes transcripts for ribosomal proteins, elongation factors of protein synthesis, and proteins of as-yet-unknown function. The results imply that (i) 40S ribosomes containing phosphorylated S6 may selectively recognize this motif or proteins which bind to it and (ii) rapamycin may inhibit cell growth by blocking S6 phosphorylation and, thus, translation of these mRNAs.

3T3 Cells↗
PubMed2000

Structural analysis of late intermediate complex formed between plasmid ColIb-P9 Inc RNA and its target RNA. How does a single antisense RNA repress translation of two genes at different rates?

The antisense Inc RNA encoded by the IncIalpha ColIb-P9 plasmid replicon controls the translation of repZ encoding the replication initiator and its leader peptide repY at different rates with different mechanisms. The initial loop-loop base pairing between Inc RNA and the target in the repZ mRNA leader inhibits formation of a pseudoknot required for repZ translation. A subsequent base pairing at the 5' leader of Inc RNA blocks repY translation. To delineate the molecular basis for the differential control, we analyzed the intermediate complexes formed between RepZ mRNA and Inc RNA(54), a 5'-truncated Inc RNA derivative. We found that the initial base pairing at the loops transforms into a more stable intermediate complex by its propagation in both directions. The resulting extensive base pairing indicates that the inhibition of the pseudoknot formation is established at this stage. Furthermore, the region of extensive base pairing includes bases different in related plasmids showing different incompatibility. Thus, the observed extensive base pairing is important for determining the incompatibility of the low-copy-number plasmids. We discuss the evolution of replication control systems found in IncIalpha, IncB, and IncFII group plasmids.

5' Untranslated Regions↗
PubMed2002

Calreticulin interacts with C/EBPalpha and C/EBPbeta mRNAs and represses translation of C/EBP proteins.

We previously identified an RNA binding protein, CUGBP1, which binds to GCN repeats located within the 5' region of C/EBPbeta mRNAs and regulates translation of C/EBPbeta isoforms. To further investigate the role of RNA binding proteins in the posttranscriptional control of C/EBP proteins, we purified additional RNA binding proteins that interact with GC-rich RNAs and that may regulate RNA processing. In HeLa cells, the majority of GC-rich RNA binding proteins are associated with endogenous RNA transcripts. The separation of these proteins from endogenous RNA identified several proteins in addition to CUGBP1 that specifically interact with the GC-rich 5' region of C/EBPbeta mRNA. One of these proteins was purified to homogeneity and was identified as calreticulin (CRT). CRT is a multifunctional protein involved in several biological processes, including interaction with and regulation of rubella virus RNA processing. Our data demonstrate that both CUGBP1 and CRT interact with GCU repeats within myotonin protein kinase and with GCN repeats within C/EBPalpha and C/EBPbeta mRNAs. GCN repeats within these mRNAs form stable SL structures. The interaction of CRT with SL structures of C/EBPbeta and C/EBPalpha mRNAs leads to inhibition of translation of C/EBP proteins in vitro and in vivo. Deletions or mutations abolishing the formation of SL structures within C/EBPalpha and C/EBPbeta mRNAs lead to a failure of CRT to inhibit translation of C/EBP proteins. CRT-dependent inhibition of C/EBPalpha is sufficient to block the growth-inhibitory activity of C/EBPalpha. This finding further defines the molecular mechanism for posttranscriptional regulation of the C/EBPalpha and C/EBPbeta proteins.

Binding Sites↗
PubMed1993

An element of the transforming growth factor-beta 1 5'-untranslated region represses translation and specifically binds a cytosolic factor.

In many cell types, there is a discrepancy between transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-beta 1) mRNA and TGF-beta 1 protein, suggesting that expression of TGF-beta 1 is regulated posttranscriptionally. We have previously shown that a 137-nucleotide (nt) region of the TGF-beta 1 5'-untranslated region (UTR) potently inhibits the expression of a heterologous reporter gene, suggesting a role for this region in the posttranscriptional inhibition of TGF-beta 1 expression. To study the mechanism of inhibition, a chimeric plasmid containing this region of the TGF-beta 1 5'-UTR and the reading frame of the human GH gene was stably transfected into C2C12 myoblastic cells. Our results show that the TGF-beta 1 5'-UTR inhibits GH expression by inhibiting GH mRNA translation. In vitro gel retardation and cross-linking assays using a radiolabelled RNA probe transcribed from this region of the TGF-beta 1 5'-UTR demonstrate the specific binding of a cytosolic factor. Deletion of a potential stem-loop-forming region abolishes binding of this factor and partially restores GH production. These results suggest that posttranscriptional inhibition of TGF-beta 1 expression is at the level of mRNA translation and that a cytosolic factor may regulate TGF-beta 1 mRNA translation.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Chicken Y-box proteins chk-YB-1b and chk-YB-2 repress translation by sequence-specific interaction with single-stranded RNA.

Y-Box proteins comprise a large family of multifunctional proteins with a wide spectrum of activities in both transcription and translational regulation of gene expression. Earlier, we have reported on the involvement of chk-YB-2 in transcriptional regulation of Rous sarcoma virus long terminal repeats and the involvement of chk-YB-1b in transcriptional regulation of alpha1(I) collagen genes. Here, we have investigated the potential role of chk-YB-2 and chk-YB-1b in RNA metabolism. We report that chk-YB-2 and chk-YB-1b are localized predominantly in the cytoplasm and that they both can bind single-stranded RNA in a sequence-specific and reversible manner. Well-conserved cold-shock domain, N-terminal proline-rich domain and the alternating clusters of acidic and basic amino acids located in the C-terminal ends of these two proteins were all found to be necessary for their RNA-binding ability. Further, we demonstrate that these two proteins inhibit translation in vitro and that binding to RNA is required for this inhibition. The significance of these results is discussed.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2005

The Xenopus ELAV protein ElrB represses Vg1 mRNA translation during oogenesis.

Xenopus laevis Vg1 mRNA undergoes both localization and translational control during oogenesis. We previously characterized a 250-nucleotide AU-rich element, the Vg1 translation element (VTE), in the 3'-untranslated region (UTR) of this mRNA that is responsible for the translational repression. UV-cross-linking and immunoprecipitation experiments, described here, revealed that the known AU-rich element binding proteins, ElrA and ElrB, and TIA-1 and TIAR interact with the VTE. The levels of these proteins during oogenesis are most consistent with a possible role for ElrB in the translational control of Vg1 mRNA, and ElrB, in contrast to TIA-1 and TIAR, is present in large RNP complexes. Immunodepletion of TIA-1 and TIAR from Xenopus translation extract confirmed that these proteins are not involved in the translational repression. Mutagenesis of a potential ElrB binding site destroyed the ability of the VTE to bind ElrB and also abolished translational repression. Moreover, multiple copies of the consensus motif both bind ElrB and support translational control. Therefore, there is a direct correlation between ElrB binding and translational repression by the Vg1 3'-UTR. In agreement with the reporter data, injection of a monoclonal antibody against ElrB into Xenopus oocytes resulted in the production of Vg1 protein, arguing for a role for the ELAV proteins in the translational repression of Vg1 mRNA during early oogenesis.

3' Untranslated Regions↗
PubMed1994

Translational regulation of nanos by RNA localization.

Localization of the maternally synthesized nanos (nos) RNA to the posterior pole of the Drosophila embryo provides the source for a posterior-to-anterior gradient of Nos protein. Correct spatial regulation of nos activity is essential for normal pattern formation. High local concentrations of Nos protein in the posterior of the embryo are necessary to inhibit translation of the transcription factor Hunchback in this region, and thus permit expression of genes required for abdomen formation (see ref. 5 for review). By contrast, misexpression of Nos protein at the anterior of the embryo prevents translation of the anterior morphogen Bicoid, suppressing head and thorax development. Posterior localization of nos RNA is mediated by sequences within the nos 3' untranslated region (3'UTR) and requires the function of eight genes of the 'posterior group'. Although the unlocalized nos RNA is stable in embryos from females mutant for any of the posterior group genes, these embryos appear to lack nos activity because they develop the abdominal defects characteristic of embryos produced by nos mutant females. We report here that unlocalized nos RNA is translationally repressed. Translational repression is mediated by the nos 3'UTR and can be alleviated either by replacement of the 3'UTR with heterologous 3'UTR sequences or by posterior localization. Thus, RNA localization provides a novel mechanism for translational regulation.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

How adhesion, migration, and cytoplasmic calcium transients influence interleukin-1beta mRNA stabilization in human monocytes.

We investigated the mechanisms by which primary human monocyte migration and the production of important cytokines are co-regulated. Motile monocytes underwent cyclic morphologic and adhesive changes that were associated with intracellular free calcium changes; in such cells, cytokine transcripts were unstable and translationally repressed. Agents that activate monocytes, including lipopolysacharrides (LPS), cytomegalovirus (CMV), and tumor necrosis factor (TNFalpha), have been shown to de-repress translation and these agents stabilize adhesion-induced transcripts for IL-lbeta and IL-8 and markedly diminish cell migration in the presence of autologous serum. LPS suppressed Rho A activity and either this agent or C3 transferase elevated intracellular free calcium, stabilized transcripts, and, in tandem, inhibited cell migration by preventing tail retraction, a prerequisite for cell translocation. These results, therefore, suggest that monocyte activating agents inhibit the RhoA pathway and continuously elevate intracellular calcium leading to a concomitant decrease in monocyte migration and stabilization of cytokine transcripts prior to translation.

ADP Ribose Transferases↗
PubMed1986

Multiple upstream AUG codons mediate translational control of GCN4.

GCN4 encodes a transcriptional activator of amino acid biosynthetic genes in yeast that is regulated at the translational level. The 5' leader of GCN4 mRNA contains four small open-reading-frames. By constructing point mutations in the initiation codons of these sequences, we show that they are essential for translational repression of GCN4. Each upstream AUG codon can repress translation; however, the two 3' proximal AUG codons are much more inhibitory than the 5' proximal AUG codons. Unexpectedly, the first AUG codon is required for efficient GCN4 expression under starvation conditions. This positive function appears to involve antagonism of the inhibitory effect of the 3' proximal AUG codons since it is dispensable in the absence of these sequences. The interaction between the upstream AUG codons is modulated by the trans-acting factors GCN2 and GCD1 in response to amino acid availability.

Amino Acids↗