PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Vancomycin Resistance”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 163 records · Page 9Linked to original sources

Experience with a hospital-wide outbreak of vancomycin-resistant enterococci.

BACKGROUND: Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) were first detected in our institution in 1991. An outbreak was recognized in late 1992 when there was a sudden rise in the number of patients per month with VRE. Little information exists concerning the natural history of infection with these pathogens, and the effect of antimicrobial therapy is unclear. Recent guidelines emphasize prudent use of vancomycin and prompt institution of barrier precautions to limit the spread of vancomycin resistance. METHODS: Data were obtained by review of microbiologic and clinical records. Patients were categorized according to site of infection, and outcome of therapy was assessed. Hospital antibiotic usage was analyzed to determine any correlation with the outbreak. Infection control measures instituted in 1993 included patient isolation, environmental cleaning, and a reemphasis of barrier precautions. Surveillance cultures were performed to assess the extent of the outbreak in January 1995. RESULTS: VRE were detected in clinical cultures from 159 patients from 1991 through 1994. Mortality rate was 48%, but in most cases death could not be attributed to enterococcal infection. Patients with wound infections healed without specific therapy. Many patients with bacteremia had resolution with ampicillin or without specific therapy. Patients were widely scattered throughout the hospital from the beginning of the outbreak. Hospital usage of cefotaxime correlated with the number of cases. Infection control measures were not successful. Surveillance culture results in January 1995 revealed that 53% of all medical and surgical inpatients had fecal colonization with VRE. Genetic analysis of selected isolates revealed that one strain predominated, but at least seven distinct strains were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that many infections with VRE resolve without specific therapy. The infection control measures we used were ineffective, possibly because of the multiple strains present in our hospital. Isolation of all patients with VRE is impractical when there is widespread fecal carriage.

Adult↗

Narasin used as a feed additive in conventional rearing of broilers can co-select for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium through the NarAB ionophore resistance mechanisms.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the role of the NarAB resistance mechanism in the selection of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREfm) and assess the impact of ionophore feed additives, particularly narasin, on the emergence of VREfm in broiler chickens. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three isogenic E. faecium strains with different antimicrobial resistance determinants were created by mutagenesis and conjugation and used in a controlled animal experiment. Ross 308 broiler chickens were inoculated with either a rifampicin-resistant, a rifampicin- and vancomycin-resistant or a rifampicin-, vancomycin- and narasin-resistant strain and fed diets supplemented with selected ionophores. Bacterial populations were analysed on selective Slanetz and Bartley agar to determine the presence and selection of VREfm and other vancomycin-resistant species. Bacterial inoculation strains and isolates were whole genome sequenced for species identification and to identify genetic resistance mechanisms. RESULTS: Narasin was shown to select for VREfm in broilers, with NarAB being essential for co-selection. Intrinsically vancomycin-resistant Pediococcus acidilactici and Enterococcus gallinarum were identified as part of the broilers' vancomycin-resistant resident microbiota. Notably, among the P. acidilactici isolates that were susceptibility tested, strains resistant to both vancomycin and narasin were only found in broilers fed narasin, supporting that narasin promotes the growth of narasin-resistant populations. CONCLUSION: Narasin use in broiler feed can co-select for vancomycin-resistant bacteria, including VREfm, through the NarAB mechanism. These findings emphasize the concerns associated with the use of particular ionophores in poultry and suggest that vancomycin and narasin resistance may be more widespread in the broiler microbiota than previously recognized. Further research is needed to understand the implications for antimicrobial resistance and human health.

Animals↗

Cell wall thickening is a common feature of vancomycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.

We have previously shown that a thickened cell wall is responsible for the vancomycin resistance of vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VRSA) (equivalent to vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus and glycopeptide-intermediate S. aureus) strain Mu50 (L. Cui, H. Murakami, K. Kuwahara-Arai, H. Hanaki, and K. Hiramatsu, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:2276-2285, 2000). However, the mechanism of vancomycin resistance in other VRSA strains remained unclear. In this study, 16 clinical VRSA strains from seven countries were subjected to serial daily passage in drug-free medium. After 10 to 84 days of passage in the nonselective medium, passage-derived strains with decreased MICs of vancomycin (MIC, <4 mg/liter) were obtained. However, all of the passage-derived strains except one (15 of 16) still possessed subpopulations that were resistant to vancomycin as judged by population analysis, and vancomycin-resistant mutant strains were selected from the passage-derived strains by one-step vancomycin selection with a frequency of 4.25 x 10(-6) to 1.64 x 10(-3). The data indicated that vancomycin-resistant cells are frequently generated from the passage-derived strains even after vancomycin selective pressure is lifted. Cell wall thicknesses and MICs of glycopeptides (vancomycin and teicoplanin) and beta-lactams (imipenem and oxacillin) were determined for a total of 48 strains, including 15 sets of three strains: the clinical VRSA strain, the passage-derived strain, and the vancomycin-resistant mutant strain obtained from the passage-derived strain. No simple correlation between glycopeptide and beta-lactam MICs was seen, while significant correlations between MICs of vancomycin and teicoplanin (r = 0.679; P < 0.001) and between MICs of imipenem and oxacillin (r = 0.787; P < 0.001) were recognized. Moreover, all of the VRSA strains had significantly thickened cell walls, which became thinner with the loss of vancomycin resistance during drug-free passages and again became thick in the resistant mutant strains. The data showed that cell wall thickness had high correlation with the MICs of the two glycopeptides (correlation coefficients, 0.908 for vancomycin and 0.655 for teicoplanin) but not with those of the beta-lactam antibiotics tested. These results together with coupled changes of cell wall thickness and vancomycin MICs in 16 isogenic sets of strains indicate that thickening of the cell wall is a common phenotype of clinical VRSA strains and may be a phenotypic determinant for vancomycin resistance in S. aureus.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

Binding of glycopeptide antibiotics to a model of a vancomycin-resistant bacterium.

BACKGROUND: The vancomycin group of glycopeptide antibiotics is active against a wide range of gram-positive bacteria. The increasing resistance to vancomycin is the result of a change of an amide linkage (D-Ala-D-Ala) to an ester linkage (D-Ala-D-Lactate) in the bacterial cell-wall precursors. RESULTS: We have used a peptide terminating in the sequence -Lys-D-Ala-D-Lactate linked by its amino terminus to a docosanoyl (C22) acyl chain and anchored in a supported lipid monolayer to mimic the surface of vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Surface plasmon resonance analysis was then used to investigate the binding of glycopeptide group antibiotics to this surface. Vancomycin, which dimerises weakly, bound with low affinity, whereas strongly dimerising antibiotics, such as chloroeremomycin, bound with higher affinities. Antibiotics that have attached hydrophobic groups, such as teicoplanin and biphenylchloroeremomycin (LY307599), bound to the lipid monolayer. This resulted in an enhanced affinity for the lipid-anchored peptide at the surface relative to affinities for an analogous non-anchored peptide in solution. CONCLUSIONS: We have shown that the affinities of glycopeptide antibiotics for a model of the surface of a vancomycin-resistant bacterium are enhanced relative to affinities determined in free solution. We have also shown that antibiotics that have membrane anchors bind tightly to the model surface and that this feature is an important determinant of the ability of an antibiotic to kill vancomycin-resistant enterococci.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

Enterococcal bacteremia in the surgical intensive care unit. Does vancomycin resistance affect mortality? The Johns Hopkins SICU Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence and mortality rate associated with nosocomial bacteremia caused by vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus in a surgical intensive care unit. DESIGN: A retrospective study. SETTING: The surgical intensive care unit of a large university hospital tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: All patients in the surgical intensive care unit with a documented nosocomial bacteremia between January 1, 1992, and December 31, 1994. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Mortality rate. RESULTS: Of the 134 nosocomial bacteremic episodes, 30.6% involved enterococci; 24.4% of the enterococci were resistant to vancomycin. Patients with vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bacteremia had a significantly longer hospital stay (mean +/- SD, 28 +/- 18 vs 12 +/- 10 days; P = .005) and were more likely to have been treated with vancomycin (70% vs 10.3%; P = .001) than patients with vancomycin-sensitive enterococcal bacteremia. The mortality (41.0%) associated with enterococcal bacteremia was similar to the overall bacteremic mortality (41.7%). There was no difference in episode-specific mortality associated with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (40%) vs vancomycin-sensitive enterococci (38.7%). Of the 4 deaths associated with vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bacteremia, only 2 occurred within 14 days of the bacteremia, as did 8 of 12 deaths associated with vancomycin-sensitive enterococcal bacteremia (P = .64). CONCLUSIONS: Enterococci were the most commonly isolated nosocomial blood-borne pathogens in the surgical intensive care unit. Nearly 25% of the enterococcal bacteremic episodes were resistant to vancomycin. Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus is associated with a prolonged hospital stay and with vancomycin use. Nevertheless, vancomycin resistance itself does not increase the mortality rate associated with enterococcal bacteremia.

Adult↗

Possible connection between a widely disseminated conjugative gentamicin resistance (pMG1-like) plasmid and the emergence of vancomycin resistance in Enterococcus faecium.

A total of 640 vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE) isolates, which were obtained between 1994 and 1999 from the Medical School Hospital of the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, were used in this study. Of the 640 strains, 611 and 29 were VanA and VanB VRE, respectively, based on PCR analysis. Four hundred ninety-two (77%) of the strains exhibited resistance to concentrations of gentamicin from 64 micro g/ml (MIC) to more than 1,024 micro g/ml (MIC). The gentamicin resistance of each of 261 (53%) of the 492 gentamicin-resistant strains was transferred to E. faecium at a frequency of about 10(-5) to 10(-6) per donor cell in broth mating. More than 90% of vancomycin resistances of the 261 strains cotransferred with the gentamicin resistances to E. faecium strains by filter mating. The conjugative gentamicin resistance plasmids were identified and were classified into five types (A through E) with respect to their EcoRI restriction profiles. The transfer frequencies of each type of plasmid between E. faecium strains or Enterococcus faecalis strains were around 10(-3) to 10(-5) per donor cell or around 10(-6) to 10(-7) per donor cell, respectively, in broth mating. Type A and type B were the most frequently isolated, at an isolation frequency of about 40% per VRE isolate harboring the gentamicin resistance conjugative plasmid. The plasmids did not show any homology in Southern hybridization with the pheromone-responsive plasmids and broad-host-range plasmids pAMbeta1 and pIP501. The EcoRI or NdeI restriction fragments of each type of plasmids hybridized to the conjugative gentamicin resistance plasmid pMG1 (65.1 kb), which was originally isolated from an E. faecium clinical isolate, and transfer efficiently in broth mating.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

Molecular typing and antimicrobial susceptibility of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium in Brazil.

OBJECTIVES: To characterize vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) isolates and to evaluate the mode of dissemination of this pathogen in Brazil. DESIGN: We collected 22 vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium isolates from 6 medical centers in Sao Paulo, Brazil, and 1 isolate from a medical center in Curitiba, Brazil. PARTICIPANTS: All Brazilian hospitals that had identified vancomycin-resistant E. faecium up to the beginning of this study (late 1999) contributed isolates to the study. METHODS: The isolates were susceptibility tested using the broth microdilution method and the E-test. The presence of vancomycin resistance genes (vanA, vanB, vanC1, vanC2-3, and vanD) was evaluated by polymerase chain reaction; molecular typing was performed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). RESULTS: The vanA gene was demonstrated in all vancomycin-resistant E. faecium, except for 1 isolate. None of the vancomycin resistance genes cited above was detected in the isolate from Curitiba, which was the first vancomycin-resistant E. faecium described in Brazil. All isolates were resistant to ampicillin and teicoplanin. The main clone remains susceptible to doxycycline and chloramphenicol, but intermediate to quinupristin-dalfopristin. PFGE analysis demonstrated 7 major PFGE patterns. A unique PFGE pattern with 4 subtypes was detected in 17 isolates from 4 different hospitals. CONCLUSION: The results of our study indicate the occurrence of intra- and interhospital dissemination of VRE in Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Brazil↗

Testing the efficacy of a molecular surveillance network: methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREF) genotypes in six hospitals in the metropolitan New York City area. The BARG Initiative Pilot Study Group. Bacterial Antibiotic Resistance Group.

Molecular fingerprinting techniques are rapidly becoming indispensable tools for hospital epidemiology. On the other hand, the relative complexity and unfamiliarity of these techniques to most hospital diagnostic laboratories limit their usefulness. In an attempt to provide a solution for this dilemma, we tested the feasibility and efficacy of a cooperative venture in which molecular typing of isolates recovered from patients in six hospitals was performed at two microbiology research laboratories with expertise in these techniques. In a small preliminary study, 30 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and 30 vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREF) isolates were collected over a 3-week period from six hospitals in the metropolitan New York area and transported to the Laboratory of Microbiology at The Rockefeller University during the summer months of 1994. Nineteen of the 27 confirmed MRSA isolates were closely related strains carrying the same mecA and the same Tn554 polymorphs in a pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) background represented by closely related subtypes of a single pattern, indicating the wide distribution of this MRSA clone among the participating hospitals. Typing of the same 27 MRSA isolates was also performed at the Tuberculosis Center of the Public Health Research Institute and identical results were obtained. The 29 confirmed VREF isolates were highly heterogeneous and belonged to as many as 23 distinct clonal types as defined by PFGE patterns and probing with vanA. Characterization of the 60 isolates by these methods was completed in one month of full-time effort by a single experienced laboratory assistant guided by a doctoral-level expert in molecular fingerprinting techniques. The collection of samples for both MRSA and VREF was not intended to address epidemiological questions but to determine the feasibility of a multicenter study. On the basis of our preliminary findings we are encouraged that a larger cooperative effort is possible and with the correct sampling method we believe that epidemiological and surveillance studies could be accomplished that would provide a tracking system to assist hospitals, clinics, and chronic care facilities in controlling the spread of multidrug-resistant pathogens.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

Vancomycin resistance: status quo and quo vadis.

The prevalence of vancomycin resistance is steadily rising among clinical isolates of Enterococcus spp., thereby limiting the treatment options for infections caused by vancomycin-resistant enterococci. The precise nature of the glycopeptide resistance genes has been elucidated, and many studies on gene reservoirs and strain-versus-resistance-gene epidemiology have been performed. The prevalence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in various clinical and environmental settings in relation to nosocomial and veterinary applications of antimicrobial glycopeptides is discussed in detail in this review. Novel molecular tools for the identification of vancomycin-resistant enterococci genomes or the various resistance genes have been applied in order to expand current insight into the overall epidemiology of the resistance trait itself. The risk of the spread of vancomycin resistance to other bacterial species was recently underscored by the emergence of staphylococci showing clinical resistance to vancomycin. The topics mentioned above are elaborated on and discussed in light of the increasing medical concern on the future detection of microbial infections beyond chemotherapeutic cure.

Animal Husbandry↗

High level oxacillin and vancomycin resistance and altered cell wall composition in Staphylococcus aureus carrying the staphylococcal mecA and the enterococcal vanA gene complex.

Recently, for the first time in the history of this bacterial species, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carrying the enterococcal vanA gene complex and expressing high level resistance to vancomycin was identified in clinical specimens (CDC (2002) MMWR 51, 565-567). The purpose of our studies was to understand how vanA is expressed in the heterologous background of S. aureus and how it interacts with the mecA-based resistance mechanism, which is also present in these strains and is targeted on cell wall biosynthesis. The vanA-containing staphylococcal plasmid was transferred from the clinical vancomycin-resistant S. aureus (VRSA) strain HIP11714 (CDC (2002) MMWR 51, 565-567) to the methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strain COL for which extensive genetic and biochemical information is available on staphylococcal cell wall biochemistry and drug resistance mechanisms. The transconjugant named COLVA showed high and homogeneous resistance to both oxacillin and vancomycin. COLVA grown in vancomycin-containing medium produced an abnormal peptidoglycan: all pentapeptides were replaced by tetrapeptides, and the peptidoglycan contained at least 22 novel muropeptide species that frequently showed a deficit or complete absence of pentaglycine branches. The UDP-MurNAc-pentapeptide, the major component of the cell wall precursor pool in vancomycin-sensitive cells was replaced by UDP-MurNAc-depsipeptide and UDP-MurNAc-tetrapeptide. Transposon inactivation of the beta-lactam resistance gene mecA caused complete loss of beta-lactam resistance but had no effect on the expression of vancomycin resistance. The two major antibiotic resistance mechanisms encoded by mecA and vanA residing in the same S. aureus appear to use different sets of enzymes for the assembly of cell walls.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

Treatment options for chronic prostatitis due to vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium.

Prostatitis due to vancomycin-resistant enterococci has not been previously described. Reported here is a case of chronic prostatitis due to Enterococcus faecium, resistant to vancomycin, ampicillin, ciprofloxacin and doxycycline, in a 42-year-old liver transplant recipient. Treatment with a combination of rifampin and nitrofurantoin for 6 weeks resulted in long-lasting cure. Other antimicrobial agents active in vitro against vancomycin-resistant enterococci, such as quinupristin/ dalfopristin and chloramphenicol, are unlikely to achieve sufficient prostatic tissue levels to be successfully utilized for treatment of this condition.

Adult↗

Vancomycin resistance in staphylococci.

Recent emergence of vancomycin resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VRSA) has posed a new threat to hospital infection control and antibiotic chemotherapy. Relatively low-level resistance of VRSA compared to that of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), and prevalence of S. aureus clinical strains heterogeneously resistant to vancomycin (hetero-VRSA), challenge the value of routine antibiotic susceptibility tests as a tool for the prediction of clinical efficacy of vancomycin therapy. This review summarizes the history of emergence of glycopeptide resistance in staphylococci and considers the mechanism of resistance in these organisms.

Journal Article↗

In-vitro activity of fosfomycin against vancomycin-resistant enterococci.

The effect of fosfomycin against 69 vancomycin-resistant isolates of Enterococcus faecium (VanA), five of E. faecium (VanB), 11 of Enterococcus faecalis (VanA), three of E. faecalis (VanB), 10 of Enterococcus gallinarum (VanC1) and two of Enterococcus casseliflavus (VanC2) and glycopeptide-sensitive E. faecium (n = 8) and E. faecalis (n = 10) was tested in vitro. Fosfomycin inhibited 97%, 94% and 96% of the vancomycin-resistant strains, according to results of agar dilution, broth microdilution, and a disc diffusion method (DIN 58940). The disc diffusion test by the NCCLS method does not include fosfomycin; using breakpoints suggested by Andrews et al. (< or = 11 mm, resistant; > or = 18 mm, susceptible), 5% of the vancomycin-resistant strains tested would have been considered fosfomycin resistant. Minimal inhibitory concentrations of most vancomycin-resistant isolates were in the intermediate sensitivity range, yielding an MIC50 of 32 mg/L and an MIC90 of 64 mg/L. Moreover the majority of inhibitory zone sizes by the disc diffusion method (DIN 58940) corresponded to intermediate susceptibility. These results suggest that fosfomycin at a high dosage and possibly used in combination with other drugs could be a potentially useful drug for the treatment of infections caused by vancomycin-resistant enterococci.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

Treatment options for vancomycin-resistant enterococcal infections.

Serious infection with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) usually occurs in patients with significantly compromised host defences and serious co-morbidities, and this magnifies the importance of effective antimicrobial treatment. Assessments of antibacterial efficacy against VRE have been hampered by the lack of a comparator treatment arm(s), complex treatment requirements including surgery, and advanced illness-severity associated with a high crude mortality. Treatment options include available agents which don't have a specific VRE approval (chloramphenicol, doxycycline, high-dose ampicillin or ampicillin/sulbactam), and nitrofurantoin (for lower urinary tract infection). The role of antimicrobial combinations that have shown in vitro or animal-model in vivo efficacy has yet to be established. Two novel antimicrobial agents (quinupristin/ dalfopristin and linezolid) have emerged as approved therapeutic options for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium on the basis of in vitro susceptibility and clinical efficacy from multicentre, pharmaceutical company-sponsored clinical trials. Quinupristin/dalfopristin is a streptogramin, which impairs bacterial protein synthesis at both early peptide chain elongation and late peptide chain extrusion steps. It has bacteriostatic activity against vancomycin-resistant E. faecium [minimum concentration to inhibit growth of 90% of isolates (MIC(90)) = 2 microg/ml] but is not active against Enterococcus faecalis (MIC(90 )= 16 microg/ml). In a noncomparative, nonblind, emergency-use programme in patients who were infected with Gram-positive isolates resistant or refractory to conventional therapy or who were intolerant of conventional therapy, quinupristin/dalfopristin was administered at 7.5 mg/kg every 8 hours. The clinical response rate in the bacteriologically evaluable subset was 70.5%, and a 65.8% overall response (favourable clinical and bacteriological outcome) was observed. Resistance to quinupristin/dalfopristin on therapy was observed in 6/338 (1.8%) of VRE strains. Myalgia/arthralgia was the most frequent treatment-limiting adverse effect. In vitro studies which combine quinupristin/dalfopristin with ampicillin or doxycyline have shown enhanced killing effects against VRE; however, the clinical use of combined therapy remains unestablished. Linezolid, an oxazolidinone compound that acts by inhibiting the bacterial pre-translational initiation complex formation, has bacteriostatic activity against both vancomycin resistant E. faecium (MIC(90) = 2 to 4 microg/ml) and E. faecalis (MIC(90) = 2 to 4 microg/ml). This agent was studied in a similar emergency use protocol for multi-resistant Gram-positive infections. 55 of 133 evaluable patients were infected with VRE. Cure rates for the most common sites were complicated skin and soft tissue 87.5% (7/8), primary bacteraemia 90.9% (10/11), peritonitis 91.7% (11/12), other abdominal/pelvic infections 91.7% (11/12), and catheter-related bacteraemia 100% (9/9). There was an all-site response rate of 92.6% (50/54). In a separate blinded, randomised, multicentre trial for VRE infection at a variety of sites, intravenous low dose linezolid (200mg every 12 hours) was compared to high dose therapy (600 mg every 12 hours) with optional conversion to oral administration. A positive dose response (although statistically nonsignificant) was seen with a 67% (39/58) and 52% (24/46) cure rate in the high- and low-dose groups, respectively. Adverse effects of linezolid therapy have been predominantly gastrointestinal (nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea), headache and taste alteration. Reports of thrombocytopenia appear to be limited to patients receiving somewhat longer courses of treatment (>14 to 21 days). Linezolid resistance (MIC > or = 8 microg/ml) has been reported in a small number of E. faecium strains which appears to be secondary to a base-pair mutation in the genome encoding for the bacterial 23S ribosome binding site. At present a comparative study between the two approved agents for VRE (quinupristin/dalfopristin and linezolid) has not been performed. Several investigational agents are currently in phase II or III trials for VRE infection. This category includes daptomycin (an acidic lipopeptide), oritavancin (LY-333328; a glycopeptide), and tigilcycline (GAR-936; a novel analogue of minocycline). Finally, strategies to suppress or eradicate the VRE intestinal reservoir have been reported for the combination of oral doxycyline plus bacitracin and oral ramoplanin (a novel glycolipodepsipeptide). If successful, a likely application of such an approach is the reduction of VRE infection during high risk periods in high risk patient groups such as the post-chemotherapy neutropenic nadir or early post-solid abdominal organ transplantation.

Acetamides↗

Control of vancomycin-resistant enterococcus in health care facilities in a region.

BACKGROUND: In late 1996, vancomycin-resistant enterococci were first detected in the Siouxland region of Iowa, Nebraska, and South Dakota. A task force was created, and in 1997 the assistance of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention was sought in assessing the prevalence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in the region's facilities and implementing recommendations for screening, infection control, and education at all 32 health care facilities in the region. METHODS: The infection-control intervention was evaluated in October 1998 and October 1999. We performed point-prevalence surveys, conducted a case-control study of gastrointestinal colonization with vancomycin-resistant enterococci, and compared infection-control practices and screening policies for vancomycin-resistant enterococci at the acute care and long-term care facilities in the Siouxland region. RESULTS: Perianal-swab samples were obtained from 1954 of 2196 eligible patients (89 percent) in 1998 and 1820 of 2049 eligible patients (89 percent) in 1999. The overall prevalence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci at 30 facilities that participated in all three years of the study decreased from 2.2 percent in 1997 to 1.4 percent in 1998 and to 0.5 percent in 1999 (P<0.001 by chi-square test for trend). The number of facilities that had had at least one patient with vancomycin-resistant enterococci declined from 15 in 1997 to 10 in 1998 to only 5 in 1999. At both acute care and long-term care facilities, the risk factors for colonization with vancomycin-resistant enterococci were prior hospitalization and treatment with antimicrobial agents. Most of the long-term care facilities screened for vancomycin-resistant enterococci (26 of 28 in 1998 [93 percent] and 23 of 25 in 1999 [92 percent]) and had infection-control policies to prevent the transmission of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (22 of 25 [88 percent] in 1999). All four acute care facilities had screening and infection-control policies for vancomycin-resistant enterococci in 1998 and 1999. CONCLUSIONS: An active infection-control intervention, which includes the obtaining of surveillance cultures and the isolation of infected patients, can reduce or eliminate the transmission of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in the health care facilities of a region.

Adult↗

Korean nationwide surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in 2000 with special reference to vancomycin resistance in enterococci, and expanded-spectrum cephalosporin and imipenem resistance in gram-negative bacilli.

Antimicrobial resistance surveillance is necessary to determine the size of the problem and to guide empirical selection of antimicrobial agents for treating infected patients. The aim of this study was to analyze the results of susceptibility tests performed by hospitals participating in the Korean Nationwide Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance (KONSAR) program. The rates of oxacillin-resistant staphylococci, penicillin-nonsusceptible pneumococci, and ampicillin-resistant E. faecium were over 70%. Ampicillin-resistant H. influenzae increased to 68%. Expanded-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant K. pneumoniae, fluoroquinolone-resistant E. coli, and imipenem-resistant P. aeruginosa remained at 16% through 27%, depending on the species. The proportions of vancomycin- resistant E. faecium and imipenem-resistant P. aeruginosa were 18 - 24% and 19-21%, respectively, indicating the seriousness of antimicrobial resistance. In conclusion, the increasing prevalence of resistant bacteria indicates that more concerted effort is required to conserve the usefulness of precious new antimicrobial agents.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

Descriptive epidemiology and case-control study of patients colonized with vancomycin-resistant enterococcus and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

BACKGROUND: Patients colonized or infected with vancomycin-resistant enterococcus and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus may be at risk of acquiring vancomycin-resistant S. aureus if the vanA gene is transferred from vancomycin-resistant enterococcus to methicillin-resistant S. aureus. OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to identify risk factors for cocolonization or coinfection (CC/CI) with vancomycin-resistant enterococcus and methicillin-resistant S. aureus. DESIGN: We conducted a descriptive, epidemiologic study of all patients with CC/CI identified from January 1998 to May 2003 and a nested case-control study of a cohort of patients hospitalized in the burn and wound unit. SETTING: We conducted our study in a 813-bed tertiary care university teaching hospital. POPULATION: The study population consisted of patients found to have CC/CI during the study period. METHODS: Descriptive epidemiologic data were collected from hospital records of all patients identified as having CC/CI. A subset of patients hospitalized in the burn and wound unit were included in a case-control study. RESULTS: CC/CI was detected in 71% of the patients during a single hospital stay. The burn and wound unit, which does active surveillance for both organisms, and the general medicine unit, which does not do active surveillance for either organism, cared for more than one-half of these patients. Among patients being cared for in the burn and wound unit, having exposure to 2 or more invasive devices (central venous catheters, indwelling urinary catheters, and enteral feeding tubes) and renal insufficiency were independent risk factors for CC/CI. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CC/CI are the population at greatest risk for vancomycin-resistant S. aureus colonization or infection. The number of invasive devices to which patients are exposed and, thus, possibly the patients' underlying severity of illness, as well as renal insufficiency, appear to be risk factors for CC/CI.

Adult↗

Emerging vancomycin resistance in enterococci in India.

Infection caused by vancomycin resistant enterococci (VRE) leads to adverse outcome and is a real challenge. Despite increasing reports of VRE in different countries, there is scanty data on this issue from India. A total of 685 enterococci were isolated from various clinical samples from January to December 2004. Antimicrobial susceptibility was performed as prescribed by National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS). Vancomycin resistance was confirmed by minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). Resistant phenotype was determined by Polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Of 685, 456 (67%) were E. faecalis and 229 (33%) were E. faecium. Resistance to various antibiotics in E. faecalis and E. faecium was as follows: ampicillin 33% and 54%, erythromycin 91% and 86%, ciprofloxacin 69% and 81%, tetracycline 50% and 54% and high level gentamicin resistance in 62% and 77% respectively. Vancomycin resistance was confirmed in 10 (1.4%) cases by MIC and all had Van A phenotype by PCR. Emergence of vancomycin resistant enterococci is of great concern because of its epidemic potential and scanty therapeutic options. Prompt diagnosis and efficient infection control measures can restrict its spread.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗