PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Vision Screening”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 163 records · Page 9Linked to original sources
PubMed2004

A new visual evoked potential system for vision screening in infants and young children.

INTRODUCTION: With a prevalence of 3-5%, amblyopia represents a major public health problem. Effective treatment depends on early detection, and a broad consensus of professional opinion supports vision screening of infants and young children. No single method of screening has been demonstrated to be superior in detecting amblyopia and all methods have significant limitations. METHODS: We assessed a new, "child-friendly" visual evoked potential (VEP) system (ENFANTtrade mark II, Diopsys Corp., Metuchen, NJ) for use in screening. We studied 122 children, aged 6 months to 5 years, comparing test results in a masked fashion to results of standard ophthalmologic examinations. A statistical program analyzed VEP differences between fellow eyes to determine a "pass" or "fail" for each child. For verbal patients, clinical amblyopia was defined as an interocular difference of two or more lines in best-corrected visual acuity. For preverbal patients, clinical amblyopia was defined by the clinician's decision to treat with occlusion or atropine penalization. Preverbal children with significant refractive errors or structural eye pathology were also considered clinically abnormal. RESULTS: The test was completed by 94% of the study group, each child requiring an average of 10 minutes to complete testing of both eyes. The sensitivity was 0.973, the specificity 0.808, the positive predictive value 0.706, and the negative predictive value 0.984. CONCLUSION: With its easy electrode placement and rapid, attractive stimulus, the new system overcomes technical difficulties which were associated with older VEP techniques. The test shows promise as a screening tool for detecting amblyopia and other visual deficits in young children.

Amblyopia↗
PubMed2002

Preschool vision screening in a Swedish city region: results after alteration of criteria for referral to eye clinics.

PURPOSE: To investigate the results of preschool vision screening and to evaluate new referral criteria in a Swedish city region. Prior to 1992, all children with visual acuity (VA) of less than 0.8 at the age of 4 years were referred to an eye clinic. Since 1992, those with slightly reduced VA (0.65 in each eye or 0.65 in one eye and 0.8 in the other) have been retested at 5.5 years of age and referred if their VA is less than 0.8. METHODS: In a prospective study, the results of vision testing were collected for all children (n = 483) born in 1989-92 inclusive and registered at one child health centre at 4 years of age. The study also involved 123 other children scheduled for retesting at the age of 5.5 years. The results of the examinations and treatments at the eye clinic are evaluated. RESULTS: Few of the children with slightly reduced VA who were retested at the age of 5.5 years had visual defects that required treatment. In those who were treated, the results of treatment were good. CONCLUSIONS: The new screening criteria appear to be appropriate and are recommended.

Amblyopia↗
PubMed1993

Colour vision screening in children: an evaluation of three pseudoisochromatic tests.

We examined 513 children (258 boys and 255 girls), between 3 and 11 years of age, with three pseudoisochromatic tests which involve different visual tasks. These were a selection of numeral designs from the Ishihara test, the Ishihara test for Unlettered Persons and the Velhagen Pfügertrident test. Eighteen children were found to be colour deficient. The symbol designs of the Unlettered Persons test were found to be the quickest and most effective method for examining children under 7 years of age. After 7 years of age the symbol designs of the Unlettered test and the numeral designs of Ishihara test were equally effective. The preferred numeral designs for screening children with the Ishihara plates are listed. Verbal identification always produced the most accurate results. Drawing over the figures or selecting replicas increased the viewing time and assisted children with normal colour vision to see both figures in transformation designs, especially pathway designs. The Velhagen Pfügertrident test was found to be unreliable for colour vision screening and younger children had difficulty performing the figure matching task.

Age Factors↗
PubMed1993

Retrospective evaluation of alternative vision screening criteria for older and younger drivers.

Visual examinations of 12,400 drivers in Pennsylvania were conducted at the time of their license renewal. Static binocular tests of visual acuity, horizontal visual field, and contrast sensitivity at varying spatial frequencies were given to license renewal operators who were unaware that their vision would be tested when they arrived at a facility where license photographs are processed. Examination results were correlated with involvement in selected crash categories over a 3.67-year period, taking (self-reported) mileage into account. Neither visual acuity nor horizontal visual field measures in isolation were significantly related to crash involvement. The combination of visual acuity, horizontal visual fields, and broad contrast sensitivity criteria was significantly related to increasing crash involvement for drivers aged 66-75 and 76 and over. The implications of including contrast sensitivity measures in driver vision screening protocols are considered.

Accident Prevention↗
PubMed1978

Comparison of vision screening performed by optometrists and nurses.

The rates of patient referral by optometrists and nurses working independently and conjointly in vision screening of schoolchildren are compared. Very few studies in the literature have examined the difference in referral rate; this difference is important because of the shortage of qualified manpower to screen the large number of children in the present school population. The study determined that the nurses correctly referred a greater percentage of children following an educational program and collaboration with the optometrist, but this increase in referral was not statistically significant.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Use of photoscreening for children's vision screening.

This statement asserts that all children should be screened for risk factors associated with amblyopia. Guidelines are suggested for the use of photoscreening as a technique for the detection of amblyopia and strabismus in children of various age groups. The American Academy of Pediatrics favors additional research of the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of photoscreening as a vision screening tool.

Amblyopia↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Small-target random dot stereogram and binocular suppression testing for preschool vision screening.

BACKGROUND: New, small-target (< 1 degree) random dot stereogram (STRDS) and binocular suppression (STBS) tests appropriate for preschool vision screening were developed to correct the shortcomings of previous such tests, particularly missed cases of anisometropic amblyopia such as found with some RDS-based testing. METHODS: In Experiment 1, the tests were administered to 14 patients with current or a recent history of moderate (< or = 20/60) anisometropic amblyopia, or with accommodative esotropia or monofixation syndrome. All subjects had good binocularity (< or = 100" contour stereoacuity). In Experiment 2, the new tests were administered in a screening setting to a group of 112 three- to five-year-olds to determine testability. Visual acuity, cover testing, and photoscreening were administered as control measures. RESULTS: In Experiment 1, eleven of the 14 patients failed both tests. Two anisometropic amblyopes passing one or both tests had an acuity < or = 20/30 in the worse eye and < or = 25" stereoacuity. Three anisometropic amblyopia patients failing the STRDS passed another RDS test with similar disparity but a larger target size, confirming a report34 that anisometropic amblyopes may pass RDS testing with parafoveal stereopsis despite the presence of central suppression. The STRDS and STBS tests indicated 80% and 96% specificity, respectively, with the original methodologies; STRDS specificity increased to 95% with retesting with a different methodology. Administration time was 30 sec to 60 sec per test. CONCLUSION: Small-target RDS or suppression testing may be more effective for strabismus and amblyopia screening of preschoolers than previous RDS test formats.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1990

Random dot stereogram E in vision screening of children.

The random dot stereogram E (RDE) has been shown to be a simple and effective test for the detection of binocular abnormalities and defective visual acuity in children. We determined the validity of the RDE as a screening test for reduced visual acuity, amblyopia and strabismus in two separate populations of children. A nonselective group of 100 school children (aged 5 to 15 years) who presented consecutively to the ophthalmology department at Auckland Public Hospital were tested with the RDE. All cases of amblyopia and strabismus were detected by the RDE. Similar screening with the RDE test of 168 preschool children (aged three to four years) in the community resulted in an unacceptably high over-referral rate. The test was unreliable in the preschool age group because of difficulty in distinguishing between test failure and non-cooperation with the test. The low positive predictive value of the test in the younger age group suggests the test to be unsuitable for preschool vision screening.

Adolescent↗