PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “outcomes”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 163 records · Page 9Linked to original sources

How do I judge my outcome when I do not know the outcome of others? The psychology of the fair process effect.

On the basis of fairness heuristic theory, the authors provide an explanation of the frequently replicated fair process effect (the finding that perceived procedural fairness positively affects how people react to outcomes). The authors argue that, in many situations, people may find it difficult to assess whether their outcome is fair or unfair and satisfying or unsatisfying because they only have information about their own outcome and they do not know the outcomes of others and that, in these situations, people use the fairness of the procedure as a heuristic substitute to assess how to judge their outcome. The results of 2 experiments corroborate the authors' line of reasoning. Findings are discussed in terms of recent developments toward an integration of the procedural and distributive justice domains.

Adult↗

Self-esteem and outcome fairness: differential importance of procedural and outcome considerations.

Results of a survey of 222 detainees in Dutch jails and police stations showed that outcome-fairness judgments of individuals with high self-esteem were more strongly related to outcome considerations than to procedural considerations, whereas outcome-fairness judgments of individuals with low self-esteem were more strongly related to procedural considerations than to outcome considerations. It was proposed that these differences were due to the fact that (a) procedures more strongly express a social evaluation than outcomes and (b) individuals with low self-esteem are more concerned with social evaluations than individuals with high self-esteem. The implications of the results for other individual-differences factors and other populations than detainees are discussed.

Adult↗

Outcomes of social care for adults: attitudes towards collecting outcome information in practice.

This paper discusses the findings of three studies of perspectives on social care outcomes undertaken by the Social Policy Research Unit (SPRU) at the University of York. The findings are related to conceptual and policy issues relevant to the idea of using outcome information in assessing performance. Respondents were managers in social services, academics, and organizations of disabled people, older people and carers. People gave their views on why outcomes were important, and what they perceived as the obstacles to implementing ways of looking at outcomes in routine or regular practice in social care. In principle, attitudes towards the collection and use of outcome information were overwhelmingly positive: results for service users and carers were at the heart of 'authentic' ideas of effectiveness, and were potentially of value in improving accountability and informing the decisions and activities of both purchasers and providers. However, a number of obstacles to implementing practical systems were identified including conceptual and technical issues, professional and organizational culture, resource constraints and the emphasis on assessment at the expense of review.

Journal Article↗

Simple assessment of outcome after acute brain injury using the Glasgow Outcome Scale.

To evaluate alternative methods of determining Glasgow Outcome Scale scores, a postal survey was made of 288 general practitioners and 128 relatives of patients who had sustained acute brain injuries 5-7 years previously. The Glasgow Outcome Scale score from the general practitioner and relative were compared with that calculated from questionnaire information by an experienced rater. There was poor agreement between general practitioner and rater (K = 0.17) and relative and rater (K = 0.35) scores. Both general practitioners and relatives indicated more favourable outcomes than the rater, with a higher level of agreement (K = 0.61) between them. When Glasgow Outcome Scale scores are used, the methods employed should be valid and reliable; failure to ensure this may be responsible for a considerable proportion of variability in reported studies of brain injury outcome.

Acute Disease↗

Psychosocial outcome risk indicator: predicting psychosocial outcome following traumatic brain injury.

This study examines the outcome of 29 individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and 23 of their respective significant others, 12 months after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation services, as a means of determining the validity of a measure developed to predict psychosocial outcome. This measure consists of 18 questions that examine 12 factors and requires the rater to make a judgement about the likely impact each factor would have on the individual with TBI and significant other. Results indicate that the social work raters accurately predicted outcome according to the factors contained in the measure. Scores on the measure at discharge were also found to be associated with general psychological distress, anxiety and insomnia, depression, family functioning, and the problems related to emotion and behaviour. Although the sample size was small, there is an indication that the devised measure is useful in predicting outcome and so has clinical value in identifying adults at greatest risk of poor psychosocial outcome after a traumatic brain injury.

Adolescent↗

Etiologic fraction analysis for continuously distributed outcome variables and empirical analogy with dichotomized outcome variables.

BACKGROUND: It is not clear from the published literature whether R2 estimated from linear regression models for continuously distributed outcome variables is analogous to the etiologic fraction for dichotomized outcome variables. This article attempts to address this issue. METHOD: Continuous and dichotomous outcomes of the same underlying attributes (gestational age and fetal growth) were compared using data from a recent study of birthweight distributions in ethnic Caucasian infants. RESULTS: The relative magnitudes of the etiologic fraction and R2 were quite similar for the same underlying attributes. For example, R2 and etiologic fraction for weight gain rate ranked 2 and 3, respectively, for fetal growth and ranked 4.5 and 5, respectively, for gestational duration. CONCLUSIONS: R2 estimated from linear regression models for continuously distributed outcome variables appears analogous to the etiologic fraction for dichotomized outcome variables. If due consideration is given to the underlying biological mechanisms of the studied attributes, R2 can be used as a measure of public health impact.

Birth Weight↗

RN staffing time and outcomes of long-stay nursing home residents: pressure ulcers and other adverse outcomes are less likely as RNs spend more time on direct patient care.

OBJECTIVE: A clear link has been demonstrated between lower nurse staffing levels in hospitals and adverse patient outcomes, but the results of studies of such relationships in long-term care facilities haven't been as clear. This study explored the time nurses spent in direct care and how it affected outcomes in long-stay (two weeks or longer) nursing home residents. METHODS: In a retrospective study of data collected as part of the National Pressure Ulcer Long-Term Study (NPULS), we analyzed data on 1,376 residents of 82 long-term care facilities whose lengths of stay were 14 days or longer, who were at risk of developing pressure ulcers but had none at study entry, and who had a Braden Scale score of 17 or less. Primary data came from residents' medical records during 12-week periods in 1996 and 1997. Dependent variables included development of pressure ulcer or urinary tract infection (UTI), weight loss, deterioration in the ability to perform activities of daily living (ADLs), and hospitalization. Independent variables included resident demographics, severity of illness, nutritional and incontinence interventions, medications, and nurse staffing time. RESULTS: More RN direct care time per resident per day (examined in 10-minute increments up to 30 to 40 minutes per resident per day) was associated with fewer pressure ulcers, hospitalizations, and UTIs; less weight loss, catheterization, and deterioration in the ability to perform ADLs; and greater use of oral standard medical nutritional supplements. More certified nursing assistant and licensed practical nurse time was associated with fewer pressure ulcers but did not improve other outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The researchers controlled for important variables in long-stay nursing home residents at risk for pressure ulcers and found that more RN direct care time per resident per day was strongly associated with better outcomes. There's an urgent need for further research to confirm these findings and, if confirmed, for improving RN staffing in nursing homes to decrease avoidable adverse outcomes and suffering.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Brief scale for measuring the outcomes of emotional and behavioural disorders in children. Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for children and Adolescents (HoNOSCA).

BACKGROUND: Following the development of a child and adolescent version of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOSCA), field trials were conducted to assess their feasibility and acceptability in routine outcome measurement. AIMS: To evaluate the reliability, validity and acceptability of HoNOSCA in routine outcome measurement. METHOD: Following training, 36 field sites provided ratings on 1276 cases at one time point and outcome data on 906. Acceptability was assessed by way of written feedback and at a debriefing meeting. RESULTS: HoNOSCA demonstrated satisfactory reliability and validity characteristics. It was sensitive to change and its ability to measure change accorded with the clinicians' independent rating. HoNOSCA was reasonably acceptable to clinicians' from a range of disciplines and services. CONCLUSIONS: Provided that training needs can be met, HoNOSCA represents a satisfactory brief outcome measure which could be used routinely in child and adolescent mental health services.

Child↗

Effects of ramipril on cardiovascular and microvascular outcomes in people with diabetes mellitus: results of the HOPE study and MICRO-HOPE substudy. Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus is a strong risk factor for cardiovascular and renal disease. We investigated whether the angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitor ramipril can lower these risks in patients with diabetes. METHODS: 3577 people with diabetes included in the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation study, aged 55 years or older, who had a previous cardiovascular event or at least one other cardiovascular risk factor, no clinical proteinuria, heart failure, or low ejection fraction, and who were not taking ACE inhibitors, were randomly assigned ramipril (10 mg/day) or placebo, and vitamin E or placebo, according to a two-by-two factorial design. The combined primary outcome was myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death. Overt nephropathy was a main outcome in a substudy. FINDINGS: The study was stopped 6 months early (after 4.5 years) by the independent data safety and monitoring board because of a consistent benefit of ramipril compared with placebo. Ramipril lowered the risk of the combined primary outcome by 25% (95% CI 12-36, p=0.0004), myocardial infarction by 22% (6-36), stroke by 33% (10-50), cardiovascular death by 37% (21-51), total mortality by 24% (8-37), revascularisation by 17% (2-30), and overt nephropathy by 24% (3-40, p=0.027). After adjustment for the changes in systolic (2.4 mm Hg) and diastolic (1.0 mm Hg) blood pressures, ramipril still lowered the risk of the combined primary outcome by 25% (12-36, p=0.0004). INTERPRETATION: Ramipril was beneficial for cardiovascular events and overt nephropathy in people with diabetes. The cardiovascular benefit was greater than that attributable to the decrease in blood pressure. This treatment represents a vasculoprotective and renoprotective effect for people with diabetes.

Aged↗

Processes and outcomes of care for patients with community-acquired pneumonia: results from the Pneumonia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT) cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Although understanding the processes of care and medical outcomes for patients with community-acquired pneumonia is instrumental to improving the quality and cost-effectiveness of care for this illness, limited information is available on how physicians manage patients with this illness or on medical outcomes other than short-term mortality. OBJECTIVES: To describe the processes of care and to assess a broad range of medical outcomes for ambulatory and hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia. METHODS: This prospective, observational study was conducted at 4 hospitals and 1 health maintenance organization in Pittsburgh, Pa, Boston, Mass, and Halifax, Nova Scotia. Data were collected via patient interviews and reviews of medical records for 944 outpatients and 1343 inpatients with clinical and radiographic evidence of community-acquired pneumonia. Processes of care and medical outcomes were assessed 30 days after presentation. RESULTS: Only 29.7% of outpatients had 1 or more microbiologic tests performed, and only 5.7% had an assigned microbiologic cause. Although 95.7% of inpatients had 1 or more microbiologic tests performed, a cause was established in only 29.6%. Six outpatients (0.6%) died, and 3 of these deaths were pneumonia related. Of surviving outpatients, 8.0% had 1 or more medical complications. At 30 days, 88.9% (nonemployed) to 95.6% (employed) of the surviving outpatients had returned to usual activities, yet 76.0% of outpatients had 1 or more persisting pneumonia-related symptoms. Overall, 107 inpatients (8.0%) died, and 81 of these deaths were pneumonia related. Most surviving inpatients (69.0%) had 1 or more medical complications. At 30 days, 57.3% (non-employed) to 82.0% (employed) of surviving inpatients had returned to usual activities, and 86.1% had 1 or more persisting pneumonia-related symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, conducted primarily at hospital sites with affiliated medical education training programs, virtually all outpatients and most inpatients had pneumonia of unknown cause. Although outpatients had an excellent prognosis, pneumonia-related symptoms often persisted at 30 days. Inpatients had substantial mortality, morbidity, and pneumonia-related symptoms at 30 days.

Adult↗

The Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite Measure (MSFC): an integrated approach to MS clinical outcome assessment. National MS Society Clinical Outcomes Assessment Task Force.

Clinical outcome assessment in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is challenging due to the diversity and fluctuating nature of MS symptoms. Traditional clinical scales such as the EDSS are inadequate in their assessment of key clinical dimensions of MS (e.g. , cognitive function), and they have psychometric limitations as well. Based on analyses of pooled data from natural history studies and from placebo groups in clinical trials, the National MS Society's Clinical Outcomes Assessment Task Force recently proposed a new multidimensional clinical outcome measure, the MS Functional Composite (MSFC). The MSFC comprises quantitative functional measures of three key clinical dimensions of MS: leg function/ambulation, arm/hand function, and cognitive function. Scores on component measures are converted to standard scores (z-scores), which are averaged to form a single MSFC score. Preliminary analyses confirm that: (1) the three clinical dimensions of the MSFC are relatively independent; (2) the MSFC is sensitive to clinical changes over 1- and 2-year intervals; and (3) the MSFC has acceptable criterion validity (i.e., predicts both concurrent and subsequent EDSS change). The advantages and potential limitations of incorporating quantitative functional outcome measures such as the MSFC into collaborative databases are discussed.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

Measuring outcome in community-based rehabilitation services for people who have suffered traumatic brain injury: the Community Outcome Scale.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a way of measuring long-term outcomes after traumatic brain injury (TBI) that takes account of individual circumstances. DESIGN: Reports by head-injured people and their families about problems and coping strategies were elicited via semi-structured interviews. Specially designed computer software was used to record problems and strengths and to measure their impact for the individual on four handicap dimensions. SETTING: Interviews took place in the respondents' homes. SUBJECTS: Between 1992 and 1997 the services at 10 rehabilitation centres in England were evaluated. Subjects were men and women aged between 16 and 65 who had suffered TBI and who had been referred for treatment to one of the centres under study. INTERVENTIONS: Head-injured people and their families were interviewed three months, 18 months and in some cases 36 months after recruitment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD) and the Functional Independence/Assessment Measure (FIM/FAM) were used to validate relevant dimensions of the new scale. RESULTS: A measure of long-term outcome was developed and called the Community Outcome Scale. Relevant dimensions of the scale showed significant correlation with the HAD and with items of the FIM/FAM. CONCLUSION: The scale captures information which no other instrument does, and merits further validation.

Adolescent↗

The North American Immune Tolerance Registry: practices, outcomes, outcome predictors.

The North American Immune Tolerance Registry was initiated to study of immune tolerance (ITT) in Canada and the United States with respect to: 1) therapeutic regimens in use for haemophilia A (HA) and B (HB) inhibitor patients; 2) therapeutic outcomes; 3) potential predictors of successful outcome and 4) complications of therapy. Data on 188 ITT courses was collected by questionnaire from 60 haemophilia centers from 1993-99. Among the completed courses, the overall success rate was 70% (115/164) for all HA and 31% (5/16) for all HB. Outcome parameters noted to be predictive of ITT success for all HA were 1) pre-ITT induction (p = 0.003), 2) ITT peak (p = 0.007) and 3) historical pre ITT peak (p = 0.04) inhibitor titres. An inverse correlation between total daily dose (units/kg/day) and success: (80% with under 50; 71% with 50-99; 73% with 100-199; and 41% with > or = 200, p = 0.01) was found. Outcome predictors were not evaluable for HB, although adverse reactions to therapy, including nephrotic syndrome, and access complications were more common among failed courses. Infection most often complicated the use of access catheters. These results are discussed within the context of the international ITT registry and upcoming prospective ITT study.

Canada↗

Results of a multi-institutional outcome assessment: results of a structured peer review of TRISS-designated unexpected outcomes.

The utility of TRISS as a component of trauma center quality assurance (QA) was evaluated. TRISS survival probabilities were estimated for a total of 2,023 consecutive trauma patients admitted to three level-I trauma centers during a 6-month period. A structured peer review was performed of the 50 patients (2.1%) having statistically unexpected outcomes. For 23 (18 survivors, five deaths) TRISS-designated outcomes were sustained in peer review. In 27 cases (one survivor, 26 deaths) TRISS-designated outcomes were not sustained by peer review and TRISS. Limitations were identified in each case. Peer review of unexpected outcomes identified by TRISS provided a consistent and objective QA methodology. An understanding of TRISS as an objective component of the trauma center QA process is essential in blending it with what is, at present, a largely subjective process in many hospitals. Use of TRISS standardizes the peer review process, resulting in a more reliable base for development and improvement of trauma center QA programs.

Adolescent↗

Surgeon and hospital characteristics as predictors of major adverse outcomes following colon cancer surgery: understanding the volume-outcome relationship.

HYPOTHESIS: Although numerous studies have demonstrated an association between surgical volume and improved outcome in cancer surgery, the specific structures and mechanisms of care that are associated with volume and lead to improved outcomes remain poorly defined. We hypothesize that there are modifiable surgeon and hospital characteristics that explain observed volume-outcome relationships. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer registry areas. PATIENTS: Patients aged 66 years and older, diagnosed and surgically treated for stage I, II, or III colon cancer between 1992 and 1996 (n = 22 672). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Thirty-day postoperative mortality and 30-day postoperative procedural interventions, including reoperation and image-guided percutaneous procedures. RESULTS: Surgeon volume, but not hospital volume, is a significant predictor of postoperative procedural intervention (adjusted odds ratio for very high-volume surgeons vs low-volume surgeons, 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-0.98). In the unadjusted analyses, high hospital volume (odds ratio, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.56-0.81) and very high hospital volume (odds ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-0.79) is associated with lower postoperative mortality. Postoperative procedural intervention is not a significant mediator of the relationship between hospital volume and mortality. A single variable-the presence of sophisticated clinical services-was the most important explanatory variable underlying the relationship between hospital volume and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Very high surgeon volume is associated with a reduction in surgical complications. However, the association between increasing hospital volume and postoperative mortality appears to derive mainly from a full spectrum of clinical services that may facilitate the prompt recognition and treatment of complications.

Adenocarcinoma↗

A comparison of one-sided methods to identify significant individual outcomes in a multiple outcome setting: stepwise tests or global tests with closed testing.

We compare two approaches to the identification of individual significant outcomes when a comparison of two groups involves multiple outcome variables. The approaches are all designed to control the familywise error rate (FWE) with any subset of the null hypothesis being true (in the strong sense). The first approach is initially to use a global test of the overall hypothesis that the groups are equivalent for all variables, followed by an application of the closed testing algorithm of Marcus, Peritz and Gabriel. The global tests considered here are ordinary least squares (OLS), generalized least squares (GLS), an approximation to a likelihood ratio test (ALR), and a new test based on an approximation to the most powerful similar test for simple alternatives. The second approach is that of stepwise testing, which tests the univariate hypotheses in a specific order with appropriate adjustment to the univariate p-values for multiplicity. The stepwise tests considered include both step-down and step-up tests of a general type, and likewise permutation tests that incorporate the dependence structure of the data. We illustrate the tests with two examples of birth outcomes: a comparison of cocaine-exposed new-borns to control new-borns on neurobehavioural and physical growth variables, and, in a separate study, a comparison of babies born to diabetic mothers and babies born to non-diabetic mothers on minor malformations. After describing the methods and analysing the birth outcome data, we use simulations on Gaussian data to provide guidelines for the use of these procedures in terms of power and computation.

Adult↗

Validation of a behavioral health treatment outcome and assessment tool designed for naturalistic settings: The Treatment Outcome Package.

In 1994, the American Psychological Association and the Society for Psychotherapy Research convened a Core Battery Conference to develop a set of criteria for the selection of a universal core battery that could be used as a common outcome tool across all outcome studies. The Treatment Outcome Package (TOP) is a behavioral health assessment and outcome battery with modules for assessing a wide array of behavioral health symptoms and functioning, demographics, case-mix, and treatment satisfaction. It was developed to follow the design specifications set forth by the Core Battery Conference, but also to ensure the battery's applicability to naturalistic treatment settings in which randomization may be impossible. In this article we discuss a number of studies that evaluate the initial psychometrics of the items that comprise the mental health symptom and functional modules of the TOP. We conclude that the TOP has an excellent factor structure, good test-retest reliability, promising initial convergent and discriminant validity, measures the full range of pathology on each scale, and has some ability to distinguish between behavioral health clients and members of the general population.

Adult↗

Acute subdural hematoma: outcome and outcome prediction.

Patients with traumatic acute subdural hematoma were studied to determine the factors influencing outcome. Between January 1986 and August 1995, we collected 113 patients who underwent craniotomy for traumatic acute subdural hematoma. The relationship between initial clinical signs and the outcome 3 months after admission was studied retrospectively. Functional recovery was achieved in 38% of patients and the mortality was 60%. 91% of patients with a high Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score (9-15) and 23% of patients with a low GCS score (3-8) achieved functional recovery. All of 14 patients with a GCS score of 3 died. The mortality of patients with GCS scores of 4 and 5 was 95% to 75%, respectively. Patients over 61 years old had a mortality of 73% compared to 64% mortality for those aged 21-40 years. 97% of patients with bilateral unreactive pupil and 81% of patients with unilateral unreactive pupil died. The mortality rates of associated intracranial lesions were 91% in intracerebral hematoma, 87% in subarachnoid hemorrhage, 75% in contusion. Time from injury to surgical evacuation and type of surgical intervention did not affect mortality. Age and associated intracranial lesions were related to outcome. Severity of injury and pupillary response were the most important factors for predicting outcome.

Acute Disease↗