PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “vancomycin”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 163 records · Page 9Linked to original sources
PubMed2003

Vancomycin use in hospitalized pediatric patients.

OBJECTIVES: To assess vancomycin utilization at children's hospitals, to determine risk factors for vancomycin use and length of therapy, and to facilitate adapting recommendations to optimize vancomycin prescribing practices in pediatric patients. METHODS: Two surveys were conducted at Pediatric Prevention Network hospitals. The first (Survey I) evaluated vancomycin control programs. The second (Survey II) prospectively reviewed individual patient records. Each hospital was asked to complete questionnaires on 25 consecutive patients or all patients for whom vancomycin was prescribed during a 1-month period. RESULTS: In Survey I, 55 of 65 (85%) hospitals reported their vancomycin control policies. Three quarters had specific policies in place to restrict vancomycin use. One half had at least 3 vancomycin restriction measures. In Survey II, personnel at 22 hospitals reviewed 416 vancomycin courses, with 2 to 25 (median = 12) patients tracked per hospital. Eighty-two percent of the vancomycin prescribed was for treatment of neonatal sepsis, fever/neutropenia, fever of unknown origin, positive blood culture, pneumonia, or meningitis. In an additional 6% (26/416), vancomycin was prescribed for patients with beta-lactam allergies and in 13% (56/416) for prophylaxis. Median duration of prophylaxis was 2 days (range: 1-15 days). Almost half (196, 47%) of the patients who received vancomycin were in intensive care units; 27% of the vancomycin courses were initiated by neonatologists and 19% by hematologists/oncologists. The predominant risk factor at the time of vancomycin initiation was the presence of vascular catheters (322, 77%); other host factors included cancer chemotherapy (55, 13%), transplant (30, 7%), shock (24, 6%), other immunosuppressant therapy (17, 4%), or hyposplenic state (2, <1%). Other clinical considerations were severity of illness (96, 23%), uncertainty about diagnosis (51, 12%), patient not responding to current antibiotic therapy (40, 10%), or implant infection (13, 3%). When vancomycin was initiated, blood cultures were positive in 85 patients (20%); cultures from other sites were positive in 45 (11%), and Gram stains of body fluids were positive in 37 (9%). In 29 (7%) patients, organisms sensitive only to vancomycin were isolated before vancomycin initiation. Reasons for discontinuing vancomycin included: therapeutic course completed (125, 30%), negative cultures (106, 25%), alternative antibiotics initiated (75, 18%), illness resolved (14, 3%), or patient expired (13, 3%). Final results of blood culture isolates resistant to beta-lactam antibiotics included 48 coagulase-negative staphylococcus, 5 Staphylococcus aureus, and 10 other species. CONCLUSIONS: At children's hospitals, vancomycin is initiated for therapy in patients who have vascular catheters and compromised host factors. Only 7% had laboratory-confirmed beta-lactam-resistant organisms isolated at the time vancomycin was prescribed. Efforts to modify empiric vancomycin use in children's hospitals should be targeted at intensivists, neonatologists, and hematologists. Initiatives to decrease length of therapy by decreasing the number of surgical prophylaxis doses and days of therapy before laboratory results may decrease vancomycin exposure.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed1996

In-vivo activity and pharmacodynamics of cefotaxime in combination with vancomycin in fibrin clots infected with highly penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae.

We studied the antipneumococcal efficacy of cefotaxime and vancomycin alone and a combination of cefotaxime with various dosages of vancomycin in the treatment of prolonged (48 h) experimental fibrin clot infections in rabbits. A clinical pneumococcal strain for which MICs were 2, 0.5 and 0.5 mg/L of penicillin, cefotaxime and vancomycin respectively, was used in this study. Cefotaxime was given iv at a fixed dose of 50 mg/kg and vancomycin iv at 1, 2.5, 5, 10 or 20 mg/kg. Maximal concentrations in clots were (mean +/- S.D.): 2.1 +/- 0.9, 1.1 +/- 0.4, 1.9 +/- 1, 2.3 +/- 1.5, 3.6 +/- 0.4 and 4 +/- 0.3 mg/g, respectively. The mean half-lives of elimination from clots were 2.2 h for cefotaxime and 7 h for vancomycin. We observed the highest bacterial reductions for the highest doses of vancomycin with or without cefotaxime. The combination of intermediate doses of vancomycin with cefotaxime led to higher antibacterial effects than either monotherapy. The low dose of vancomycin gave no significant additional effect compared with cefotaxime alone. The times of regrowth were similar for cefotaxime and cefotaxime-vancomycin 1, and also for vancomycin 10 and vancomycin 20 with or without cefotaxime but were significantly delayed for the combination cefotaxime-vancomycin 2.5 and cefotaxime-vancomycin 5 as compared with vancomycin 2.5 and vancomycin 5. By using a multivariate analysis, we demonstrated that the most important parameters were Cmax (r = 0.43) and AUC (r = 0.58) for cefotaxime alone and Cmax (r = 0.70) for vancomycin alone; none of the tested parameters was found to be significantly correlated with the efficacy of the combinations of cefotaxime and vancomycin. From these findings, and under the experimental conditions used (i.e., relatively low concentrations of cefotaxime), we demonstrated that the in-vivo antibacterial efficacy of the combination of cefotaxime and vancomycin was higher than each monotherapy when the local concentrations of vancomycin were at least 1.9 mg/L.

Analysis of Variance↗