PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Form Perception”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,621 records · Page 90Linked to original sources

PET studies of parietal involvement in spatial attention: comparison of different task types.

Five experiments are described that concern the mechanisms that direct attention to spatial and non-spatial features of a stimulus and the effects that attention has on the visual system's analysis of that stimulus. Shifts of attention from one spatial location to another activated the superior parietal lobe and this activation was fairly independent of the task performed on the attended object, the response made to the attended object, and whether the shift of attention was controlled endogenously or exogenously. Maintaining attention tonically on a location or a particular visual feature such as shape, colour or motion did not produce a superior parietal response. Tonic attention to a feature (colour, shape, motion) or location, however, did produce enhancements in the response of various regions that are probably specialized for processing the attended visual feature. The activation of superior parietal cortex during shifts of spatial attention as well as the activation of parietal-occipital cortex when attention is tonically maintained on a location suggest that the parietal cortex plays an important role in spatial computations.

Animals↗

Stimulus modality and stimulus-response compatibility in absolute identification.

Accuracy and response time (RT) were measured in the absolute identification (AI) of 10 unidimensional perfectly pairwise discriminable stimuli. One group of 20 subjects performed a visual AI task involving line segments of variable length. A second group of 20 subjects participated in an auditory task with the stimuli composed of pure tones of variable intensity. Subjects performed the task under two conditions: a spatially compatible and a spatially incompatible stimulus-response mapping. Results showed greater accuracy for the visual modality and longer RT for the incompatible mapping. The experimental factors did not substantially alter the bowing observed when performance was plotted according to the ordinal position of the stimuli. The data do not support the hypothesis that the bow effect is attributable to motor programming or motor adjustment stages.

Acoustic Stimulation↗