PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “THROMBOPLASTIN”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,675 records · Page 93Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

Optimal dosing of subcutaneous unfractionated heparin for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis.

Twice-daily, inpatient, subcutaneous unfractionated heparin is at least as effective and safe as continuous intravenous unfractionated heparin for the treatment of acute deep vein thrombosis. Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin therefore may be suitable for outpatient treatment of deep vein thrombosis. The purpose of this study was to develop a dosing nomogram for a dose each 12 hours (2 doses per day) 12-hourly subcutaneous unfractionated heparin that is suitable for outpatient treatment of acute deep vein thrombosis. A cohort study was performed in patients with acute deep vein thrombosis in two phases. In both phases, the first subcutaneous loading dose of unfractionated heparin was 317 U/kg, and the second dose was 231 U/kg. The activated partial thromboplastin time was measured daily, 6 hours after the morning injection, and subsequent doses of unfractionated heparin were adjusted according to a nomogram, which was modified for phase II. Warfarin was started with unfractionated heparin. In phase I (14 outpatients), activated partial thromboplastin time results were frequently subtherapeutic (9:14) the day after starting unfractionated heparin (day 1), and were frequently supratherapeutic (27:40) after the first 2 days of unfractionated heparin therapy. In phase II (21 patients), to explain the frequently subtherapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time results that were obtained on day 1, the activated partial thromboplastin time results were measured after the initial loading dose. Mean activated partial thromboplastin time results of 86 and 61 seconds were obtained 6 and 12 hours after this dose, suggesting that 317 U/kg is a suitable subcutaneous loading dose. In contrast to phase I, in phase II, unfractionated heparin dose was not increased on day 1 in response to a low activated partial thromboplastin time result. This reduced the frequency of supratherapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time results during the early days of therapy without increasing the frequency of subtherapeutic results. Warfarin therapy had a substantal effect on the activated partial thromboplastin time that appeared to account for a high frequency of supratherapeutic results during the later days of unfractionated heparin therapy; the activated partial thromboplastin time increased by 20 seconds (95% CI, 14-27 seconds) with each increase in the International Normalized Ratio of 1.0. We had limited success at developing a dosing nomogram for subcutaneous unfractionated heparin that reliably achieved activated partial thromboplastin time results within the therapeutic range. However, as oral anticoagulants directly increased activated partial thromboplastin time results, we suggest that adjusting unfractionated heparin dose to achieve prespecified activated partial thromboplastin time results may not be appropriate in patients who are receiving concomitant warfarin therapy.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1999

Standardization of coagulation tests.

A lot of attempts have been made to standardise both activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and prothrombin time (PT). Only the standardization of PT has been successfully implemented while the standardization of APTT is still underway. The PT test is a common method for monitoring oral anticoagulant therapy. Owing to the variable response of the thromboplastins and the different ways of reporting, PT results obtained from patients treated with oral anticoagulants have not been interchangeable between laboratories. In 1977, the World Health Organization (WHO) designed a batch of human brain thromboplastin as the first international reference preparation (IRP) for thromboplastin and a calibration system was proposed in 1982, based on the assumption that a linear relationship exists between the logarithm of the PT obtained with the IRP and test thromboplastins. This calibration model is used to standardize the reporting of the PT by converting the PT ratio observed with the local thromboplastin into an International Normalized Ratio (INR). The INR system is being adopted by an increasing number of hospitals in many countries. With the increasing use of the INR system, a number of problems have been identified with the INR system. The most serious one is that the ISI of a thromboplastin depends on the coagulometer used. Besides, a number of investigators have noted that the ISI value provided by the manufacturer for each new batch of thromboplastin reagent may be incorrect and the use of inappropriate control plasma can lead to erroneous INR calculations. Four solutions have been proposed to solve the problems of the INR system as follows: (a) the local system calibration with lyophilized plasma calibrants with assigned manual PT determined in terms of the relevant IRP for thromboplastin; (b) the use of a mean normal prothrombin time (MNPT) obtained with the coagulometer to derive the prothrombin ratio: (c) PT standardization by means of the procedure using plasma calibrants: and (d) selection of sensitive thromboplastin with low ISI values. The INR system has been adopted in Thailand since 1984. There are 3 steps in the implementation as follows: (a) preparation of National Reference Thromboplastin; (b) selection of high sensitive thromboplastin; and (c) optimal therapeutic range for Thai patients. The anticoagulant effect of heparin is usually monitored by the APTT, a test that is sensitive to the inhibitory effects of heparin on thrombin, factor Xa. and factor IXa. However, the type of clot detection system, the contact activator; and the phospholipid composition of the reagent affect the APTT response. In 1995. ISTH/ICSH proposed a calibration model for APTT standardization. As the problem showed a great similarity to PT standardization, the same model of calibration was applied but no international reference preparation for the APTT is yet available. In 1998. van den Besselaar et al proposed a lyophilized APTT reagent comprising synthetic phospholipids and colloidal silica as a candidate IRP for the APTT.

Anticoagulants↗
PubMed2002

[Prothrombin time and its standardization].

This review regarding prothrombin time and its standardization is described around some recent topics as the followings. 1. History of standardization for prothrombin time and revised WHO guideline for thromboplastin; A short history of standardization is summarized to understand a scheme of International Normalized Ratio (INR) based on International Sensitivity Index (ISI) that is calibrated by International Reference Preparation (IRP) for thromboplastin, and some key points in revised WHO guideline for thromboplastin and plasma used to control oral anticoagulant therapy are interpreted for research and practical use. 2. Point-of-care prothrombin time monitoring; A portable device to measure prothrombin time with whole blood sample, such as CoagChek (Roche), contributes to self-management by patients required long-term oral anticoagulation. Some investigators reported clinical agreement to use this monitoring system and improvement of patient's QOL and cost-effectiveness in overseas. 3. New types of thromboplastins; Two new types of thromboplastins have been available since the last year in Japan. One is a human plain thromboplastin, Simplastin HTF (Bioméreux) from extract of cultured human lung cancer cell, and another is IL test PT-Fibrinogen Recombinant (Iatron) from recombinant rabbit tissue factor relipidated in a synthetic phospholipid blend. For control of oral anticoagulation, good performance are expected in either thromboplastins because of their sufficient low ISI values. 4. INR methodology for other diseases; INR/ISI system is designed as a standardized methodology for control of oral anticoagulation. Prothrombin time, however is utilized as a global coagulation test for diagnosis or criteria of other disorders, such as congenital coagulation factor deficient, severe liver dysfunction and disseminated intravascular coagulation. Previous our study indicated that discrepancy of sensitivities to plasma absorbed multiple coagulation factors and plasma from patients under oral anticoagulation was revealed in rabbit brain thromboplastins, but not in human origins. Discrepancy of sensitivities observed in rabbit thromboplastins was emphasized in convert to INR values. These results suggested that the use of human thromboplastin of which ISI is close to 1.0 leads possibility for introducing INR methodology to evaluate PT of other disorders.

Environmental Monitoring↗
PubMed1992

Reliance on prothrombin time ratios causes significant errors in anticoagulation therapy.

BACKGROUND: The intensity of warfarin anticoagulation in the United States may be inappropriate if the international normalized ratio (INR) is not used, or if the international sensitivity index (ISI) of the thromboplastin is outside the range of 2.2 to 2.6. METHODS: Fifty-three hospital laboratories provided data on the sensitivity of their thromboplastin and whether they reported INR values. Additional data on thromboplastin sensitivity were obtained from 140 laboratories involved in the Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation study. The three major manufacturers of thromboplastin confirmed the range of thromboplastin sensitivity reported by the laboratories. RESULTS: Of 53 laboratories surveyed, 16 (30%) could not provide ISI data and only 11 (21%) reported INR results. Unlabeled thromboplastin was being used by 20% to 24% of laboratories, and only 8% to 20% were using thromboplastins with an ISI of 2.2 to 2.6. At the time the three manufacturers were contacted, they reported marketing thromboplastins with ISI values from 1.2 to 2.8, but none of the thromboplastins at that time had ISI values between 2.2 and 2.6. CONCLUSION: Warfarin therapy in the United States is managed inappropriately because most laboratories do not report INRs and the variability in thromboplastin sensitivity produces misleading prothrombin time ratio results. Additionally, recent research may require reexamination if INR or ISI data were not provided.

Data Collection↗
PubMed1979

Prothrombin time standardization: report of the expert panel on oral anticoagulant control. The International Committee on Thrombosis and Haemostasis, The International Committee for Standardization in Hematology.

In collaborative experiments in 199 laboratories, nine commercial thromboplastins, four thromboplastins held by the National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBS & C), London and the British Comparative Thromboplastin were tested on fresh normal and coumarin plasmas, and on three series of freeze-dried plasmas. One of these was made from coumarin plasmas and the other two were prepared from normal plasmas; in each series, one plasma was normal and the other two represented different degrees of coumarin defect. Each thromboplastin was calibrated against NIBS & C rabbit brain 70/178, from the slope of the line joining the origin to the point of intersection of the mean ratios of coumarin/normal prothrombin times when the ratios obtained with the two thromboplastins on the same fresh plasmas were plotted against each other. From previous evidence, the slopes were calculated which would have been obtained against the NIBS & C "research standard" thromboplastin 67/40, and termed the "calibration constant" of each thromboplastin. Values obtained from the freeze-dried coumarin plasmas gave generally similar results to those from fresh plasmas for all thromboplastins, whereas values from the artificial plasmas agreed with those from fresh plasmas only when similar thromboplastins were being compared. Taking into account the slopes of the calibration lines and the variation between laboratories, precision in obtaining a patient's prothrombin time was similar for all thromboplastins.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1997

Longer aPTT values in healthy children than in adults: no single cause.

We have shown that activated partial thromboplastin time values in children are considerably longer than in adults, but the causes for this observation remained unclear. Therefore, we investigated the correlation between activated partial thromboplastin time values and concentrations of clotting factors, quotients and titers of the tissue thromboplastin inhibition test, and antiphospholipid antibodies in healthy children, children with recurrent infections, and adults. Concentrations of factors VIII, IX, and HMWK were significantly lower in children than in adults. Simple linear regression analysis failed to show a correlation between the concentration of a single clotting factor and the activated partial thromboplastin time values. No significant correlation was found between activated partial thromboplastin time and elevation of the tissue thromboplastin inhibition test quotients or titers, or antiphospholipid antibodies values. The determined activated partial thromboplastin time was best described by a function including all measured coagulation factors. Our study suggests, that no single clotting factor or lupus anticoagulants are responsible for the longer activated partial thromboplastin time in healthy children, but that activated partial thromboplastin prolongation is caused by the combination of several slightly lower clotting factors.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

Importance of platelets in experimental venous thrombosis in the rat.

Venous thrombosis was induced by ligature of the inferior vena cava in rats whose blood was made hypercoagulable by intravenous (IV) administration of tissue thromboplastin. From a dose-response showing that the administration of increasing doses of tissue thromboplastin resulted in a subsequent progressive increase of thrombus weight, two concentrations of tissue thromboplastin were chosen: a high dose (550 microL/kg, IV) where thrombus formation was optimal and a concentration (7 microL/kg, IV) where tissue thromboplastin-hypercoagulability was intermediate. In both experimental conditions, leukopenia provoked by a myelotoxic drug did not influence the development of venous thrombosis. However, after thrombocytopenia induced by an antiplatelet antiserum, a dramatic decrease in thrombus formation was observed in animals that had been pre-challenged with the lower dose of tissue thromboplastin, whereas decrease in platelet count did not affect venous thrombosis under high thrombogenic challenge. When administered orally 2 hours before thrombosis induction, the ticlopidine analogue clopidogrel showed dose-dependent inhibition of thrombus formation in animals that were pre-challenged with a low dose of tissue thromboplastin (ED50 = 7.9 +/- 1.5 mg/kg, orally) but remained ineffective against high tissue thromboplastin-induced venous thrombosis. We further determined the effect of heparin and hirudin, and showed that both of these drugs exhibited a more potent antithrombotic activity after injection of the lower dose of tissue thromboplastin than after injection of a high dose of tissue thromboplastin. Therefore, using our model of stasis and hypercoagulability, platelet activation played a major role in the development of venous thrombosis when the thrombogenitic stimulus was mild.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Establishing a new target range for unfractionated heparin for acute coronary syndromes.

INTRODUCTION: The target activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) range of 1.5 to 2.5 times the control value or 45 to 75 seconds recommended by the ACC/AHA for patients receiving unfractionated heparin (UFH) for acute coronary syndromes (ACS) is vulnerable to variation in test reagents. Rather than use the standard target aPTT range, it has been recommended that each institution establish its own target aPTT range based upon anti-factor Xa heparin levels. As a quality assurance project, we evaluated our institution's therapeutic aPTT range by examining the correlation between aPTTs and anti-factor Xa heparin levels and established a new target aPTT range with a new thromboplastin reagent based upon the therapeutic anti-factor Xa heparin levels. METHODS: Sixty-two plasma samples from 26 consecutive patients receiving UFH for ACS were analyzed. Plasma aPTTs measured with a thromboplastin reagent and a new thromboplastin reagent and anti-factor Xa heparin levels were obtained on each plasma sample. Linear regression analysis was performed to establish a new target aPTT range from corresponding therapeutic anti-factor Xa heparin levels. RESULTS: Thirty-two percent of patients with our institution's target range aPTTs of 61 to 100 seconds had anti-factor Xa heparin levels below 0.35 to 0.7 U/mL while 68% of patients had therapeutic anti-factor Xa heparin levels (positive predictive value = 68%). When the same blood was tested with a new thromboplastin reagent lot, only 9% of patients with target range aPTTs had anti-factor Xa heparin levels below 0.35 U/mL while 91% of patients had therapeutic anti-factor Xa heparin levels (positive predictive value = 91%). The Pearson correlation coefficient ( r ) for the new thromboplastin reagent lot was 0.93. The target aPTT range established with the new thromboplastin reagent lot was 61 to 100 seconds. CONCLUSION: Monitoring aPTTs without standardizing the thromboplastin reagent may not adequately reflect therapeutic heparin levels. Despite apparently target aPTTs, patients treated with UFH may be under-anticoagulated. Our new anti-Xa-adjusted target aPTT range shows an increase in the positive predictive value of aPTTs. Large-scale clinical studies are needed to determine the optimal anti-factor Xa range for ACS patients treated with UFH, with further refinements if glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors are concomitantly used and to show a benefit in clinical outcomes for monitoring plasma heparin levels with anti-factor Xa heparin levels. Institutional standardization of the aPTT is necessary to ensure optimal patient care when changing thromboplastin reagents.

Acute Disease↗