PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “A Private Choice”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2002

The price of choice: private health insurance in Australia.

Private Health Insurance (PHI) is an integral part of the financing of the Australian health care system. PHI is popular and has strong political support because it is perceived to give choice of access and responsiveness. However, in the past increasing premiums have led to a progressive decline in membership. A package of reforms by the Commonwealth Government in support of the private health insurance has reinvigorated the industry over the last three years. Some strategies for achieving a sustainable PHI industry are described. The key challenge is to control claims cost to maintain affordable premiums. Many techniques to do this compromise choice and challenge the very rationale for purchasing the product. Funds and providers will have to establish a new level of relationship to meet this challenge.

Australia↗
PubMed2000

Public deliberation and private choice in genetics and reproduction.

The development of human genetics raises a wide range of important ethical questions for us all. The interpersonal dimension of genetic information in particular means that genetics also poses important challenges to the idea of patient-centredness and autonomy in medicine. How ought practical ethical decisions about the new genetics be made given that we appear, moreover, no longer to be able to appeal to unquestioned traditions and widely shared communitarian values? This paper argues that any coherent ethical approach to these questions must be able both to uphold the moral status of the individual and at the same time recognise the communitarian, interpersonal dimensions both of the world in which we live and of personal autonomy itself. The paper then goes on to propose an approach to the resolution of the ethical questions raised by the use of the new genetics in reproductive choice through the development of a coherent and principled process of public reason and justification oriented towards the support and development of personal autonomy.

Ethics, Medical↗
PubMed2004

[Determinants of elders' choice between private and public health care providers].

OBJECTIVE: Elderly choose between utilizing private or public health care providers based on their socioeconomic, demographic, and epidemiological condition. The purposes of this study was to evaluate how these factors affect the choice of health care provider and to compare the impact of their choice on individual and family income. METHODS: Data from 7,920 elders interviewed in a study of the State Committee for the Elderly of the state of Rio Grande do Sul in 1995 was used to evaluate the impact of elders' gender, age, educational level, individual income, family income, family size, participation in the family total income, and health self-assessment when choosing private or public health care providers. The statistical analysis was carried out using logistic regression. RESULTS: To have access to private health care providers, family income had a much more significant impact than individual income. When family income increased in one minimum wage, the odds of using private providers increased by 20% while it was only 7% when there was a similar increase in individual income. Other variables had also a positive impact: female, age, schooling, and smaller family size. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly choices' on health care depend on the family's needs and resources and not on the individual's condition. Therefore, low-income elderly health is a lower priority in the family and it is disproportionately impaired by reduced family resources and deficiencies of public health care.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

The effect of private insurance access on the choice of GP/specialist and public/private provider in Spain.

This paper sheds light into the investigation of differential patterns of utilisation of physician services by populations subgroups that is emerging in a number of studies. Using Spanish data from the National Health Survey of 1997 we try to explain the distinct role of the type of insurance on the choice between specialists and GPs and its intertwining with the choice between private and public providers. We estimate a two-stages probit to conclude that differences in insurance access is the main determinant of both, the choice of sector and the kind of physician contacted, giving rise to very different patterns of consumption of GP and specialist visits. People with only public insurance go 2.8 times to the GP per one time that they visit a specialist; individuals with duplicate coverage have a ratio of GP/specialist visits equal to 1.4 (the combination being public GP and private specialist) and people with only private insurance access actually have an 'inverted' pattern of visits: they contact specialists more often than GPs. Age, sex and health and public supply characteristics also have a distinct and interesting impact on these choices. Finally, equity concerns based on the implied assumption that specialists care is superior to general practitioner care are discussed.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

2020 healthcare management in Canada: a new model home next door.

The Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada asked whether Medicare is sustainable in its present form. Well, Medicare is not sustainable for at least six reasons. Given a long list of factors, such as Canada's changing dependency ratio, the phenomenon of diminishing returns from increased taxation, competing provincial expenditure needs, low labour and technological productivity in government-funded healthcare, the expectations held by baby boomers, and the evolving value sets of Canadians--Medicare will impoverish Canada within the next couple of decades if not seriously recast. As distasteful as parallel private-pay, private-choice healthcare may be to some policy makers and providers who grew up in the 1960s, the reality of the 2020s will dictate its necessity as a pragmatic solution to a systemic problem.

Canada↗