PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “ACP Ethics Manual”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

American College of Physicians Ethics Manual. Third edition.

Medicine, law, and social values are not static and must be re-examined periodically. This edition of the ACP Ethics Manual covers emerging issues in medical ethics and revisits some old issues. The overview of the evolution of medical ethics, which appeared in previous editions of the Manual, has been eliminated to allow more space for the consideration of today's ethical dilemmas. Other changes include a revised chapter on end-of-life care, discussion of physician-assisted suicide, revised sections on conflicts of interest and on medical risk to the physician and patient, given developments in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), and discussion of sexual contact between physician and patient. A statement on disclosure of errors and a section on care of the physician's family have also been added. The sections on confidential information told by a patient's family or friend to the physician; on physician-pharmaceutical industry relations; on physicians in training; and on the impaired physician have been expanded. Sections on advertising, peer review, and resource allocation have been revised. The literature of biomedical ethics expands at a rate that does not allow a bibliography to remain current, so an exhaustive list of references or suggested readings is not included in this manual. Instead, only cited references are listed.

Codes of Ethics↗

Do actions reported by physicians in training conflict with consensus guidelines on ethics?

OBJECTIVE: To assess the extent to which actions reported by internal medicine trainees conflict with published guidelines on ethics. METHODS: A confidential survey was sent to a random sample (N = 1000) of associate members of the American College of Physicians (ACP). Questions were asked about ethical decision making in areas addressed by the guidelines in the ACP Ethics Manual. Quoted manual guidelines were provided, followed by 55 yes or no questions, such that a yes answer represented an action that conflicted with a guideline. There were two follow-up mailings to nonresponders. RESULTS: Forty percent (n = 397) completed the questionnaire; 17% indicated they were aware of the guidelines on ethics. On average, associates responded yes to 16% of questions where a yes response indicated they have acted outside guidelines on ethics one or more times. The mean number of responses (n = 55) that conflicted with a guideline was 7.6 per person (SD, 4.7 responses; range, 0 to 33 responses). Ninety-eight percent of respondents reported actions falling outside a guideline one or more times and 80% did so four or more times. The most frequently reported reason (965/3219 [30%]) from a list of four choices for acting outside a guideline was "I was aware of the guideline, but this did not represent an ethical dilemma to me." CONCLUSIONS: Few responding ACP associates indicated awareness of the ACP guidelines on ethics. Physicians in training nevertheless reported acting according to the presented guidelines most of the time, although nearly all respondents acted outside a guideline at least once, and some did so many times. Reported behaviors were sometimes inconsistent with consensus ethical standards that apply to internists. Physicians in training need to know more about ethical standards that apply to their own practice and should be aware when their actions deviate from ethical norms. Before acting outside guidelines on ethics, trainees should discuss their conflicts with others, such as attending physicians, clinical ethicists, or hospital ethics committees.

Codes of Ethics↗