SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “ADHD subtypes”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2004

ADHD subtypes: do they differ in their executive functioning profile?

The present study was designed to investigate the hypothesis that children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder combined subtype (ADHD-C) have a generalized executive functioning (EF) [Barkley, R. A. (1997). Behavioural inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: Constructing a unifying theory of AD/HD. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 65-94; Barkley, R. A. (1997). ADHD and the nature of self-control. New York: The Guilford Press]. We tested whether ADHD-C and ADHD inattentive subtype (ADHD-I) can be differentiated from each other on EF measures. We compared 16 normally developing boys with 16 boys with ADHD-C and 16 with ADHD-I on five EF domains. The boys were all matched on age, IQ, and the presence of oppositional defiant disorder (ODD)/conduct disorder (CD). Despite carefully diagnosed groups and methodological controls, the results do not support the EF-hypothesis of ADHD-C. Children with ADHD-C differed from normal controls (NC) on tasks related to inhibition; they did not exhibit EF deficits on all EF tasks. Children with ADHD-C also exhibited deficits on non-EF tasks. Furthermore, the ADHD-C and ADHD-I subtypes did not differ from one another. Neuropsychological findings on the domains under study did not yield evidence for the distinctiveness of ADHD-C and ADHD-I subtypes.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2026

Shared genetic architecture between ADHD and intelligence varies across ADHD subtypes.

BACKGROUND: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a heterogeneous neurodevelopmental condition frequently accompanied by cognitive difficulties. Although previous genetic studies have demonstrated substantial overlap between ADHD and intelligence, most have treated ADHD as a single phenotype. However, whether this shared genetic architecture differs across ADHD subtypes remains unclear. METHODS: We conducted a genome-wide cross-trait analysis integrating large-scale genome-wide association study (GWAS) datasets of overall ADHD, its subtypes-childhood ADHD, persistent ADHD, and late-diagnosed ADHD-and intelligence (total N > 300,000). Genome-wide genetic correlations, polygenic overlap, local genetic correlations, and variant-level associations between ADHD phenotypes and intelligence were evaluated to characterize their shared genetic architecture. Shared variants were identified through cross-trait enrichment analyses and subsequently mapped to genes for functional annotation and gene-set enrichment. Bidirectional associations were evaluated using two-sample Mendelian randomization with sensitivity analyses. Additional GWAS datasets were used to validate the robustness of shared loci by assessing the consistency of effect directions. RESULTS: All ADHD phenotypes showed significant negative genetic correlations with intelligence (rg ranging from -0.3442 to -0.4205). Despite these modest genome-wide correlations, cross-trait analyses revealed substantial genetic overlap, including polygenic overlap, local genetic correlations, and variant-level associations. We identified 184 loci jointly associated with ADHD traits and intelligence, including 64 novel loci, whereas no shared loci were detected for persistent ADHD under the current analysis. Functional annotation revealed biologically distinct enrichment patterns across subtypes: childhood ADHD loci were linked to early neurodevelopmental processes, while late-diagnosed ADHD loci were enriched in synapse-related and neuronal signaling pathways. Mendelian randomization analyses suggested bidirectional associations, with stronger evidence supporting a directional association from intelligence to ADHD risk. Furthermore, these shared loci showed largely consistent effect directions across additional GWAS datasets, providing support for the robustness of the findings. CONCLUSIONS: The shared genetic architecture between ADHD and intelligence varies across ADHD subtypes, highlighting distinct biological pathways underlying cognitive heterogeneity in ADHD. These findings suggest that the relationship between ADHD liability and general cognitive ability is not uniform across ADHD subtypes and may inform future research on risk stratification and early identification in child and adolescent psychiatry.

Humans↗

PubMed2007

Attention and executive functions profile in drug naive ADHD subtypes.

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has been associated with executive functioning and sustained and divided attention deficits. In order to clarify the questions on neurocognitive impairment in ADHD, we investigated the presence of specific executive functions (EFs) and attention deficit patterns in ADHD clinical subtypes. 50 patients with ADHD and 44 controls were evaluated. All subjects were boys and performed a clinical-psychopathological and neuropsychological battery. Five main domains of EFs and attention were studied. Executive functions-related neurocognitive abilities were used as control tasks. ADHD patients, inattentive and combined subtypes differ from controls on response inhibition, divided attention, phonological, and visual object working memory and on variability of reaction times measured with CPT. Comparison of ADHD subtypes, in five main domains of EFs, did not show evidence of different executive functioning profiles. Response inhibition can predict performance on working memory tests but it cannot predict performance on divided attention/set shifting and on sustained attention. ADHD boys exhibit a selective impairment on executive functions and attention tasks. These data suggest the involvement of partially independent neural circuits which control inhibition and divided attention in ADHD. Since right prefrontal cortex seems to be crucial in controlling response inhibition, while left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex seems important in modulating divided attention, these areas are deputated to be involved in the pathogenesis of neuropsychological deficits in ADHD subtypes. In addition, this study candidates the impairment in phonological and visual-object working memory as a possible neuropsychological trait in ADHD males with inattentive or combined subtypes.

Attention↗

PubMed2001

Lack of association of dopamine D4 receptor gene polymorphisms with ADHD subtypes in a population sample of twins.

Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common, highly heritable syndrome of childhood characterized by problems with inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity. A variety of case control and family-based transmission distortion genetic studies of ADHD have focused on the possible involvement of polymorphisms of the DRD4 receptor gene. The majority of studies have examined the association of variously defined ADHD with an exon 3 polymorphism containing a variable number of imperfect 48 base pair repeats. Recently, McCracken et al. [2000: Mol Psych 5:531-536] reported an association of the DSM-IV primarily inattentive ADHD subtype with a 5' 120 base pair repeat polymorphism in the DRD4 gene. In this report, we test for the possible association of these two polymorphisms with population-derived samples of DSM-IV ADHD subtypes. Furthermore, we extend previous studies by testing for associations with ADHD subtypes derived from latent-class analysis of interview responses. In contrast to most, but not all, previous studies, we failed to demonstrate any significant association of the exon 3 7-repeat allele with ADHD. Nor did we replicate the association of the 5'120 base pair repeat polymorphism. We do find a significant association of the exon 3 3-repeat allele with a novel talkative/impulsive latent-class-defined subtype of ADHD.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2005

[Neuropsychological assessment of ADHD subtypes].

Starting from a discussion of the validity of neuropsychological methods for the diagnosis of ADHD the results of an own study are presented. What is the diagnostic value of the German version of the CPT (Continuous Performance Task) and the DAT (Dortmunder Aufmerksamkeitstest) in discriminating ADHD subtypes (according to DSM-IV) and in which areas do the children of each subtype differ from a control group of normal children? The computer versions of the CPT and DAT were administered to 14 boys with the "combined subtype" of ADHD, 14 boys with the "predominantly inattentive type" of ADHD and 18 boys without clinical signs; all groups were matched in age and intelligence. Subsequently the mean differences between the various test parameters were assessed as to their significance. Contrary to other studies there were no significant differences either between both ADHS types or relative to the control group with regard to the CPT omission errors and the reaction time. There were differences in the reaction variability both between the ADHD subtypes and relative to the control group. Only the "combined subtype", not the "pre-dominantly inattentive type" differed from the control group as to the CPT commission errors. Regarding the DAT, there were significant differences between all three groups regarding both the solution quality and the response delay.

Attention↗

PubMed2002

Neuropsychological performance in DSM-IV ADHD subtypes: an exploratory study with untreated adolescents.

OBJECTIVE: To explore neuropsychological performance in untreated Brazilian adolescents suffering from attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). METHOD: We assessed 30 untreated adolescents with ADHD and 60 healthy control subjects, aged 12 to 16 years, using a neuropsychological battery including the Wisconsin Card-Sorting Test (WCST), the Stroop Test (ST), the Digit Span, and the Word Span. RESULTS: We found neuropsychological differences among the DSM-IV ADHD subtypes. Adolescents with the predominantly inattentive subtype (ADHD-I) performed more poorly than did control subjects on both the Digit Span and the ST. On both the Digit Span and the WCST, adolescents with the combined subtype (ADHD-C) presented significantly more impairments than did control subjects. Adolescents with the predominantly hyperactive-impulsive type (ADHD-HI) did not differ significantly from the control subjects in any measure assessed, but had a better performance than did those with ADHD-C on both the Digit Span and the WCST. In addition, adolescents with ADHD-HI performed better on the ST than did adolescents with ADHD-I. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest cognitive differences among ADHD subtypes, supporting the diagnostic distinction among them. Adolescents with ADHD-HI do not seem to have significant cognitive deficits.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2005

Collaborative analysis of DRD4 and DAT genotypes in population-defined ADHD subtypes.

BACKGROUND: It has been proposed that some of the variability in reporting of associations between attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and candidate genes may result from mixing of genetically heterogeneous forms of ADHD using DSM-IV criteria. The goal of the current study is to test whether population-based ADHD subtypes defined by latent class analysis help resolve issues of variable findings across individual gene association studies. METHODS: Three studies which had previously reported no associations between polymorphisms of the DRD4 and DAT genes and DSM-IV defined ADHD were reanalyzed using population-based and DSM-IV defined ADHD subtypes. RESULTS: Across studies no significant associations were found for either DRD4 or DAT polymorphisms using DSM-IV ADHD subtypes. In contrast, a significant association was found between the combined data set for the 440 base pair 3' DAT VNTR polymorphism and population-defined severe combined ADHD (OR=1.25, p=.01). A marginally significant association was also found between the 7 repeat DRD4 allele and population-defined severe combined ADHD. CONCLUSION: Use of alternative population-based defined ADHD subtypes may help resolve some of the variable results presented for candidate gene association studies in ADHD.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2006

Validation of population-based ADHD subtypes and identification of three clinically impaired subtypes.

Statistically based classification methods have successfully refined ADHD into homogenous and heritable subtypes. External validity and impairment of these subtypes was examined using the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL). We compared mean CBCL syndrome and competency t-scores across ADHD subtypes defined by latent class analysis in a sample of 1,346 individual twins from Missouri. The potential for comorbidity with conduct disorder (CD), oppositional defiant disorder (ODD), or major depression (MD) to increase impairment in specific ADHD subtypes was also examined. CBCL profiles confirm differences in severity, with more severe classes having increased syndrome scale and decreased competency scale CBCL scores. Clinically significant impairment was found for severe inattentive and combined subtypes and the mild combined subtype. Overall, the presence of comorbid CD, ODD, or MD did not result in increased ADHD subtype impairment. CBCL scores distinguish impairment in ADHD subtypes created through LCA. Comorbidity with CD, ODD, or MD does not significantly increase impairment among ADHD subtypes. The mild combined ADHD subtype represents a clinically significant but under-studied form of ADHD.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2006

Right hemisphere brain morphology, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) subtype, and social comprehension.

Social comprehension involves empathy for others' experiences and appropriate responses to nonverbal cues. Previous research using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has suggested a relationship between brain morphology and psychiatric syndromes, such as attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), that typically entail social difficulties. The right hemisphere, specifically, has been associated with social skill deficits, and numerous studies have also associated ADHD with social skill deficits. No studies, however, have examined the association of ADHD subtype with both social comprehension and right-hemisphere morphology. Fifty-nine children (6-12 years old) underwent MRI, from which the right hemisphere was classified into four morphologic subtypes. Children were also grouped by ADHD subtype or clinical control status. From Behavior Assessment System for Children (BASC) items, a social comprehension subscale was constructed. Analyses revealed significant differences in social comprehension based on ADHD subtype. Differences in social comprehension based on ADHD status were especially pronounced in children with atypical right-hemisphere morphology. Thus, the diagnosis of ADHD might be associated with underlying risk in the area of social comprehension, especially for children with atypical right-hemisphere morphology.

Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Parent-, teacher-, and self-rated motivational styles in ADHD subtypes.

The motivational styles of 25 children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, combined type (ADHD/C), 13 children with ADHD, inattentive type (ADHD/IA), and 25 nondiagnosed controls (NC) were compared using parent, teacher, and self-ratings. Both ADHD subtypes demonstrated motivational impairment characterized by a preference for easy work, less enjoyment of learning, less persistence, and a greater reliance on external than on internal standards to judge their performance relative to NC. Some motivational style differences between ADHD subtypes were also revealed, with the ADHD/C group more motivated by competitiveness and a desire to be perceived as superior to others and the ADHD/IA group less uncooperative and possibly more passive in their learning styles. When IQ was statistically controlled, these results were generally unchanged. The contributing role of motivational deficits to the generally poor academic functioning of children with ADHD is discussed, along with potential intervention implications of the divergent motivational styles of different ADHD subtypes.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Gender differences in ADHD subtype comorbidity.

OBJECTIVE: To examine gender differences in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder ("ADHD") symptom comorbidity with "oppositional defiant disorder", "conduct disorder", "separation anxiety disorder", "generalized anxiety disorder", speech therapy, and remedial reading in children. METHOD: From 1994 to 1995, data from a large sample (N = 4,371) of twins and siblings studied in the Australian Twin ADHD Project were obtained by mailed DSM-IV-based questionnaires, investigating patterns of comorbidity in the three subtypes of "ADHD": "inattentive", "hyperactive/impulsive", and "combined". A total of 1,550 questionnaires were returned (87%) over the next 12 to 18 months. RESULTS: Analysis of variance showed significant between-group differences in males and females for inattention and hyperactive/impulsive symptom counts with higher rates of "oppositional defiant disorder" and "conduct disorder" in males, and higher rates of "separation anxiety disorder" in females indicating internalizing disorders are more common in females and externalizing disorders are occurring more often in males. Differences were found between the "ADHD" subtypes and the no ADHD category for all comorbid conditions, for both males and females. Children without ADHD consistently had fewer symptoms, while children with the combined subtype showed consistently more comorbid symptoms indicating a strong relationship between high rates of externalizing symptoms and high rates of internalizing symptoms. Gender differences in speech therapy were significant only for the children without ADHD. The rates of "separation anxiety disorder" were higher in females with the "inattention" subtype and the rate of "generalized anxiety disorder" higher for females with the "combined" subtype, indicating that the subtypes of ADHD were associated with these internalizing disorders in different ways. CONCLUSIONS: Although comorbidity differs among ADHD subtypes, there were no significant gender differences in comorbidity for externalizing disorders. Inattentive girls may present with anxiety. Clinical approaches for both males and females should be sensitive to possible language and reading problems.

Analysis of Variance↗

PubMed1997

Behavioral characteristics of DSM-IV ADHD subtypes in a school-based population.

From an ethnically diverse sample of 2,744 school children, 221 attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) [123 (4.5%) predominantly inattentive (IA), 47 (1.7%) predominantly hyperactive/impulsive (HI), and 51 (19%) combined type (C)] were identified using teacher ratings on a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.)(DSM-IV) symptom checklist. Subjects were compared to 221 controls on teacher ratings of behavioral, academic, and social functioning. The results revealed relatively independent areas of impairment for each diagnostic group. The IA children were impaired in all areas, but were rated as displaying more appropriate behavior and fewer externalizing problems than HI or C children. The HI group displayed externalizing and social problems, but was rated as no different than controls in learning or internalizing problems. The C group demonstrated severe and pervasive difficulties across domains. These findings support the validity of the DSM-IV ADHD subtypes; all ADHD groups demonstrated impairment relative to controls, but show different patterns of behavioral characteristics.

Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity↗

PubMed2002

Replication of the latent class structure of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) subtypes in a sample of Australian twins.

BACKGROUND: Previous efforts to subtype Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) using latent class analysis (LCA) applied to DSM-IV symptom profiles of adolescent female twins from Missouri (USA) have identified distinct classes within the domains of inattention, hyperactivity-impulsivity and combined-type problems. The objective of the current report is to determine if the latent class structure of ADHD subtypes can be replicated in a culturally distinct sample of female and male Australian twins. METHOD: LCA was applied to parent-report DSM-IV ADHD symptom profiles of N=2,848 child and adolescent Australian twins and compared to North American findings. Separate models were fitted for females (N= 1,432) and males (N= 1,416). RESULTS: The most congruent latent ADHD classes across samples included a non-symptomatic class, three mild-moderate and two severe classes. Also present within samples was a rare hyperactive-impulsive class and a unique class, the structure of which was idiosyncratic across samples. Mean symptom endorsement and individual symptom endorsement probabilities for each of the stable classes were similar across samples. Consistent with previous findings, there was substantial overlap between the DSM-IV inattentive and combined subtypes with the severe inattentive and severe combined latent classes. However, DSM-IV inattentive and combined subtypes were distributed over several latent classes in each sample, and a substantial proportion of individuals with no DSM-IV diagnosis were also assigned to these severe classes. CONCLUSIONS: Results from LCA using an Australian twin sample replicate six of the eight latent class subtypes previously reported using Missouri female twins and extend the findings to male twins. LCA and DSM-IV systems of ADHD classification identify different phenotypic groups, and the basis of this disparity merits further investigation.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2001

No association of the dopamine transporter gene 3' VNTR polymorphism with ADHD subtypes in a population sample of twins.

Dopamine pathway genes have been the subject of a variety of studies testing the association of candidate genes and liability for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Due to the known effects of stimulant medications such as methylphenidate on the dopamine transporter, a variety of case control and family-based transmission distortion genetic studies of ADHD have focused on DAT1 polymorphisms. The most widely reported positive finding has been with a variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR) polymorphism of unknown function in the 3' untranslated region of the DAT1 gene. In this report, we test for association of alleles of this polymorphism with ADHD using population-derived samples of twins. We use the transmission disequilibrium test and ADHD subtypes defined by both DSM-IV and latent class criteria. We fail to demonstrate any significant association or trend for association of any of the VNTR alleles with any of the variously defined ADHD subtypes.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2000

Does actigraphy differentiate ADHD subtypes in a clinical research setting?

OBJECTIVE: To compare subtypes of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (predominantly inattentive and combined types) and a comparison group on an objective measure of activity level (actigraphy). METHOD: Actigraphs were worn by 64 children (49 boys, 15 girls) during a full-day clinical diagnostic assessment; 20 subjects had a diagnosis of ADHD predominantly inattentive type, 22 had ADHD combined type, and 22 were non-ADHD controls. Mean actigraph scores were calculated for two 2-hour intervals, comprising, respectively, a psychometric evaluation in the morning and the completion of a speech and language assessment and research measures in the afternoon. RESULTS: There were no significant group differences in activity level in the morning session. During the afternoon session, children with ADHD were significantly more active than controls, but there were no differences between ADHD subtypes. CONCLUSIONS: These data partially support specifications in the DSM-IV regarding hyperactivity in ADHD; however, they also indicate that situational and/or temporal factors may affect the degree to which hyperactivity is expressed. Furthermore, the findings contradict specifications in the DSM-IV that suggest that children with ADHD combined type should be more hyperactive than children with ADHD predominantly inattentive type.

Attention↗

PubMed2006

Prenatal smoking exposure and dopaminergic genotypes interact to cause a severe ADHD subtype.

BACKGROUND: In utero exposure to smoking and alcohol are common risk factors that have been associated with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in human beings and animal models. Furthermore, molecular studies have focused on the association between ADHD and DNA polymorphisms in dopamine pathway-related genes. We examined the joint effects of genetic and prenatal substance exposures on DSM-IV and population-defined subtypes of ADHD. METHODS: Logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between ADHD subtypes, DAT1 and DRD4 polymorphisms, and prenatal substance exposures in a birth-record sample of male and female twin pairs, aged 7-19 years. RESULTS: Interactions between prenatal exposure to smoking and variations in the DAT1 and DRD4 loci were observed in children with either the DSM-IV or population-defined ADHD combined subtypes. The odds of a diagnosis of DSM-IV combined subtype was 2.9 times greater in twins who had inherited the DAT1 440 allele and who were exposed, than in unexposed twins without the risk allele. The OR was 2.6 in the population-defined subtype. Odds ratios for the DRD4 seven-repeat allele were 3.0 (2.8) in the population-defined (DSM-IV) combined ADHD subtypes. The OR for exposed children with both alleles was 9.0 (95% confidence interval=2.0-41.5) for the population-defined combined subtypes. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that smoking during pregnancy is associated with specific subtypes of ADHD in genetically susceptible children.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2005

Estimation of prevalence of DSM-IV and latent class-defined ADHD subtypes in a population-based sample of child and adolescent twins.

The goal of this study is to determine the prevalence and age of onset of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders and latent class-derived attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) subtypes in a population-based twin sample of boys and girls. Missouri birth records identified families with a twin pair 7 to 18 years of age. Telephone screening interviews for ADHD symptoms were completed for 5007 families. Diagnostic assessments were administered to 564 families with at least one twin meeting screening criteria, plus 183 control families. Prevalence and age of onset for both ADHD nosologies were calculated by sex and zygosity from parent report data. The prevalence of any DSM-IV ADHD was 6.2% overall, 7.4% in boys and 3.9% in girls. The inattentive subtype was most common in boys; the combined subtype was most common in girls. The mean age of onset of symptoms in children with any DSM-IV ADHD was 3.5 years, with no significant differences between boys and girls. Prevalences of latent class defined ADHD subtypes also varied by sex with the severe inattentive and combined classes more common in boys than girls. The age of onset of symptoms did not differ between boys and girls but were higher than in the DSM-IV subtypes. Findings in this twin sample showed that clinically significant ADHD, defined by either DSM-IV or latent class criterion, has an early age of onset and is more common in boys than girls. As clinical samples are most commonly composed of male combined subtypes, the inattentive subtype of both sexes in the general population is an under-treated segment of the general population.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2004

Variations in anxiety and depression as a function of ADHD subtypes defined by DSM-IV: do subtype differences exist or not?

Concerns have been raised about the ability of diagnostic criteria for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) to distinguish subtypes that are clearly distinct from each other with regard to clinical correlates. One area of concern is that research regarding differences in anxiety and depression as a function of ADHD subtype has produced discrepant findings. This study was designed to systematically evaluate whether the ADHD subtypes differ with regard to level of internalizing symptoms. From a large pool of children referred to an ADHD center based in a pediatric hospital, children were differentiated into three groups: ADHD, Combined Type (ADHD/COM); ADHD, Inattentive Type (ADHD/I); and a non-ADHD, comparison group (COMP). Parent- and child-report measures using both dimensional and categorical methods were used to assess internalizing symptoms. The results indicated that children with ADHD/COM and ADHD/I had similar levels of anxiety and depression. Subtype differences related to parent-reported depression were accounted for by group differences in level of externalizing problems. The results were discussed with regard to their implications for refining the criteria used to differentiate children with ADHD into subtypes.

Adolescent↗