SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “AI-enabled cardiovascular modeling”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Multiomics approaches to cardiovascular disease: technological innovations and clinical translation.

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) remain the leading cause of global morbidity and mortality, reflecting a persistent gap between clinical phenotyping and the molecular mechanisms that govern disease initiation, progression, and interindividual variability. Recent advances in emerging technologies have fundamentally reshaped cardiovascular physiology by enabling high-resolution, cross-layer profiling of the heart and vasculature across genomic, epigenomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, metabolomic, lipidomic, glycomic, and fluxomic layers, increasingly at single-cell and spatial resolution. These approaches reveal CVD as a coordinated, multilayered process driven by dynamic interactions among cell types, regulatory programs, and metabolic states, rather than isolated gene-level defects. In this review, we synthesize how emerging multiomic, computational, and functional genomic technologies are redefining the study of cardiovascular disease across molecular, cellular, and tissue levels. We highlight recent innovations in single-cell and spatial atlases, long-read sequencing, proteomics and metabolomics, integrative data modeling, and functional omics approaches, including genome-scale perturbation screens and single-cell perturbation frameworks. These platforms enable mechanistic dissection of regulatory circuits, distinguish primary disease drivers from secondary adaptations, and directly assess therapeutic reversibility, advancing the field beyond associative biomarker discovery toward mechanism-guided target prioritization. We further discuss key methodological and translational challenges accompanying high-dimensional cardiovascular data, including preanalytical variability, control selection, temporal misalignment across molecular layers, population diversity, and reference bias. By integrating technological innovation with computational rigor and functional validation, this review frames emerging omics-enabled strategies as a unified, physiologically grounded framework for translating molecular insight into clinically meaningful cardiovascular phenotypes and advancing precision cardiovascular medicine.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Beyond data and technology: the need for new thinking to enable the era of precision prevention.

BACKGROUND: Global flagship initiatives increasingly advocate for proactive health maintenance to alleviate the growing burden on reactive, disease-focused healthcare systems. Precision prevention is conceived as the targeted modulation of causal pathways across the disease continuum, from latent risk and pre-disease states to clinical manifestation, surpassing conventional public health prevention strategies that prioritise managing population-level risk factors. Traditional discovery and implementation models, however, remain poorly aligned with the pace and breadth of scientific and technological advances. This review outlines key barriers to scaling precision prevention and argues for the integration of conceptual, methodological, and policy perspectives into a single implementation‑oriented framework. MAIN: Individualised risk stratification lies at the core of precision prevention. Genomics serves as a stable substrate for lifetime susceptibility assessment, while meaningful prediction in multifactorial chronic disease requires additional risk monitoring using dynamic intermediate molecular markers and high-resolution exposomic data. Machine learning and other artificial intelligence (AI) methods are increasingly helpful tools for integrating large, heterogeneous and temporally structured real-world data to generate personalised predictions of health trajectories. Trustworthy AI-enabled risk prediction or decision-support systems are expected to provide transparency about model logic, assumptions and performance. In discovery, existing diagnostic classifications and conventional case-control designs can obscure mechanistic heterogeneity. Shifting toward precision phenotyping and biologically grounded disease redefinition could reveal a new layer of molecular understanding. Evidence generation strategies that reflect the temporal change of disease, including high‑risk enrichment, surrogate endpoints, and adaptive, trajectory-based monitoring, are particularly important for common conditions with prolonged latency periods (e.g., cancer, cardiovascular disease). Features often dismissed as "noise", such as stochastic molecular variation and minimal exposures, may in fact encode meaningful individual-level signals and thus merit investigation. CONCLUSION: To shift healthcare from reactive treatment toward proactive health maintenance requires coordinated action from stakeholders to reshape the pillars of discovery, reform outcome assessments and modernise implementation strategies.

Humans↗