Symposium on inhalation anesthesia, intravenous anesthesia, Brussels, March 15, 1980.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · PubMed Health
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
It is the purpose of the study to outline the superiorities of combined anesthesia in 100 patients undergoing orthopaedic (25 cases) and orthopaedic surgery (75 cases) interventions. The average duration of the operation is 90 +/- 25 min, performed under continuous peripheral (40 patients) and central (60 patients) nerve block, using Propofol against the background of continuous i.v. infusion and spontaneous ventilation. Nerve block is done according to routinely adopted techniques. The initial infusion rate for propofol (Diprivan) is 5 +/- 1.3 mg/kg/h, followed by infusional rate securing sedation II-III degree according to Ramsey's scale (mean 4 +/- 1.2 mg/kg/h). In 92 per cent of patients the sedation level is estimated as very good. In 8 per cent switching over to TIVA (total intravenous anesthesia) is necessitated because of the incomplete nerve block. No cases of hypotension or other essential secondary effects are recorded. Subjectively the anesthesiological technique is accepted as very good by most of the patients.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: To compare hormone response to stress caused by surgery performed under balanced general anesthesia and total intravenous anesthesia. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Two randomly formed groups of 24 patients each were studied. All patients were scheduled for lumbar laminectomy to correct disc hernias, with one group receiving balanced anesthesia with isoflurane (expiratory fraction between 0.5% and 0.6%), and the second group receiving total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) (propofol infusion changed every 10 min from 12 to 6 mg/kg/h). Analgesics and relaxants were given by continuous infusion at preestablished doses (fentanyl 2 micrograms/kg/h; vecuronium 0.05 mg/kg/h). Cortisol and catecholamine (adrenalin, noradrenaline and dopamine) levels were determined at the following times: the morning of surgery (baseline), 5 min after intubation, 5 min after incision, 30 and 60 min after intubation; 5 min after tube removal and upon admission to the recovery unit. RESULTS: Cortisol levels decreased from baseline (14 +/- 3 pg/ml) until 30 min after intubation (4 +/- 2 pg/ml; p < 0.05) in the balanced anesthesia group. Adrenaline levels followed the same pattern (baseline 77 +/- 7 versus 57 +/- 10 pg/ml 30 min after intubation). Dopamine levels were statistically different (p < 0.05) at baseline (42 +/- 3 pg/ml), after intubation (38 +/- 2 pg/ml) and after incision (35 +/- 3 pg/ml), but the difference disappeared 30 minutes after intubation (38 +/- 8 pg/ml). Noradrenaline levels after incision (425 +/- 116 pg/ml) were significantly different from those at baseline (671 +/- 124 pg/ml), and the difference was evident until 60 min after incision. In the TIVA group we found significantly higher cortisol levels after intubation (21 +/- 0 pg/ml) than after baseline (14 +/- 2 pg/ml); this level decreased after extubation (7 +/- 0 pg/ml; p < 0.05). Adrenaline levels were significantly higher than at baseline (64 +/- 11 pg/ml) at times corresponding to intubation (76 +/- 5 pg/ml) and extubation (48 +/- 5 pg/ml). Noradrenaline increased significantly over baseline (497 +/- 99 pg/ml) after incision (597 +/- 90 pg/ml) and decreased significantly after 30 min. The increases in cortisol were significantly greater in the TIVA group than in the control group after intubation (21 +/- 0 versus 8 +/- 3 pg/ml, respectively) after intubation, after incision (18 +/- 2 versus 6 +/- 3 pg/ml) and 30 minutes after intubation (15 +/- 2 versus 4 +/- 2 pg/ml). Similar differences were found for dopamine after intubation (49 +/- 2 versus 38 +/- 2 pg/ml) and after incision (45 +/- 5 versus 35 +/- 3 pg/ml). CONCLUSIONS: Hormone levels are significantly higher during intravenous anesthesia than during balanced anesthesia, and the difference is evident from the earliest measurement performed.
The unique pharmacokinetic properties of propofol gave rise to a widespread use of the technique of total intravenous anaesthesia. These properties of propofol are reviewed and compared to those of barbiturates and benzodiazepines. Based on this comparison and with respect to their respective intra- and postoperative effects, a cost-benefit analysis of both inhalational- and intravenous anaesthesia is presented. The choice of an anaesthetic technique must not only be made with regard to medical implications; economical aspects have also to be taken into account without challenge to the quality of care. A consequent use of low-flow techniques and a market oriented purchase of drugs and disposables may allow cost savings in anesthesia.
IV regional anesthesia can offer a more favorable patient recovery profile and shorter postoperative nursing care time and hospital discharge time than an isoflurane-based general anesthetic or brachial plexus block technique for hand surgery.
A 3-year-old girl with neuroblastoma was scheduled for intraoperative radiation therapy. Prior to surgery, meetings were held to ensure the safety during transfer between the operating room and the radiation unit because those units were placed on the different floors in our hospital. In the operating room the patient was anesthetized with propofol, fentanyl and ketamine (PFK). After the resection of the tumor, the patient was moved to the radiation unit. All personnel had to leave the treatment room while the radiation was administered, which required 3 minutes. During the transfer and treatment, the following apparatus were effective to ensure the patient's safety; mobile respiratory and cardiovascular monitors, closed-circuit television to observe the monitors and patient, and a portable gas powered ventilator. The total intravenous anesthesia with PFK was used throughout all scheduled procedures. For patients treated with intraoperative radiation therapy, the administration of inhalation anesthetics should be discontinued to supply 100% oxygen, which enhances the effect of irradiation, and to avoid the complexity of the transfer with an anesthetic machine. This discontinuation, however, may cause the cardiovascular instability. It seems that total intravenous anesthesia has advantages over inhalation anesthesia for patients who undergo intraoperative radiation therapy.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the different effects on autonomic circulatory control during volatile induction/maintenance of anesthesia (VIMA) vs total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Operating theater of a university hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty patients, with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status of I or II, were randomly allocated into the VIMA group (n = 10) or the TIVA group (n = 10). INTERVENTIONS: In the VIMA group, anesthesia was induced with 5% sevoflurane and 60% N2O in oxygen and maintained with 2% sevoflurane and 60% N2O in oxygen. In the TIVA group, anesthesia was induced with propofol 2.0 mg/kg intravenously by bolus injection and fentanyl 2 microg/kg, and maintained with an intravenous infusion of propofol 5 mg/kg.per hour and air-oxygen mixture. MEASUREMENTS: Monitoring included recordings of electrocardiographic and arterial blood pressure waveforms. Autonomic nervous activity and arterial cardiac baroreflex function were evaluated by analysis of blood pressure variability, heart rate variability, and transfer function analysis between these 2 variables. MAIN RESULTS: In the VIMA group, the low-frequency component of blood pressure variability (LF(SBP)) and low- and high-frequency components of the R-R interval variability (LF(RR) and HF(RR)) decreased significantly during anesthesia. In the TIVA group, LF(SBP) and LF(RR) decreased significantly. The degree of reduction in LF(SBP) was greater in the VIMA group than in the TIVA group. However, changes in R-R interval variability and cardiac baroreflex indices were not significantly different between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrated that although reductions in autonomic nervous modulation to the heart might not be so different between the 2 groups, reduction in sympathetic nervous modulation to peripheral vasculature is greater in the VIMA group than in the TIVA group.
BACKGROUND: Moyamoya disease is a rare neurovascular disorder that requires special anesthetic managements during revascularization procedures. We have investigated the incidence of early postoperative complications under inhaled anesthesia in comparison with total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) retrospectively. METHODS: Seventy-two patients undergoing revascularization procedures were divided into two groups, one with inhaled anesthesia (n = 23) and the other with TIVA (n = 49). Surgical procedures were performed under normocapnia, proper body temperature, and all patients were prevented from anemia by homologous transfusion. To avoid the variance in anesthetic managements, 39 patients under 15 years of age were picked up and divided in the same way as above. Early postoperative complications including transient ischemic attack and cerebral infarction during the first 2 weeks after operation were investigated. RESULTS: In all patients, early postoperative complications occurred in 48% of inhaled anesthesia group and in 49% of TIVA group. In patients under 15, these complications occurred in 44% and in 57%, respectively. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two anesthetic groups. CONCLUSIONS: Several previous studies reported the excellence of TIVA for revascularization procedure on the basis of regional blood flow because inhaled anesthesia may provoke intracerebral steal in moyamoya disease. Our investigation in this study revealed that both anesthetic methods have no significant difference in postoperative complications during the first 2 weeks after operation. Thus further study should be needed to verify the safety of inhalation anesthetics in patients with moyamoya disease.
Total intravenous anesthesia with droperidol, fentanyl and ketamine (DFK) was administered to 36 cardiac patients who underwent mostly coronary artery bypass graft or heart valve replacement. The induction and maintenance of anesthesia using this technique were almost satisfactory with little decrease in systolic blood pressure (SBP), although six patients among the early 21 patients developed hypotension below 90 mmHg (SBP) during the induction, and required vasopressors. Half of the patients had hypertensive episode of above 180 mmHg (SBP), from the start of operation to onset of cardiopulmonary bypass, which was safely and effectively overcome by a small dose of antihypertensive agents. Total intravenous anesthesia with DFK was accompanied with much more hypertensive episodes compared to anesthesia with moderate dose fentanyl (30 micrograms.kg-1) combined with enflurane. However, the incidence of cardiovascular complications following anesthesia was not statistically different between the two anesthesia groups. In addition, most of the patients with DFK showed a rapid awaking time with relatively good postoperative cardiovascular stability. These findings suggest that total intravenous anesthesia with DFK is accompanied with minimal hemodynamic changes during and after open heart surgery.
Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) has been recommended in view of avoiding air pollution. However, intermittent administration of anesthetic agents has a large disadvantage of delayed emergence. We reported that continuous TIVA with propofol, ketamine, vecuronium and buprenorphine (PKBp) could bring rapid emergence. In this study, we calculated and compared the cost of anesthesia in the subjects who had undergone general anesthesia either with continuous PKBp or nitrous oxide-oxygen-sevoflurane. In group PKBp subjects, after induction with propofol, ketamine, vecuronium and buprenorphine, anesthesia was maintained with continuous intravenous administration of propofol corresponding to the patient's age using twice step down method; ketamine (240 micrograms.kg-1.h-1), vecuronium (80 micrograms.kg-1.h-1) and buprenorphine (0.4 microgram.kg-1.h-1). Group GOS subjects, after the same induction method, received nitrous oxide, sevoflurane and vecuronium. Moreover, the group GOS subjects were divided to two groups; the high flow GOS (N2O:O2:sevoflurane = 4 l:2 l:30 ml) and the low flow GOS (N2O:O2:sevoflurane = 2 l:1 l:15 ml). Continuous PKBp group showed lower cost than the high flow GOS group. The PKBp group showed lower cost than the low flow GOS group except in patients weighing more than 100 kg. Furthermore, we calculated the cost of continuous PKBp anesthesia in Japan, U.S.A. and U.K. The U.S.A. cost of PKBp was higher than the Japanese and the U.K., because the cost of ketamine in U.S.A. is higher than in the other countries. Continuous PKBp is more economical than the high flow GOS, and continuous PKBp in Japan is more economical than in U.S.A.
Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) is recommended to avoid air pollution. However, intermittent administration of anesthetic agents has a large disadvantage of delayed emergence time. We suggested continuous TIVA with propofol, ketamine, vecuronium and buprenorphine (PKBp), and reported that maintenance with continuous intravenous administration of propofol corresponding to the age associated with ketamine (240 micrograms.kg-1.h-1), vecuronium (80 micrograms.kg-1.h-1) and buprenorphine (0.4 microgram.kg-1.h-1) brought rapid emergence and that the last 1/6 of anesthetic time was the point to reduce propofol maintenance dose. In this study, we maintained anesthesia with continuous intravenous administration of propofol using twice step down method every one hour. We conclude that the reduction of propofol maintenance dose for every 1/6 in one hour produces fewer dropout cases.