Cardiac auscultation and teaching rounds: how can cardiac auscultation be resuscitated?
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Clinical Competence↗
SEARCH · PubMed Health
Results for “AUSCULTATION”
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Fetal heart rate auscultation. Comparing auscultation to electronic fetal monitoring.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Auscultation↗
Transvaginal versus transabdominal Doppler auscultation of fetal heart activity: a comparative study.
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine whether transvaginal Doppler auscultation is more sensitive than transabdominal auscultation for the detection of fetal heart rate in the first trimester of pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: In a prospective study 141 patients between 6 weeks and 11 weeks 6 days of gestation underwent both transvaginal and transabdominal Doppler evaluation by use of continuous-wave Doppler instruments for detection of fetal heart rate. Transvaginal ultrasonography was used as the gold standard to establish fetal cardiac activity and to help assign gestational age. The two methods of auscultation were compared for accuracy in different gestational age ranges. Sensitivities and specificities were calculated, and associations were investigated with chi 2 analysis. The direction of disagreement between modalities was tested with the McNemar chi 2 test. RESULTS: Transvaginal auscultation outperformed transabdominal auscultation in every gestational age range. Transvaginal Doppler auscultation performed significantly better than transabdominal Doppler auscultation at 8 weeks to 8 weeks 6 days (p < or = 0.004) and 9 weeks to 9 weeks 6 days (p < or = 0.006). In pregnancies with cardiac activity, fetal heart rate can be successfully detected transvaginally in 60.5% of pregnancies at 8 weeks to 8 weeks 6 days and in 87.5% of pregnancies at 9 weeks to 9 weeks 6 days of gestation. This compares with successful transabdominal detection rates of 22.9% and 56% at 8 and 9 weeks, respectively. As gestational age advances both methods became increasingly sensitive for the detection of fetal heart rate. The earliest fetal heart rate detected transvaginally was at 6 weeks 0 days of gestation compared with 7 weeks 0 days transabdominally. The transvaginal Doppler method was also more successful in detecting the fetal heart rate in women with a retroverted uterus (p < or = 0.01). CONCLUSION: By use of continuous-wave Doppler instrumentation, transvaginal auscultation is significantly better than transabdominal auscultation in detecting fetal heart rate between 8 weeks to 8 weeks 6 days and 9 weeks to 9 weeks 6 days of gestation. Use of transvaginal auscultation has potential in the evaluation of first-trimester fetal cardiac activity.
Abdomen↗
Using a multimedia tool to improve cardiac auscultation knowledge and skills.
OBJECTIVE: Today's medical school graduates have significant deficits in physical examination skills. Medical educators have been searching for methods to effectively teach and maintain these skills in students. The objective of this study was to determine if an auscultation curriculum centered on a portable multimedia CD-ROM was effective in producing and maintaining significant gains in cardiac auscultatory skills. DESIGN: Controlled cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: All 168 third-year medical students at 1 medical school in an academic medical center. INTERVENTIONS: Students were tested before and after exposure to 1 or more elements of the auscultation curriculum: teaching on ward/clinic rotations, CD-ROM comprehensive cases with follow-up seminars, and a CD-ROM 20-case miniseries. The primary outcome measures were student performance on a 10-item test of auscultation skill (listening and identifying heart sound characteristics) and a 30-item test of auscultation knowledge (factual questions about auscultation). A subset of students was tested for attenuation effects 9 or 12 months after the intervention. RESULTS: Compared with the control group (1 month clinical rotation alone), students who were also exposed to the CD-ROM 20-case miniseries had significant improvements in auscultation skills scores (P < .05), but not knowledge. Additional months of clerkship, comprehensive CD-ROM cases, and follow-up seminars increased auscultation knowledge beyond the miniseries alone (P < .05), but did not further improve auscultation skills. Students' auscultation knowledge diminished one year after the intervention, but auscultation skills did not. CONCLUSION: In addition to the standard curriculum of ward and conference teaching, portable multimedia tools may help improve quality of physical examination skills.
Analysis of Variance↗
The teaching of chest auscultation during primary care training: has anything changed in the 1990s?
OBJECTIVE: To survey the teaching time and importance given to cardiopulmonary auscultation during internal medicine (IM) and family practice (FP) residencies, and to compare current practices to those of the early 1990s. DESIGN: A nationwide mail survey of IM and FP program directors (PDs). SETTING: All Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited IM and FP residencies. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 538 of 939 PDs (57.5%). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In contrast to the early 1990s, when there had been no significant difference in teaching practices between IM and FP programs, more IM than FP residencies taught cardiopulmonary auscultation in 1999 (cardiac auscultation: IM residencies, 48%; FP residencies, 29.2% [p < 0.001]; pulmonary auscultation: IM residencies, 23.7%; FP residencies, 12.2% [p < 0.001]). Across the decade there also had been a significant increase in the percentage of IM programs offering structured education in chest auscultation (cardiac auscultation increase, 27.1 to 48% [p < 0.001]; pulmonary auscultation increase, 14.1 to 23.7% [p < 0.02]), but no significant changes for FP residencies. IM PDs gave more clinical importance to auscultation and expressed a greater desire for expanded teaching than did their counterparts in FP programs. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates a significant gain over the last decade in the percentage of IM residencies offering structured teaching of cardiopulmonary auscultation. This same gain did not occur for FP programs. Whether these differences in attitudes and teaching practices will translate into improved auscultatory proficiency of IM trainees will need to be determined.
Auscultation↗
Auscultated fetal heart rate accelerations. III. Use of vibratory acoustic stimulation.
The auscultated acceleration test has been proposed as a simple, inexpensive screening test for fetal health; previous studies of the auscultated acceleration test used external stimulation to elicit fetal movement. This study was conducted to explore the ability of the auscultated acceleration test to predict nonstress test results when vibratory acoustic stimulation is used to elicit fetal reactivity. After antepartum nonstress testing on 100 gravid women between 28 and 43 weeks' gestation, a 6-minute auscultated acceleration test protocol was performed with two vibratory acoustic stimulations to the maternal abdomen if no spontaneous fetal heart rate acceleration occurred. The ability of the auscultated acceleration test to predict nonstress test results after selected variables were controlled for was as follows: sensitivity, 75%; specificity, 97.6%; false-positive results, 14.3%; and false-negative results, 4.7%. Logistic regression analysis indicated that, in addition to the auscultated acceleration test, gestational age and race contributed significantly to the prediction of nonstress test results. Although specificity and the false-positive rate were improved, the use of vibratory acoustic stimulations to elicit fetal movement did not improve the validity of the auscultated acceleration test in terms of sensitivity and false-negative results over previous studies. However, the auscultated acceleration test continues to show potential as an initial screening test for fetal assessment. In addition to recommendations for further research, methodologic issues related to sampling techniques are identified.
Acoustic Stimulation↗
Estimation of pressure gradients by auscultation: an innovative and accurate physical examination technique.
BACKGROUND: Knowledge of pressure gradients across valves, arteries, and ventricular septal defects (VSD) is important in patient management. It was determined how well such gradients can be estimated by auscultation of a murmur's frequencies. METHODS: In 151 patients with pulmonary stenosis (PS) (n = 77), aortic stenosis (AS) (n = 30), or VSD (n = 44), the auscultation gradient was estimated by a murmur's frequencies by use of an "auscultatory scale." The auscultation gradient was recorded before Doppler echocardiography was performed by a blinded cardiac sonographer. RESULTS: Auscultation correlated highly with Doppler echocardiography (Doppler = 0.99. Auscultation + 7.12; r = 0.84, P <.0001). Agreement was good (mean difference [Auscultation - Doppler] = -6.8 +/- 15.8 mm Hg). In 95 patients (63%), agreement was within 10 mm Hg. Auscultation was more accurate when Doppler gradients were < or =60 mm Hg (r = 0.76, P <.0001, vs r = 0.22, P not significant for >60 mm Hg; mean difference -2.6 +/- 10.6 mm Hg vs -16.5 +/- 20.9 mm Hg for >60 mm Hg, P <.0001). Among lesions, PS showed the highest correlation, although agreement for PS, AS, and VSD was not significantly different. Isolated valvar PS showed excellent accuracy (r = 0.92, P <.0001; mean difference -5.6 +/- 8.9 mm Hg). CONCLUSIONS: Auscultation of a murmur's frequency composition can estimate gradients accurately in most patients with PS (especially valvar PS), AS, or VSD, although it is less accurate for gradients >60 mm Hg. This innovative technique can improve diagnostic accuracy, thereby further substantiating the value of physical examination.
Adolescent↗
Hemopneumothorax missed by auscultation in penetrating chest injury.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency and extent of hemothorax, pneumothorax, and hemopneumothorax missed by auscultation in penetrating chest injury. DESIGN: A retrospective chart and chest radiograph review. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and eighteen patients suffering penetrating chest injuries during 1993 were studied. A missed auscultation was defined as a patient with normal breath sounds but shown by chest radiograph to have a hemothorax, pneumothorax, or hemopneumothorax. The amount of hemothorax was recorded after chest tube placement or at thoracotomy. The degree of pneumothorax was determined by Rhea's method. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients (60%) had a hemothorax, pneumothorax, or hemopneumothorax. Auscultation to detect hemothorax, pneumothorax, or hemopneumothorax had a sensitivity of 58%, a specificity of 98%, and a positive predictive value of 98%. Thirty of 71 patients (42%) were found to have pleural space blood or air missed by auscultation. Twelve patients (41%) had a hemopneumothorax, 11 patients (36%) had hemothorax, and seven patients (23%) had pneumothorax. Auscultation missed hemothorax up to 600 mL, pneumothorax up to 28%, and hemopneumothorax up to 800 mL and 28%. CONCLUSION: Hemopneumothorax and hemothorax are the conditions most likely to be missed by auscultation, especially in patients with gunshot wounds. Auscultation has a high positive predictive value because it indicates injury with a fair degree of certainty; however, a negative auscultation does not rule out injury.
Adolescent↗
Diagnosis of asbestosis by a time expanded wave form analysis, auscultation and high resolution computed tomography: a comparative study.
BACKGROUND: Crackles are a prominent clinical feature of asbestosis and may be an early sign of the condition. Auscultation, however, is subjective and interexaminer disagreement is a problem. Computerised lung sound analysis can visualise, store, and analyse lung sounds and disagreement on the presence of crackles is minimal. High resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is superior to chest radiography in detecting early signs of asbestosis. The aim of this study was to compare clinical auscultation, time expanded wave form analysis (TEW), chest radiography, and HRCT in detecting signs of asbestosis in asbestos workers. METHODS: Fifty three asbestos workers (51 men and two women) were investigated. Chest radiography and HRCT were assessed by two independent readers for detection of interstitial opacities. HRCT was performed in the supine position with additional sections at the bases in the prone position. Auscultation for persistent fine inspiratory crackles was performed by two independent examiners unacquainted with the diagnosis. TEW analysis was obtained from a 33 second recording of lung sounds over the lung bases. TEW and auscultation were performed in a control group of 13 subjects who had a normal chest radiograph. There were 10 current smokers and three previous smokers. In asbestos workers the extent of pulmonary opacities on the chest radiograph was scored according to the International Labour Office (ILO) scale. Patients were divided into two groups: 21 patients in whom the chest radiograph was > 1/0 (group 1) and 32 patients in whom the chest radiograph was scored < or = 1/0 (group 2) on the ILO scale. RESULTS: In patients with an ILO score of < or = 1/0 repetitive mid to late inspiratory crackles were detected by auscultation in seven (22%) patients and by TEW in 14 (44%). HRCT detected definite interstitial opacities in 11 (34%) and gravity dependent subpleural lines in two (6%) patients. All but two patients with evidence of interstitial disease or gravity dependent subpleural lines on HRCT had crackles detected by TEW. In patients with an ILO score of > 1/0 auscultation and TEW revealed mid to late inspiratory crackles in all patients, whereas HRCT revealed gravity dependent subpleural lines in one patient and signs of definite interstitial fibrosis in the rest. In normal subjects crackles different from those detected in asbestosis were detected by TEW in three subjects but only in one subject by auscultation. These were early, fine inspiratory crackles. CONCLUSION: Mid to late inspiratory crackles in asbestos workers are detected by TEW more frequently than by auscultation. Signs of early asbestosis not apparent on the plain radiograph are detected by TEW and HRCT with similar frequency. off
Asbestosis↗
Should functional cardiac murmurs be diagnosed by auscultation or by Doppler echocardiography?
BACKGROUND: For many years, cardiac auscultation has been the only available method for distinguishing between functional and organic murmurs; however, a more reliable differential diagnosis can now be achieved with Doppler echocardiography. The question remains as to whether a Doppler echocardiogram needs to be routinely recorded in the presence of a heart murmur or whether the auscultatory diagnosis of a functional murmur is sufficient. HYPOTHESIS: This prospective study attempts to answer this important question at a time when medical costs have to be curbed. METHODS: The three cardiologists involved in this study saw 516 new patients in their private practice over a 10-month period; of these, 321 (63.6%) underwent Doppler echocardiography. All patients underwent careful auscultation prior to echocardiography. At the end of their examinations, the cardiologists noted whether they considered the murmur to be of functional or organic origin. Minimal mitral or aortic regurgitations of short duration and low velocity occurring on non-thickened valves were considered functional. RESULTS: The results for cardiac auscultation and Doppler echocardiography were considered to be concordant, that is, both techniques diagnosed either a functional or organic murmur in 250 of 321 patients (77.9%). The results for cardiac auscultation and Doppler echocardiography showed a major discordance in just six cases (1.9%). All were mitral regurgitations of moderate severity. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of cardiac murmurs in the general population is very high. As echocardiography currently represents a significant proportion of cardiac medical expenditure, it would be wise to limit the use of this technique to essential indications. This study confirms that both cardiac auscultation and Doppler echocardiography possess important limitations. Nevertheless, it also shows that well-trained cardiologists can identify the vast majority of functional murmurs on auscultation. Better training of nonspecialist physicians in cardiac auscultation may help in containing medical expenses.
Clinical Competence↗
Causes of false-negative auscultation of regurgitant lesions: a Doppler echocardiographic study of 294 patients.
Few data are available regarding the prevalence and causes of false-negative auscultation (mis-auscultation) of aortic (AR), mitral (MR), or tricuspid regurgitation (TR), and there are no such data that are relevant when the patient's pretest probability of having regurgitation is unknown. The authors therefore studied 294 patients examined by pulsed Doppler echocardiography. On 755 examinations (2.57 examinations per patient), Doppler velocity patterns typical of AR, MR, or TR were found in 63, 96, and 49 patients, respectively. For all three murmurs, mis-auscultation was the rule, rather than the exception, with sensitivities of auscultation ranging from 0 to 37%, depending (but weakly) on the site of the murmur and the years of training of the observer. Specificity of auscultation was high (85% to 100%). The factors associated with the mis-auscultation of AR were poor image quality in the echocardiograms, absence of cardiomegaly, and less experience of the examiner. The probability of missing MR increased in the presence of coronary artery disease (CAD) or if the examiner had less experience. The likelihood of missing TR by auscultation was increased by CAD, obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or the absence of cardiomegaly. This study suggests that there is a high prevalence of "silent" murmurs, and that not hearing a regurgitant murmur does not suffice to rule out the presence of regurgitation.
Aortic Valve Insufficiency↗
Intrapartum fetal heart rate assessment: monitoring by auscultation or electronic means.
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to assess the frequency with which auscultation could be used as the primary mode of fetal assessment during labor in a busy labor and delivery suite by means of published criteria. STUDY DESIGN: During a 3-month period, 862 patients in labor with live fetuses between 24 and 43 weeks of gestation were available for auscultation in the prospective study. Auscultation was initiated during a contraction and extended for 30 seconds after uterine activity ceased. It was repeated every 15 minutes in the first stage and every 5 minutes in the second stage of labor. RESULTS: In 420 patients this modality was not begun because of inability of the nurses to meet 1:1 staffing requirements. In 19 patients auscultation was not performed because of obesity (12) or patient refusal (7). Of the 423 assessed by auscultation 392 were unable to complete monitoring caused by the frequency requirement (n = 212) or the recording criteria (n = 163). Of the 31 patients where auscultation was successfully completed, there was a 1:1 nurse ratio during the entire labor. CONCLUSIONS: Auscultation with stringent evaluation and recording frequency is not feasible under normal labor and delivery room conditions unless 1:1 nursing care is always available.
Adult↗
Auscultation of the fetal heart presents advantages over electronic monitoring.
Currently available data support the conclusion that within specified intervals, intermittent auscultation of fetal heart sounds is equivalent to continuous electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for detecting intrapartum fetal compromise. One of the disadvantages of EFM is its associated increase in cesarean delivery rates. Patients should receive information on both intermittent auscultation and EFM to enable them to make an informed choice of method for intrapartum fetal assessment. Presently, EFM is routinely used with the majority of laboring patients in the United States. This is likely due to confusion regarding the proper technique used for intermittent auscultation as well as insufficient information about appropriate interventions in the event fetal bradycardia occurs. We have developed a protocol for the performance of intermittent auscultation, including recommended responses to different levels of bradycardia. Intermittent auscultation is simple, provides objective information, and appeals to many well-informed patients. In addition, when the collection of information not relevant to management decisions is eliminated, intermittent auscultation nursing requirements are not greater than with EFM. Laboring patients should receive information on both intermittent auscultation and EFM to enable them to make an informed choice of method for intrapartum fetal assessment.
Bradycardia↗
Effects of electronic fetal-heart-rate monitoring, as compared with periodic auscultation, on the neurologic development of premature infants.
In a multicenter, randomized clinical trial, we assessed the early neurologic development of 93 children born prematurely whose heart rates were monitored electronically during delivery and compared it with that of 96 children born prematurely whose heart rates were periodically monitored by auscultation. All the children were singletons with cephalic presentation, and all weighed less than or equal to 1750 g at birth. The mental and psychomotor indexes of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development (standardized mean score +/- SD, 100 +/- 16) and a formal neurologic examination were administered at three follow-up visits (at 4, 8, and 18 months of age, corrected for gestational age). At 18 months, the mean mental-development scores in the groups receiving electronic fetal monitoring and periodic auscultation were 100.5 +/- 2.4 and 104.9 +/- 1.8, respectively (P greater than 0.1). The mean psychomotor-development scores in the two groups at 18 months were 94.0 +/- 2.4 and 98.3 +/- 1.8, respectively (P greater than 0.1). The incidence of cerebral palsy was higher in the electronically monitored group--20 percent as compared with 8 percent in the group that was monitored by auscultation (P less than 0.03). In the electronic-fetal-monitoring group (but not in the periodic-auscultation group), the risk of cerebral palsy increased with the duration of abnormal fetal-heart-rate patterns, as assessed by retrospective review (chi 2 trend = 12.71, P less than 0.001). The median time to delivery after the diagnosis of abnormal fetal-heart-rate patterns was 104 minutes with electronic fetal monitoring, as compared with 60 minutes with periodic auscultation. We conclude that as compared with a structured program of periodic auscultation, electronic fetal monitoring does not result in improved neurologic development in children born prematurely.
Birth Weight↗
Accuracy of auscultation in the detection of haemopneumothorax.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy of auscultation in the detection of haemopneumothorax. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: University hospital, Taiwan. PATIENTS: 148 patients with chest injuries admitted between July 1994 and August 1996. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Correlation between the results of auscultation and radiographic findings in 148 patients with injuries to the chest. 83 (56%) had internal injuries, of whom 38 had pneumothoraces, 24 haemothoraces, and 21 haemopneumothoraces. RESULTS: Auscultation had a sensitivity of 84%, a specificity of 97%, an accuracy of 89% and a positive predictive value of 97% in the detection of these injuries. CONCLUSIONS: Auscultation is not as accurate as chest radiography. Chest tubes can be inserted before chest radiography in patients in whom auscultation has indicated an injury. A chest radiograph is essential in those patients with normal breath sounds to exclude a haemopneumothorax that had been missed by auscultation.
Adolescent↗
Interrater reliability of auscultation of breath sounds among physical therapists.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although auscultation is routinely used in the assessment of respiratory status, the ability of the rater to accurately and consistently identify lung sounds has been questioned. The literature on this issue is sparse and has focused on reliability of auscultation of tape-recorded rather than in vivo lung sounds. The purposes of this study were to determine the interrater reliability of physical therapists in the direct auscultation of lung sounds based on their clinical experience in chest physical therapy and to determine whether the adoption of standardized nomenclature and education on proper technique and interpretation affects reliability. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A group of 57 registered physical therapists were stratified by clinical experience into four groups. Sixteen therapists (ie, 4 in each stratum) were randomly chosen using a random number table. The following criteria were developed to delineate clinical experience. Group 1 subjects were senior chest physical therapists with at least 5 years of experience in this area of practice. Group 2 subjects were experienced therapists who had a minimum of 2 years of experience in chest physical therapy and were currently practicing in this area. Group 3 subjects were experienced physical therapists in other areas who were also practicing in chest physical therapy on occasional weekend service. Group 4 subjects were new graduates. Ten patients were evaluated by each group of 4 physical therapists using a teaching stethoscope with one diaphragm/bell and four pairs of earpieces. The education session consisted of discussion of the adoption of standardized nomenclature and education on proper technique and interpretation of auscultation. Interrater reliability was assessed before and after the education session using kappa (kappa) values. Comparisons were made between kappa values before and after the education session to determine the effect of education and between groups to determine the effect of clinical experience. RESULTS: The kappa values before the education session were low, indicating poor reliability in detecting specific abnormal sounds (kappa = -.02-.59). Group 1 (seniors in respiratory therapy) and group 4 (new graduates) demonstrated the greatest reliability levels. The lowest kappa values were observed for detecting and categorizing the quality of breath sounds (normal, absent, bronchial, or decreased) (kappa = -.02-.25). Following the education session, there was a general improvement in reliability (kappa = -.30-.77), especially for group 3 (specialists in other areas). The most improvement was noted for the detection of the quality of breath sounds (kappa = .08-.50). CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: Reliability of auscultation was poor to fair, in general, before the education session. There was a definite improvement in reliability after the education session. There was no clear effect of clinical experience on reliability, and the agreement among observers appeared to depend on the abnormal lung sound present. Limitations of this study and recommendations for future research are discussed. [Brooks D, Thomas J. Interrater reliability of auscultation of breath sounds among physical therapists.
Auscultation↗
[A new medical education using a lung sound auscultation simulator called "Mr. Lung"].
We developed a lung sound auscultation simulator "Mr. Lung" in 2001. To improve the auscultation skills of lung sounds, we utilized this new device in our educational training facility. From June 2001 to March 2002, we used "Mr. Lung" for our small group training in which one hundred of the fifth year medical students were divided into small groups from which one group was taught every other week. The class consisted of ninety-minute training periods for auscultation of lung sounds. At first, we explained the classification of lung sounds, and then auscultation tests were performed. Namely, students listened to three cases of abnormal or adventitious lung sounds on "Mr. Lung" through their stethoscopes. Next they answered questions corresponding to the portion and quality of the sounds. Then, we explained the correct answers and how to differentiate lung sounds on "Mr. Lung". Additionally, at the beginning and the end of the lecture, five degrees of self-assessment for the auscultation of the lung sounds were performed. The ratio of correct answers for lung sounds were 36.9% for differences between bilateral lung sounds, 52.5% for coarse crackles, 34.1% for fine crackles, 69.2% for wheezes, 62.1% for rhonchi and 22.2% for stridor. Self-assessment scores were significantly higher after the class than before. The ratio of correct lung sound answers was surprisingly low among medical students. We believe repetitive auscultation of the simulator to be extremely helpful for medical education.
Auscultation↗
A randomized trial of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether continuous intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring (EFM) is associated with decreased perinatal mortality and morbidity compared with intermittent auscultation. METHODS: The study was conducted simultaneously at two university hospitals in Athens, Greece (Alexandra and Marika Iliadi Hospitals) from October 1, 1990 to June 30, 1991. All patients with singleton living fetuses and gestational ages of 26 weeks or greater were eligible for inclusion. The participants were assigned to continuous EFM or intermittent auscultation based on the flip of a coin. Both groups were followed during labor according to the most recent ACOG guidelines. However, fetal scalp blood pH and crossover from one group to the other were not used. RESULTS: A total of 1428 patients were included, 746 in the EFM group and 682 in the auscultation group. There were no differences between the groups in terms of maternal age, gravidity, parity, gestational age, and number of antepartum high-risk factors. More patients monitored electronically received oxytocin for either augmentation (52.4 versus 38.1%; P = .0001) or induction (15.6 versus 7%; P = .0001). The length of labor was longer in the EFM group (first stage 6.1 +/- 4.3 versus 5.5 +/- 3.7 hours; P = .006; second stage 29.4 +/- 18.6 versus 26.9 +/- 16.9 minutes; P = .01). There was a higher incidence of nonreassuring fetal heart rate patterns in the EFM group (23.4 versus 10.7%; P = .0001) and a higher rate of surgical intervention (11.2 versus 4.8%; P = .0001). This difference pertained to both vacuum extraction (5.8 versus 2.4%; P = .002) and cesarean delivery for suspected fetal distress (5.3 versus 2.3%; P = .005). There were no differences in 1- and 5-minute Apgar scores, fetal acidosis at birth, need for neonatal resuscitation, neonatal intensive care unit admission, use of assisted ventilation, neonatal hospital stay, or any other neonatal complications. Two neonatal deaths occurred in the EFM group and nine perinatal deaths in the auscultation group (two intrapartum and seven neonatal deaths). The perinatal mortality rates were 2.6 per 1000 and 13 per 1000 total births, respectively (P = .04). The two deaths in the EFM group and three of the neonatal deaths in the auscultation group may not have been prevented by intrapartum monitoring; however, four neonatal deaths from the auscultation group occurred in depressed (5-minute Apgar scores less than 7), acidotic (cord artery pH at or below 7.13) infants. The perinatal death rate related to fetal hypoxia was significantly less in the EFM group (zero of 746 versus six of 682; P = .03). CONCLUSION: In this controlled trial, intrapartum EFM, as the primary and only method of intrapartum fetal surveillance, was associated with decreased perinatal mortality due to fetal hypoxia but also with higher rates of surgical intervention for suspected fetal distress.
Adult↗