PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Advance Directive Adherence”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1993

Advance directives. Effect of type of directive on physicians' therapeutic decisions.

BACKGROUND: Despite growing support for advance directives, there are few data validating their utility. We conducted this study to determine if the type of advance directive influences physicians' willingness to withhold specific therapies and if physicians are equally willing to withhold these therapies. METHODS: The 444 full-time faculty of the department of medicine of a university medical center were presented with patient scenarios and accompanying advance directives in three separate surveys that were mailed. They were asked if they would withhold each of 12 specific therapies based on their interpretation of the advance directive. Three types of advance directives were studied: general statement, therapy specific, and therapy specific combined with designation of a proxy and prior patient-physician discussion. RESULTS: The mean proportion of all 12 therapies that were withheld varied by type of advance directive: general-statement advance directive, 55%; therapy-specific advance directive, 71%; and therapy-specific advance directive with proxy and prior patient-physician discussion, 83%. Respondents were more likely to withhold cardiopulmonary resuscitation when given a therapy-specific advance directive vs general-statement advance directive, 84% vs 73%, respectively. With a therapy-specific advance directive that was supported by a proxy and prior patient-physician discussion, 100% of physicians were willing to withhold cardiopulmonary resuscitation. With the therapy-specific advance directive that was supported by proxy and prior patient-physician discussion, physicians were not equally willing to withhold all therapies, ie, mechanically assisted ventilation, 98%; intravenous fluids, 82%; antibiotics, 80%; simple tests, 70%; and pain medications, 13%. CONCLUSIONS: Detailed advance directives with a supportive proxy, coupled with physician-patient discussion, furnish the most reliable medical directives. Even with such directives, physicians are more likely to withhold life-saving therapies than simple tests, treatments, and pain medications.

Advance Directive Adherence↗
PubMed1999

A new doctor in the house: ethical issues in hospitalist systems.

The traditional patient-primary care physician (PCP) relationship provides many ethical protections for patients, including confidentiality, shared medical decision making, and respect for patient autonomy. Hospitalist models, which introduce a purposeful discontinuity of care, threaten these protections and raise certain ethical concerns. We analyze 2 cases that explore ethical issues arising in hospitalist systems and suggest ways to ensure ethical protection for patients. The first case examines how hospitalization can disrupt the patient-PCP relationship and raise ethical issues regarding confidentiality. In the second case, we discuss decision making when the patient's goals and preferences for care change as a result of hospitalization. Effective hospitalist systems provide a model for a trusting patient-physician relationship. Although the hospitalist must take responsibility for inpatient management, the PCP has a key role in addressing important issues in the hospital and providing care after discharge. As hospitalists assume control of inpatient care, they must also provide ethical protections to patients to supplement those currently vested in the patient-PCP relationship. An approach that keeps the patient's best interests foremost, defines a clear role for the PCP, and takes advantage of the expertise and availability of hospitalists will best serve patients and physicians.

Advance Directive Adherence↗
PubMed1995

Advance directives: do they work?

Advance directives have been widely endorsed, and empiric work has taken place that can aid clinicians in the appropriate use of validated documents. This report reviews philosophic and methodologic issues and offers practical illustrations. Despite the evidence that advance directives can work, there are serious barriers to their actual use. Therefore, these barriers are evaluated and potential solutions suggested.

Advance Directive Adherence↗
PubMed2000

Physician-older patient communication at the end of life.

Communication with dying patients and their families requires special skills to assist them in this extremely stressful period. This article begins with a case that illustrates many of the challenges of communicating with the dying. It then reviews the literature about communication with older patients at the end of life, focusing on physician-patient discussions, decision-making, advance directives, and cultural factors. The article concludes with a practical discussion of problems that physicians may encounter when working with older patients at the end of life and their families and recommendations to improve communication.

Advance Care Planning↗
PubMed1998

Advance directives and other medical decisions concerning the end of life in cancer patients in Japan.

The purpose of our survey was to investigate the experience of physicians regarding advance directives and other medical decisions concerning the end of life. A postal questionnaire was sent to 500 Japanese physicians who were most involved in medical care of terminal patients. A total of 339 (68%) physicians responded. In dealing with terminal patients, approximately half gave priority to their patients' wishes for medical care, if known, regardless of the patient's competency. Of the respondents, 149 had been presented with advance directives by their patients and 35% followed all advance directives presented in their practice. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for arrested patients to enable their family to be at the bedside at the time of the death was common. More than 60% of the respondents thought that active euthanasia and assisted suicide were never ethically justified. Our study indicates that the wishes of patients are currently not always given top priority in medical decisions concerning the end of life.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Advance directives, dementia, and 'the someone else problem'

Advance directives permit competent adult patients to provide guidance regarding their care in the event that they lose the capacity to make medical decisions. One concern about the use of advance directives is the possibility that, in certain cases in which a patient undergoes massive psychological change, the individual who exists after such change is literally a (numerically) distinct individual from the person who completed the directive. If this is true, there is good reason to question the authority of the directive -- which is supposed to apply to the individual who completed it, not to someone else. This is 'the someone else problem'. After briefly introducing advance directives as a basis for medical decision-making, this paper elaborates 'the someone else problem' in the context of severe dementia. The paper then reconstructs the reasoning that leads to this putative problem and exposes the important underlying assumption that we are essentially persons. An alternative view of what we are, one that regards personhood as inessential, is then considered, before several arguments are advanced in favor of that alternative view. The paper next explores implications for advance directives: 'The someone else problem' is effectively dissolved, while it is noted that a related problem (one beyond the paper's scope) may persist. A few implications beyond advance directives are also identified.

Advance Directive Adherence↗
PubMed1994

Whose will is it, anyway? A discussion of advance directives, personal identity, and consensus in medical ethics.

I consider objections to the use of living wills based upon the discontinuity of personal identity between the time of the execution of the directive and the time the person becomes incompetent. Recent authors, following Derek Parfit's "Complex View" of personal identity, have argued that there is often not sufficient identity of interests between the competent person who executes the living will and the incompetent patient to warrant the use of the advance directive. I argue that such critics err by seeking personal identity in a purely descriptive manner. By exploring Buchanan and Brock's concept of "surviving interests", an argument is developed that certain future-oriented acts have a normative force that contributes to the narrative unity which is constitutive of personal identity. This narrative concept of the self is entailed by many of our ordinary practices and challenges the philosophical consensus to view the self in a more dynamic and communitarian manner.

Advance Directive Adherence↗