PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Advanced Cardiac Life Support”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Resuscitation. II: Advanced cardiac life support.

Advanced cardiac life support is the definitive sequence of initial treatment for the victim of a cardiac arrest. Advanced cardiac life support forms a large part of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, which also includes basic life support and post-resuscitation intensive care.

Algorithms↗

Basic Life Support and Advanced Cardiac Life Support changes.

Short article that delineates recent changes in Basic Life Support and Advanced Cardiac Life Support. These changes are based on recommendations from the 1992 National Conference on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) and Emergency Cardiac Care (ECC).

Adult↗

The effect of an advanced cardiac life support course on advanced cardiac life support ability.

Thousands of health care providers spend time, money, and energy each year taking the AHA-sponsored ACLS courses, and ACLS-certified health care providers are frequently given greater job responsibility than other health care providers in the same setting. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of an ACLS course on the ability of health care providers to perform ACLS in a simulated situation. A nonequivalent control group design was used. The sample consisted of 76 health care providers whose job responsibilities included ACLS. The Mega-Code skill station from the ACLS course was used to evaluate ACLS performance. Chi-square analyses showed a significant (p less than 0.05) difference in the posttest pass/fail results of the two groups and a significant (p less than 0.05) difference in the changes from pretest to posttest of the two groups. The research hypotheses were supported, and the researches concluded that the course had a positive effect on the subjects' ACLS ability.

Clinical Competence↗

Use of a computerized advanced cardiac life support simulator improves retention of advanced cardiac life support guidelines better than a textbook review.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether an advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) computer simulation program improves retention of ACLS guidelines more effectively than textbook review. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: Academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-five anesthesia residents and faculty tested 10 to 11 months after ACLS provider course training. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomized and asked to prepare for a mock resuscitation (Mega Code) with either textbooks or a computerized ACLS simulation program. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Performance on a standardized Mega Code examination that required application of supraventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, and second-degree Type II atrioventricular block algorithms. Mega Code sessions were administered by an instructor who was blinded as to the subject group. The sessions were videotaped and scored by two evaluators who also were blinded as to the subject group. RESULTS: Participants who used the ACLS simulation program scored significantly higher (mean 34.9 +/- 5.0 [SD] of 47 possible points) than participants who reviewed using a textbook (29.2 +/- 4.9); p < .001. Pass-fail rates for the algorithms were also higher for the group that reviewed with the simulator (mean 2.5 +/- 0.5 of 3 possible passes) than the group that used the textbook (1.6 +/- 1.0); p = .001. CONCLUSIONS: Use of a computerized ACLS simulation program improves retention of ACLS guidelines better than textbook review.

Academic Medical Centers↗

Education in adult advanced cardiac life support training programs: changing the paradigm. Members of the Advanced Cardiac Life Support Education Panel.

To develop a consensus for change in the educational aspects of the Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) Training Program, the American Heart Association appointed panel members to engage in a consensus process. At a preconference meeting held in the fall of 1991, panel members received broad input from experts in adult education, experienced ACLS educators, and resuscitation scientists. The panel then developed a statement based on the preconference discussions and presented it at the National Conference on CPR and Emergency Cardiac Care held in February 1992. The conference's recommendations and the process that led to them are described in this paper. The key conclusions of the consensus process are as follows. The purpose of ACLS programs is the education of health professionals whose jobs include the management of patients in arrest or near-arrest. The goal of each ACLS course is to have each participant succeed in acquiring the skills and knowledge required for resuscitation. Aspects of the course which threaten failure or raise anxiety should be minimized or eliminated. ACLS course directors are strongly encouraged to design courses whose content and presentation are best suited to the training, experience, and needs of the course participants. Flexibility is strongly encouraged. Evaluation (testing) should be used primarily for its educational value, to help both learners and instructors identify areas needing improvement. The problem learner should be identified as early as possible and should receive intensive remediation to achieve the goal of every participant acquiring the targeted skills and knowledge. Because skill retention is variable, rescuers should practice skills frequently in regular refresher sessions. At a minimum, retraining every two years is strongly recommended.

Adult↗

An interactive multimedia training system for advanced cardiac life support.

This paper describes an Advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) training system (ACLSYS) with multimedia and hypertext features for training medical personnel and evaluating their performance during ACLS events. ACLSYS runs in a Windows 95 environment and is written in Visual Basic 4.0 Enterprise Edition and Access 7.0. The system consists of two primary modules: a multimedia training module and a simulation/evaluation module. The training module provides the knowledge and skills required for the appropriate early treatment of cardiopulmonary arrest. The simulation/evaluation module generates randomly an unlimited number of ACLS cases. These cases become part of the training case database and are available for retraining. ACLS certified personnel were included in the validation of the system.

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation↗

Recent progress in advanced cardiac life support.

The revised guidelines for advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) from the American Heart Association are anticipated in the fall of 2000. Although dramatic changes in the approach to adult basic and ACLS are not anticipated, several controversies and new drugs on the horizon may radically change our approach to emergent cardiac resuscitation. This article features some of the evolving thinking on the emergent treatment of the adult with ventricular fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia, the critical rhythms seen in most cases of acute cardiac distress. Approaches to airway therapy drug administration and new agents also are described.

Adult↗

Training in advanced cardiac life support.

The nationally recognized training and certification program in Advanced Cardiac Life Support consists of lecture material and a new concept in training and testing for the practical skills of Advanced Cardiac Life Support. The course content follows closely the concepts of advanced life support as explained in the standards on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiac care.

Allied Health Personnel↗

Evaluation of advanced cardiac life support written examinations.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the quality of 2 advanced cardiac life support written examinations and the relationship between demographic variables and test performance. DESIGN: Descriptive. SETTING: Advanced cardiac life support courses held at 4 midwestern hospitals, one outpatient surgery center, and one community college. SUBJECTS: Nonprobability sample of 367 participants. OUTCOME MEASURE: Two versions of the American Heart Association advanced cardiac life support written examinations. RESULTS: Reliability coefficients of test A and test B were 0.45 and 0.54, respectively. Discrimination and difficulty indices calculated on both tests revealed that test B questions were more difficult, with better discriminators. Prior experience, sex of participant, and profession were identified as factors influencing test performance. CONCLUSION: Although test B surpassed the performance of test A, both examinations were problematic. Additional investigation and refinement of the advanced cardiac life support tests are warranted.

Analysis of Variance↗

Physician compliance with advanced cardiac life support guidelines.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine compliance with advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) guidelines among ACLS-certified and non-ACLS-certified physicians. DESIGN: Retrospective review of consecutive cardiac arrests between July 1989 and June 1990, including assessment of the resuscitation leaders' ACLS certification. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: All nontraumatic prehospital and hospital cardiac arrests in a rural university hospital. RESULTS: Two hundred seven arrests were studied for a total of 436 rhythms with a maximum of 4 rhythms per arrest. There were 78 resuscitations (36.3%) with return of spontaneous circulation. A total of 2,038 interventions were recorded for all rhythms, with 1,320 (64.8%) compliant with ACLS guidelines compared with 718 (35.2%) deviations. Synchronized cardioversion, calcium chloride and sodium bicarbonate were used with significantly higher noncompliance. Ventricular fibrillation had significantly higher mean rhythm deviation scores, whereas scores were significantly lower for sinus rhythm and stable bradycardia (P < .003). Resuscitations led by ACLS-certified and non-ACLS-certified physicians were compared for mean number of deviations per resuscitation attempt, and no differences were found. Resuscitations with return of spontaneous circulation were compared with unsuccessful resuscitations, and there was no difference between groups in controlled deviation scores. No differences could be found between ACLS-certified and non-ACLS-certified physicians for return of spontaneous circulation and survival-to-discharge rates. CONCLUSION: Despite biannual ACLS training of all medical residents and ICU nurses, noncompliance with ACLS guidelines was noted in 35.2% of treatments. We found no correlation between ACLS certification and ACLS guideline compliance.

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation↗

The development and evaluation of new versions of the written examination for the American Heart Association Advanced Cardiac Life Support provider course.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To create new versions of the written, multiple-choice examination used in the American Heart Association (AHA) Advanced Cardiac Life Support course, evaluate their reliability and difficulty, and then design revised versions with improved reliability and of standardized difficulty. DESIGN: Psychometric evaluation of new versions of the AHA Advanced Cardiac Life Support test and revisions. SETTING: AHA Advanced Cardiac Life Support courses. PARTICIPANTS: Candidates for completion of AHA Advanced Cardiac Life Support provider courses in five states. INTERVENTION: The course content was divided into 11 content areas that were weighted for importance and appropriateness for testing in a multiple-choice format. The weights were used to construct a blueprint for a 50-question, multiple-choice examination. Five versions of the examination were then constructed based on the content blueprint, drawing from new questions and expert revision of previously written questions. Reliability and difficulty were assessed using 915 administrations at five different sites nationwide. The initial test versions differed in their degree of difficulty, which was not explained by demographic factors. The results were used to revise three of the versions to improve reliability and equalize difficulty of the versions. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The final five versions have estimated reliability ranging from Cronbach's alpha of .62 to .86. Mean scores ranged from 87.4% to 89.1%. CONCLUSION: After field testing and revision, five examinations with acceptable reliability and roughly equal difficulty were constructed. The new examinations test the participants' knowledge of important aspects of resuscitation science and practice based on a blueprint of the course content.

American Heart Association↗

An experimental algorithm versus standard advanced cardiac life support in a swine model of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare an experimental algorithm with standard advanced cardiac life support in a swine model of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled experimental trial. SETTING/TYPE OF PARTICIPANT: Animal laboratory using swine. INTERVENTIONS: Eighteen swine (17.8 to 23.7 kg) were sedated, intubated, anesthetized, and instrumented for monitoring of arterial and central venous pressures and ECG. Ventricular fibrillation was induced using a bipolar pacing catheter. Animals were randomized to treatment with the experimental algorithm or standard advanced cardiac life support therapy after eight minutes of untreated ventricular fibrillation. The experimental algorithm consisted of starting CPR; giving high-dose epinephrine (0.20 mg/kg), lidocaine (1.0 mg/kg), bretylium (5.0 mg/kg), and propranolol (0.5 to 1.0 mg) by peripheral IV; hyperventilating (20 to 25 breaths per minute); and delaying countershock (5 J/kg) 60 seconds after completion of drug delivery. Data were analyzed with the Student's t-test and Fisher's exact test. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Outcome variables were arterial and central venous pressures, return of spontaneous circulation, and one-hour survival. Hemodynamics were not different between groups during CPR. Return of spontaneous circulation occurred in seven of nine swine (77%) in the experimental algorithm group versus two of nine swine (22%) in the advanced cardiac life support group (P = .057). Four of nine swine (44%) in the experimental algorithm group survived to one hour versus none of the animals in the advanced cardiac life support group (P = .041). CONCLUSION: In this swine model of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, animals treated with an experimental algorithm had a significant improvement in one-hour survival compared with those treated with advanced cardiac life support.

Algorithms↗

The ventilation/compression ratio influences the effectiveness of two rescuer advanced cardiac life support on a manikin.

Time is of crucial importance during advanced cardiac life support (ACLS). Several parallel tasks have to be performed more or less simultaneously. The guidelines recommend a ventilation/ compression ratio of 1:5 in two-rescuer ACLS. This was compared with respect to time and CPR quality to an alternative method of a 2:15 ratio performed by one of the two rescuers freeing one rescuer to concentrate on other tasks than ventilation and chest compression. Seventeen paramedic students were trained in pairs in ACLS according to the European Resuscitation Council guidelines using an Ambu Mega Code trainer manikin. From a starting point of asystole paramedics were required to perform ECG analysis, intubation, i.v. access, adrenalin and atropine injection, flushing of the drug bolus before conversion to ventricular fibrillation followed by defibrillation in addition to ventilation and chest compression. Unpaired two-tailed Student t-test and the Fisher's exact test were used for statistical analysis, with a P-value less than 0.05 regarded as significant. It took significantly less time to perform successful CPR with the 2:15 ratio compared to the 1:5 ratio. The quality of the ventilations and compressions performed were not significantly different between 2:15 and 1:5 ratio. When two rescuers are performing ACLS, the 2:15 ratio method appears to be time saving vs. the 1:5. This could potentially improve the outcome after cardiac arrest.

Allied Health Personnel↗

An integrated logistics support system for training crew medical officers in advanced cardiac life support management.

The purpose of this paper is to present an approach for the development of an integrated logistics support system for training space flight crew medical officers in advanced cardiac life support (ACLS). The most practical approach to deal with this problem has been determined to be the training of one or more of the crew members on the mission as crew medical officers (CMO's). If this approach is taken, there are a number of problems that must be addressed. The basic approach presented in this paper is to develop a performance quality index for ACLS tasks and use this index to monitor and control the performance of crew members throughout their tenure as CMO's. The control tool of the system is based on an integrated learning and forgetting model used to forecast CMO performance level at a given point during flight training. The model represents an aid for trainers in determining a training regime and maintaining the performance standards. A performance evaluator and trainer is also developed to help in the establishment of trainee performance level during training or retraining. All of these tools were evaluated using either expert opinion questionnaires or experimental results. In conclusion, the results presented provide the tools required for an integrated logistics support system for training ACLS personnel.

Aerospace Medicine↗