SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Afatinib”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Clinical pharmacokinetics of afatinib: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Afatinib is commonly used in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This systematic review summarizes clinical pharmacokinetics (PK) evidence focusing on the effect of disease state and drug interactions on afatinib exposure. METHODS: Google Scholar, Science Direct, PubMed, and the Cochrane library were searched for human studies reporting the clinical PK of afatinib. The search yielded 24 articles that met the predefined inclusion criteria. RESULTS: Afatinib exposure increased slightly more than dose proportionally, with higher doses producing greater AUC0-24 and Cmax values. The apparent oral clearance reported after administration of the oral solution was lower than that observed following tablet administration. The Cmax of afatinib increases by 38.5% after coadministration with ritonavir and exposure decreases 34.3% with rifampicin. The Cmax decreases 31.45% when given with pemetrexed. Both the AUC0-24 and Cmax increase in NSCLC and tumor state. The AUC0-24 of afatinib is 2.61 folds higher following multiple oral doses among patients with solid tumors. Afatinib exposure is 22.1 % higher in renal impaired patients than in healthy controls. In grade 2 diarrhea, the AUC0-24 of afatinib is 83.93% higher as than in grade 0-1 diarrhea in solid tumor patients. CONCLUSION: This systematic review provides an updated synthesis of clinical PK evidence on afatinib. Afatinib exposure is influenced by dose, repeated administration, renal impairment, diarrhea associated toxicity, and P-glycoprotein mediated drug interactions. These findings may support individualized dosing, toxicity-guided dose adjustment, and future development of PK models for afatinib.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

A phase II study to evaluate the efficacy of commercially available molecularly matched targeted therapies in the second-line setting.

BACKGROUND: Initial studies have shown improved outcomes in patients receiving cancer therapies matched to their molecular alterations. To improve the chances of finding a therapeutic match for patients, this study evaluated the preliminary antitumor activity of 3 commercially available multitargeted agents in the United States, regorafenib, afatinib, and cabozantinib. METHODS: In this phase II trial, patients who did not benefit from first-line treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), upper aerodigestive tract cancers, non-colon gastrointestinal cancers, and urothelial carcinoma underwent next-generation sequencing to identify actionable genomic alterations. Eligible patients, based on identified mutations deemed treatable by regorafenib, cabozantinib, or afatinib, were enrolled to receive matched targeted therapies. Outcomes were monitored via Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria, with dose modifications per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, v4.03 guidelines for adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: One hundred patients with metastatic cancers were enrolled across tumor types. Median treatment durations were 12 weeks (regorafenib), 10.7 weeks (afatinib), and 24.1 weeks (cabozantinib). The overall objective response rate was 7.0%, with 1 complete response and 8 partial responses. The clinical benefit rate, including responses and stable disease >6 months, was 16.0%. Median progression-free survival ranged from 1.9 months for urothelial carcinoma to 3.2 months for NSCLC. Toxicities were common for all medications; for regorafenib, 90.7% of patients had AEs (50% Grade 3/4); for afatinib, 86% of patients had AEs (54% Grade 3/4); for cabozantinib, 100% of patients had AEs (36% Grade 3/4). The most common AEs were diarrhea, fatigue, nausea, decreased appetite, and stomatitis. CONCLUSIONS: Regorafenib, afatinib, and cabozantinib had modest effects when used as molecularly matched targeted therapies in patients with NSCLC, upper aerodigestive tract cancers, non-colon gastrointestinal cancers, and urothelial carcinoma in the second-line setting. Future research could examine more precise matching of therapies to genomic alterations and evaluate combination therapies.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Novel Co-Occurrence of Germline EGFR p.V843I and Somatic EGFR Exon 19 Deletion in NSCLC: Insights into Reduced Sensitivity to EGFR-TKIs.

Germline EGFR pathogenic variants (PVs) are rare and define a distinct hereditary subset of NSCLC with unique clinical characteristics. Germline EGFR p.T790M is the most frequent and best characterized, with reported sensitivity to first- and second-generation EGFR-TKIs. Yet, the response of germline EGFR variants, especially the rarer ones such as p.V843I, to osimertinib remains poorly characterized. Given the very low frequency of germline non-p.T790M variants, their clinical relevance can only be investigated via case reports. Herein, we report what is, to the best of our knowledge, the first case of advanced lung adenocarcinoma harboring a germline EGFR p.V843I variant coexisting in cis with the unusual somatic EGFR exon 19 C-helix deletion, p.S752_I759del. Additionally, a somatic TP53 variant was detected. Treatment with afatinib induced a partial response lasting only six months, as rapid disease progression occurred without identifiable acquired resistance mechanisms. Subsequently, no objective response to osimertinib or afatinib rechallenge was observed. Acquired EGFR and MET amplification were detected in corresponding rebiopsies. Overall survival was 29 months. Our findings suggest that, despite the presence of the previously reported EGFR-TKI-sensitive, EGFR p.S752_I759del, the co-occurrence of germline p.V843I may have contributed to reduced sensitivity to afatinib and osimertinib. This case expands the molecular spectrum of hereditary EGFR-mutated NSCLC and, together with our narrative review of the literature, supports an emerging model in which germline EGFR PVs may act both as tumor-predisposing events and as potential mechanisms of early resistance to EGFR-TKIs.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Efficacy of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR exon 19 insertions: clinical-genomic, preclinical analysis through LC-SCRUM-Asia (multi-institutional genomic screening registry).

BACKGROUND: EGFR exon 19 insertions (EGFRex19ins) are rare EGFR mutations. Their clinical-genomic characteristics and outcomes with EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) remain uncertain. METHODS: We evaluated the clinical-genomic characteristics and outcomes of EGFR-TKIs for EGFRex19ins in the multi-institutional prospective lung cancer genomic screening project (LC-SCRUM-Asia). We also studied preclinical Ba/F3 models expressing EGFR-K745_E746insIPVAIK (Ba/F3-IPVAIK) to investigate their sensitivity to 1st-, 2nd-, 3rd-generation, and EGFR exon 20 insertion-active TKIs. RESULTS: In LC-SCRUM-Asia, 16,204 NSCLC patients were enrolled from March 2015 to December 2023. EGFRex19ins were detected in 13 samples (0.1 % of NSCLC). The median age was 72 years (range, 38-80); most patients were female (77 %), had adenocarcinoma (92 %), and were never-smokers (62 %). Twelve patients (93 %) had EGFR-K745_E746insIPVAIK, while one (7 %) had EGFR-K745_E746insVPVAIK. The most frequent co-mutation was TP53 (62 %); no patients had other driver alterations. Six patients (46 %) tested positive for EGFR exon 19 deletions with PCR-based Cobas EGFR test, likely due to cross-reactivity arising from sequence homology. Twelve patients received EGFR-TKIs; five (42 %) experienced partial response. In the preclinical study, Ba/F3-IPVAIK showed the highest sensitivity to 2nd-generation EGFR-TKIs compared to other EGFR-TKIs. Structural studies supported these consistent results. When broken down by EGFR-TKI generations, response rates for 1st-, 2nd-, and 3rd-generation TKIs were 50 % (1/2), 80 % (4/5), and 0 % (0/5), respectively. The median PFS for 1st-, 2nd-, and 3rd-generation TKIs were 8.7 (95 % CI, 7.4-NR), 14.7 (95 % CI, 8.0-NR), and 4.4 (95 % CI, 3.4-NR) months, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our preclinical, structural, and clinical findings indicate 2nd-generation EGFR-TKIs are more effective for EGFRex19ins compared to other TKIs.

Adult↗