PubMed HealthSearch

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

A rapid and simple clonality assay for bovine leukemia virus-infected cells by amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) analysis.

UNLABELLED: Enzootic bovine leukosis (EBL), although eradicated in some European countries, is still the most common neoplastic disease of cattle, caused by the bovine leukemia virus (BLV). During the progression of EBL, BLV-infected cells clonally expand, and some of which result in tumor onset. The clonality of BLV-infected cells is generally evaluated with NGS or Sanger sequencing. Although these methods clearly distinguish EBL from non-EBL cases, the procedures are complex and not practical for routine veterinary diagnosis. In this study, we developed an amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) analysis for BLV clonality assay (BLV-AFLP). This analysis uses restriction enzyme digestion to amplify the chimeric regions of BLV 3' linear transcribed region (LTR) and host genome through conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and visualizes the results by gel-electrophoresis. The method was established using cattle samples representing different stages of the disease: BLV-uninfected, non-EBL, and EBL cattle. Non-EBL cattle showed smeared bands, indicating polyclonal proliferation, while EBL cattle showed distinct bands, indicating clonal expansion. The results of BLV-AFLP correlated well with those of previously reported methods, suggesting its efficacy in detecting clonal proliferation. The validation using blood samples of non-EBL cattle and tumor samples of EBL cattle confirmed that BLV-AFLP could effectively identify clonal proliferation in EBL samples. Moreover, the emergence of dominant clones in the tumor at later stages was successfully detected before EBL onset in some cattle, highlighting its sensitivity and potential for early detection. Overall, BLV-AFLP is suitable for practical use in the field, improving BLV management strategies and minimizing economic losses. IMPORTANCE: Enzootic bovine leukosis (EBL) is routinely diagnosed based on external manifestations at the farm, such as the presence of tumors and/or general lymph node enlargement. However, due to the nonspecific clinical manifestations of EBL, over half of EBL cases are unrecognized at the farm, with most cases being diagnosed during postmortem inspection at the slaughterhouse. Early detection and monitoring of clonal expansion are necessary for managing EBL and reducing economic losses. In this study, we developed BLV-AFLP that represents a significant advancement in the diagnosis of EBL in cattle. This method can rapidly assess the clonal proliferation of BLV-infected cells, crucial for distinguishing between asymptomatic and EBL cattle. Additionally, tracking clonal dynamics offers insights into the disease's progression, potentially providing strategies for avoiding economic losses. Overall, as BLV-AFLP is a simple and rapid test for detecting EBL, it is feasible and efficient for routine veterinary practice.

Leukemia Virus, Bovine

Evaluation of bone preparation approaches using length-based analysis and targeted sequencing for forensic human identification of historic skeletal remains.

Advances in DNA technology have significantly enhanced the forensic community's ability to develop genetic profiles from unidentified human skeletal remains. However, sampling requires mechanical grinding of hard tissues before DNA isolation. This processing can compromise genetic profiles, particularly in aged bones. We compared the industry-standard pulverization method with an alternative powder-free preparation involving prolonged demineralization and subsequent slicing of 19th-century cortical bone. Data from DNA quantification, STR genotyping, and targeted SNP sequencing were used to evaluate powdered samples versus demineralized slices from paired human bones. Average human DNA yields for pulverized samples and demineralized slices were 0.032&#x2009;ng and 0.692&#x2009;ng, respectively. Demineralized slices recovered more amplifiable DNA than traditional homogenization methods (p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.05). No pulverized samples produced STR profiles, whereas demineralized slices from the same bone samples yielded partial profiles. Samples underwent DNA repair, library preparation, and hybridization capture using the FORensic Capture Enrichment (FORCE) panel. Applying low-coverage (1X) analysis of high-throughput sequencing (HTS) data, demineralized slices outperformed those prepared by traditional pulverization methods (p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.05) and substantially increased the information recovered compared with conventional STR analysis methods. Based on HTS data from pulverized samples, DNA fragment length ranged from 27 to 95&#x2009;bp, and FORCE SNP recovery was 33.23%. In contrast, for demineralized slices, DNA fragment length ranged from 85 to 114&#x2009;bp, and FORCE SNP recovery was 83.24%. The required reagents and equipment are typically available in forensic labs, and the workflow outlined herein significantly increases the success of DNA recovery from challenging skeletal samples.

Humans