SEARCH · PubMed Health
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVES: To describe the development of the Amputee Mobility Predictor (AMP) instrument designed to measure ambulatory potential of lower-limb amputees with (AMPPRO) and without (AMPnoPRO) the use of a prosthesis, and to test its reliability and validity. DESIGN: Measurement study using known groups method and concurrence with existing measures. SETTING: Academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: A convenience sample of 191 lower-limb amputee subjects who had completed prosthetic training, 24 in the reliability study (mean age +/- standard deviation, 68.3+/-17.9y, range, 28-99y) and 167 in the validity study (mean age, 54.8+/-18.6y; range, 18-100y). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intra- and interrater reliability; construct validity by known groups method; concurrent validity by comparisons with 6-minute walk test, Comorbidity Index, age, and time since amputation; predictive validity by comparison with 6-minute walk test after controlling for other factors. RESULTS: Interrater reliability was.99 for subjects tested with and without their prosthesis; intrarater reliability was.96 and.97. Both the AMPnoPRO (P<.0001) and the AMPPRO scores (P<.0001) distinguished among the 4 Medicare functional classification levels. The AMP correlated strongly with 6-minute walk scores (AMPnoPRO r=.69, P<.0001; AMPPRO r=.82, P<.0001) and the amputee activity survey (AMPnoPRO r=.67, P<.0001; AMPPRO r=.77, P<.0001), and negatively correlated with age (AMPnoPRO r=-.69, P<.0001; AMPPRO r=.56, P<.0001) and comorbidity (AMPnoPRO r=-.43, P<.0001; AMPPRO r=.38, P<.0001). CONCLUSION: The AMP with and without a prosthesis are reliable and valid measures for the assessment of functional ambulation in lower-limb amputee subjects.
There are approximately 700 lower limb amputations performed throughout Scotland each year. A national system of survey and analysis conducted by the Scottish Physiotherapy Amputee Research Group (SPARG) provides information on these patients up until discharge from hospital. However, there has been no method of collecting long-term functional and prosthetic use information following discharge. The Functional Measure for Amputees (FMA) has, therefore, been developed from the Prosthetic Profile of the Amputee (PPA) questionnaire, designed by Gauthier-Gagnon and colleagues in Canada (Grisé et al, 1993). Modifications to the PPA were carried out to make it more appropriate for the Scottish amputee population; these changes were approved by the original authors. The test-retest reliability of the 14-question FMA was assessed using a repeat postal questionnaire study. One hundred and thirty-three (133) from a possible 390 trans-tibial amputees were returned. Comparing sociodemographic and clinical variables between consenters and non-consenters showed no evidence to support sample bias. Continuous data items on the FMA analysed using an intraclass correlation coefficient showed ICC values of 0.74, 0.85, 0.96 and 0.64. Categorical data items analysed using percentage agreements showed reliability of over 70% for seven items, between 40% and 70% for three items and between 20% and 40% for the remaining three items. The FMA questionnaire was found to be reliable on the majority of its questions and moderately reliable on the remaining questions during successive follow-up postal administrations.
Based on evaluation of the rehabilitative needs of patients who have had a leg amputated because of cancer, an amputee visitor program was developed. The visitor is a cancer amputee who has successfully completed rehabilitation. About 5 days after a patient's amputation, the visitor sees the patient, telling of personal experiences, answering the patient's questions, and showing the prosthesis. The visitor later evaluates the visit on a data collection sheet. From 1 to 6 months after the visit, the patient and, if possible, a relative are interviewed to determine their long-term reaction to the program. During a 30-month period, 65 new patients were seen and evaluated by two visitors. Sixty (92%) responded favorably to the visit. In follow-up interviews with 36 patients, 33 (92%) said the visit substantially improved their outlook. In summary, our data indicate that the amputee visitor contributes significantly to rehabilitation.
Rates of amputation as a percentage of all combat injuries have increased significantly since the Korean War. Following traumatic and combat-related amputation, definitive treatment and rehabilitation require a large, multidisciplinary team to provide comprehensive medical and supportive care. Associated injuries are remarkably frequent, complicating treatment and potentially delaying rehabilitation and/or limiting outcomes. Patient and family psychosocial issues also must be assessed and appropriately addressed. The US Army Amputee Patient Care Program, with the support of numerous other government and private organizations, has been developed to meet the comprehensive medical, rehabilitative, and social needs of amputees injured in the current global war on terrorism, with the goal of maximizing subsequent patient outcomes utilizing a sports medicine approach.
Interface pressures and shear stresses were measured at monthly intervals on two trans-tibial amputee subjects who lost more than 12% of their body weight over the course of the study. For one subject interface pressures and shear stresses during the weight-acceptance phase of gait decreased over the study interval at all 13 sites monitored, while the other subject experienced increased pressures distally but decreased pressures proximally. Subjects' stumps appeared to atrophy over the study interval, increasing distal end and patellar tendon loading, but not increasing interface shear stresses at other locations. Adding socks at the end of the study did not return interface pressures to first session values at all sites. It is expected that local stump shape changes occurred, causing a non-uniform change in interface stress patterns.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: The ability to successfully negotiate stairs and steps is an important factor for functional independence. While work has been undertaken to understand the biomechanics of gait in lower-limb amputees, little is known about how amputees negotiate stairs and steps. This study aimed to determine the mechanics of landing in unilateral lower-limb amputees when stepping down to a new level. A secondary aim was to assess the effects of using a shank-mounted shock-absorbing device (Tele-Torsion Pylon) on the mechanics of landing. METHODS: Ten unilateral amputees (five transfemoral and five transtibial) and eight able-bodied controls performed single steps down to a new level (73 and 219 mm). Trials were repeated in amputees with the Tele-Torsion Pylon active and inactive. The mechanics of landing were evaluated by analysing peak limb longitudinal force, maximal limb shortening, lower extremity stiffness, and knee joint angular displacement during the initial contact period, and limb and ankle angle at the instant of ground-contact. Data were collected using a Vicon 3D motion analysis system and two force platforms. FINDINGS: Amputees landed on a straightened and near vertical limb. This limb position was maintained in transfemoral amputees, whereas in transtibial amputees knee flexion occurred. As a result lower extremity stiffness was significantly greater in transfemoral amputees compared to transtibial amputees and able-bodied controls (P<0.001). The Tele-Torsion Pylon had little effect on the mechanics of landing in transtibial amputees, but brought about a reduction in lower extremity stiffness in transfemoral amputees (P<0.05). INTERPRETATION: Amputees used a stepping strategy that ensured the direction of the ground reaction force vector was kept anterior of the knee joint centre. Using a Tele-Torsion Pylon may improve the mechanics of landing during downward stepping in transfemoral amputees.
OBJECTIVE: Foot problems are common in the remaining foot of diabetic amputees. Because high foot pressures are associated with foot ulceration, we studied foot pressures of the remaining foot of diabetic and nondiabetic unilateral amputees. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Four age-matched groups of 11 subjects were studied. The groups were comprised of diabetic subjects with previous major amputation, nondiabetic nonneuropathic amputees, diabetic nonamputee patients with similar peripheral nerve involvement as the diabetic amputees, and nondiabetic control subjects. Vibration perception threshold (VPT) was assessed by biothesiometry and foot pressures with an optical pedobarograph. RESULTS: Mean +/- SE VPT in the diabetic amputees was significantly higher than the nondiabetic amputees (40.2 +/- 3.7 vs. 17.7 +/- 2.8 V, P less than 0.002) and similar to diabetic nonamputees (43.4 +/- 3.3 V, NS). VPT was abnormal in 9 (82%) diabetic amputees, 2 (18%) nondiabetic amputees, and 10 (91%) nonamputee diabetic patients. The mean peak foot pressure in the diabetic amputees was higher compared with nondiabetic amputees (18.3 +/- 2.2 vs. 11.3 +/- 1.4 kg/cm2, P less than 0.05) and control subjects (10.0 +/- 1.5 kg/m2, P less than 0.01), but no difference existed with diabetic nonamputees. Abnormally high foot pressures (greater than 12.3 kg/cm2) were present in 8 (73%) diabetic amputees, 3 (27%) nondiabetic amputees, 8 (73%) diabetic nonamputees, and 4 (36%) healthy subjects. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that high pressures are present under the remaining foot in diabetic amputees, and that these pressures are associated with diabetic neuropathy. Prosthetic usage does not increase the pressures under the remaining foot in nondiabetic amputees.
Lower extremity amputees have to cope with many activities in everyday life that are substantially more difficult than walking on level ground, and such demands require a high degree of functionality from their prosthetic components. The present study is a biomechanical evaluation (kinematics, kinetics and EMG) of stair ascent and descent in a group of eight transtibial amputees (mean (standard deviation): age 51(14) years, height 176(7)cm, mass 88(19)kg); a group of 12 transfemoral amputees (age 37(8) years, height 182(7)cm, mass 83(7)kg) fitted with the electronically controlled C-LEG knee joint system; and a group of 12 able bodied persons (age 30(10) years, height 174(12)cm, mass 69(12)kg). During stair descent the transfemoral amputees presented a strong reduction of the prosthetic ankle moments (0.11Nm/kg) compared to transtibial amputees (0.93Nm/kg) and control subjects (1.26Nm/kg). Loading of the prosthetic knee joint in the transfemoral amputees more closely resembles the loading seen in the control population when compared to transtibial amputees (mean maximum flexion moment: controls 1.31Nm/kg, transfemoral amputees 1.00Nm/kg, transtibial amputees 0.50Nm/kg). Overload of the contralateral limb is more prominent in the transfemoral amputee than in the transtibial amputee. During stair ascent, the transtibial amputee presents a significant reduction of the knee flexion moment compared to the controls (mean maximum flexion moment: transtibial amputees 0.28Nm/kg, controls 1.31Nm/kg). These differences correlate with a change in the muscle activity of the knee extensor and hamstring muscles. The results also show adaptations in motor strategies during stair negotiation, for those with the partial loss of a lower limb due to the functional limits of current prosthetic components. The present data may contribute to a further enhancement of the efficiency of prosthetic feet and knee joints.
The aims of this study were to establish the take-off characteristics of long jump performance of disabled amputee athletes, and to establish to what extent amputee athletes conform to a model of performance defined for elite able-bodied athletes. The jumps of 8 male below-knee (trans-tibial) and 8 male above-knee (trans-femoral) amputee athletes who competed in the finals of the long jump at the 1998 World Disabled Championships were recorded in the sagittal plane on video (50 Hz). Approach speed was measured using a laser Doppler system. The best jump for each athlete was digitized, and kinematic data from the key instants of touch-down (TD), maximum knee flexion (MKF) and take-off (TO) were obtained. Amputees demonstrated a lower approach speed and jumped less far than able-bodied athletes although below-knee amputees performed better than above-knee amputees. For each amputee group there was a significant (p < 0.05) linear relationship between approach speed and distance jumped. With the exception of their slower horizontal speed and greater negative vertical speed at touch-down, below-knee amputees demonstrated characteristics of technique that were similar to elite able-bodied long jumpers. Above-knee amputees at touchdown had a more upright trunk, smaller hip and knee angles and consequently a smaller leg angle. This was attributed to the difficulty of taking off on the last stride on the prosthetic limb. Consequently, above-knee amputees were less able to gain vertical velocity during the compression (TD-MKF) phase, but were able to compensate for this by using a greater hip range of motion during the extension (MKF-TO) phase. It was concluded that below-knee amputees displayed the same basic jumping technique as elite able-bodied long jumpers, but above-knee amputees did not. These findings have implications for the training and technical preparation of amputee long jumpers.
INTRODUCTION: Review of the literature about evaluation of amputees. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A search of the Medline and Reedoc databases with the key words lower limb amputee, upper limb amputee, evaluation of lower limb amputee, evaluation of upper limb amputee, survey of lower limb amputee, survey of upper limb and the same words in French for reports on the evaluation of amputees. RESULTS: Evaluations of amputees differ according to the level of amputation (lower or upper limb) and age (adult or child). They concern standing balance, walking (lower limb) and the mono- or bimanual prehensile capacities with or without prostheses in daily living activities and leisure (upper limb) as well as quality of life, personal satisfaction, psychological impact and, in particular, coping strategies. DISCUSSION: For lower-limb amputees, tools to evaluate include scales of deambulation, of which few are valid in French, and global scales (on locomotor capacities, quality of life and satisfaction), which have been recently validated, but only one of them is valid in French. For upper-limb amputees, specific and valid tools are not available for adults; however, for children some functional capacity scales in daily activities have been validated and take into account psychomotor development. None of these tools are valid in French, and their use is scattered and limited to validation studies. CONCLUSION: Only a few tools to evaluate amputees are valid in French for adults, and they concern lower-limb amputees only. Validating some of these tools in French is necessary.
UNLABELLED: Trans-tibial amputees with different indications for amputation often have stump problems. Many active amputees have limits in daily life and sports activities because of pressure ulcers, friction, allergic dermatitis or volume changes. Many methods and materials have been tried to make a well-fitted socket. A new polyurethane concept had been designed with a shock absorbing effect. The purpose of this prospective study was to compare a conventional suspension with a polyurethane concept with regard to the amputees' satisfaction, socket comfort, physical capacity and to analyse the long-term effect. The total material includes 29 unilateral trans-tibial amputees. They answered a questionnaire after 2 months use of the polyurethane concept and were interviewed after 3 and 5 years. After 3 years 22 amputees and after 5 years 20 amputees used the polyurethane concept. Gait was registered in 7 amputees. Speed and symmetry index (SI) for temporal, stride and kinematics variables were used to evaluate gait. The amputees reported that the polyurethane concept was better or much better in physical capacity in 117 (67%) and socket comfort was better or much better in 119 (82%) compared with the conventional suspension. There was no obvious symmetry difference in gait variables in speed, step length, step time or single support or in kinematics knee variables. The amputees tended to walk faster, decrease in symmetry in temporal and stride variables and increase in symmetry in kinematics variables with the polyurethane concept. After 5 years 6 had died and 20 amputees of the surviving 23 used the polyurethane concept. CONCLUSIONS: The polyurethane concept increased comfort considerably and physical activity increased when the trans-tibial amputees changed from conventional suspension. Gait registration was not useful to evaluate the amputees' satisfaction or socket comfort.
OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate the effects of amputation on the estimates of urea volume of distribution (V) and KT/V urea in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients and to present a method for correcting the errors created by the uncorrected anthropometric formulas estimating V. DESIGN: (1) A mathematical analysis of the error and the correction proposed was performed. (2) Urea kinetic modeling with uncorrected and corrected estimates utilizing both the Watson and the Hume anthropometric formulas was performed in amputees on CAPD. SETTING: Subjects were recruited from four dialysis units in one city: one Veterans Affairs unit, one university-affiliated unit, and two community units. PATIENTS: Fourteen amputees on CAPD:12 with unilateral leg amputation and 2 with bilateral leg amputation, at the same length of the leg, were studied. INTERVENTIONS: Urea kinetic studies were performed in 24-hour drained dialysate and urine specimens. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Uncorrected and corrected estimates of V and KT/V urea were compared to each other and to the predictions of the mathematical model. Body weights corresponding to uncorrected and corrected V estimates were compared to the actual body weights. RESULTS: (1) The mathematical model predicts that uncorrected estimates by the anthropometric formulas will falsely characterize unilateral amputees as leaner than they are and bilateral amputees as more obese than they are. (2) In unilateral amputees studied with the Watson formulas, uncorrected V was 0.546 +/- 0.023 L/kg and corrected V was 0.520 +/- 0.023 L/kg (p < 0.001). Corresponding weekly KT/V urea values were 1.97 +/- 0.14 and 2.07 +/- 0.14, respectively (p < 0.001). Similar results were obtained with the Hume formulas. In bilateral leg amputees studied with the Watson formulas, uncorrected V was 0.479 +/- 0.022 L/kg and corrected V was 0.514 +/- 0.023 L/kg. Corresponding KT/V estimates were 2.11 +/- 0.45 and 1.96 +/- 0.14, respectively. The differences were even greater with the Hume formulas. Estimates of body weight calculated from corrected V values were equal to actual weight measurements, whereas those calculated from uncorrected V values were lower than actual body weight measurements in unilateral amputees, and much higher than actual body weight measurements in bilateral amputees. CONCLUSION: Uncorrected anthropometric estimates falsely characterize unilateral amputees as leaner than they actually are and bilateral amputees, amputated at the same leg length, as more obese than they actually are. Uncorrected KT/V estimates are, therefore, falsely low in unilateral amputees, and falsely high in bilateral amputees. The proposed correction of the anthropometric formulas provides estimates agreeing closely with dietary estimates of body composition. Further studies are needed to define the accuracy of the corrected formulas.