PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Anastomosis”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

Cervical or thoracic anastomosis after esophageal resection and gastric tube reconstruction: a prospective randomized trial comparing sutured neck anastomosis with stapled intrathoracic anastomosis.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to compare in prospective randomized fashion a manually sutured esophagogastric anastomosis in the neck and a stapled in the chest after esophageal resection and gastric tube reconstruction. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Despite the fact that all reconstructions after esophagectomy will result in a cervical or a thoracic anastomosis, controversy still exists as to the optimal site for the anastomosis. In uncontrolled studies, both neck and chest anastomoses have been advocated. The only reported randomized study is difficult to evaluate because of varying routes of the substitute and different anastomotic techniques within the groups. The reported high failure rate of stapled anastomoses in the neck and the fact that most surgeons prefer to suture cervical anastomoses made us choose this technique for anastomosis in the neck. Our routine and the preference of most surgeons to staple high thoracic anastomoses became decisive for type of thoracic anastomoses. METHODS: Between May 9, 1990 and February 5, 1996, 83 patients undergoing esophageal resection were prospectively randomized to receive an esophagogastric anastomosis in the neck (41 patients) or an esophagogastric anastomosis in the chest (42 patients). To evaluate selection bias, patients undergoing esophageal resection during the same period but not randomized (n = 29) were also followed and compared with those in the study (n = 83). Objective measurements of anastomotic level and diameter were assessed with an endoscope and balloon catheter 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. The long-term survival rates were compared with the log-rank test. RESULTS: Two patients (1.8%) died in hospital, and the remaining 110 patients were followed until death or for a minimum of 60 months. The genuine 5-year survival rate was 29% for chest anastomoses and 30% for neck anastomoses. The overall leakage rate was 1.8% (2 cases of 112) with no relation to mortality or anastomotic method. All patients in the randomized group had tumor-free proximal and distal resection lines, but 1 patient in the nonrandomized group had tumor infiltrates in the proximal resection margin. At 3, 6, and 12 months after operation, there was no difference in anastomotic diameter between the esophagogastric anastomosis in the neck and in the thorax (P = 0.771), and both increased with time (P = 0.004, ANOVA repeated measures). Body weight development was the same in the two groups. With similar results in randomized and nonrandomized patients, study bias was eliminated. CONCLUSIONS: When performed in a standardized way, neck and chest anastomoses after esophageal resection are equally safe. The additional esophageal resection of 5 cm in the neck group did not increase tumor removal and survival; on the other hand, it did not adversely influence morbidity, anastomotic diameter, or eating as reflected by body weight development.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

[Ileo-anal anastomosis: surgical anastomosis with mucosectomy or stapled anastomosis without mucosectomy?].

The ileal pouch-anal anastomosis procedure has become the procedure of choice for many patients with chronic ulcerative colitis and with familial adenomatous polyposis. The results in several thousand patients from many institutions are excellent. In an attempt to reduce the number of bowel movements and to improve continence, a modification of the original hand-sewn anastomosis has been proposed in which and ileal pouch distal rectal anastomosis is performed which, in turn, leaves from 1 to 3 cm of diseased rectal mucosa above the anal canal. Advocates of this modification state that resting pressure is higher and that continence, particularly nighttime continence, is significantly improved. Despite some apparent advantage, with less of a decrease in resting pressure and an advantage in ease of operation, no advantage over hand-sewn ileal pouch-anal anastomosis has been shown to-date in two prospective randomized trials in functional results or in complication rate. In addition, it is uncertain what the significance is of the small strip of diseased mucosa that i retained as far a recurrent disease, continuation of extra-intestinal manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease, and with risk of carcinoma. We believe that the stapled ileal pouch distal rectal anastomosis should be avoided in patients who have severe chronic ulcerative colitis low in the rectum or if there is proximal chronic ulcerative colitis with dysplasia or carcinoma. We also feel that this procedure should be avoided in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and in patients who have extra-intestinal manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗
PubMed2001

Outcome of primary and secondary ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and ileorectal anastomosis in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to present Swedish experiences of the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis from the introduction in 1984. The study also compared the surgical and functional outcome of different anal continence preserving procedures: ileal pouch-anal anastomosis as primary surgery, ileal pouch-anal anastomosis as secondary surgery after colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis, and ileorectal anastomosis alone. METHODS: The material comprises all 120 patients with familial adenomatous polyposis reported to the Swedish Polyposis Registry who had undergone prophylactic colorectal surgery, including those operated on because of colorectal cancer from 1984 until the end of 1996. Anal continence preserving surgery was performed on 102 patients: 20 had ileal pouch-anal anastomosis as primary surgery at a median age of 24.5 years, 39 had ileal pouch-anal anastomosis as secondary surgery at a median age of 34 years, and 43 had ileorectal anastomosis alone, at a median age of 26 years, because 6 of the initially ileorectal anastomosis-operated patients were converted to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis as secondary surgery. Surgical outcome was assessed on the basis of hospital records. A questionnaire was used to evaluate the functional outcome. Fisher's exact probability test was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Complications occurred in 51 percent of the patients after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: 40 percent after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis as primary surgery and 56 percent after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis as secondary surgery. When the previous ileorectal anastomosis was taken into account 67 percent of the patients suffered complications which was significantly more compared with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis as primary surgery. After ileorectal anastomosis, 26 percent had complications which was significantly less compared with all other procedures but ileal pouch-anal anastomosis as primary surgery. No cancer occurred after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, either in the ileal pouch or in retained rectal mucosa, but two of the patients who had an ileorectal anastomosis developed rectal cancer. One pouch excision was performed compared with ten rectal excisions. Functional outcome did not differ between ileal pouch-anal anastomosis as primary surgery and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis as secondary surgery. However, ileorectal anastomosis-operated patients had significantly better bowel function with regard to nighttime stool frequency, continence and perianal soreness. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that major advantages of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis are the low excision rate and, so far, no cancer in the ileal pouch. Moreover, the surgical outcome of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis as primary surgery is not significantly different from that of ileorectal anastomosis. However, the good surgical and functional outcome of ileorectal anastomosis, despite the long-range prognosis including rectal cancer and excision risks, has to be taken into consideration when selecting patients with familial adenomatous polyposis for primary surgery.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗
PubMed1999

Comparison of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and ileorectal anastomosis in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the surgical complications and long-term outcome and assess the functional results and quality of life after ileorectal anastomosis and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. METHODS: From 1980 to 1997, 131 patients with familial adenomatous polyposis were operated on or were followed up or both at the Familial Gastrointestinal Cancer Registry at Mount Sinai Hospital. Demographic and operative data were prospectively collected in the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis group, and retrospectively in the ileorectal anastomosis group. A questionnaire or telephone interview or both were undertaken to evaluate functional outcome and quality of life. RESULTS: The ileorectal anastomosis group consisted of 60 patients (mean age, 31 years; mean follow-up, 7.7 years). In the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis group there were 50 patients (mean age, 35 years; mean follow-up, 6 years). There were no statistically significant differences with respect to anastomotic leak rate in ileal pouch-anal anastomosis vs. ileorectal anastomosis (12 vs. 3 percent; P = 0.21), risk of small-bowel obstruction (24 vs. 15 percent; P = 0.58), and risk of intra-abdominal sepsis (3 vs. 2 percent; P = 0.86). Reoperation rate was similar in the two groups (14 vs. 16 percent; P = 0.94). Twenty-one patients (37 percent) with ileorectal anastomosis were converted to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (12 patients) or proctocolectomy (9 patients), because of rectal cancer (5 patients), dysplasia (1 patient), or uncontrollable rectal polyps (15 patients). Two pelvic pouches were excised, and another one was defunctioned. Information regarding functional results and quality of life was obtained in 40 patients (66.6 percent) in the ileorectal anastomosis group and in 43 patients (86 percent) in the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis group. Patients with ileorectal anastomosis had a significantly better functional outcome with regard to nighttime continence and perineal skin irritation. But otherwise, functional results and quality of life were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Although ileorectal anastomosis has a better functional outcome, ileal pouch-anal anastomosis may be preferable because of the lower long-term failure rate. Ileorectal anastomosis is still an option in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis with rectal polyp sparing and good compliance for follow-up.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗
PubMed2001

Wide-lumen stapled anastomosis vs. conventional end-to-end anastomosis in the treatment of Crohn's disease.

PURPOSE: Preanastomotic recurrence and stricturing after surgery for ileocolic Crohn's disease is a frequent, unexplained phenomena that may lead to prompt reoperation. The aim of this study was to determine whether a wide-lumen stapled anastomosis (side-to-side, functional end-to-end) provides better outcome than a conventional sutured end-to-end anastomosis METHOD: A case-control comparative analysis of patients with Crohn's disease from two inflammatory bowel disease centers treated with wide-lumen stapled anastomosis and a matched (age and gender) group treated with conventional sutured end-to-end anastomosis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 138 patients with Crohn's disease were treated, 69 with wide-lumen stapled anastomosis and 69 with conventional sutured end-to-end anastomosis. Preoperative therapy, number of previous resections, indication for operation, and length of bowel resected were similar in both groups. Fewer complications occurred after wide-lumen stapled anastomosis (P = 0.048). A total of 55 patients developed recurrent Crohn's disease symptoms, 39 (57 percent) in the conventional sutured end-to-end anastomosis and 16 (24 percent) in the wide-lumen stapled anastomosis group. Median follow-up was 70 and 46 months, respectively. After conventional sutured end-to-end anastomosis 18 reoperations were required, 15 for anastomotic stricture and 3 for fistulization. After wide-lumen stapled anastomosis three reoperations were necessary, two for stricture and one for fistulization. The cumulative reoperation rate for anastomotic recurrence was significantly lower (P = 0.017; log-rank test) for the wide-lumen stapled anastomosis group. CONCLUSION: Wide-lumen stapled anastomosis is as safe as conventional sutured end-to-end anastomosis and results in a lower incidence of symptomatic recurrent Crohn's disease and need for reoperation. Further prospective study of the wide-lumen stapled anastomosis technique is necessary to define the precise role of this operation in patients with Crohn's disease.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Long-term functional outcome after low anterior resection: comparison of low colorectal anastomosis and colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare long-term functional results of two methods of reconstruction after anterior rectal resection for cancer: low colorectal anastomosis and colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: After anterior resection for mid or low rectal cancer, the decision to perform low colorectal or coloanal anastomosis is made intraoperatively, depending on the distance of the tumor from the anal verge. Functional results of these operations are considered to be similar one to two years after surgery. No study to date has compared long-term functional results after rectal excision followed by either low colorectal anastomosis or colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis. METHODS: From 1987 to 1992, 173 patients underwent anterior resection for cancer located between 2 to 12 cm from the anal verge. All patients alive without recurrence were contacted by telephone interview for assessment of functional results. There were 47 patients with colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis and 34 patients with low colorectal anastomosis. Minimum follow-up was three years for all patients (mean, 5 years). RESULTS: The two groups were well matched for gender, age, histologic stage, and use of adjuvant therapies. Patients with colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis displayed significantly better function in terms of frequency of defecation (1.57+/-1 vs. 2.79+/-1; P=0.001) and presence of irregular transit or stool "clustering" (30 vs. 71 percent; P=0.003). Patients who underwent colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis were significantly less likely to require constipating agents (4 vs. 21 percent; P=0.03) or need to follow a restricted diet (14 vs. 41 percent; P=0.01). Results concerning the need to defecate again within one hour and disruption of social or professional life as a consequence of surgery showed a tendency in favor of colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis. CONCLUSION: Colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis offers superior long-term function compared with low colorectal anastomosis after radical treatment of rectal cancer. Preservation of a short rectal segment followed by a straight colorectal anastomosis does not offer any clinical advantage over colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Functional outcome of conversion of ileorectal anastomosis to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and ulcerative colitis.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to review the functional outcome in 20 patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and ulcerative colitis who were converted from ileorectal anastomosis to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. METHODS: From 1985 to 1997, 12 patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (5 males; mean age, 39.1 years) and 8 patients with ulcerative colitis (5 males; mean age, 36.7 years) underwent conversion from ileorectal anastomosis to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Clinical and operative data were analyzed retrospectively. Functional results were obtained by telephone interview in 16 patients (94 percent) after pouch construction. Four patients were not interviewed (2 were deceased, 1 was lost to follow-up, and 1 was not reachable). RESULTS: Indications for conversion were uncontrollable rectal polyps (10 patients) and colonic cancer found in the pathology specimen after ileorectal anastomosis in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (2 patients), intractable proctitis (5 patients), colonic cancer found in the pathology specimen of patients with ulcerative colitis after ileorectal anastomosis (2 patients), and rectal dysplasia (1 patients). Mean follow-up time was 5 (range, 1-11) years. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis was handsewn in 14 patients, and the remaining cases were double-stapled in 4 patients with ulcerative colitis. No intraoperative difficulties were reported in 13 cases; technical problems were related to adhesions (3 cases), difficult rectal dissection (2 cases), and stapler-related difficulties (2 cases). Postoperative complications after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis included small-bowel obstruction (4 patients) and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis leak (1 patient). Patients with ileorectal anastomosis vs. those with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis had a better functional outcome with regard to nighttime continence (14 (88 percent) vs. 6 (38 percent) patients) and average bowel movements (<6/day; 12 (75 percent) vs. 4 (25 percent) patients). Complete daytime continence, 15 (94 percent) vs. 10 (62 percent) patients, was similar in the two groups. Physical and emotional well-being were similarly rated as very good to excellent. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and ulcerative colitis with ileorectal anastomosis, conversion to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis may be required. In view of the risk of rectal cancer or intractable proctitis, patients seem to accept the conversion in spite of poorer bowel function.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗
PubMed2001

Coloplasty in low colorectal anastomosis: manometric and functional comparison with straight and colonic J-pouch anastomosis.

PURPOSE: After resection of the distal rectum with a straight reanastomosis, poor bowel function can occur. This is felt to be because of the loss of the rectal reservoir. To overcome this, a neoreservoir using a colonic J-pouch has been advocated in low colorectal and coloanal anastomosis. However, difficulties in reach, inability to fit the pouch into a narrow pelvis, and postoperative evacuation problems can make the colonic J-pouch problematic. Coloplasty is a new technique that may overcome the poor bowel function seen in the straight anastomosis and the problems of the colonic J-pouch. The purpose of this study was to compare the functional results after a low colorectal anastomosis among patients receiving a coloplasty, colonic J-pouch, or straight anastomosis. METHODS: Twenty patients underwent construction of a coloplasty with a low colorectal anastomosis. Postoperative manometry and functional outcome of these patients was compared with a matched group of 16 patients who had a colonic J-pouch and low colorectal anastomosis and 17 patients who had a straight low colorectal anastomosis. RESULTS: Maximum tolerated volume was significantly favorable in the coloplasty (mean, 116.9 ml) and colonic J-pouch group (mean, 150 ml) vs. the straight anastomosis group (mean, 83.3; P < 0.05) The compliance was also significantly favorable for the coloplasty (mean, 4.9 ml/mmHg) and the colonic J-pouch group (mean, 6.1 ml/mmHg) vs. the straight anastomosis group (mean, 3.2 ml/mmHg; P < 0.05) The coloplasty (mean, 2.6; range, 1-5) and colonic J-pouch (mean, 3.1; range, 2-6) had significantly fewer bowel movements per day than the straight anastomosis group (mean, 4.5; range, 1-8; P < 0.05). Similar complication rates were noted in the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a coloplasty and low colorectal anastomosis seem to have similar functional outcome along with similar pouch compliance compared with patients with colonic J-pouch and low colorectal anastomosis. However, the coloplasty may provide an alternative method to the colonic J-pouch for a neorectal reservoir construction when reach or a narrow pelvis prohibits its formation. Technically it also may be easier to construct.

Anastomosis, Surgical↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Evaluation of a biofragmentable anastomosis ring for small intestinal anastomosis in ponies.

Six ponies divided into two groups of three were used in a double crossover study design. Group 1 ponies had a small intestinal resection and anastomosis performed using a biofragmentable anastomosis ring (BAR); group 2 ponies had a hand-sewn small intestinal resection and anastomosis using a Gambee suture pattern. Approximately 30 days later, all ponies had a second celiotomy and anastomosed segments were removed. Group 1 ponies had a hand-sewn anastomosis performed and group 2 had a BAR. The anastomotic sites were collected at necropsy approximately 30 days later. Anastomosed intestinal segments were evaluated with ultrasound to determine lumen diameter, area, circumference, and wall thickness. Gross descriptions of adhesions were recorded and sections of the anastomotic site were taken for histological evaluation. Time to perform the BAR anastomosis was significantly less (P = .0004) than for the hand-sewn Gambee anastomosis. Ponies with handsewn anastomoses had no signs of colic, whereas five of six ponies with BAR anastomoses had several episodes of abdominal discomfort, between day 16 to 18, corresponding to the time of BAR disintegration as determined by abdominal radiographs. Hand-sewn anastomoses had a tendency to have more adhesion formation than BAR anastomoses, but all anastomoses, except one BAR anastomosis, were graded as having a low obstructive potential. BAR anastomoses had a significantly larger mean index of stenosis for intraluminal diameter (76% +/- 13.6), area (93.7% +/- 6.01) and circumference (75.8% +/- 14.0) than the hand-sewn anastomoses (26.6% +/- 11.9; 44.6% +/- 19.5; 26.8% +/- 12.7). The BAR anastomoses also had a significantly smaller mean intraluminal diameter (0.96 cm +/- 0.49), area (0.838 cm2 +/- 0.65) and circumference (3.28 cm +/- 1.63) than the hand sewn anastomoses (3.11 cm +/- 0.73; 7.99 cm2 +/- 3.9; 10.3 cm +/- 2.47). In addition, the BAR anastomoses had a significantly larger (P = .0069) bowel wall thickness at the anastomoses and a significantly larger (P = .047) wall thickness proximal to the anastomosis than the hand-sewn anastomoses, indicating some degree of hypertrophy because of chronic obstruction. No significant difference was found in the diameter, area, or circumference between bowel proximal and distal to the anastomosis for either the BAR or Gambee techniques, or between the BAR and Gambee anastomosis as a measure of chronic obstruction. There was a significantly higher (P = .0043) histological score (worse healing) for mucosal healing and continuity for the BAR, as well as a tendency to score higher for inflammation, anastomotic alignment, and anastomotic fibrosis. The BAR technique had a significantly higher (P = .0043) total histological score than the Gambee technique. Although the BAR was advantageous in many respects, results of this study suggest that it should not be used for equine small intestinal anastomosis because of the potential for stricture formation.

Anastomosis, Roux-en-Y↗
PubMed1988

["One-knot" microvascular anastomosis using glutide as an external splint--experimental arterio-arterial anastomosis in rats].

Experimental microvascular anastomosis using a glutide copolymer (lactide: glycolide = 80: 20) as an external splint was undertaken in rats between the left and the right carotid arteries. Both arteries were dissected free over a 1-cm length, the left carotid artery was transected at the cranial end, and the right carotid artery was cut at the caudal end. The left carotid artery was then introduced into a glutide pipe-splint. The arterial wall was turned back 180 degrees over the edge of the splint. The reflected part of the artery and the glutide were covered with the freed-up right carotid artery. One stitch was made around the two arteries and the glutide in a manner similar to that of binding a barrel with steel wire. The "One-knot anastomosis" was then complete. We call this type of anastomosis "antegrade anastomosis". If, on the other hand, the right carotid artery is introduced into the pipe, turned back at the edge of the glutide, covered with the left carotid artery and secured with one stitch, the technique is known as "retrograde anastomosis". The patency rates of the resulting vessels were as follows: antegrade anastomosis, 83% (15/18); and retrograde anastomosis, 92% (23/25); so that the average patency rate was 88% (38/43). We measured the anastomosing time that is the time between the transection of one of the two arteries and the completion of the anastomosis. The average anastomosing time was 21 minutes for antegrade anastomosis and 14 minutes for retrograde anastomosis. But the 'pure anastomosing time' (the time taken to connect the two already prepared arteries) was 2-3 minutes. We believe that one-knot anastomosis technique for future clinical application is promising.

Anastomosis, Surgical↗
PubMed1989

Sutureless large bowel anastomosis: European experience with the biofragmentable anastomosis ring.

Sutureless colonic anastomosis using a biofragmentable anastomosis ring (BAR) has been evaluated in a prospective randomized comparison with sutures and staples for elective colorectal surgery. One hundred and one patients underwent BAR anastomosis, 85 a sutured anastomosis, and 16 a stapled anastomosis. There were two anastomotic leaks in the patients undergoing BAR anastomosis, seven in patients having a sutured anastomosis, and one in a patient who had a stapled anastomosis. Wound infection occurred in ten BAR patients, ten sutured patients and no stapled patient. There was no statistically significant difference in these or in other postoperative complications between the groups. The BAR was easy to use and is a safe alternative to sutures and staples for large bowel anastomosis.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Comparison of defecatory function after colonic J-pouch anastomosis and straight anastomosis for stapled low anterior resection: results of a prospective randomized trial.

PURPOSE: Although defecatory function after low anterior resection for rectal cancer is reported to be better following colonic J-pouch than straight anastomosis, few prospective randomized trials comparing the two forms of anastomosis have been reported. We performed a prospective randomized trial comparing straight anastomosis with colonic J-pouch anastomosis both clinically and physiologically in patients undergoing stapled low colorectal anastomosis. METHODS: A total of 42 consecutive patients were intraoperatively randomized to undergo either straight anastomosis or colonic J-pouch anastomosis. Clinical defecatory function was evaluated by a questionnaire answered preoperatively, then 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Anorectal physiological assessment was also carried out before surgery, then 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The clinical defecatory function assessed 6 months and 12 months after surgery did not differ between the two groups. However, while the length of high-pressure zone was significantly shortened, and (neo)rectal capacity was significantly reduced postoperatively in the straight group, none of these physiological parameters were significantly altered in the pouch group. CONCLUSION: Although the aim of colonic J-pouch to preserve reservoir function was physiologically achieved, the improvement in clinical defecatory function was not significant. Thus, further prospective studies are needed to confirm the functional superiority of colonic J-pouch anastomosis for stapled low colorectal anastomosis after low anterior resection.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

[Experimental study of hypoglossal facial anastomosis and accessory-facial anastomosis in guinea pigs].

Hypoglossal facial nerve anastomosis (XII-VII anastomosis) or accessory-facial anastomosis (XI-VII anastomosis) have been chosen for facial rehabilitation when the facial nerve is widely sacrificed and end-to-end anastomosis or nerve grafting is unavailable. However, no detailed study has been conducted to determine which donor nerve is better for the anastomosis procedure in view of regeneration of the facial nerve. To compare and evaluate nerve regeneration after XII-VII anastomosis and XI-VII anastomosis, animal models of these anastomoses were made in guinea pigs by using a Y-shaped silicon tube. The proximal cut-ends of the hypoglossal nerve and accessory nerve were suspended in the paired inlet limbs of a Y-shaped silicone tube with a 9-0 nylon suture, and the distal cut-end of the facial nerve was suspended in the single outlet limb in a similar manner. After 4 and 8 weeks, histological studies were carried out. An electrophysiological study of conduction velocity and amplitude of evoked electromyography were measured at 8 weeks postoperation. The nerve fibers regenerated from the hypoglossal nerve were significantly more numerous than those from the accessory nerve at both 4 and 8 weeks after anastomosis. The amplitude of evoked electromyography elicited from the hypoglossal nerve was greater than that from the accessory nerve, even though there is no significant difference in conduction velocities between the two anastomoses. The nerve regeneration by the cross-over procedure was influenced by many factors such as the number of nerve fibers in the donor nerve and the affinity between donor and recipient nerves. The number of nerve fibers in the hypoglossal nerve was significantly greater than that in the accessory nerve. However, there was no significant difference in the ratios of regenerated nerve fibers to the preoperative nerve fibers. Accordingly, we concluded that the affinity of the hypoglossal or accessory nerve to the facial nerve is a minor factor if it exists, and the difference in the fiber count in these nerves is a major factor in the outcome of nerve regeneration.

Accessory Nerve↗
PubMed1995

Sutureless anastomosis using a biofragmentable anastomosis ring.

The biofragmentable anastomosis ring (BAR) is composed of polyglycolic acid and barium sulfate. When used for intestinal anastomosis, the BAR fragments after the anastomosis is established. We used this device in 43 patients. In three patients, the anastomosis with BAR was abandoned due to technical difficulties. A total of 43 anastomoses with BAR were performed in 40 patients. The operations in which BAR was used included right hemicolectomy in 12 patients, transverse colectomy in 7, sigmoidectomy in 11, small bowel resection in 5 and other bowel resections in 8. The time spent for the BAR anastomsis ranged from 7 to 30 min with a mean of 15.2 min, which was significantly shorter than that of conventional hand-sutured anastomosis in 23 cases. The fragmentation and excretion of the BAR occurred from 14 to 49 days later with a mean of 21.8 days. There was only one instance of anastomotic leakage (1/40, 2.5%), which occurred in a patient with a cytomegaloviral infection of the intestine. A postoperative barium enema study in 28 patients showed no passage disturbance through the anastomosis. In conclusion, the anastomosis using BAR is considered to be a simple, safe, and fast method for performing either colonic or small intestinal anastomosis.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Scintigraphic comparison of neorectal emptying between colonic J-pouch anastomosis and straight anastomosis after stapled low anterior resection.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Colonic J-pouch anastomosis after low anterior resection of the rectum has been reported to be associated with an increased risk of evacuation difficulty. Using scintigraphy we compared neorectal emptying after stapled low anterior resection between colonic J-pouch anastomosis and straight anastomosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 19 patients after colonic J-pouch anastomosis and 22 after straight anastomosis. After the introduction of an artificial stool containing (99m)Tc-DTPA into the neorectum sequential lateral gamma images were obtained. From the time activity curve of radioactivity in the whole pelvis the time taken to evacuate one-half of the introduced artificial stool ( t(1/2)) and the percentage of artificial stool evacuated in 1 min (Evac(1)) were calculated. Fourteen volunteers were also studied as the reference group. RESULTS: The t(1/2) was significantly longer and Evac(1) significantly lower in patients after low anterior resection than in the reference group. t(1/2) was significantly longer in the pouch group than in the straight group. Anastomotic height was significantly correlated with both t(1/2) and Evac(1). Neither t(1/2) nor Evac(1) was correlated with the severity of impaired defecatory function. CONCLUSION: Although neither of the two parameters of neorectal emptying was correlated with the severity of impaired defecatory function, less effective neorectal emptying in patients after colonic J-pouch anastomosis than in those after straight anastomosis may be a factor causing evacuation difficulty after colonic J-pouch anastomosis.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Sutureless intestinal anastomosis with the biofragmentable anastomosis ring: experience of 632 anastomoses in a single institute.

PURPOSE: Uncertainty with the safety of the biofragmentable anastomosis ring makes surgeons hesitate in its widespread use in intestinal surgery. This study was designed to evaluate the validity of the biofragmentable anastomosis ring as a routine anastomotic device in enterocolic surgery. METHODS: The study analyzed the nine-year experience of 632 biofragmentable anastomosis ring anastomoses performed in 617 patients: 525 (83 percent) as elective procedures and 107 (17 percent) as emergency. Three classic types of anastomosis, end-to-end (n=354), end-to-side (n=263), and side-to-side (n=15), were performed with a standard technique. RESULTS: Anastomotic sites included ileocolic/ileorectal in 283 patients (45 percent), colorectal in 148 (23 percent), enteroenteric in 101 (16 percent), and colocolic in 100 patients (16 percent). Anastomotic leakage with clinical relevance was observed in five patients (0.8 percent): three elective cases, and two emergency (2 colorectal anastomoses and 1 ileorectal required diversions). Among 13 instances (2.1 percent) with postoperative intestinal obstruction, only 1 required relaparotomy for closed-loop obstruction. Seven patients (1.1 percent; 4 elective cases, and 3 emergency) died postoperatively; no deaths were directly related to the biofragmentable anastomosis ring technique. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the anastomosis using the biofragmentable anastomosis ring is a uniform and highly reliable technique even in high-risk emergency surgery. Along with its clinical validities, clinical application of the biofragmentable anastomosis ring in different types of anastomoses in enterocolic surgery is expected to be expanded with a high level of technical safety.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Sleeve anastomosis of the intestine. Physical and biochemical studies of a new intestinal anastomosis in rats.

A new, sleeve-shaped interpositional anastomosis of the small intestine was tested in rats. It was compared with a conventional two-layer anastomosis as regards healing, bursting strength, collagen content and complications. Each type of anastomosis was constructed in a separate group of 38 rats. The complications rate did not differ between the two groups. At 2 and 4 days postoperatively the bursting pressure was significantly higher in the sleeve anastomosis than in the conventional anastomosis. Hydroxyproline content did not differ between the two types of anastomosis. The study demonstrated superior breaking strength of sleeve anastomosis in the early postoperative period compared with conventional two-layer anastomosis. This finding merits further investigation.

Anastomosis, Surgical↗