SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Anesthesia, Local”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

14 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Early Analgesia for the Management of Acute Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of early analgesic interventions, particularly NSAIDs versus opioids, in reducing pain and improving clinical outcomes among adults with AP. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov from database/registry inception to December 2025 to obtain relevant data. Randomized controlled trials involving adults aged 18 years or older diagnosed with AP, irrespective of the etiology and severity, who were administered analgesics (opioids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, epidural anesthesia, local anesthesia, and paracetamol) and compared with placebo, conventional treatment, or another analgesic modality were included in this review. The primary outcome assessed was pain reduction. The secondary outcomes assessed were the need for rescue analgesia, length of hospital stay, complications (local and/or systemic), mortality, and adverse drug effects. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0. Effect estimates were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis (DerSimonian-Laird approach), while nonpooled outcomes were summarized narratively. RESULTS: A total of 13 studies were included in the analysis. NSAIDs provided pain relief comparable to opioids, with a lower incidence of local complications (RR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.37-0.94). No significant differences in the need for rescue analgesia (OR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.33-2.35), length of hospital stay (MD: -2.68 d, 95% CI: -6.27 to 0.91), mortality (RR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.19-3.05), and adverse drug effects (RR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.17-1.76) were observed. However, the findings are limited by study bias and heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: Early analgesia with NSAIDs has efficacy and safety comparable to opioids in adults with AP, with the advantage of reducing local complications.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Evaluation of intravenous sedation in dental implant surgeries: A prospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of intravenous sedation on patient-centered outcomes during implant and bone augmentation surgeries. METHOD: A prospective observational cohort study included 40 patients undergoing placement of ≥3 implants, with or without bone augmentation. Patients underwent surgery under either intravenous sedation (n = 20) or local anesthesia alone (n = 20), according to routine clinical decision-making and patient preference. The sedation group received intravenous sedation with a multimodal regimen comprising remimazolam, dexmedetomidine, alfentanil, and low-dose esketamine, whereas the control group received local anesthesia only. Patient-reported outcome measures, hemodynamic parameters (SBP, DBP, HR, SpO2), postoperative pain (0-10 scale), and OHRQoL (OHIP-14) were recorded from baseline through 7 days post-surgery. RESULTS: Intravenous sedation was associated with significantly lower intraoperative pain (0.5 [IQR: 0∼2.75] vs. 3.25 ± 2.40, p = 0.003), anxiety (1 [IQR: 0∼2.75] vs. 4 [IQR: 3∼6], p = 0.001), and experienced discomfort (2 [IQR: 1∼3.75] vs. 4.15 ± 2.16, p = 0.016), and shortened perceived treatment duration (2.90 ± 2.34 vs. 5 [IQR: 4∼5], p = 0.020). Early postoperative pain was lower in the sedation group from Days 1-4 (p = 0.003-0.010). Hemodynamic parameters were more stable under sedation, with lower SBP (116.42 ± 13.32 vs. 144.11 ± 17.42 mmHg, p < 0.001), DBP (73.21 ± 10.28 vs. 82.37 ± 11.03 mmHg, p = 0.012), and HR (71.00 [IQR: 62.50∼79.25] vs. 85.00 ± 10.72 bpm, p = 0.021). OHRQoL scores favored the sedation group in swallowing, diet, malaise, and daily activities, particularly during the first three postoperative days (p=0.006-0.040). CONCLUSION: Intravenous sedation may enhance the patient experience during implant and/or bone augmentation procedures by reducing intraoperative pain and anxiety, improving hemodynamic stability, and promoting better early-postoperative recovery and OHRQoL. These findings suggest that intravenous sedation provides a safe and effective alternative for implant dentistry surgery, particularly for anxious or pain-sensitive individuals.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Morbidity and mortality from local anesthetics: localized and systemic toxicity.

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: Local anesthetics remain vital to modern medicine, yet their narrow therapeutic window continues to result in complications. This review synthesizes recent literature to define the current landscape of local anesthetic-associated adverse events. RECENT FINDINGS: Perioperative mortality attributable to local anesthetics persists despite sustained safety initiatives and professional society recommendations. Pharmacovigilance and case data identify lidocaine (oropharyngeal, topical, and via local infiltration) as the predominant contributor to adverse outcomes, including death. Local anesthetic systemic toxicity remains an issue, with a recent shift in epidemiology: an increasing proportion of toxic events originates from surgeon- and proceduralist-administered analgesia. Anesthesiologist-controlled methods also cause toxicity via catheter-based delivery and nerve blocks in highly vascular regions. Localized toxicity in the form of high neuraxial contributes to morbidity, with recent reviews reinforcing known risk factors; whereas localized neurotoxicity appears less troublesome when managed appropriately. SUMMARY: The cumulative evidence identifies shifts in the patterns of systemic and localized toxicities. Bupivacaine-based peripheral nerve blocks no longer represent the principal cause of complications because of the advent of ultrasound guidance and lipid emulsion therapy. In contrast, high neuraxial techniques persist as a cause of morbidity, accompanied by intravenous/oropharyngeal lidocaine, proceduralist-administered local infiltration analgesia, and catheter-based delivery.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Clinical effectiveness of transversus abdominis plane block versus local anaesthesia wound infiltration for postoperative pain relief after laparoscopic appendicectomy in children: A multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled phase III trial.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pain relief after laparoscopic appendicectomy in children provided by transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and local anaesthesia wound infiltration (LAWI) of trocar insertion sites has never been compared. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether TAP block could decrease postoperative opioid requirements after laparoscopic appendicectomy in children compared with LAWI. DESIGN: Multicentre, double-blind, phase III randomised trial. SETTING: Two tertiary paediatric surgery centres. PATIENTS: Children aged 3 to 15 years admitted for laparoscopic appendicectomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the total dose of nalbuphine delivered within 24 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes were the Face Legs Activity Cry Consolability (FLACC) scale values at 1, 2, 6, 12 and 24 h, the time from levobupivacaine injection to the first dose of nalbuphine, and the time from the end of surgery to the first mobilisation. Patients received either ultrasound-guided TAP block (TAP group) or LAWI of trocar insertion sites (infiltration group) with 0.6 ml kg -1 of levobupivacaine 2.5 mg ml -1 , combined with standardised systemic multimodal analgesia including paracetamol, ketoprofen, phloroglucinol and nalbuphine. RESULTS: Forty-six and 50 patients were analysed in the TAP and infiltration groups, respectively [age: 10 [7 to 12] versus 10 [8 to 12] years; females: 16 (35%) versus 25 (50%); duration of surgery: 71 [64 to 90] versus 69 [56 to 89] min]. The primary outcome (total nalbuphine dose) was 0.2 [0.0 to 0.2] and 0.2 [0.0 to 0.2] mg kg -1 in the TAP and infiltration groups, respectively ( P  = 0.95). FLACC scale values did not significantly differ between the two groups ( P  = 0.78). Time to the first dose of nalbuphine or to first mobilisation was not significantly different between groups ( P value for log-rank test = 0.095 and 0.18, respectively). CONCLUSION: TAP block does not appear to provide a greater opioid-sparing effect than LAWI of trocar insertion sites after laparoscopic appendicectomy in children, when combined with systemic multimodal analgesia including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04969133.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Analgesia for Awake Internal Jugular Vein Cannulation in Trauma Emergency Bay: A Randomized Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Superficial Cervical Plexus Block With Local Infiltration.

BACKGROUND: Internal jugular vein (IJV) cannulation is a critical component of trauma resuscitation but is often associated with significant pain during vessel dilation and suturing when performed under local anesthetic (LA) infiltration. OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized that an ultrasound (USG)-guided superficial cervical plexus block (SCPB) would provide superior analgesia and improve procedural efficiency in awake trauma patients compared to standard LA infiltration. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized study of conscious, adult trauma patients requiring IJV cannulation. Participants were randomized to receive either 10 mL of 1% lignocaine via ultrasound-guided SCPB (Group S) or LA infiltration (Group L). The primary outcome was procedural pain measured by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS 0-10) during skin puncture, vessel dilation, catheter insertion, and suturing. Secondary outcomes included total procedure time, Verbal Numeric Rating Discomfort Scale (0-10), and complications. RESULTS: We enrolled 60 patients, with 30 patients assigned to each study group. Median NRS pain scores were significantly lower in Group S compared to Group L at all procedural time points (p < 0.01). The total procedure time was reduced by approximately 50% in Group S (7.5 min [interquartile range (IQR) 6.0-9.3]) compared to Group L (15.5 min [IQR 9.5-16.5]; p < 0.01). Patient discomfort scores were also significantly lower in Group S (p < 0.01). No periprocedural complications were reported in either group. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided SCPB may be a useful alternative to local infiltration for IJV cannulation in selected awake trauma patients, when performed by clinicians experienced in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia. By providing comprehensive sensory coverage, the technique significantly reduces procedural time and enhances patient cooperation without need for systemic sedation.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Comparing the efficacy and safety of unilateral versus bilateral spinal anesthesia: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Unilateral spinal anesthesia has gained increasing attention in recent years. Emerging evidence suggests that it provides comparable analgesia to conventional bilateral spinal anesthesia while reducing adverse effects, and its efficacy and safety compared to bilateral spinal anesthesia remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of unilateral versus bilateral spinal anesthesia. DESIGN: Systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). DATA SOURCES: A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 10, 2024. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Included studies were randomized controlled trials involving adult patients (≥18 years) undergoing surgery under spinal anesthesia, comparing unilateral versus bilateral spinal anesthesia for efficacy and adverse effects. Studies that focused exclusively on either unilateral or bilateral spinal anesthesia were excluded. The comparator group used the same local anesthetic as the experimental group, with no restrictions on adjuncts (e.g. fentanyl, morphine). RESULTS: Nineteen randomized controlled trials including 1191 patients met the inclusion criteria. Compared with bilateral spinal anesthesia, unilateral spinal anesthesia has a longer onset of sensory blockade (MD = 2.58, 95% CI: 0.93 to 4.22, p = 0.002), a shorter duration of sensory blockade (MD = -27.83, 95% CI: -39.25 to -16.42, p < 0.00001). In addition, unilateral spinal anesthesia significantly reduced the incidence of hypotension (RR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.31 to 0.52, p < 0.0001), nausea and vomiting (RR = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.07 to 0.56, p = 0.002), and post-dural puncture headache (RR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.23 to 0.81, p = 0.009). No statistically significant differences were observed in bradycardia and urinary retention. Collectively, these findings support unilateral spinal anesthesia as a strategy that may enhance perioperative safety while maintaining adequate anesthetic efficacy in appropriately selected patients. CONCLUSIONS: Unilateral spinal anesthesia may offer a favorable balance between anesthetic efficacy and safety compared with bilateral spinal anesthesia, although its clinical utility may depend on surgical duration and patient characteristics.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Comparison of analgesic efficacy of pericapsular group of nerve block versus anterior quadratus lumborum block in adult patients undergoing unilateral hip arthroplasty: A comparative randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Total hip arthroplasty is a painful surgical procedure; therefore, it is a challenge to manage effective pain control during the perioperative period. STUDY OBJECTIVES: We compared the analgesic efficacy of the pericapsular nerve group block and the anterior quadratus lumborum block in patients undergoing unilateral hip arthroplasty. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTINGS: Operating room of a tertiary care center. PATIENTS: 92 adult patients of >18 years who underwent elective, unilateral total hip arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia were randomized to either Group P (USG guided PENG block with 30 ml 0.25% ropivacaine +4 mg dexamethasone) or Group Q (USG guided QL block with 30 ml 0.25% ropivacaine +4 mg dexamethasone) 20 min before surgery. MEASUREMENTS: We compared the total perioperative fentanyl consumption between the two groups in the first 24 h as the primary outcome. Other outcomes included time to first rescue analgesia in the postoperative period, NRS scores at rest and on movement at 0, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h, incidence of intraoperative hemodynamic changes, and incidence of postoperative PONV. MAIN RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the total fentanyl consumption between the two groups: 237.5 (150-450) μg in the P group and 250 (125-400) μg in the Q group; p = 0.617. The time to first rescue analgesia was similar in both groups: the P group (198 [123-268] minutes) and the Q group (241 [180-318] minutes); p = 0.120. There was also no difference in pain scores, intraoperative hemodynamic changes, or PONV. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in the perioperative opioid consumption, pain scores, and adverse event rates between the pericapsular nerve group block and anterior quadratus lumborum block in adult patients undergoing unilateral hip arthroplasty. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI number: CTRI/2023/08/057157).

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Low-Dose Perineural Dexamethasone Enhances Analgesia After Pediatric Hand Surgery Without Elevating Systemic Stress Markers: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Supraclavicular brachial plexus block is a widely used technique for upper limb surgery in children. Although perineural dexamethasone has demonstrated efficacy in prolonging analgesia in adults, data on its optimal dosing and systemic safety in pediatric patients are limited. This study aimed to evaluate whether low-dose perineural dexamethasone can prolong postoperative analgesia without increasing systemic stress markers in young children undergoing hand or wrist surgery. METHODS: In this triple-blinded, randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06086392), 90 children aged 3 months to 6 years undergoing elective upper extremity surgery were assigned to receive supraclavicular brachial plexus block with 0.2% ropivacaine combined with either normal saline (control), dexamethasone 0.05 mg/kg, or dexamethasone 0.1 mg/kg. The primary outcome was time from arrival in the postanesthesia care unit to first administration of rescue opioid analgesia. Secondary outcomes included total opioid consumption, postoperative pain intensity using the FLACC scale, blood glucose levels, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and time to motor recovery. RESULTS: Both dexamethasone groups demonstrated significantly prolonged time to first opioid use compared with the control group (mean±SD: 19.4±2.2 h in the 0.1 mg/kg group, 16.0±1.9 h in the 0.05 mg/kg group, and 8.5±1.3 h in controls; P <0.0001). Total opioid consumption was significantly reduced in the dexamethasone groups. Postoperative pain scores were lower in both intervention groups, especially during the first 12 hours. No significant differences were found among groups in blood glucose, inflammatory markers, or incidence of nerve deficits. Motor recovery was delayed in the dexamethasone groups but did not interfere with early mobilization. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose perineural dexamethasone (0.05 to 0.1 mg/kg) safely and effectively prolongs postoperative analgesia and reduces opioid needs in children undergoing upper limb surgery, without causing systemic metabolic or inflammatory disturbances. The 0.05 mg/kg dose may offer a more favorable balance between analgesic efficacy and motor recovery time. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I-randomized controlled trial.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Superficial Cervical Plexus Block and Quality of Recovery after Thyroidectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Whether adding a bilateral superficial cervical plexus block to a thyroidectomy enhanced recovery pathway improves postoperative quality of recovery remains uncertain. METHODS: In a single-center prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in adults undergoing thyroidectomy with general anesthesia, participants were randomized to bilateral superficial cervical plexus blocks with 0.25% bupivacaine or saline. All participants received multimodal analgesia with dexamethasone, acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and incisional local anesthetic. The primary outcome was quality of recovery, measured by the QoR-40 survey, on postoperative day 1. Secondary outcomes included the need for rescue opioid, total opioid consumption, nausea, vomiting, antiemetic administration, length of stay in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), and opioid use on postoperative day 1. RESULTS: A total of 160 participants were randomized to receive a superficial cervical plexus block with bupivacaine 0.25% (n = 78) or saline (n = 82). On postoperative day 1, mean QoR-40 scores were 174 (95% CI, 170 to 178) for bupivacaine and 173 (95% CI, 169 to 177) for saline. The adjusted mean difference between bupivacaine versus saline was 0.91 (95% CI, -3.57 to 5.40; P = 0.688). There were no significant between-group differences in the need for opioids in the PACU or on postoperative day 1, nausea, vomiting, or PACU length of stay. However, the total amount of opioid administered in the PACU was lower in the bupivacaine group (median [interquartile range], 0 [0 to 8]) compared with the saline group (2 [0 to 20]; Hodges-Lehmann location shift, 0 morphine milligram equivalents; 95% CI, -4 to 0; P = 0.017), and fewer participants in the bupivacaine group received rescue antiemetics (3 [3.8%] vs . 13 [16%]; difference, -12%; 95% CI, -22% to -1.8%; P = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral superficial cervical plexus blocks did not improve quality of recovery after thyroidectomy when added to a multimodal analgesic regimen including dexamethasone, acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and incisional local anesthetic but were associated with lower total PACU opioid consumption.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Adductor Canal Block and Local Anesthetic Versus Local Anesthetic Alone in ACL Reconstruction: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Effective postoperative analgesia is crucial for early recovery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Local infiltration analgesia (LIA) and adductor canal block (ACB) are common regional techniques, but their combined efficacy remains unclear. PURPOSE: To compare the effectiveness of LIA alone versus LIA combined with ACB in patients undergoing ACLR, with primary outcomes including postoperative opioid consumption and quadriceps function. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. METHODS: A double-blind randomized controlled trial enrolled 100 patients undergoing ACLR under general anesthesia. Patients were randomized into 2 groups: LIA + sham (saline injection) (n = 50) and LIA + ACB (n = 50). The primary outcome was postoperative opioid consumption in the first 24 hours. Secondary outcomes included visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, quadriceps function assessed by straight leg raise (SLR) at 3 hours, Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) at 1 week. Statistical analysis was performed using t tests and chi-square tests with a P value <.05 considered significant. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in 24-hour opioid consumption between the LIA + ACB and LIA-only groups (P = .109). Similarly, VAS pain scores at 24 hours postoperatively showed no significant differences between the groups (P = .0804). Early functional recovery, assessed by SLR performance at 3 hours, was equivalent between groups (P = .6711). Additionally, QoR-15 scores on postoperative day 1 and KOOS values at 1 week demonstrated no significant differences (P = .6486 and P = .9054, respectively). Intraoperative opioid consumption was not different between the groups (P = .127). CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that the addition of ACB to LIA does not yield postoperative analgesic in ACLR. Consequently, LIA alone suffices for routine ACLR, potentially enabling clinicians to optimize perioperative workflows without incurring the additional time, financial burden, and resources associated with routine ACB administration. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT04721119.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Intravenous lidocaine reduces the propofol EC50 for loss of consciousness and intraoperative anesthetic consumption in gynecological laparoscopy: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous lidocaine reduces propofol requirements and procedure-related adverse events. OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to test whether intravenous lidocaine would reduce the effect-site concentration of propofol required to achieve loss of consciousness and decrease propofol consumption during total intravenous anesthesia in gynecological laparoscopy. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Sixty patients were randomly allocated to receive either intravenous lidocaine (1.5 mg·kg-¹ bolus) followed by continuous infusion or an equal volume of saline. Propofol was administered via target-controlled infusion starting at an effect-site concentration of 3.5 μg/mL. The concentration was then adjusted in steps of 0.5 μg/mLaccording to Dixon's up-and-down sequential method: decreased if loss of consciousness was achieved, or increased if not. Loss of consciousness was defined as loss of response to verbal commands. The median effective concentration (EC50) of propofol for inducing loss of consciousness was calculated using the Dixon's up-and-down method. General anesthesia was maintained with propofol and remifentanil, guided by state entropy (target 40-60) and surgical pleth index (target 20-50). Drug consumption was normalized to anesthesia duration and body weight. RESULTS: The estimated EC50 of propofol for inducing loss of consciousness was significantly lower in the lidocaine group than in the saline group (3.32 μg/mL, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 3.04-3.59 vs. 3.89 μg/mL, 95% CI: 3.50-4.28). Under the study protocol, the lidocaine group also required less propofol (8.62 mg·kg-1·h-1, 95% CI: 8.10-9.15 vs. 9.89 mg·kg-1·h-1, 95% CI: 9.05-10.73) and less remifentanil (0.23 μg·kg-1·min-1, 95% CI: 0.21-0.24 vs. 0.27 μg·kg-1·min-1, 95% CI: 0.24-0.30) compared with the saline group. CONCLUSION: Intravenous lidocaine reduced the propofol EC50 for Loss of Consciousness (LOC) and decreased intraoperative propofol and remifentanil consumptions in patients undergoing gynecological laparoscopy. These findings suggest a propofol- and opioid-sparing effect of intravenous lidocaine in this setting, although confirmation in larger multicenter trials is needed.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Continuous Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Thoracic Paravertebral Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Thoracotomy.

OBJECTIVES: To compare postoperative analgesia using continuous ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) versus thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB), with dynamic visual analog scale (VAS) during coughing as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included static VAS (at rest), hemodynamic changes, side effects, total opioid consumption, time of first rescue analgesia, length of hospitalization, anesthesia recovery time, postanesthesia care unit stay, time to first ambulation, and patient satisfaction. METHODS: The study included 40 cases scheduled for elective thoracotomy admitted to the cardiothoracic surgery unit of Menoufia University Hospital. Patients were equally randomized into 2 groups, 20 patients each receiving either ultrasound-guided ESPB or TPVB (control group). Both groups received 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine as a loading dose followed by continuous infusion of 0.125% bupivacaine at 5 mL/h, with patient-controlled boluses of 20 mL on demand. RESULTS: Dynamic visual analogue pain scale scores were significantly lower in the ESPB group at 6, 9, 12, and 24 hours ( P =0.008, 0.035, 0.001, 0.006). Morphine consumption was significantly reduced in the ESPB group ( P < 0.001). Hypotension was more frequent in TPVB (40% vs. 10%, P =0.028). No significant differences were observed in hospital stay or patient satisfaction. DISCUSSION: The utilization of continuous ultrasound-guided ESPB demonstrated better postoperative visual analogue pain scale scores and a significant decrease in opioid consumption, with fewer side effects than TPVB.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Effects of erector spinae plane block on postoperative pain in patients undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction for breast cancer: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Implant-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy causes acute pain. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a single-shot T5 erector spinae plane block (ESPB) reduces postoperative pain. DESIGN: Single-center, RCT with allocation concealment; blinded assessors and statisticians. SETTING: Tertiary cancer center in China. PATIENTS: 100 adults scheduled for radical mastectomy with implant reconstruction were randomized (1:1); follow-up complete. INTERVENTION: Before induction, ESPB was given under ultrasound guidance at T5 with 30 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine plus dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg; controls received no block. Standardized general anesthesia and postoperative PCA for both groups. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Resting NRS at 6 h (MCID=1). Secondary outcomes were opioid consumption, quality of recovery, and PONV. RESULTS: ESPB did not significantly reduce resting pain at 6 h at the median (τ =0.50; adjusted difference -0.9; p = 0.08). At the upper tail, pain intensity was lower (τ = 0.75; -1.8; p <0.01). Repeated measures provided additional time-point information, improving estimation precision and test sensitivity. ESPB get lower pain scores at 6, 12, and 24 hours (all p <0.01). But, the 95% CI includes the MCID, the clinical benefit remains uncertain. Opioid use decreased at 24 h (-13.5 mg; p <0.01) and 48 h (-6.6 mg; p <0.01). Quality of recovery improved at 24 h (difference 5 points; p <0.01), but not later. No differences were observed in intraoperative hemodynamics or PONV. CONCLUSIONS: Single-shot T5 ESPB with perineural dexmedetomidine may reduce postoperative pain and opioid requirements and improve early recovery. Further large trials are warranted. Clinical relevance remains to be confirmed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06143020.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

The analgesic efficacy of intrathecal morphine compared to peripheral regional analgesia in total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Following elective total hip arthroplasty, pain continues to be a significant problem. Intrathecal morphine or peripheral regional analgesia, that is local infiltration analgesia or peripheral nerve block, are common analgesic modalities, but it is still not known which is superior. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. DATA SOURCES: The following electronic databases were searched from inception to 24 March 2026: CENTRAL; Ovid Embase; Ovid MEDLINE; Scopus; and Web of Science. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials that compared intrathecal morphine to peripheral regional analgesia in patients scheduled for elective total hip arthroplasty under general or spinal anaesthesia. RESULTS: Eight trials and 471 patients were included. The peripheral regional analgesia was peripheral nerve block in six trials and local infiltration analgesia in two trials. No difference was demonstrated between intrathecal morphine and peripheral regional analgesia in regard to the first coprimary outcome, the pain score at rest at 24 h. The quality of evidence was moderate. Intrathecal morphine was found to be superior to peripheral regional analgesia with respect to the second coprimary outcome, the cumulative intravenous morphine equivalent consumption at 24 h. Mean difference (95% CI) was 11.38 mg (4.31-18.45; P  = 0.002, I2  = 81%). The quality of evidence was low. Intrathecal morphine was revealed to be superior to peripheral regional analgesia at 8-12 h for the pain score at rest, 1.24 (0.60-1.88); P  = 0.0001, I2  = 68%; pain score on movement, 1.15 (0.12-2.17), P  = 0.03, I2  = 65%; but the rate of in hospital pruritus was reduced with peripheral regional analgesia, 0.31 (0.17-0.58), P  = 0.0002, I2  = 0%. No differences in functional status were shown. CONCLUSIONS: We found no difference between intrathecal morphine and peripheral regional analgesia in regard to pain score at rest at 24 h. Intrathecal morphine may lead to a favourable effect on some but not all analgesic indices compared to peripheral regional analgesia in elective total hip arthroplasty. The quality of evidence for these positive effects was low. Intrathecal morphine reduced the systemic opioid consumption, but is not in itself an opioid free strategy. This notion is supported by the increased incidence of in hospital pruritus with intrathecal morphine. The quality of evidence for this was high. In view of the quality of evidence, high quality randomised controlled trials are required to substantiate these results.

Humans↗