PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

[Adverse effects of angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers ].

Angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers belong to a novel class of cardiovascular agents that is characterized by excellent tolerance. The overall rate of their side effects is similar to that of placebo. Specific nonproductive cough is much less common during treatment with angiotensin II blockers compared with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. Nevertheless serious side effects very rarely occur with angiotensin II blockers and include cough, angioneurotic edema, anemia, liver damage, renal failure, aggravation of angina and migraine. The data of current literature concerning adverse effects of angiotensin II in different clinical situations are extensively reviewed. Angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers are not considered to be safe in pregnancy, bilateral renal artery stenosis and severe renal or hepatic impairment.

Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists↗

Upregulation of angiotensin II type 2 receptor and limitation of myocardial stunning by angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers during reperfused myocardial infarction in the rat.

BACKGROUND: We have previously shown that angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers induce cardioprotection and upregulate angiotensin II type 2 receptor during in vivo postischemic-reperfusion in dogs. Whether angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers upregulate angiotensin II type 2 receptors in rats is controversial, and whether surmountable and insurmountable angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers exert similar protective effects during reperfused myocardial infarction is not known. METHODS: We assessed the effects of the surmountable angiotensin receptor blocker valsartan, and the insurmountable angiotensin receptor blocker irbesartan, on hemodynamics and left ventricular systolic and diastolic function (echocardiography/Doppler) in vivo and infarct size (triphenyl tetrazolium chloride method), and regional angiotensin II type 1 receptor and angiotensin II type 2 receptor expression (immunoblots) ex vivo, after anterior reperfused myocardial infarction in rats. The rats were randomized to four groups: intravenous valsartan (10 mg/kg, n = 8), irbesartan (10 mg/kg, n = 8), or saline vehicle (controls, n = 14) over 30 minutes before reperfused myocardial infarction, and sham (n = 8). Angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockade was assessed by the inhibition of angiotensin II pressor responses. RESULTS: Compared with the control group, both angiotensin receptor blockers significantly decreased infarct size, limited the increase in left atrial pressure, improved positive left ventricular dP/dtmax and dP/dtmin, improved left ventricular ejection fraction and diastolic function, and limited infarct expansion after reperfused myocardial infarction. Both angiotensin receptor blockers increased angiotensin II type 2 receptor protein in the postischemic-reperfused zone, with no change in angiotensin II type 1 receptor protein. There were no changes in the sham group. CONCLUSION: The overall results indicate that the angiotensin receptor blockers valsartan and irbesartan both induce cardioprotection, limit myocardial stunning, and upregulate angiotensin II type 2 receptor protein expression after reperfused myocardial infarction in the rat. Patients who are already receiving angiotensin receptor blockers and develop acute coronary syndromes might benefit from these cardioprotective effects during reperfusion therapy.

Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers↗

Differences among angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers: characteristics of candesartan cilexetil.

Several angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor blockers are now available for the treatment of hypertension. Although the agents in this class all act by blocking the AT1-receptor, they differ in their pharmacokinetics and binding characteristics. One of the newest AT1-receptor blockers, candesartan cilexetil, is administered in an inactive form and is rapidly and completely converted to the active drug, candesartan, during gastrointestinal absorption. In vitro studies have shown that candesartan has the highest receptor affinity of all the available AT1-receptor blockers and is not displaced from the receptor by high concentrations of angiotensin II. The tight and long-lasting binding of candesartan to the AT1-receptor provides effective blockade of the negative cardiovascular effects of angiotensin II.

Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists↗

Candesartan cilexetil: a new, long-acting, effective angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker.

Candesartan is a potent and selective angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker which binds tightly to and dissociates slowly from the AT1 receptor. It is administered orally as the prodrug candesartan cilexetil, which is rapidly and completely converted to the active compound, candesartan, during gastrointestinal absorption. In hypertensive patients, candesartan cilexetil dose-dependently lowers diastolic and systolic blood pressure (BP) over the 24-h dose interval and it maintains its antihypertensive effects in the long term. Clinical trials indicate that a once-daily dose of 4-16 mg provides a clinically relevant reduction in BP. The usual maintenance doses of candesartan cilexetil are expected to be 8 mg and 16 mg once-daily and dosage adjustment does not appear to be necessary in elderly patients or those with mild to moderate renal or hepatic impairment. Adverse events during treatment with candesartan cilexetil occur at a similar low incidence as with placebo and no dose-dependent events or adverse metabolic effects have been noted. As once-daily monotherapy, candesartan cilexetil 8 mg is as effective as enalapril 10-20 mg, amlodipine 5 mg or hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg, and candesartan cilexetil 16 mg is more effective than losartan 50 mg. The trough to peak ratio for the reduction in BP with candesartan cilexetil has been shown to be in the order of 80-100%, confirming the smooth 24-h BP-lowering profile of the drug. Combined treatment with candesartan cilexetil and hydrochlorothiazide or amlodipine provides an enhanced BP-lowering effect that is useful in patients with inadequate response to initial treatment after step-up titration. Candesartan cilexetil is similarly well tolerated as placebo, both when given as monotherapy, and in combination for example with hydrochlorothiazide. Candesartan cilexetil with its flexible dosage regimen therefore appears to offer an effective and well-tolerated alternative to other established agents in the treatment of a wide range of hypertensive patients.

Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists↗

Control of radiation-induced pneumopathy and lung fibrosis by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and an angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker.

PURPOSE: This report summarizes our experiences on the protective effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, especially captopril and an angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker on radiation-induced pulmonary injury. METHOD: In the first series of experiments, adult male Sprague Dawley rats were given a single dose of either 20 or 30 Gy of gamma rays to a 35 cm2 right hemithorax port, whilst shielding the left, contralateral, lung. Perfusion scans and autopsies were performed at intervals up to 12 months post-radiation. Three different ACE inhibitors, penicillamine and pentoxifylline were given as radiation protectors and their activity compared. A model of irradiation for total bone marrow transplant (BMT) was used for the second group of experiments. Male WAC/Rij/MCW rats received total-body irradiation and a regimen of cyclophosphamide (CTX) in preparation for bone marrow transplant. The modifiers were two ACE inhibitors, captopril and enalapril, and L-158,809, an angiotensin II (A II) type 1 receptor blocker. All drugs were administered in the rats' drinking water and all were well-tolerated. RESULTS: In the irradiated rats, pulmonary damage progressed from the presence of blebs and detachment from basement membranes of endothelial cells a few days after injury, to severe arteritis and interstitial collagen deposition at 3 months, and then on to severe pneumonitis and extensive pulmonary fibrosis at 6 months. Marked increase of hydroxyproline was also found in the lungs at 6 months. These morphological changes were associated with significant decrease of ACE and plasminogen activator activity (PLA) and a marked increase of prostaglandins (PG12) and thromboxane (Txa2), substances considered as indicators of endothelial pulmonary damage. ACE inhibitors captopril, CL 24817, enalapril and CGS 13945 prevented the markers of endothelial dysfunction. Captopril and CL 24817, which contain a sulphydryl (-SH) radical in their moiety and the AII type 1 receptor blocker, L-158,809, were the most efficient in protecting the lung parenchyma from the inflammatory response and subsequent fibrosis. Penicillamine, an SH-containing compound with weak ACE inhibitory activity was also a strong antifibrotic agent but showed only modest anti-inflammatory properties. Additionally, in the irradiated rats, captopril also reduced the incidence of squamous cell skin carcinomas and subcutaneous sarcomas consequent to the highest doses of radiation. CONCLUSION: ACE inhibitors and one AII type 1 receptor blocker were effective in protecting lungs from radiation-induced pneumonitis and the development of lung fibrosis in two models of rat radiation injury. In the first series of experiments (unilateral irradiation), those ACE inhibitors containing a sulphydryl radical were more effective than those without it. This observation led to the question of whether this protective effect is related to inhibition of AII synthesis or rather to some of the collateral pharmacologic properties of these drugs, such as anti-oxidation or protease inhibition. The AII receptor blocker, however, was shown to be equally effective, if not better, in its antifibrotic capacity than any ACE inhibitor with or without an SH radical, reaffirming the role of AII in modulation of collagen synthesis.

Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists↗

Renoprotective effects of benidipine in combination with angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker in hypertensive Dahl rats.

We examined the effects of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker candesartan, the calcium channel blockers benidipine and amlodipine, hydralazine, and the combination of candesartan and benidipine or amlodipine on blood pressure and renal function in Dahl salt-sensitive (DS) hypertensive rats. Male DS rats (5 weeks of age) were fed a high-salt (8% NaCl) diet, resulting in hypertension accompanied by glomerular sclerosis and an increased urinary albumin excretion. Drugs were orally administered from 2 to 6 weeks after the start of the feeding. Although candesartan (1 or 10 mg/kg) had little effect on the blood pressure, benidipine (4 mg/kg), amlodipine (4 mg/kg) and hydralazine (5 mg/kg) had similar hypotensive effects. Benidipine, but not amlodipine, hydralazine, or candesartan, significantly inhibited the increase in the albuminuria and glomerular sclerosis. The combination of candesartan (1 mg/kg) and benidipine (4 mg/kg) lowered the levels of blood pressure and albuminuria more effectively than the combination of candesartan (1 mg/kg) and amlodipine (4 mg/kg). These results indicate that benidipine is effective in preventing the impairment of renal function in DS hypertensive rats, and suggest that additional benefits can be expected by combination therapy with benidipine and an angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker.

Albuminuria↗

Functional comparison of the antagonistic properties of some Angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers on the contraction elicited by Angiotensin II and thromboxane A2 on human saphenous veins.

We previously described on human vascular preparations that, in addition to its antagonistic properties on Angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor, losartan could also inhibit the contraction elicited by the stable thromboxane A2 mimetic U46619. The present study was designed (1) to investigate, in human vascular preparations (the saphenous veins) whether these antagonistic properties on thromboxane A2/prostaglandin H2 (TP) receptor were shared by some other AT1 receptor antagonists (irbesartan and valsartan) and the active metabolite of losartan EXP3174, and (2) to compare their antagonistic properties on TP receptors to their antagonistic properties on AT1 receptors. In the presence of indomethacin (10 microM) and Nomega-nitro-L-arginine (100 microM), irbesartan, valsartan, and EXP3174 induced a rightward shift of U46619- and angiotensin II-induced contraction. The inhibitory effect of irbesartan, valsartan, and EXP3174 on U46619-induced contraction was significant from 100 microM while their inhibitory effect on the contraction elicited by angiotensin II was significant from 1 nM. With regard to the plasma therapeutic concentrations of irbesartan, valsartan, and EXP3174, these data suggest that TP receptor blockade does not account for the antihypertensive effects of these AT1 receptor blockers.

15-Hydroxy-11 alpha,9 alpha-(epoxymethano)prosta-5↗

Emerging role of angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers for the treatment of endothelial dysfunction and vascular inflammation.

BACKGROUND: Angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers (AT1RBs) share the effect of attenuating angiotensin II actions with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) but differ in other respects. Notably, the impact of unopposed angiotensin type 2 receptor stimulation and the absence of augmentation of bradykinin through inhibition of the kininase pathway may lead to differences between the effects of AT1RBs and ACEIs. ACEIs have been shown to improve endothelial dysfunction in many clinical settings. OBJECTIVE: To review current evidence regarding the effects of AT1RBs on endothelial dysfunction in patients. METHODS: MEDLINE and Current Contents searches, augmented by careful analyses of the bibliographies in the identified papers, were used to identify studies assessing the effects of chronic, oral use of AT1RBs on endothelial function and related inflammatory markers in patients. Animal studies and human studies using single doses or intravenous infusions were excluded. RESULTS: Clinical studies are available pertaining to the elderly and patients with coronary artery disease, hypertension and diabetes. The effect on endothelial dysfunction induced by postprandial lipemia has also been assessed. In general, AT1RBs improve vasomotor endothelial dysfunction and some inflammatory markers, but a few studies comparing ACEIs directly with AT1RBs suggest that AT1RBs may be inferior. AT1RB activity on endothelial dysfunction in patients with type I diabetes has not been shown. CONCLUSIONS: AT1RBs are an important addition to the therapy of endothelial dysfunction and vascular inflammation in patients. Further research is necessary to determine which AT1RBs and which dosing regimens are optimal.

Acrylates↗

Effect of Angiotensin II Type 1 receptor blocker on cardiac angiotensin-converting enzyme and chymase-like activities, and cardiac fibrosis in cardiomyopathic hamsters.

It has been reported that cardiac chymase has an effect on cardiac fibrosis through the Angiotensin (Ang) II formation and an Ang II-independent mechanism. In the present study, Ang II type 1 (AT1) receptor blocker (candesartan cilexetil) was administered to dilated cardiomyopathic (DCM; Bio TO2) hamsters for 4 weeks to study the effect of AT1 receptor blocker on cardiac chymase-like activity and cardiac fibrosis. Echocardiography, histological examination, and assessment of cardiac angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)/chymase-like activities were conducted. Hamsters showed cardiac dysfunction due to increased left ventricular dimensions and decreased ventricular wall thickness, significant increase in cardiac chymase-like activity, and fibrosis. This result indicates that the cardiac chymase-like activity is responsible for cardiac fibrosis. When candesartan cilexetil was administered to Bio TO2 hamsters, cardiac chymase-like activity increased significantly, whereas cardiac fibrosis decreased significantly. Cardiac ACE and chymase-like activities were unchanged in non-DCM hamsters with candesartan cilexetil. This suggests that the cardiac Ang II formation mechanism was stimulated by suppressing the effect of cardiac Ang II, and cardiac chymase-like activity could be increased. Moreover, this mechanism may be more highly activated if cardiac Ang II is activated in the heart. In conclusion, we demonstrated that AT1 receptor blocker reduced cardiac fibrosis, although cardiac chymase-like activity increased. Because the Ang II-forming pathway and the effect of chymase in hamsters is similar to that in dogs, the results of the present study may supplement the available information for dogs.

Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers↗

Vascular protection in diabetes: a pharmacological view of angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers.

Vascular protection is key to reducing the morbidity associated with diabetes. Angiotensin II is known to exert a variety of deleterious effects on the vasculature, and this is likely to be a major explanation of the protective benefits observed with blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS). Intriguingly, RAAS blockade also appears to reduce the onset of new diabetes, which points to a fundamental effect on metabolism. Recent developments have thrown new light onto the mechanism of these effects. The importance of unopposed stimulation of the angiotensin II type 2 (AT(2)) receptor in vascular protection is recognised, and recent studies have revealed that some angiotensin II type 1 (AT(1)) receptor blockers (ARBs) show partial peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPARgamma) agonistic activity in vitro, an effect that is at least partly due to direct interaction with PPARgamma itself. There is a clear order of potency among the ARBs, with telmisartan the most potent and the only ARB to show an effect at physiologically achievable plasma concentrations. Adiponectin, an adipokine closely involved with glucose sensitisation, is also modulated by the relative activation of AT(1) and AT(2) receptors. Such effects would suggest that important benefits may result from the use of ARBs in clinical practice, although confirmation of the clinical relevance will depend upon the results of numerous ongoing studies.

Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers↗

Therapeutic effects of angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker at an advanced stage of hypertensive diastolic heart failure.

OBJECTIVE: Angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker (ARB) is increasingly prescribed for the treatment of systolic heart failure with a growing body of clinical evidence. The roles of ARB, however, remain to be clarified in the treatment of diastolic heart failure (DHF), particularly at its advanced stage. This experimental study investigated the effects of ARB administered at an advanced stage of hypertensive DHF. METHODS: Dahl salt-sensitive rats fed an 8% NaCl diet from age 7 weeks represent overt DHF at age 20 weeks, as noted in previous studies (hypertensive DHF model). The DHF model rats were randomly divided into two groups at age 17 weeks when left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, hypertrophy, fibrosis, macrophage infiltration and reactive oxygen species generation were already augmented; six rats treated for 3 weeks with a subdepressor dose of ARB (olmesartan 0.6 mg/kg per day), and six untreated rats. RESULTS: The 3-week administration of ARB significantly decreased the left ventricular end-diastolic pressure in association with attenuation of left ventricular hypertrophy, fibrosis and diastolic dysfunction. Macrophage infiltration was attenuated with decreased gene expression of transforming growth factor-beta1 and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in the left ventricular myocardium of the ARB-treated rats. The production of reactive oxygen species also decreased with NADPH oxidase activity. CONCLUSIONS: ARB provides beneficial effects in hypertensive DHF independent of its antihypertensive effects even if initiated at an advanced stage. The beneficial effects are at least partly attributed to the attenuation of inflammatory changes and oxidative stress through the suppression of cytokine and chemokine production and of NADPH oxidase activity.

Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers↗

Angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker, valsartan, prevented cardiac fibrosis in rat cardiomyopathy after autoimmune myocarditis.

Favorable effects of angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers on patients with ischemic or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy have already been suggested by several human trials but their effects on inflammatory cardiomyopathy remain unknown. We investigated the effects of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker, valsartan, in chronic heart failure after inflammatory cardiomyopathy. Autoimmune myocarditis was induced in Lewis rats by injection with porcine cardiac myosin. In the phase of chronic heart failure, from day 28 until day 70, rats were treated by oral administration of valsartan. Three groups were designated: 1 ml saline, 10 mg/kg valsartan, and 30 mg/kg valsartan. On the 73rd day, hemodynamic parameters, pathological findings and the expression levels of r-ANP mRNA of the ventricle were examined, and were compared with the saline control. The ventricular weight/body weight ratio and area of fibrosis was decreased in the 30 mg/kg valsartan group. The left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and the central venous pressure were decreased in a dose-dependent manner in both valsartan groups, while the first pressure derivatives +dP/dt and -dP/dt did not differ among the three groups. A high dose of valsartan reduced the expression of tissue ANP mRNA compared with the saline group. In conclusion,valsartan suppressed myocardial hypertrophy and fibrosis, and it improved the hemodynamics and cardiac function in an animal model of post-myocarditis dilated cardiomyopathy.

Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists↗

Effects of candesartan, an angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker, on diabetic nephropathy in KK/Ta mice.

BACKGROUND: Although therapeutic effects of angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker (ARB) on renal injury in non-insulin dependant diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) have been demonstrated, the beneficial effects and their mechanisms in diabetic nephropathy have not been well evaluated. METHODS: KK/Ta mice were divided into three groups according to the treatment: candesartan 4 mg/kg/day from 6 to 28 weeks of age (group I; early treatment); from 12 to 28 weeks of age (group II; late treatment); only vehicle (group III). BALB/c mice treated with vehicle were used as controls (group IV). Body weight (BW), systolic blood pressure (SBP), blood glucose, urinary type IV collagen and albumin excretion were measured every 4 weeks. Morphometry and immunohistology of albumin, transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta1) and Smad7 were performed in all groups. RESULTS: BW and blood glucose were higher in groups I, II and III than in group IV from 8 weeks. SBP was markedly reduced in groups I and II compared with group III (p < 0.05, p < 0.005). Urinary type IV collagen and albumin excretion were increased in group III compared to group IV (p < 0.05, p < 0.005), whereas they were reduced in groups I and II when compared to group III (p < 0.05). Morphometric analysis revealed that the whole glomerular area (WGA), glomerular tuft area (GTA), extracellular matrix area (ECMA) and intraglomerular cell nuclei number (NIGCN) were significantly reduced in groups I, II and IV compared to group III at 28 weeks. In immunohistochemistry, TGF-beta1 expression in both glomeruli and tubules of groups I and II decreased compared to that of group III at 28 weeks, while Smad7 in group III glomeruli was reduced compared to that in groups I and II. CONCLUSIONS: It appears that candesartan reduced urinary type IV collagen and albumin excretion, and attenuated glomerular hypertrophy and mesangial matrix accumulation by the TGF-betaS/Smad signaling pathway in KK/Ta mice with diabetic nephropathy.

Albuminuria↗

Different effects on inhibition of cardiac hypertrophy in spontaneously hypertensive rats by monotherapy and combination therapy of adrenergic receptor antagonists and/or the angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker under comparable blood pressure reduction.

To confirm that alpha1, beta adrenoceptor antagonists and angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers (ARBs) have different abilities to attenuate progressive cardiac hypertrophy despite their comparable lowering of blood pressure, we compared the effect of these agents alone or in combination on hypertensive cardiac hypertrophy. Eight-week-old spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) were divided into 7 groups. Single administration of doxazosin, atenolol, or losartan, or half-dose combinations of these drugs were given orally for 6 weeks. The control group did not receive any drugs. The heart weight-to-body weight ratio (HW/BW), left ventricular mass index (LVMI), plasma brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and left ventricular BNP mRNA expression were measured after 6-week administration. Blood pressure did not differ among the drug-treated groups, all of which showed lower blood pressure than the control group. The HW/BW and LVMI of the drug-treated groups, except the doxazosin group, were lower than in the control group. Moreover, the LVMI values of the groups receiving losartan were significantly lower than those in the groups without losartan (p < 0.05). Plasma BNP of the drug-treated groups was lower than that in the control group (p < 0.05). The left ventricular BNP mRNA expression of the drug-treated groups, except the doxazosin group, was lower than that in the control group. The atenolol group showed a higher level of BNP mRNA than the groups receiving losartan monotherapy or combination therapies (p < 0.05). In conclusion, the ARB had the strongest attenuating effect on the development of hypertensive cardiac hypertrophy, and the alpha1 and beta adrenergic receptor blockers were more effective in combination than as monotherapies in SHR.

Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists↗

The angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker losartan in clinical practice: a review.

Blockade of angiotensin II receptors was first achieved in the 1970s using a peptide, saralasin acetate. Although it was effective in lowering blood pressure, it required parenteral administration and had a short duration of action and partial agonist activity. These disadvantages are absent with losartan, a selective, orally administered, nonpeptide blocker of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor that recently became available for clinical use. Losartan has a sustained duration of action, permitting once-daily dosing in many patients, and lacks partial agonist activity. More than 3300 hypertensive patients have received losartan in Phase III, controlled clinical trials. Losartan given concomitantly with a low dose (12.5 mg) of hydrochlorothiazide further reduces blood pressure. Its overall incidence of adverse experiences is similar to that of placebo. Because of its efficacy, specificity, duration of action, and safety profile, losartan should be considered as first-line therapy for the treatment of patients with hypertension.

Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists↗

Beneficial effects of angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker antihypertensive treatment on inflammation indices: the effect of smoking.

The effect of long-term angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker (ARB) therapy on inflammation indices has not been fully investigated in a hypertensive population. The authors evaluated 323 consecutive nondiabetic patients (mean age, 57 years; 176 men; 92 smokers) with high renin activity and uncomplicated essential hypertension whose blood pressure levels normalized (from 163.9/100.7 mm Hg to 131.6/82.8 mm Hg) after 4 weeks of ARB or ARB/diuretic treatment. All patients underwent full laboratory evaluation (routine examination of blood and urine, liver, kidney, thyroid function, and lipid and glucose profiles), including measurement of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and serum amyloid A levels, at drug-free baseline, which was repeated after 6 months of ARB or ARB/diuretic treatment. A significant (P<.001) overall decrease was noted in both high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (-0.41+/-1.56 mg/dL) and serum amyloid A (-0.62+/-2.03 mg/dL), but a smaller decrease in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and serum amyloid A change was seen in the smoker subgroup compared with nonsmokers (P<.05), indicating that the ARB or ARB/diuretic anti-inflammatory effect may be adversely affected by smoking status.

Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers↗

Angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker ameliorates overproduction and accumulation of triglyceride in the liver of Zucker fatty rats.

The effects of angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker (ARB) on triglyceride (TG) metabolism associated with insulin resistance were explored in Zucker fatty (ZF) rats. Olmesartan medoxomil, a newly developed ARB, was given as a 0.01% drinking solution ad libitum to ZF and Zucker lean (ZL) rats for 4 wk. Olmesartan lowered blood pressure in both strains to the same extent. ZF rats had a markedly low insulin sensitivity index (SI) and glucose effectiveness (SG), together with significantly increased glucose levels. Olmesartan treatment substantially elevated both SI and SG. The ZF rats were hyperlipidemic, with plasma TG levels sixfold higher than those of the ZL rats. Olmesartan remarkably decreased the plasma free fatty acid level in the ZF rats, but it did not exert a significant effect on the plasma TG level. The TG secretion rate assessed by the Triton WR-1339 technique was almost six times higher in the ZF than in the ZL rats, and olmesartan treatment suppressed this TG overproduction by one-half. The TG content in the liver was ten times higher in the ZF than in the ZL rats, and olmesartan halved this high hepatic TG content without affecting the cholesterol content. The fatty liver developed in the ZF rats was ameliorated by olmesartan treatment. Olmesartan treatment had no significant effects on TG metabolism or insulin sensitivity in the ZL rats. Taken in sum, ARB improves the overproduction and accumulation of TG in the liver associated with insulin resistance, and it does so through mechanisms independent of its hypotensive action.

Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers↗