PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Anhedonia”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

[Translation and validation of the Revised Social Anhedonia Scale (SAS Social Anhedonia Scale, M.L. Eckblad, L.J. Chapman et al., 1982). Study of the internal and concurrent validity in 126 normal subjects].

The Revised Social Anhedonia Scale (SAS) with 40 items (Eckblad et al., 1982) which studies the social dimension of anhedonia has been validated in the United-States (Mishlove & Chapman, 1985). However, no french translation and validation of this scale has been made to date. This work presents the french translation of the Social Anhedonia Scale and its validation. After a back-translation and final adjustment, it has been submitted to a sample of 126 control subjects from the general population. Furthermore, they were asked to fill two other scales: the Chapman Physical Anhedonia (PAS) with 61 items and the Fawcett Pleasure Scale (36 items), both of them exploring the subjects answer in terms of anhedonia/hedonia towards social, sensorial and/or physical experiences. The internal validity has been determined on the one hand by the Cronbach alpha coefficient which showed a strong unidimensional characteristic (0.80) and the other hand by the correlation of each item with the total score using the point biserial coefficient which ranged from .204 to .559. The concurrent validation has been determined by the Pearson correlation coefficient between the french version of social anhedonia scale and the french version of physical anhedonia scale. The values were .42, p = .001. Furthermore, this two scales are significant inversely correled to the french version of the pleasure scale: r = -.22, p = .0125 for the first, and r = -.26, p = .0027 for the second. The internal and concurrent validity of the french version of the revised social anhedonia scale should allow to improve our understanding of anhedonia in psychiatry and psychopathology.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1994

[Evaluation of anhedonia in psychopathology: second study of the validation of the French version of the Chapman and Chapman physical anhedonia scale. Study of 356 persons].

This work presents a second study of validation of the French version of the Physical Anhedonia Scale (PAS) in four groups (221 and 32 normal subjects, 61 schizophrenics (RDC) and 42 major depressives (RDC). The internal consistency was determined by the Kuder-Richardson coefficient (KR 20) which values was 0.75 in the normal group and 0.82 in the schizophrenic group. The mean of the correlations between each item and the total score was 0.25. The concurrent validity was studied by the correlation coefficient between the PAS score and a sub-scale of physical pleasure (FCPCS-PP) extracted from the Fawcett Clark Pleasure Capacity Scale. The values were -0.39 (p < 0.01) in the normal groups, -0.37 (p < 0.01) in the schizophrenic group and -0.56 (p < 0.01) in the depressive group. A test retest have shown a value of 0.76 (p < 0.01) between two passations (3 weeks) of the PAS. The norms of PAS in the French population were given.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[French translation of the Chapman Social and Physical Anhedonia Questionnaire: validation of the French translation in controls and schizophrenic patients].

Whereas Chapman's social and physical scales are the most used instruments for the assessment of anhedonia in schizophrenia, no French translation has been still validated by the authors. Therefore, the aim of this study was first to translate into French the both scales, and after back translation, to obtain the agreement of the original authors. Second, the aim was to establish values and to establish the cut-off beyond of which French subjects could be considered as anhedonic. One hundred and twenty-three subjects were included: 72 control subjects without mental disorders and 51 stable schizophrenic patients defined by the DSM III-R, ICD 9, ICD 10, RDC or Feighner criteria. According to the literature, schizophrenic patients had higher scores for both scales than control subjects (p < 0.001; Student t test). The social anhedonia scores are different due to cultural variations. The distribution of physical anhedonia scores in control subjects or in schizophrenic patients differed from normal distributions (respectively, p < 0.05; p < 0.0001; Shapiro-Wilks test). The distribution of social anhedonia scores differed from normal distributions (p < 0.01) only in schizophrenic patients but not in control subjects. By maximising the Younden indice [Sensitivity + Specificity -1], the cut-off of the physical anhedonia score was 18 (Younden indice = 0.45), and the cut-off of the social anhedonia score was 12 (Younden indice = 0.24). In using this cut-off, the French physical anhedonia scale had a good positive predictive value (evaluated by logistic regression) for schizophrenia. Therefore, a patient with a physical anhedonia score beyond 18 have a probability of 64% to be schizophrenic. In contrast, the social anhedonia scale was less discriminant for schizophrenia. Indeed, patient with a social anhedonia score beyond 12 have a probability of 52% to be schizophrenic. This French version of Chapman's anhedonia scales could be considered as an useful instrument to assess anhedonia, in particular physical anhedonia, in schizophrenic patients.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Relations between alexithymia and anhedonia: a study in eating disordered and control subjects].

INTRODUCTION: Alexithymia and anhedonia both refer to a deficit in emotion regulation. Although these 2 concepts have been conceptualized to be closely linked, very few studies aimed at examining carefully their interrelations. OBJECTIVES: Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to investigate the relationships between scores on alexithymia and anhedonia self-reports, and to assess whether the results were influenced by the presence of an emotional disorder. LITERATURE FINDINGS: The 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale is the self-report most frequently used to assess alexithymia. Nevertheless, the results of recent studies comparing the psychometric properties of the TAS-20 and another alexithymia self-report - the Bermond-Vorst Alexithymia Questionnaire (BVAQ) - have recommended the BVAQ over the TAS-20. DESIGN: Thus, both questionnaires were included in the present study. In addition, since depression and anxiety may influence the correlations between alexithymia and anhedonia scores, we also measured depression and anxiety and these scores were used to control for their potential confounding effect in the analyses. Two groups of participants were included in this study: 46 eating disordered female patients (ED) and 198 female control subjects. All the participants filled up the Bermond-Vorst Alexithymia Questionnaire-form B (BVAQ-B), the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20), the Chapman and Chapman Social Anhedonia Scale (SAS) and Physical Anhedonia Scale (PAS), the 13-item Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and the Spielberger State and Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-Y). The analyses consisted, first, in establishing the matrix of correlations between these self-reports total scores, using Pearson's coefficients of correlation. Then, TAS-20, BVAQ-B, SAS and PAS scores were correlated, adjusting for BDI and STAI scores, using partial correlation analyses. Mean scores comparisons according to the group of participants, and to the presence/absence of alexithymia, as well as to the presence/absence of anhedonia were performed using ANCOVAs or Mann-Whitney tests. RESULTS: As predicted, BDI and STAI scores were found significantly and positively correlated with alexithymia and anhedonia scores in both participant groups. After controlling for depression and anxiety scores, TAS-20 and PAS scores remained significantly correlated, but not TAS-20 and SAS scores. BVAQ-B scores remained significantly correlated with PAS and SAS scores in the control group, but only with the PAS scores in the ED group. ED patients had higher alexithymia and anhedonia scores than the controls. In total, among the alexithymic individuals, 8.9% were social anhedonics, and 31.1% had a physical anhedonia. Conversely, among the participants with a physical anhedonia, two third were alexithymics. The same proportion of participants with a social anhedonia was alexithymic (66.7%). CONCLUSION: The results of the present study are informed about the relationships between alexithymia and anhedonia. They also stress the need to rely on several alexithymia measurements, and they further demonstrate the necessity to compare the associations between different affect regulation dimensions in normal and psychopathological disorders.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

Social and physical anhedonia in relation to cerebral laterality and electrodermal habituation in unmedicated psychotic patients.

The neglect of psychophysiological investigation of social anhedonia, in contrast to physical anhedonia, was addressed by examining relations between electrodermal orienting responses and their lateral asymmetry in unmedicated schizophrenic, bipolar/schizoaffective, and unipolar depressive patients and normal control subjects. In support of relations between social withdrawal and right-hemispheric reactivity, social anhedonia was associated with a predominance of right-hemispheric influences in schizophrenic and bipolar/schizoaffective patients but not in depressive patients. Anhedonia in all but the depressive group was also related to responsiveness, particularly when fast habituators were pooled with nonresponders and compared with moderate and slow habituators. Anhedonia was higher in the more responsive group. This was particularly true of physical anhedonia. The results support associations between both types of anhedonia--social and physical--and psychophysiology, and they also suggest that anhedonia is not a unitary concept.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Anhedonia and negative symptomatology in chronic schizophrenia.

The relationships between negative symptomatology and anhedonia have been studied on 61 subjects who had Research Diagnostic Criteria for chronic schizophrenia. Negative symptomatology was rated by the negative subscales of the Kay Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). Anhedonia was rated by the Physical Anhedonia Scale of Chapman (PAS), the Fawcett-Clark Pleasure Capacity Scale-Physical Pleasure (FCPCS-PP), and the social interest subscale (SIS) of the Nurse Observation Scale for Inpatients (NOSIE-30). Pearson correlations were calculated between negative and anhedonia scales. Schizophrenics were dichotomized first into negatives and positives using the composite score of the PANSS, and second into low and high negatives using the negative subscale of the PANSS. For each dichotomy, the corresponding subgroups were compared on anhedonia scales using Student's test. The results have shown no significant correlations between negative and anhedonia scales (PAS and FCPCS-PP). There were no significant differences concerning the PAS and the FCPCS-PP between negative and positive subgroups of schizophrenics and between low- and high-negative subgroups. Anhedonia is not a negative symptom. Our results confirm the reported studies on subjective experiences in schizophrenia. A search for more restricted forms of schizophrenia characterized by severe anhedonia is needed.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Anhedonia: a neglected symptom of psychopathology.

In the last century psychopathologists attached importance to the concept of anhedonia, the loss of ability to experience pleasure. Its role in the diagnosis of melancholia was considered to be crucial. In the present century attention to anhedonia has faded, possibly because of the focus upon depressed mood as the pathognomonic feature of depressive disorders. Research on the symptomatology of endogenous depression did not include the concept; anhedonia was also lacking from the major instruments of psychiatric research, the depression rating scales, Attention was drawn to anhedonia by two authors: by Meehl in the 1960s and by Klein in the 1970s. Meehl considered anhedonia from the point of view of a personality defect predisposing to mental illness; and Klein regarded anhedonia to be a symptom of depressive illness and probably the best clinical marker predicting response to antidepressant drugs. In 1980 the revised DSM presented the concept of 'loss of interest or pleasure' as one of the two cardinal symptoms of major depression. Since then there has been a gradual recovery of emphasis although many systems confuse the two concepts of 'loss of interest' and anhedonia. It is possible that anhedonia may provide the key to a more exact delineation of depressive disorders in biological research and in clinical practice. Further research will depend upon a more precise, cross-nationally agreed definition of the concept and the means of its assessment.

Affective Symptoms↗
PubMed1994

Affective and social-behavioral correlates of physical and social anhedonia in schizophrenia.

The association between scales measuring physical and social anhedonia, self-reports of affective response to emotion-eliciting films, and role play measures of social skill was evaluated in patients with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, and bipolar affective disorder. We hypothesized that patients with schizophrenia would report significantly greater anhedonia than the bipolar patients and that higher scores on the anhedonia scales would be related to attenuated reports of the experience of positive affect and poorer social skill. Patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder did not differ in ratings of anhedonia, but both groups had higher physical and social anhedonia scores than did bipolar patients. Higher scores on the physical anhedonia scale, but not the social anhedonia scale, were related to attenuated reports of positive affect following viewing of affect-eliciting films in schizophrenia-schizoaffective disorder patients. Neither anhedonia scale was related to role play measures of social skill performance for any patient group.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Anhedonia, self-experience in schizophrenia, and implications for treatment.

Anhedonia - the inability to experience pleasure - is a symptom of several psychiatric disorders such as depression, drug and alcohol dependence, but also schizophrenia. The concept of anhedonia played a major role in psychiatric and psychoanalytic explanations of psychotic behavior. The relationship between notions of anhedonia and of mental evolution and regression (in the work of Myerson and Bleuler) is discussed. The non-evolutionist views of Rado and Meehl are described. Then the concept of anhedonia is discussed in relationship to the phenomenological approach of Sass and Parnas, who view anhedonia as one manifestation of a self-disturbance or self-disorder that is fundamental in schizophrenia. Concerning treatment of anhedonia, it was often hypothesized that anhedonia is associated with a dysfunction of the mesolimbic dopaminergic reward system. However, studies in humans and non-human animal models indicate that dysfunction of central dopaminergic neurotransmission interferes with the process of motivation rather than with the ability to experience pleasure; the latter may be more mediated by the opioidergic and serotonergic neurotransmission. Understanding the neurobiological correlates of motivation and pleasure may provide new options to treat anhedonia in patients with schizophrenia.

Animals↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Anhedonia in schizophrenia].

A study on 61 subjects who meet Spitzer's Research Diagnosis Criteria of schizophrenia and on 56 normal subjects has been conducted to explore anhedonia. Anhedonia was evaluated by two rating scales, the Physical Anhedonia Scale (PAS) and a sub-scale of physical pleasure (FCPCS-PP) extracted from the pleasure scale of Fawcett. The reliabilities of the scales were studied in the schizophrenic group by the Cronbach alpha and the Kuder Richardson (KR 20) coefficient and by the correlation between the two scales (concurrent validity). The Cronbach alpha was 0.77 for the FCPCS-PP and the KR 20 was 0.82 for the PAS. The correlation between the two scales was -0.37 (p < 0.01). The schizophrenics were significantly more anhedonic than normals with higher score on the PAS and with a lower score on the FCPCS-PP. Using the Beck Depression Inventory to rate depression in the schizophrenic group and to dichotomize these subjects into depressed schizophrenics and no depressed schizophrenics, we failed to find significantly differences concerning anhedonia scales between these two sub-groups of schizophrenics. There was no difference between in and outpatients concerning the anhedonia scales. Our results suggest that anhedonia would be a possible marker of schizophrenic disease. The distribution of the anhedonia scales in the schizophrenic group is normal or unimodal and it doesn't support the hypothesis of a qualitative sub-group of schizophrenics characterised by severe anhedonia.

Adult↗
PubMed2025

The Relationship Among Range Adaptation, Social Anhedonia, and Social Functioning: A Combined Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy and Resting-State fMRI Study.

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: Social anhedonia is a core feature of schizotypy and correlates significantly with social functioning and range adaptation. Range adaptation refers to representing a stimulus value based on its relative position in the range of pre-experienced values. This study aimed to examine the resting-state neural correlates of range adaptation and its associations with social anhedonia and social functioning. STUDY DESIGN: In study 1, 60 participants completed resting-state magnetic resonance spectroscopy and fMRI scans. Range adaptation was assessed by a valid effort-based decision-making paradigm. Self-reported questionnaires was used to measure social anhedonia and social functioning. Study 2 utilized 26 pairs of participants with high (HSoA) and low levels of social anhedonia (LSoA) to examine the group difference in range adaptation's neural correlates and its relationship with social anhedonia and social functioning. An independent sample of 40 pairs of HSoA and LSoA was used to verify the findings. STUDY RESULTS: Study 1 showed that range adaptation correlated with excitation-inhibition balance (EIB) and ventral prefrontal cortex (vPFC) functional connectivity, which in turn correlating positively with social functioning. Range adaptation was specifically determined by the EIB via mediation of ventral-medial prefrontal cortex functional connectivities. Study 2 found HSoA and LSoA participants exhibiting comparable EIB and vPFC connectivities. However, EIB and vPFC connectivities were negatively correlated with social anhedonia and social functioning in HSoA participants. CONCLUSIONS: EIB and vPFC functional connectivity is putative neural correlates for range adaptation. Such neural correlates are associated with social anhedonia and social functioning.

Humans↗
PubMed2005

The neural correlates of anhedonia in major depressive disorder.

BACKGROUND: Anhedonia is a relative lack of pleasure in response to formerly rewarding stimuli. It is an important diagnostic feature of major depressive disorder (MDD), and predicts antidepressant efficacy. Understanding its neurobiological basis may help to target new treatments and predict treatment outcomes. Using a novel paradigm, we aimed to explore the correlations between anhedonia severity and magnitude of neural responses to happy and sad stimuli in regions previously implicated in studies of human reward processing and depressive anhedonia. METHODS: Neural responses to happy and sad emotional stimuli (autobiographical prompts and mood congruent facial expressions) were measured using blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) functional magnetic resonance imaging in twelve MDD individuals with varying degrees of anhedonia. RESULTS: In response to happy stimuli, anhedonia, but not depression severity per se, was positively and negatively correlated with ventromedial prefrontal cortex (VMPFC) and amygdala/ventral striatal activity, respectively. State anxiety independently contributed to a VMPFC-subcortical dissociation of response to happy (but not sad) stimuli, which was similar, but different, to anhedonia. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that anhedonia and state anxiety are associated with dysfunction within neural systems underlying the response to, and assessment of, the rewarding potential of emotive stimuli in MDD, and highlight the importance of employing a symptom-dimension-based approach in the examination of the neurobiology of depression.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Anhedonia in the deficit syndrome of schizophrenia.

Previous studies have shown that anhedonia characterizes the deficit syndrome of schizophrenia. Anhedonia is also one of the main symptoms of the depressive state. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationships between anhedonia and depression in the deficit syndrome of schizophrenia. Self-evaluations of anhedonia and depression were performed by three groups of subjects (32 deficit schizophrenics, 32 major depressives, 35 healthy subjects) matched for sociodemographic variables. Deficit schizophrenics and major depressives are more anhedonic than controls, but there is no difference between the two study groups. Contrarily to what is evidenced for major depressives and for healthy subjects, the depressive symptomatology correlates with anhedonia in deficit schizophrenics. When deficit schizophrenics are dichotomized into depressed versus non-depressed patients, no difference is observed concerning anhedonia. These results suggest that anhedonia in the deficit syndrome of schizophrenia has no specificity but appears independent of coexisting depression and covaries with several characteristics of depression (retardation, cognitive distortions). Our results support the hypothesis that the deficit syndrome of schizophrenia could constitute a non-depressive mood disorder.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

The anhedonias: a conceptual history.

BACKGROUND: The term and concept of 'anhedonia' refer to a group of clinical phenomena whose common denominator is the complaint of a putative incapacity to 'experience pleasure". Linked to disorders such as schizophrenia and depression, anhedonia remains difficult to define and measure. METHOD: This paper explores the historical frames in which anhedonia was originally constructed; and is fully based on primary sources. It makes use of the 'conceptual method', i.e. it differentiates the history of the word from that of the behaviours and concepts involved. RESULTS: Historical analysis shows that the boundaries of 'anhedonia' have been fuzzy since the time of Ribot, and that this has made it conceptually unstable. One reason for this instability pertains to the fact that from the start its definition has been parasitical upon the (itself evolving) concept of 'pleasure'. Another that it is defined negatively, i.e. as a reduction or abolition in a putative unitary function. Yet another, that there is little evidence that anhedonia itself is a unitary phenomenon. CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that at this stage it might be advisable to refer to the concept in the plural (the anhedonias); that a definition should be formulated that it is less dependent upon the ongoing concept of pleasure; and that far more empirical research is needed to find out whether anhedonia is more than a final common pathway.

History, 19th Century↗
PubMed1978

The prediction of outcome from anhedonia and process-reactive scales.

Earlier researchers have suggested that the ability of process-reactive measures to predict future adjustment may result from their relationships to the anhedonia dimension. In the present study the abilities of process-reactive and anhedonia measures, independent of one another, to predict rehospitalization data were compared. After anhedonia scores had been partialed out, schizophrenics' process-reactive scores were correlated modestly with length of the patients' next hospitalization and reclassification as nonschizophrenic. No such significant correlations appeared between anhedonia and adjustment measures after process-reactive scores had been partialed out. Among nonschizophrenics, a sizeable correlation between anhedonia and the probability of later diagnosis of schizophrenia appeared, which suggests that anhedonia may be a useful prodromal marker for schizophrenia.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Anhedonia and emotional numbing in combat veterans with PTSD.

We explored relationships between anhedonia and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptom clusters, including their role in predicting psychiatric comorbidity. Our measure of anhedonia was derived from an examination of the latent structure of the Beck Depression Inventory. We found evidence for a two-factor solution, leading to anhedonia and undifferentiated, global depressive symptoms scales. In primary analyses, anhedonia had a unique positive relationship with PTSD's emotional numbing symptoms and minimal relationships with other PTSD symptoms. Upon examining the incremental validity of appetitive functioning (i.e., anhedonia, emotional numbing) over and above aversive functioning (i.e., re-experiencing, avoidance, and hyper-arousal PTSD symptoms) variables, greater emotional numbing increased the likelihood of being diagnosed with a major depressive disorder, and greater anhedonia increased the likelihood of being diagnosed with additional anxiety disorders and to a lesser extent, psychotic disorders. Results were consistent with research on the distinction of appetitive and aversive functioning, providing insight into the nature of PTSD.

Adult↗