PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Animal Testing Alternatives”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1991

Non-animal alternative toxicity tests for detergents: genuine replacements or mere prescreens?

Non-animal toxicity tests and testing strategies for use in identifying the potential toxic hazard of chemicals and products, and in providing information for use in risk and safety assessment, are in the course of development, validation and evaluation. Possible replacement alternatives to the rabbit Draize eye irritancy test are discussed, and results obtained for two in-vitro tests developed by FRAME (the kenacid blue test and the neutral red release test), applied to 19 surfactants and 32 formulations, are discussed. It is concluded that there are now legal and moral requirements that relevant and reliable non-animal tests should be developed and accepted for use whenever possible.

Animal Testing Alternatives↗
PubMed1992

Alternatives to ocular irritation testing in animals.

The preliminary conclusions of a survey of possible non-animal alternatives to the Draize rabbit eye irritancy test, recently conducted for the Commission of the European Communities, are presented. The various types of alternatives to animal tests are reviewed in terms of their current state of development and validation, and also their potential in relation to the type of exposure, level of testing, type of testing, type of effect, location of effect, and type of test material. Various problems concerning the availability and quality of in vivo eye irritation data, and the use of this data in in vitro/in vivo comparisons, are highlighted. Finally, the use of step-wise and integrated animal/non-animal and non-animal/non-animal test systems and strategies are discussed.

Animal Testing Alternatives↗
PubMed1990

Refinement of long-term toxicity and carcinogenesis studies.

The chance that alternatives will completely replace animals for toxicology research in the foreseeable future is nil. Continual refinement of animal toxicity and carcinogenesis studies, however, can be an effective means of reducing the numbers of animals used and conserving time and resources without compromising scientific quality. We must continue to strive to find species and strains that can metabolize chemicals similar to humans, are small enough to be housed in large numbers, and have low prevalence of spontaneous lesions with sufficient life span to express the toxic and carcinogenic potential of chemicals. Adequate care of animals with control of variables such as light, temperature, diet, bedding, diseases, and genetic characters of laboratory animals will decrease the variability. Humane considerations and euthanasia of animals with large masses and other conditions interfering with eating and drinking, major injuries and ulcers related to husbandry and treatment, and diseases indicating pain and suffering will help not only to alleviate further pain and distress but also to facilitate collection of tissues without secondary complications for detection of chemical treatment-related lesions. Limiting the duration of studies to decrease the variability due to age-associated changes will also refine long-term studies. Other considerations for refinement of carcinogenesis studies include selection of the most sensitive sex of one or more species for evaluation of selected chemicals in a class where toxic and carcinogenic potential of other representative chemicals are known. Genetically engineered animal models with known oncogenes may reduce the duration and increase the sensitivity of carcinogenesis studies with a reduction in the use of animals.

Animal Husbandry↗
PubMed1991

Alternative methods in toxicology tests: in vitro toxicity.

Toxicity testing is required for new chemicals being introduced onto the market. The use of animals in evaluating chemical safety is costly and time consuming. Furthermore, there is the ethical need to develop alternative methods to reduce the required number of animals. The new in vitro assays offer numerous advantages such as speed, reproducibility and control of test conditions, and increased sensitivity. Although the dermal irritation assays might be substituted by the in vitro tests in the near future (Duffy, 1989), much work is required to evaluate organ toxicity with in vitro methods. We present data regarding the use of Balb/3T3 mice fibroblasts and primary rat hepatocytes as test systems for in vitro toxicity. The end-points we have analysed are total protein content, dye accumulation in lysosomes, reductase mitochondrial activity, intracellular content and leakage of enzymes into the medium.

Animal Testing Alternatives↗
PubMed1991

Statistical model in tests for eye irritants.

A test used to classify substances for eye irritancy, as required by the Consumer Product Safety Commission, is performed on 1-3 groups of 6 albino rabbits in a sequential manner. When the statistical implications of the test are realized, it is possible for a substance to be classified as an irritant with fewer reactions than the number required for it to be classified as not an irritant. A procedure is given for correcting the inconsistency in the current test, and an alternative test, which considerably reduces the number of animals required, is proposed. Probability models and expected sample size calculations have been derived.

Animal Testing Alternatives↗
PubMed1991

Correlation between amount of virus with altered nucleotide sequence and the monkey test for acceptability of oral poliovirus vaccine.

Production of live attenuated oral poliomyelitis vaccine (OPV) requires rigorous neurovirulence safety testing of each vaccine lot, currently carried out in monkeys. It has been reported that a change from 472-U to 472-C in the type 3 OPV RNA is associated with an increased histologic lesion score produced upon intraspinal inoculation of the mutant virus in monkeys. We have developed a method, based on polymerase chain reaction, for measuring the relative abundance of these mutant sequences directly in vaccine preparations and used this method to evaluate the proportion of 472-C in 40 different lots of type 3 OPV. Six vaccine lots that had failed the intraspinal monkey neurovirulence test contained a higher proportion of 472-C than all other lots that had passed this test. OPV type 3 virus containing 472-C was rapidly selected during serial passages in African green monkey kidney cells that are used for manufacturing of the vaccine. We have also found that the wild-type poliovirus type 3 strain Leon/37, from which the vaccine strain was originally derived, contained a mixture of 472-U and 472-C sequences. No other mutations in OPV type 3 RNA have been detected by similar assays at position 2034, also associated with attenuation, or at several other positions reported to be altered in some vaccine preparations. Our results suggest that molecular diagnostics may provide a supplement or a potential alternative to animal testing of live attenuated vaccines.

Animal Testing Alternatives↗
PubMed1992

A national validation study of the acute-toxic-class method--an alternative to the LD50 test.

In a national collaborative study an alternative to the classical LD50 test--the acute-toxic-class method--was validated. With this testing procedure mortality ranges are determined between defined dose levels that are used for classification and labelling in the European Community. The results were compared with LD50 data obtained from the literature which were categorized according to the defined dose levels. The results of this collaborative study have shown that the acute-toxic-class method allows allocation to the toxicity classes of very toxic, toxic, harmful and unclassified in the same manner as on the basis of the classical LD50 tests. The acute-toxic-class method uses fewer animals and subjects fewer animals to pain and distress than the LD50 test and yields the same information on toxic signs in the treated animals. Identical classifications were obtained by the six participating laboratories in 86% of the tests. This demonstrates that the acute-toxic-class method results in excellent reproducibility in comparison to the classical LD50 test and that this new method is a reliable alternative to the LD50 test.

Animal Testing Alternatives↗
PubMed1992

[Ethics of animal research and application to humans].

Animal experimentation has proven to be of invaluable help in the understanding of biological functions, for the advancement of medical research and for the improvement of health conditions of both humans and animals. This phase of scientific progress is far from completed and there are no hints for substitution of all animal experiments by so called alternative methods. Therefore, there is a real need to analyse, without prejudice or undue dogmatic statements, the present situation in order to contribute to a responsible attitude, which should be transparent, understandable for lay people and useful as a background for the passing of adequate legislation. This process of analysis calls for the cooperation of scientists, a class which can neither be ignored nor treated as minor and should be above any suspicion of any part concerned. Finding a reasonable and just solution for the problem under debate can only result from the convergence of utilitarian and responsible ethical viewpoints. From utilitarian reasoning an overwhelming mass of evidence has resulted in favour of animal experimentation: medical progress would be severely maimed by prohibition or severe curtailing of animal experiments and catastrophic consequences would ensue. On the other hand, ethical considerations result in clear condemnation of useless or redundant experiments, of those causing disproportionate pain or suffering or of doubtful scientific standing: and to the recommendation that every effort should be undertaken in order to find and to establish on a sound scientific basis, alternative or complementary methods, i.e. those not involving animals.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Animal Testing Alternatives↗