PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Aortic Dissection”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1988

Aortic dissection and dissecting aortic aneurysms.

Operation was employed in the treatment of 546 patients for complications of aortic dissection during the 32-year period of 1956-1988. Current concepts and operative techniques evolved during this period. Fortunately, about half the patients were treated during the latter 4 years, as modern therapy became standardized. The cumulative survival rate was 86% for all patients and 94% for those treated during recent years. Pathologic processes and requirements of operation became clearer by treating 174 patients who had had 198 previous operations by the time of referral. Reoperation was required for complications of operations now considered outdated, heart operations in patients with ascending aortic dilatation, and progressive dilatation of residual segments of the aorta. The 546 patients were followed, and a total of 838 operations were finally employed, resulting in total aortic replacement in 18, near total replacement in 41, entire thoracic aorta in 22, near total thoracic aorta in 33, and the entire thoracoabdominal aorta in 148 patients. Long-term survival in 439 patients after final operation was 66% and 44% at 5 and 10 years, respectively, despite the fact that the median age at first admission was 59. Operative treatment appears to be well-established for this disease.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1988

The management of localized abdominal aortic dissections.

Aortic dissections limited to the abdominal aorta occur infrequently. We have identified four cases of abdominal aortic dissection and have reviewed these in combination with 43 previously reported cases to identify factors that influence the prognosis and management of this disease. Abdominal aortic dissections are similar to thoracic dissections in their presentation, with acute shearing pain and systolic hypertension occurring commonly. Although the diagnosis may be made by ultrasonography or CT scanning, angiography is the definitive diagnostic study. Factors found to be associated with high mortality include presentation with acute pain (p less than 0.0003), involvement of visceral vessels (p less than 0.02), and rupture (p less than 0.000002). Chronicity appears to be protective (p less than 0.04), although chronic dissections may present acutely. Although prosthetic replacement of the involved aorta is the treatment of choice in most cases, nonoperative management with regular follow-up can be considered in asymptomatic chronic dissections.

Aged↗
PubMed1992

Aortic dissection.

Aortic dissection, once thought to be rare, is the most common catastrophe of the aorta, being twice as common as ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. In one Inner London borough, aortic dissection accounted for 4.2% of sudden deaths in men over a three-year period. Early diagnosis and prompt treatment are crucial to achieving a successful outcome, because the events that influence survival occur early in the course of the disease. Surgical repair of aortic dissection is an uncommon operation in the United Kingdom. The Cardiac Surgical Register for 1988 (the most recent year available for analysis) reveals that 208 operations were performed to replace the ascending aorta, 12 operations to replace the aortic arch and 15 operations on the descending aorta during that year.

Aged↗
PubMed1988

[The place of radiologic research procedures in the diagnosis of aortic dissection].

Aortic dissection is a rare but life-threatening disease that requires a prompt and exact diagnosis. That is why the radiologist now assumes a central role due to the introduction of new imaging modalities. Each of them can make a contribution while having its own limitations. The choice of the right examination procedure and its correct application determine a successful radiological diagnosis. On the basis of experience with more than 150 operated patients we explain our diagnostic strategy in aortic dissection.

Aortic Dissection↗
PubMed1991

[Vascular complications associated with aortic dissection].

Aortic branch occlusion may constitute the mode of presentation or become an important focus of treatment in patients sustaining acute aortic dissection. The optimal therapeutic approach in patients with acute aortic dissection complicated by cerebral, visceral and peripheral vascular problems, and the implications of such complications, are not well established. We review the outcome in 187 consecutive patients (149 males and 38 females, mean age 58 years) with acute dissection of the thoracic aorta who were admitted and operated on in our department over a 13-year period. We assess the incidence, consequences and specific management of significant stenotic and obstructive lesions of the aorta and its branches. Noncardiac vascular complications occurred in 59 patients (32%); of these complications, 38 were associated with type A dissection (incidence 28%) and 21 with type B dissection (incidence 48%). A trend towards decreasing overall surgical mortality was observed in the second part of the study (1983-1989) compared with the first part (1977-1982) i.e. 28% versus 12%. Although aortic rupture and cardiac tamponade were the strongest correlate of morbidity and mortality, death specifically related to vascular complication was more common when such malperfusion occurred in the carotid, celio-mesenteric and renal circulation. Proximal aortic repair at the site of the intimal tear with obliteration of the false lumen may have restored adequate distal circulation in 27 patients in whom improvement of the visceral or peripheral ischemia was observed after the thoracic aortic repair. Additional procedures (immediately after the thoracic repair or later) were necessary in 15 patients to restore adequate perfusion in the compromised area.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adolescent↗
PubMed1987

Management of familial aortic dissection.

Aortic dissection uncommonly occurs in multiple family members, and this association is most commonly seen in kindreds with Marfan's syndrome. There is increasing evidence that such connective tissue disturbances may not always appear in their complete phenotypic pattern. This report describes two siblings with aortic dissection. It is proposed that this suggests underlying connective tissue disease and warrants investigation of close relatives.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

The diagnosis and management of aortic dissection.

Aortic dissection is a severe disease. Most untreated patients with types I and II (proximal) dissection and over half of those with type III (distal) dissection die within 1 year. Most of the deaths occur within 2 weeks and are caused by rupture, aortic insufficiency, and branch vessel obstruction. Aortic dissection is suspected in patients with anterior chest and back pain that progresses downward. Diagnosis is confirmed by computed tomography, aortography, or echocardiography. Appropriate medical treatment and corrective surgery, including total aortic replacement, performed in the acute and chronic stages, are now successful in over 90% of the cases; long-term results of treatment are steadily improving and are expected to exceed 50% at 10 years. The keys to a successful outcome are being aware of the symptoms of dissection, early diagnosis, and prompt application of appropriate treatment; diligent follow-up includes controlling blood pressure, decreasing the velocity of left ventricular contraction, monitoring the size of the residual aorta, and taking appropriate action if redissection, aneurysmal formation, or rupture occurs.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1985

[Aortic dissection presenting aortic regurgitation induced by diastolic prolapse of an intimal flap into the left ventricle: a case report].

A case of aortic dissection associated with aortic regurgitation which was induced by diastolic prolapse of an intimal flap into the left ventricular outflow tract was reported. This 57-year-old man, referred for evaluation of sudden onset of chest oppression and a heart murmur, was hypertensive for several years. His admission blood pressure was 184/44 mmHg, and a systolic ejection murmur and a diastolic decrescendo murmur were audible along the left sternal border. Two-dimensional echocardiography revealed an intimal flap in the markedly enlarged aortic root. The intimal flap moved posteriorly in systole and anteriorly in diastole, and prolapsed into the left ventricular outflow tract during diastole. Associated with the movement of the intimal flap, an aortic cusp was shifted from its original position to the left ventricular outflow tract in diastole. Aortography disclosed type I aortic dissection and severe aortic regurgitation. After medical treatment for four months, the patient underwent a Bentall surgical procedure and recovered. Impaired coaptation of the aortic valve induced by diastolic prolapse of the intimal flap into the left ventricular outflow tract is a newly encountered echocardiographic finding in proximal aortic dissection.

Aortic Dissection↗
PubMed1992

[Aortic dissection after aortic valve replacement: clinical and anatomic features].

BACKGROUND: Cardiac surgery has become a possible cause of ascending aortic dissection, particularly in patients who have undergone aortic valve replacement. METHODS: From January 1979 to December 1989, 134 patients with angiographic evidence of aortic dissection, were studied in the Haemodinamic Laboratory of the University of Turin. Twelve of these patients (7 men and 5 women), mean age 51.6 years, had been previously operated for aortic valve replacement. We evaluated incidence, clinical and anatomic features of ascending aortic dissection in this group. RESULTS: A dilated ascending aorta with a mean diameter of 4.92 cm. was noted in all these patients. The interval between valve replacement and diagnosis of aortic dissection was 57 months (range 1 day to 9 years). Reoperation was performed in 11 patients. Four intraoperative deaths occurred and 2 other patients died in the early post-operative period. Survival rate at 12 months was 50%. Our incidence of ascending aortic dissection after aortic valve replacement was 0.66% (10 patients out of 1499 operated for aortic valve replacement) and it is in agreement with reports from other Authors in literature. CONCLUSIONS: Replacement of the ascending aorta must be considered if an important dilatation of aortic root is found at time of aortic valve surgery. New efforts must be undertaken to identify patients at high risk for this complication because an elevated mortality rate is observed in reoperation for aortic dissection.

Adult↗
PubMed1987

[Late aortic dissection after aortic valve substitution. Considerations on 5 operative cases].

This study analyses the clinical course of five patients who developed acute ascending aortic dissection 45.8 months (17-87 months) after aortic valve replacement (AVR) and underwent reoperation in our Department. All except one had aortic insufficiency with mild dilatation of the ascending aorta. No evidence of aortic wall degeneration was present at the time of AVR. Prostheses implanted were: Hancock 2, St. Jude 2, Bjork-Shiley 1. Associated procedures (coartectomy, coronary artery by-pass) were carried out in two patients. The dilated aorta was managed at the first operation by longitudinal resection in 3 of them. Emergent aortic dissection repair was performed: in 3 cases with composite graft according to the Bentall procedure, in one case with non valved dacron conduit and in the last case with teflon patch. Histological examination of the dissected aortic wall showed elastic fiber degeneration like cystic medial necrosis. Three patients survived surgical repair and are doing well at 22.4 months of mean post-operative follow-up. Surgical strategy of this complication is discussed; particular emphasis is given to the method of treatment of ascending aorta dilatation during AVR.

Adult↗
PubMed1987

[Color Doppler echocardiography in the diagnosis of aortic dissection and aortic wall abscesses].

In eleven patients with aortic dissection or perforated endocarditic aortic wall abscess cavity, the diagnostic usefulness of Color Doppler Echocardiography (CDE) for the identification of true and false lumen as well as the perforation jet was assessed by comparison with the findings of angiography, digital subtraction angiography, computed tomography and surgery. The information gained in addition to that of these procedures, as well as to that of the four conventional echocardiographic techniques was evaluated. Six patients had aortic dissections of DeBakey type I or III; in all of them the diagnosis had been established with conventional ultrasonic techniques. Similarly, in all patients with aortic dissection of DeBakey type I, a clear differentiation between true and false lumen in the aortic root and ascending aorta could already be made by grey-scaled echocardiography. In these patients, however, CDE made the additional demonstration of the perforation jet into the false lumen possible. In those three patients with aortic dissection of DeBakey type III as well as in the abdominal aortic region of DeBakey type I, color Doppler echocardiography was the only method to define true and false lumen and to clearly localize the perforation sites. Two further patients were found to have a small, local dissection, which could only be assumed by conventional echocardiography; the color Doppler M-mode image led to a clear diagnosis. In three patients an endocarditic abscess cavity of the aortic wall could be detected by conventional echocardiography. Two-dimensional color Doppler echocardiography additionally enabled us to visualize the presence and the course of perforation flows. In two patients color-coded Doppler echocardiography made it possible to detect perforations in regions which could not be localized either with conventional echocardiographic techniques or the above-mentioned control procedures.

Abscess↗
PubMed1992

[Treatment strategy of vascular complications of acute aortic dissection].

Aortic branch occlusion may constitute the mode of presentation or become an important focus of treatment in patients sustaining acute aortic dissection. We reviewed the outcome of 187 consecutive patients (149 males and 38 females, mean age 58 yrs) with acute dissection of the thoracic aorta who were admitted and operated in our clinic during a 13-year period. We assessed the incidence, the consequences and the specific management of stenotic and obstructive lesions of the aorta and its branches. Noncardiac vascular complications occurred in 59 patients (32%); out of these complications, 38 were associated with dissection type A (incidence 28%) and 21 with dissection type B (incidence 48%). Trend towards decreasing overall surgical mortality was observed in the second part (1983-1989) of the study when compared with the first part (1977-1982): it was 28% versus 12%. Although aortic rupture and cardiac tamponade were the strongest correlate of morbidity and mortality, death specifically related to vascular complication was more common when such malperfusion occurred in the carotid, coelio-mesenteric and renal circulation. Proximal aortic repair at the site of the intimal tear with obliteration of the false lumen may have restore adequate distal circulation in 27 patients in whom improvement of the visceral or peripheral ischemia was observed after the thoracic aortic repair. Additional procedures (immediately after the thoracic repair or later on) were necessary in 15 patients to restore adequate perfusion in the compromised area. Early aggressive thoracic aortic repair followed in selected patients by additive vascular procedures can save some patients with compromise visceral or peripheric circulation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

[A case of ascending aortic dissection after aortic valve replacement in congenital bicuspid aortic valve].

Congenital bicuspid aortic valve is a risk factor of aortic dissection, but the case is rare in Japan. Several reports described ascending aortic aneurysm after aortic valve replacement. In these reports, most of aneurysms were false aneurysm, but the cases of ascending aortic dissection were rare. In this case, dissecting aneurysm of the ascending aorta occurred 4 years after aortic valve replacement, which was performed with mechanical prosthesis because of infective endocarditis, and it was repaired successfully by the modified Cabrol's method. This case was congenital bicuspid aortic valve, and had already been complicated with moderate aortic dilatation in the ascending aorta. In patients of congenital bicuspid aortic valve with aortic dilatation, consideration of complete replacement of the ascending aorta with aortic valve replacement is important.

Adult↗
PubMed1988

[Atypical clinical course of thoracic aortic dissection with subacute pericardial hemorrhage].

A case of dissecting aortic aneurysm is reported which occurred without significant pain but was complicated by a subacute pericardial bleeding leading to a large pericardial effusion. The patient was hospitalized because of clinical signs of cardiac tamponade which could be alleviated by pericardiocentesis. Neither 2D-echocardiography nor a portable x-ray of the chest disclosed evidence of aortic dissection. After a symptom-free interval of several hours the patient died because of recurring intractable pericardial tamponade. The differential diagnosis of a large hemorrhagic pericardial effusion should include rupture of a dissecting aortic aneurysm even when typical symptoms are lacking.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1989

[Transesophageal Doppler echocardiography in the diagnosis of dissecting aortic aneurysm].

Transesophageal Doppler echocardiography (TEDE) was performed in three patients with proven or suspected DeBakey type I and type III aortic dissection. Case 1: A 66-year-old woman, with DeBakey type I aortic dissection. Clear images of a widened dissected aorta and an intimal flap were obtained in both the ascending and descending aorta, including the aortic arch. The site of an entry into the false lumen was identified by the defect of the intimal flap and the pulsatile entry flow through it. The reentry into the true lumen was also identified near the orifice of the celiac trunk. In this case, the observation was performed using this technique during the operation; i.e., replacement of the ascending aorta with an artificial graft. Case 2: A 77-year-old man, DeBakey type III aortic dissection. The study was performed after surgery which consisted of replacement of the descending aorta with an artificial graft. TEDE provided clear images of the artificial graft, the aorta, and their boundaries. The remaining intimal flap was clearly confirmed. Case 3: An 80-year-old man, DeBakey type III aortic dissection. In this case, though abdominal echography suggested aortic dissection, angiography and X-ray CT failed to facilitate the diagnosis. Only TEDE confirmed the diagnosis. The abnormal flow via the entry directing toward the false lumen was clearly demonstrated on the color Doppler images. We therefore conclude that TEDE is a useful and reliable means of diagnosing dissecting aortic aneurysm.

Aged↗