PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Bacterial Toxins”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Nonmalignant T cells stimulate growth of T-cell lymphoma cells in the presence of bacterial toxins.

Bacterial toxins including staphylococcal enterotoxins (SEs) have been implicated in the pathogenesis of cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCLs). Here, we investigate SE-mediated interactions between nonmalignant T cells and malignant T-cell lines established from skin and blood of CTCL patients. The malignant CTCL cells express MHC class II molecules that are high-affinity receptors for SE. Although treatment with SE has no direct effect on the growth of the malignant CTCL cells, the SE-treated CTCL cells induce vigorous proliferation of the SE-responsive nonmalignant T cells. In turn, the nonmalignant T cells enhance proliferation of the malignant cells in an SE- and MHC class II-dependent manner. Furthermore, SE and, in addition, alloantigen presentation by malignant CTCL cells to irradiated nonmalignant CD4(+) T-cell lines also enhance proliferation of the malignant cells. The growth-promoting effect depends on direct cell-cell contact and soluble factors such as interleukin-2. In conclusion, we demonstrate that SE triggers a bidirectional cross talk between nonmalignant T cells and malignant CTCL cells that promotes growth of the malignant cells. This represents a novel mechanism by which infections with SE-producing bacteria may contribute to pathogenesis of CTCL.

Antigen Presentation↗

Bacterial meningitis and diseases caused by bacterial toxins.

Bacterial meningitis most commonly occurs in young calves secondary to septicemia. Clinical signs of hyperirritability are usually seen. Meningitis can be confirmed by cerebrospinal fluid analysis and culture or by necropsy. Intoxications by the exotoxins of Clostridium perfringens types C and D, C. botulinum, and C. tetani are difficult to confirm. The clinical signs of these intoxications vary from flaccid paralysis (botulism) to muscular rigidity (tetanus). Treatment of affected cattle has been unrewarding in botulism and enterotoxemia, whereas early aggressive treatment of tetanus cases can often be successfully resolved. Botulism and enterotoxemia can be proved using mouse inoculation tests, whereas tetanus is diagnosed largely by ruling out other diseases.

Animals↗

Bacterial toxins.

Many bacterial toxins are proteins, encoded by the bacterial chromosomal genes, plasmids or phages. Lysogenic phages form part of the chromosome. The toxins are usually liberated from the organism by lysis, but some are shed with outer membrane proteins in outer membrane vesicles. An important non-protein toxin is lipopolysaccharide or endotoxin, which is a constituent of the cell wall of gram negative bacteria. Toxins may damage the eukaryotic cell membrane by combining with some structural component, or otherwise alter its function. Many toxins combine with specific receptors on the surface membrane, frequently glycoproteins or gangliosides, and penetrate the cell to reach their intracellular target. A common mechanism of entry is absorptive endocytosis. Many protein toxins have an A-B structure, B being a polypeptide which binds to the receptor and A being an enzyme. Many toxins are activated, either when produced by the bacterium or when bound to the membrane receptor, by proteases (nicking). An enzymatic process common to many toxins is adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-ribosylation of the adenylate cyclase regulatory proteins, leading to an increase in intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP). This is the mechanism of action of cholera toxin. Diphtheria toxin catalyzes the transfer of ADP-ribose to elongation factor-2, inhibiting protein synthesis. Most toxins act on the target cells to which they bind, but tetanus toxin, and, to a lesser degree, botulinum toxin, ascend axons and affect more distant structures. Although many toxin effects caused by bacteria have been described, only a few toxins have been identified, characterized, and their mode of action determined at the molecular level. The best known of these are discussed.

Bacteria↗

Interaction with a lipid membrane: a key step in bacterial toxins virulence.

Bacterial toxins are secreted as soluble proteins. However, they have to interact with a cell lipid membrane either to permeabilize the cells (pore forming toxins) or to enter into the cytosol to express their enzymatic activity (translocation toxins). The aim of this review is to suggest that the strategies developed by toxins to insert in a lipid membrane is mediated by their structure. Two categories, which contains both pore forming and translocation toxins, are emerging: alpha helical proteins containing hydrophobic domains and beta sheets proteins in which no hydrophobicity can be clearly detected. The first category would rather interact with the membrane through multi-spanning helical domains whereas the second category would form a beta barrel in the membrane.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

[Analysis of synaptic neurotransmitter release mechanisms using bacterial toxins].

Several bacterial toxins are powerful and highly specific tools for studying basic mechanisms involved in cell biology. Whereas the clostridial neurotoxins are widely used by neurobiologists, many other toxins (i.e. toxins acting on small G-proteins or actin) are still overlooked. Botulinum neurotoxins (BoNT, serotypes A-G) and tetanus neurotoxin (TeNT), known under the generic term of clostridial neurotoxins, are characterized by their unique ability to selectively block neurotransmitter release. These proteins are formed of a light (Mr approximately 50) and a heavy (Mr approximately 100) chain which are disulfide linked. The cellular action of BoNT and TeNT involves several steps: heavy chain-mediated binding to the nerve ending membrane, endocytosis, and translocation of the light chain (their catalytic moiety) into the cytosol. The light chains each cleaves one of three, highly conserved, proteins (VAMP/synaptobrevin, syntaxin, and SNAP-25 also termed SNAREs) implicated in fusion of synaptic vesicles with plasma membrane at the release site. Hence, when these neurotoxins are applied extracellularly, they can be used as specific tools to inhibit evoked and spontaneous transmitter release from certain neurones whereas, when the membrane limiting steps are bypassed by the mean of intracellular applications, BoNTs orTeNT can be used to affect regulated secretion in various cell types. Several members of the Rho GTPase family have been involved in intracellular trafficking of synaptic vesicles and secretory organelles. As they are natural targets for several bacterial exoenzymes or cytotoxins, their role in neurotransmitter release can be probed by examining the action of these toxins on neurotransmission. Such toxins include: i) the non permeant C3 exoenzymes from C. botulinum or C. limosum which ADP-ribosylate and thereby inactivate Rho, ii) exoenzyme S from Pseudomonas aeruginosa which ADP-ribosylates different members of the Ras, Rab, Ral and Rap families, iii) toxin B from C. difficile which glucosylates Rho, Rac and CDC42, iv) lethal toxin from C. sordellii which glucosylates Rac, Ras and to a lesser extent, Rap and Ral, but not on Rho or CDC42, and v) CNF deamidases secreted by pathogenic strains of E. coli which activate Rho and, to a lesser extent, CDC42. Since these toxins or exoenzymes have no or little ability to enter into the neurones, they must be applied intraneuronally to bypass the membrane limiting steps. Injection of several of these toxins into Aplysia neurones allowed us to reveal a new role for Rac in the control of exocytosis. ADP-ribosylating enzymes, which specifically act on monomeric actin (C2 binary toxin from C. botulinum and iota toxin from C. perfringens), are potential tools to probe the role of actin filaments during secretion.

ADP Ribose Transferases↗

Toxins: bacterial and marine toxins.

The term toxin refers in a specific way to a toxic substance of biologic origin; that is, a true toxin is a poison produced by a living organism. The purpose of this article is to review some of the most potentially dangerous toxins of concern today. Mechanisms of action, routes of exposure, diagnostic tools, and treatment recommendations are addressed. In addition, current therapeutic uses for certain toxins are discussed.

Bacterial Toxins↗

Adverse host responses to bacterial toxins in human infants.

Bacterial toxin interaction with the intestinal epithelium is regulated developmentally as well as by nutritional factors. It is the binding of bacterial toxins to the epithelium followed by several events that forms the basis of infantile diarrhea, a leading cause of morbidity and mortality world-wide. There has been increasing interest in bacterial toxin interaction with the enterocyte, postreceptor events that follow and the effect of developmental regulation on necrotizing enterocolitis. Diet and environmental factors can provide a major influence on bacterial-enterocyte interaction. Particularly important is the role of breast milk and its constituents, as well as probiotics, in this regard. The purpose of this review is to provide a brief overview on this complex interaction.

Animals↗

Interactions between bacterial toxins and intestinal cells.

Bacterial toxins which act on intestinal cells display a great diversity of size, structure and mode of action. Some toxins interact with the cell by transducing a signal across the membrane leading to stimulation of intracellular second messenger (E. coli heat stable enterotoxin), others form pores (C. perfringens enterotoxin, ...) permitting the leakage of cellular components and cell lysis. The most sophisticated toxins comprise at least two functional domains or components, one being a binding domain permitting the internalization into the cell of an enzymatic domain which modifies an intracellular target. The enzymatic modification (ADP-ribosylation, UDP-glucosylation, glycohydrolysis, proteolysis, ...) of a specific target (heterotrimeric G-protein, small G-protein, monomeric actin, ribosomal RNA, ...) alters the cell physiology (increase of ions and water secretion, cytoskeleton rearrangement, protein synthesis inhibition, apoptosis, ...) and tissue organization (modification of barrier permeability, necrosis, ...). The study of bacterial toxins leads to the understanding of the interactions between pathogenic bacteria and their hosts and constitutes also a new approach in cell biology, by facilitating the exploration of certain regulatory pathways such as that controlling actin polymerization.

Animals↗

Bacterial toxins--an overview.

Toxins are non-replicating agents of biological origin. They are non-infectious, non-contagious, and non-curable by antibiotics or chemotherapeutic agents. However, individuals can be protected by vaccination. The multifactorial nature of virulence of toxin and toxin producers, produces comparative and cooperative pathogenesis, and this makes studies all the more difficult. Antibody raised against all components helps in this pursuit. The toxins have been classified into seven different classes and over 44 bacterial toxins have been discussed. The botulinum toxin is by far the most toxic substance in the world. All the toxins produced are either secreted out, called exotoxins (proteins), or are entrapped in the cell membrane, called endotoxins (lipopolysaccharides). These toxins are di-chain molecules, internalized into the cell by receptor mediated endocytosis, and ADP-ribosylation is the most common mode of action. The toxins produced by bacteria are enterotoxins, neurotoxins, cytotoxins, lysins (e.g., hemolysin), gangrene producing toxins. However, a single bacteria often produces more than one toxin. Bacterial toxins, which are primarily harmful, are also being used for the cure of cancer, killing of mosquito larvae, understanding of basic sciences like ADP-ribosylation, etc.

Animals↗

Structural basis for the reversible activation of a Rho protein by the bacterial toxin SopE.

The bacterial enteropathogen Salmonella typhimurium employs a type III secretion system to inject bacterial toxins into the host cell cytosol. These toxins transiently activate Rho family GTP-binding protein-dependent signaling cascades to induce cytoskeletal rearrangements. One of these translocated Salmonella toxins, SopE, can activate Cdc42 in a Dbl-like fashion despite its lack of sequence similarity to Dbl-like proteins, the Rho-specific eukaryotic guanine nucleotide exchange factors. To elucidate the mechanism of SopE-mediated guanine nucleotide exchange, we have analyzed the structure of the complex between a catalytic fragment of SopE and Cdc42. SopE binds to and locks the switch I and switch II regions of Cdc42 in a conformation that promotes guanine nucleotide release. This conformation is strikingly similar to that of Rac1 in complex with the eukaryotic Dbl-like exchange factor Tiam1. However, the catalytic domain of SopE has an entirely different architecture from that of Tiam1 and interacts with the switch regions via different amino acids. Therefore, SopE represents the first example of a non-Dbl-like protein capable of inducing guanine nucleotide exchange in Rho family proteins.

Amino Acid Sequence↗