PubMed1990
The benzofurane derivative benzbromarone (BBR) previously has led to liver tumor formation after long-term treatment of rats, but no indications of genotoxicity were detected. The present studies were designed to elucidate the mechanism(s) possibly involved in liver tumor formation by BBR. Female Wistar rats were used. Phenobarbital (PB) served as a positive control. (1) Short-term treatment (7 days) with daily doses of 2 to 100 mg/kg BBR led to adaptive responses in the liver, i.e., growth (increases in DNA, RNA, and protein) and induction of monooxygenases. These changes were also observed after feeding BBR for 8, 33, 77, and 102 weeks at doses of 2, 10, and 50 mg/kg/day but tended to weaken with time. Similar effects were obtained with PB fed at 2, 10, or 50 mg/kg/day. However, unlike PB, BBR did not enhance the expression of cytochrome P450-PB as demonstrated by immunostaining of histological liver sections. (2) BBR feeding for 102 weeks, but not for 77 weeks, produced some neoplastic liver nodules and at 50 mg/kg produced one hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Thus, BBR was tumorigenic in the present study, but was clearly weaker than PB which had induced liver nodules and HCCs at 77 weeks and even more markedly at 102 weeks. (3) To check for tumor-initiating activity 100 mg/kg BBR was given 14 hr after a two-thirds hepatectomy followed by promotion with PB (50 mg/kg) for 15 weeks. No phenotypically altered liver foci were detected. (4) To test for tumor-promoting activity rats received a single dose of N-nitrosomorpholine (250 mg/kg), and subsequently BBR or PB at doses of 2, 10, and 50 mg/kg/day. While PB markedly enhanced the development of neoplastic nodules and HCCs, BBR had only a weak enhancing effect on the induction of HCC, which was not dose related. gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase-positive foci dramatically increased in PB-treated animals, in contrast they showed no response after 2 and 10 mg/kg BBR and even decreased after 50 mg/kg BBR. (5) With PB changes in liver growth, monooxygenase activity, foci expansion, and tumor promotion all correlating with tumorigenesis in a quantitative manner, apparent no-observed-effect-levels are somewhat below 2 mg/kg (or 10 mg/kg for liver enlargement). (6) These studies suggest that BBR belongs to a group of nongenotoxic, growth-stimulating drugs with tumorigenic potential in rat liver. Its effects on the liver are different from those of PB, but seemed to resemble those of peroxisome proliferators, a hypothesis studied in the subsequent papers.