PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Body Size”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1992

Morphometric studies in inbred and hybrid house mice. VIII. Effects of litter size on brain size and body size.

Litter size, brain size, and body size were examined in inbred and hybrid house mice of three different ages in order to test whether litter size exhibits a positive genetic, but negative environmental association with both brain and body size. As estimated from among-line covariation, litter size showed a positive, but non-significant genetical association with brain and body size. It also showed a significant, negative environmental association with brain and body size, as hypothesized. Over all inbreds and hybrids, litter size explained 8% and 14%, respectively, of the within-strain (environmental) variation in brain and body size. It was concluded that the negative phenotypic association of litter size with brain size and especially body size is the reflection of a well-known negative maternal environmental effect whereby mice with large body sizes tend to produce larger litters of mice with smaller body sizes.

Animals↗
PubMed1989

Mirror feedback and judgments of body size.

Body size perception was measured in 44 obese and normal weight subjects using a video TV methodology. Subjects performed a task whereby they manipulated the size of their body image on a TV screen. Subjects viewed their images in the presence and absence of a full length mirror. Subjects were more accurate judging body size with the mirror present. Subjects also responded more slowly and made more adjustments of their body image when the mirror was present. No differences between obese and normal weight subjects were found. Ramifications of the findings for individuals who diet are discussed.

Body Constitution↗
PubMed1977

Correlation of tooth size and body size in living hominoid primates, with a note on relative brain size in Aegyptopithecus and Proconsul.

Second molar length and body weight are used to test the correlation between tooth size and body size in living Hominoidea. These variates are highly correlated (r= 0.942, p less than 0.001), indicating that tooth size can be used in dentally unspecialized fossil hominoids as one method of predicting the average body weight of species. Based on tooth size, the average body weight of Aegyptopithecus zeuxis is estimated to have been beteen 4.5 and 7.5 kg, which is corroborated by known cranial and postcranial elements. Using Radinsky's estimates of brain size, the encephalization quotient (EQ) for Aegyptopithecus was between 0.65 and 1.04. A similar analysis for Proconsul africanus yields a body weight between 16 and 34 kg, and an EQ between 1.19 and 1.96.

Animals↗
PubMed1992

Body size perception and body satisfaction in restrained and unrestrained eaters.

In 21 restrained and 20 unrestrained eaters body size perception was measured using the video distortion technique (VDT), the image marking procedure (IMP) and the kinesthetic size estimating apparatus (KSEA). Body satisfaction was assessed by questionnaires (Body Shape Questionnaire, Dieting scale of the Eating Attitudes Test). Restrained eaters showed no systematic over- or underestimation of the body size but less perceptual accuracy (in VDT and KSEA). Furthermore, they were clearly more dissatisfied with their bodies than unrestrained eaters. Both findings were unrelated to each other. In both groups depressive mood or thoughts seemed to be associated with body dissatisfaction but not with body size misperception. Objective body measures (body mass index, body fat content) were not related to either body size perception or body satisfaction. The findings suggest that a perceptual uncertainty in regard to body size (either for visual or for somatosensory aspects) has already developed in restrained eaters, which may constitute a predisposition for more overt forms of body size misperception as found in eating disorder patients.

Behavior Therapy↗
PubMed1977

Submaximal working capacity, heart size and body size in boys 8-18 years.

Heart diameters, heart volume (HV), PWC130, VO2 at 130 heart rate, and cardiorespiratory reactions during work at 3 kgm-s-1 were obtained in 237 boys ranging in age from 8--18 years. Results indicate that heart size, PWC130, VO130, and exercise HR, VO2/HR, f and SBP change significantly with age. On the other hand, HV - kg-1 and work VO2, VE and VE/VO2 remain rather stable throughout the growth period. Correlation analysis indicates that about 85% of the observed variation in the size of the heart during growth can be accounted for by the body weight, while about 70% of the variation in light submaximal working capacity (VO130) can be explained by HV alone. Holding age, height and body weight constant by partial correlation procedures yeilds significant relationships between HV and VO130 (r = 0.461), and between HV - kg-1 and VO130 (r = 0.414). Age, height, weight and size of the heart correlated simultaneously against VO130 account for 75% of the variance in the dependent variable. It would seem important to suggest the need for study of the interactions between age, size and maturity, in addition to indicators of size and efficiency of the oxygen delivery system, and indices of muscle oxygen utilization efficiency. Such an approach will permit a more definite partitioning of the variance in submaximal aerobic capicity during growth, and would probably yeild a more conservative estimate of the relationship between the size of the heart and submaximal working capacity during growth.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1989

The discrepancy between emotional vs. rational estimates of body size, actual size, and ideal body ratings: theoretical and clinical implications.

Thirty-two asymptomatic college females were assessed on multiple aspects of body image. Subjects' estimation of the size of three body sites (waist, hips, thighs) was affected by instructional protocol. Emotional ratings, based on how they "felt" about their body, elicited ratings that were larger than actual and ideal size measures. Size ratings based on rational instructions were no different from actual sizes, but were larger than ideal ratings. There were no differences between actual and ideal sizes. The results are discussed with regard to methodological issues involved in body image research. In addition, a working hypothesis that differentiates affective/emotional from cognitive/rational aspects of body size estimation is offered to complement current theories of body image. Implications of the findings for the understanding of body image and its relationship to eating disorders are discussed.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1989

Body-image disturbances in bulimia nervosa: influences of actual body size.

This study evaluated body-image distortion and ideal body-size preferences in 423 nonbulimic women and 108 bulimics. Analyses of covariance were utilized to compare the bulimic and nonbulimic groups on measures of current and ideal body size. Weight was used as a covariate to evaluate the influence of actual body size on perception of current body size and selection of ideal body size. Bulimics chose current body sizes that were significantly larger than those picked by nonbulimics regardless of actual body size. Bulimics also chose thinner ideal body sizes than did nonbulimics, regardless of actual body size. These results suggest that body-image distortion and extreme preference for thinness are a fundamental characteristic of bulimia nervosa. These results were discussed in terms of how perception of a large body size and preference for a very thin body size might interact to produce a high degree of dissatisfaction and overconcern with body size in bulimia nervosa.

Adult↗
PubMed1986

Body size estimation in bulimia.

Body size estimation was studied in 22 patients with bulimia and 20 normal controls. Two methods of body size estimation were used, a distorting television image method (DTIM) and the image marking method (IMM). The subjects estimated body size of a dummy as well as their own body on the DTIM. When estimating body size on the DTIM the bulimics overestimated and the controls underestimated, there being a significant difference between the two groups. There was no difference between the groups when estimating the size of the dummy. On the IMM a significant difference was found between the bulimic and control groups, the bulimics overestimating body size and the controls being more accurate. Marked directional effects were found with the DTIM. The two methods of body size estimation are compared.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Body-size judgments and eye movements associated with looking at body regions in obese and normal weight subjects.

Eye movements of 20 male and 20 female obese and nonobese subjects were monitored during two body-size estimation tasks using a computer-based video technology. Analysis indicated no differences in body-size estimation between subjects using the staircase method. All subjects slightly underestimated body size; however, obese subjects were more sensitive than normal-weight subjects in detecting size distortion when a signal-detection task was employed. Eye-movement data indicated subjects looked longest at the chest, followed by waist, head, thighs, and calves/feet, in both the staircase and the signal-detection methods. Women viewed the waist region longer than men. On a signal-detection task subjects were better at detecting body-size distortion when viewing the body from the back than from front or profile.

Adolescent↗