PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Book citation”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

An analysis of objective quality indicators on Year Book citations: implications for MEDLINE searchers.

PURPOSE: This study is an analysis of Mosby Year Book citations from Ovid Online's Comprehensive Core Medical Library (CCML). The purpose of this study was twofold: (1) to determine whether Year Book citations were more likely to be judged "key" than non-Year Book citations by clinicians; and (2) to determine whether the MEDLINE record of Year Book citations evaluated as key contained objective quality indicators that searchers might use to target key articles. BACKGROUND: As part of the MEDLINE/Full-Text Research Project, health care professionals evaluated search output from CCML on a five-point scale. The scale included the choice "key" for those items which the evaluator would not want to miss. Because the output contained items from the Year Book series, it was possible to determine whether the Year Book items were evaluated as key more frequently than expected. METHODS: This study analyzes the MEDLINE records corresponding to 110 references from the Mosby Year Book series evaluated as key by clinicians receiving search output from CCML. The records were examined for the presence of such searchable elements as Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms and publication types related to study design, evidence of research support, inclusion in the Abridged Index Medicus (AIM) subset, and a comments field. Also noted were the presence of a structured abstract, study design details in the author abstract, and inclusion in more than one Year Book. RESULTS: A chi-square test (p < .001 indicated that the proportion (33%) of Year Book citations marked key on the searches was significantly higher than that of non-Year Book citations (18%). When the occurrence of the searchable elements was compared to MEDLINE as a whole, the following access points appeared more frequently in the key Year Book records: study design terms categorized under epidemiologic methods in the MeSH Tree Structures; the checktag comparative study; AIM subset; comments field; and, publication types (pt) clinical trial, randomized controlled trial, multicenter study, and meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS: These searchable elements should be helpful in targeting some, but not all, key articles in MEDLINE.

Chi-Square Distribution↗

Book citations: influence of epidemiologic thought in the academic community.

Whilst their 'death' has often been certified, books remain highly important to most professions and academic disciplines. Analyses of citations received by epidemiologic texts may complement other views on epidemiology. The objective was to assess the number of citations received by some books of epidemiology and public health, as a first step towards studying the influence of epidemiological thought and thinking in academia. For this purpose, Institute for Scientific Information/ Thomson Scientific - Web of Science/ Web of Knowledgedatabase was consulted, in May 2006. The book by Rothman & Greenland appeared to have received the highest number of citations overall (over 8,000) and per year. The books by Kleinbaum et al, and by Breslow & Day received around 5,000 citations. In terms of citations per year the book by Sackett et al ranks 3rd, and the one by Rose, 4th of those included in this preliminary study. Other books which were influential in the classrooms collected comparatively less citations. Results offer a rich picture of the academic influences and trends of epidemiologic methods and reasoning on public health, clinical medicine and the other health, life and social sciences. They may contribute to assess epidemiologists' efforts to demarcate epidemiology and to assert epistemic authority, and to analyze some historical influences of economic, social and political forces on epidemiological research.

Bibliometrics↗

Misrepresentation of research citations among medical school faculty applicants.

PURPOSE: A descriptive study of bibliographic misrepresentations by applicants to medical school faculty positions. METHOD: The authors reviewed 250 1995 faculty applicant bibliographies from eight medical institutions, representing six medical specialities. Using computerized library database searches or direct retrieval, they evaluated the legitimacy of each journal, abstract, and book citation. The authors classified and tabulated the following discrepancies as misrepresentations: (1) citing a nonexistent article in an existent source, (2) claiming authorship on an article that did not list the applicant as an author, and (3) altering authorship order to enhance the applicant's position. RESULTS: The authors found 56 misrepresented citations among 2,149 verified articles (2.6%). These misrepresentations were distributed among 39 applicants (15.6%; 95% CI, 11.5% to 20.9%); 11 of whom (4.4%) had multiple discrepancies. Sixty-eight percent of all misrepresentations were due to discrepancies in authorship order, while journal citations constituted the most frequent source of misrepresentation (77%). CONCLUSIONS: Misrepresentation of bibliographic citations does exist among medical school faculty applicants. One possible solution to this problem would be to require applicants to document their bibliographic citations.

Authorship↗

The NLM Gateway: a metasearch engine for disparate resources.

The U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM) has created a metasearch engine called the NLM Gateway at the URL "gateway.nlm.nih.gov". The Gateway allows the user to issue one search that takes place on multiple NLM retrieval engines. A composite result set is presented in several categories of information: journal citations; books, serials and audiovisuals; consumer health; meeting abstracts; and other collections.

Databases as Topic↗

Pathophysiology of septic encephalopathy: a review.

OBJECTIVES: Encephalopathy is a common complication of sepsis. This review describes the different pathologic mechanisms that may be involved in its etiology. DATA SOURCES: The studies described here were derived from the database PubMed (http:¿¿www.nlm.nih.gov) and from references identified in the bibliographies of pertinent articles and books. The citations are largely confined to English language articles between 1966 and 1998. Older publications were used if they were of historical significance. STUDY SELECTION: All investigations in which any aspect of septic encephalopathy was reported were included. This selection encompasses clinical, animal, and in vitro cell culture work. DATA EXTRACTION: The literature cited was published in peer-reviewed clinical or basic science journals or in books. DATA SYNTHESIS: Contradictions between the results of published studies are discussed. CONCLUSIONS: The most immediate and serious complication of septic encephalopathy is impaired consciousness, for which the patient may require ventilation. The etiology of septic encephalopathy involves reduced cerebral blood flow and oxygen extraction by the brain, cerebral edema, and disruption of the blood-brain barrier that may arise from the action of inflammatory mediators on the cerebrovascular endothelium, abnormal neurotransmitter composition of the reticular activating system, impaired astrocyte function, and neuronal degeneration. Currently, there is no treatment.

Brain Diseases↗

[An analysis of the scientific publications of the A. A. Bogomolets Institute of Physiology of the Academy of Sciences of Ukraine].

Scientific publications from three sectors of the Institute have analyzed for the period since 1979 till 1988 inclusive. The analysis is based on data of annual reference books Science Citation Index (SCI) and lists of publications of each researcher of the Institute. It is shown that with almost equal numerical strength of researchers and similar number of publications the sector of molecular physiology contributed 43.6% to cited works 48.2% of these works are included into database of SCI. Such indices for the sectors of neurophysiology and physiology of visceral systems accounted for 33%, 33.4% and 23.4, 18.4% respectively. It is of interest that 47.5% of references to the cited works of the molecular physiology sector were made by foreign scientists and self-citation constituted 17.4%, while for the other sectors such indices had a reverse relationship. The problem on objectification of estimation of research is under discussion.

Academies and Institutes↗

Lynch Syndrome

CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS: Lynch syndrome is characterized by an increased risk for colorectal cancer (CRC) and cancers of the endometrium, ovary, stomach, small bowel, urinary tract, biliary tract, prostate, brain (usually glioblastoma), skin (sebaceous adenomas, sebaceous epithelioma, sebaceous carcinomas, and keratoacanthomas), and pancreas. Cancer risks and age of onset vary depending on the associated gene. Several other cancer types have been reported to occur in individuals with Lynch syndrome (e.g., sarcomas, adrenocortical carcinoma). However, the data are not sufficient to demonstrate that the risk of developing these cancers is increased in individuals with Lynch syndrome. DIAGNOSIS/TESTING: The diagnosis of Lynch syndrome is established in a proband with a germline heterozygous pathogenic variant in MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, or PMS2 or a 3' EPCAM deletion identified by molecular genetic testing, or, rarely, constitutional inactivation of the MLH1 promotor due to methylation identified by DNA methylation analysis. MANAGEMENT: Treatment of manifestations: Polypectomy at the time of colonoscopy; referral to advanced endoscopist for lesions requiring advanced resection techniques; surgical resection of polyps when needed; individualized surgical management for colon cancer based on tumor location, stage, Lynch syndrome-associated gene, age, comorbidity, bowel function, anticipated quality of life, and risk of metachronous CRC; mismatch repair (MMR) testing, microsatellite instability (MSI) testing, and multidisciplinary evaluation for rectal cancer prior to treatment; consider immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for metastatic or unresectable MMR-deficient or MSI-high tumors; other tumors are managed as in the general population. Prevention of primary manifestations: Risk-reducing hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy can be considered after childbearing is completed. Prophylactic colectomy prior to the development of colon cancer is generally not recommended for individuals known to have Lynch syndrome because screening colonoscopy with polypectomy is an effective preventive measure. Aspirin therapy has been shown to decrease the risk for CRC in individuals with Lynch syndrome. Surveillance: Colonoscopy with removal of precancerous polyps with frequency and initial screening based on gene involved and family history; annual education for females regarding the symptoms of endometrial and ovarian cancers; consider transvaginal ultrasound examination and endometrial biopsy every one to two years beginning at age 30 to 35 years; consider upper endoscopy examination particularly for individuals with a family history of gastric cancer and those of Asian ancestry with frequency and initial screening based on gene involved and family history; biopsies should be evaluated for H pylori infections so that appropriate treatment can be given as needed; consider capsule endoscopy and small bowel enterography for distal small bowel cancers in symptomatic persons; consider urinalysis with urine cytology annually beginning between ages 30 and 35 years; consider pancreatic cancer screening in individuals with a family history of pancreatic cancer; follow population screening guidelines and maintain awareness for signs and symptoms of other cancers. Agents/circumstances to avoid: Obesity, physical inactivity, cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, and type 2 diabetes may increase CRC risk in individuals with Lynch syndrome. Evaluation of relatives at risk: Molecular genetic testing for the familial Lynch syndrome-related pathogenic variant is recommended for all first-degree relatives (parents, sibs, and offspring) of an affected individual in order to identify as early as possible those who would benefit from surveillance, risk-reducing interventions, and other preventive measures. Testing for constitutional MLH1 hypermethylation is recommended for all first-degree relatives of individuals with Lynch syndrome caused by constitutional MLH1 methylation. GENETIC COUNSELING: Lynch syndrome caused by a heterozygous germline Lynch syndrome-related pathogenic variant (i.e., a pathogenic variant in MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, or PMS2 or a 3' EPCAM deletion) is inherited in an autosomal dominant manner. Individuals with Lynch syndrome caused by constitutional inactivation of MLH1 by methylation typically represent simplex cases, although affected individuals from a few families have been reported with inherited MLH1 promoter methylation. The majority of individuals with a heterozygous germline Lynch syndrome-related pathogenic variant inherited the pathogenic variant from a parent who may or may not have had cancer. Each child of an individual with Lynch syndrome has a 50% chance of inheriting the Lynch syndrome-related pathogenic variant and the related cancer risks. If the reproductive partner of an individual with Lynch syndrome has a germline heterozygous pathogenic variant in the same Lynch syndrome-related gene, offspring are at risk of inheriting biallelic pathogenic variants and having constitutional mismatch repair deficiency. Once a germline Lynch syndrome-related pathogenic variant has been identified in an affected family member, predictive testing for at-risk asymptomatic family members and prenatal/preimplantation genetic testing are possible.

Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colorectal Cancer (HNPCC)↗

Multisystem Proteinopathy

CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS: Multisystem proteinopathy (MSP) is a genetically heterogeneous, multisystem degenerative disorder characterized by adult-onset proximal and distal muscle weakness (clinically resembling a limb-girdle muscular dystrophy syndrome), early-onset Paget disease of bone (PDB), and premature frontotemporal dementia (FTD). Muscle weakness progresses to involve other limb and respiratory muscles. PDB involves focal areas of increased bone turnover that typically lead to spine and/or hip pain and localized enlargement and deformity of the long bones; pathologic fractures occur on occasion. Early stages of FTD are characterized by dysnomia, dyscalculia, comprehension deficits, and paraphasic errors, with minimal impairment of episodic memory; later stages are characterized by inability to speak, auditory comprehension deficits for even one-step commands, alexia, and agraphia. Mean age at diagnosis for muscle disease is 43 years, PDB is 41 years, and FTD is 56 years. Dilated cardiomyopathy, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and Parkinson disease are now known to be part of the spectrum of findings associated with MSP. DIAGNOSIS/TESTING: The diagnosis of MSP is established in a proband with typical clinical findings and a heterozygous pathogenic variant in VCP, HNRNPA1, HNRNPA2B1, or SQSTM1 identified by molecular genetic testing. MANAGEMENT: Treatment of manifestations: Weight control to avoid obesity; physical therapy and stretching exercises to promote mobility and prevent contractures; occupational therapy and mechanical aids (canes, walkers, orthotics, wheelchairs) as needed for ambulation/mobility; surgical intervention for foot deformity and scoliosis as needed; respiratory aids when indicated; assisted living arrangements for muscle weakness and/or dementia; bisphosphonates to relieve pain and disability from PDB; social and emotional support; education regarding safety precautions. Surveillance: Echocardiogram and electrocardiogram with repeat cardiac evaluation every two to three years or earlier if symptomatic; annual pulmonary function studies; sleep studies as clinically indicated; annual alkaline phosphatase measurement; skeletal imaging as indicated for evaluation of PDB; neurologic and neuropsychological assessment every two to three years or more frequently as needed; multidisciplinary monitoring for respiratory, cardiac, musculoskeletal, and cognitive decline. GENETIC COUNSELING: MSP is inherited in an autosomal dominant manner. Most individuals diagnosed with MSP have an affected parent. Estimates based largely on VCP-MSP suggest that approximately 5% of individuals have a de novo pathogenic variant. Each child of an individual with MSP has a 50% chance of inheriting the MSP-related pathogenic variant. Marked intrafamilial variability may be observed among heterozygous family members, including differences in age at onset, severity, rate of progression, and the specific combination of manifestations. Once the MSP-related pathogenic variant has been identified in an affected family member, predictive testing for at-risk family members and prenatal/preimplantation genetic testing are possible.

Inclusion Body Myopathy with Early-Onset Paget Dis↗

[Citation analysis of the Chinese Journal of Ophthalmology from 2001 to 2004].

OBJECTIVE: To study the aspects of citation of the Chinese Journal of Ophthalmology and the requirement and utilization of literatures by the scientists working in the field of ophthalmology. METHODS: The citation analysis was used to analyze the references cited in the 926 articles published in the Chinese Journal of Ophthalmology from 2001 to 2004. RESULTS: The citation rate was 91.79% and there were 8.05 citations per article. Citations from journals and books accounted for 91.97% and 7.85% of all citations, respectively. The Price Index was 35.50% and the self-citation rate was 8.40%. The citations from the high-ranked 17 journals accounted for 54.03% of all citations. CONCLUSIONS: The articles cited by papers published in the Chinese Journal of Ophthalmology cover a wide variety of journals. Most citations came from the English journals. The half-citing life is relatively longer and the Price Index is relatively low. It indicates that the authors' ability for using the recently published articles should be improved.

Bibliometrics↗

So much writing, so little science: a review of 37 years of literature on edetate sodium chelation therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and efficacy of edetate sodium (ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid; EDTA) chelation therapy for atherosclerosis. METHODS: Literature search using MEDLINE, encompassing 1966 through May 1993. Further references were obtained from articles and books, and from citations obtained from the American Academy of Medical Preventics. RESULTS: 16 case reports or case series, 2 longitudinal studies, and 3 clinical trials were reviewed, along with testimonials cited in 19 books. CONCLUSIONS: Little valid scientific evidence is available. Although the postulated mechanisms of action for EDTA are biologically plausible and EDTA appears to be safe, it has not been proven effective. Indeed, the best evidence shows it to be ineffective. Therefore, EDTA chelation therapy should not be used in clinical practice to treat atherosclerosis.

Arteriosclerosis↗

Content, style, and emotional tone of texts in introductory psychology.

Random samples taken from six recent textbooks and three older books in introductory psychology were analyzed with respect to linguistic style, emotional tone, and pattern of citation. Newer and older books, individual books, and categories of chapters within books were compared to each other. Analysis suggests that newer books are longer and linguistically more complicated. They also contain proportionally more citations, and more text pages devoted to social psychology and psychopathology than older books. There were several significant stylistic and emotional differences among books and some significant content differences among chapters.

Analysis of Variance↗

Trust, but verify. The accuracy of references in four anesthesia journals.

To determine the accuracy of bibliographic citation in the anesthesia literature, we reviewed all 1988 volumes of ANESTHESIOLOGY, Anesthesia and Analgesia, British Journal of Anaesthesia, and Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia and sequentially numbered all references appearing in that year (n = 22,748). One hundred references from each of the four journals were randomly selected. After citations to nonjournal articles (i.e., books or book chapters) were excluded, the remaining 348 citations were analyzed in detail. Six standard bibliographic elements--authors' names, article title, journal title, volume number, page numbers, and year--were examined in each selected reference. Primary sources were reviewed, unless our institution did not own the source or could not obtain it through interlibrary loan, in which case standard indexes, abstracting services, and computerized databases were consulted. Each element was checked for accuracy, and references were classified as either correct or incorrect. A reference was correct if each element of the citation was identical to its source. Of the examined references, more than half (50.3%) contained an error in at least one element. The elements most likely to be inaccurate were, in descending order, article title, author, page numbers, journal title, volume number, and year. No significant differences (P = 0.283) existed in the error rates of the four journals; the percentage of citations containing at least one error ranged from 44% (Anesthesia and Analgesia) to 56% (British Journal of Anaesthesia). The citation error rate of anesthesia journals is similar to that reported in other specialties, where error rates ranging from 38% to 54% have been documented.

Anesthesiology↗

Mediator analysis: an overview of recent research on carers supporting people with intellectual disability and challenging behavior.

Families and front-line care staff are often key agents in helping deliver behavioural interventions to people with intellectual disability and challenging behaviour. The present paper reviews factors which may impact on the effectiveness of such interventions. Both PsychLit and MedLine were used to conduct an automated literature search which included the terms 'learning disability', 'mental handicap', 'mental retardation', 'intellectual disability', 'challenging behaviour', 'families' and 'staff. This search was substantially augmented by additional citations obtained from books and journal articles. The impact of attitudes, beliefs and emotional states as setting conditions for interventions was highlighted. A variety of more general setting conditions related to intervention effectiveness were also identified. Implications for both clinical practice and future research were discussed.

Adaptation, Psychological↗

History of medicine on the Internet: resources for librarians.

This paper offers an inventory of resources on the history of medicine on the Internet. Some sites are bibliographic; they supply book and journal citations. Some provide leads (or links) to more specific information, and some include full-text articles or historical essays. Because this material is intended to furnish librarians with reference direction, more attention is given to bibliographic and "linked" sites.

Computer Communication Networks↗

History of medicine on the Internet: resources for librarians.

This paper offers an inventory of Internet resources on the history of medicine. Some sites are bibliographic; they supply book and journal citations. Some provide leads (or links) to more specific information, and some include full-text articles or historical essays. Because this material is intended to furnish librarians with reference direction, more attention is given to bibliographic and "linked" sites. This paper updates a previous version published in Medical Reference Services Quarterly in Spring 1998.

History of Medicine↗

The availability of references and the sponsorship of original research cited in pharmaceutical advertisements.

BACKGROUND: The primary goal of pharmaceutical advertisements is to convince physicians to prescribe the manufacturer's product. We sought to determine what materials are cited in support of claims in pharmaceutical ads and medical research articles, and whether health care professionals seeking to verify the claims could obtain these references. METHODS: We reviewed 438 unique ads from the 1999 issues of 10 American medical journals, and a random sample of 400 references in medical research articles selected from the same journals. We classified references as journal article, data on file, meeting abstract or presentation, book or monograph, marketing report, prescribing information, government document or Internet site. We attempted to confirm or obtain each reference through library and Internet searches or by direct request from the manufacturer. The main outcome we sought to determine was the availability of the reference to a clinician. We also ascertained the source of funding for original research cited in the ads and the research articles. RESULTS: In the 438 ads with medical claims, 126 contained no references and 312 contained 721 unique references. Of these ad references, 55% (396/721) cited journal articles and 19% (135/721) cited data on file. In contrast, in the sample of research article references, 88% (351/400) cited journal articles and 8% (33/400) cited books. Overall, 84% of the citations from the ads were available: 98% of journal articles, 86% of books, 71% of meeting abstracts or presentations and 20% of data-on-file references. In all, 99% of the sample of research article references were available. We determined that 58% of the original research cited in the pharmaceutical ads was sponsored by or had an author affiliated with the product's manufacturer, as compared with 8% of the articles cited in the research articles. INTERPRETATION: Many pharmaceutical ads contain no references for medical claims. Although references to journal articles were usually obtainable, other published sources were not as easily acquired. The majority of unpublished data-on-file references were not available, and the majority of original research cited to substantiate claims in the pharmaceutical ads was funded by or had authors affiliated with the product's manufacturer.

Advertising↗

Misrepresentation of research criteria by orthopaedic residency applicants.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that applicants for postgraduate training may misrepresent research citations. We evaluated the research citations that were identified in a review of the Publications and Work and Research sections from the Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) data for all applicants to our orthopaedic residency program for the 1998 to 1999 academic year. METHODS: The citations were searched for on Medline. We initially used the name of the first author, then the name of the applicant, the name of the journal, the volume number, the issue number, and the page numbers. When a journal was not listed in Medline, an interlibrary search was instituted with use of the same format. When no match was made for any category, the citation was defined as misrepresented. Point estimates are reported as percentages. RESULTS: Publications were listed on sixty-four (30.0 percent) of 213 applications. One hundred and thirty-eight publications were cited; there were fifteen citations (10.9 percent) to book chapters, twenty-six (18.8 percent) to journals not listed in Ulrich's International Periodicals Directory, and twenty-one (15.2 percent) to articles listed as in press, in print, or submitted for publication. Seventy-six articles that had been cited as appearing in journals listed in Ulrich's Directory were checked and verified. Fourteen (18 percent) of these seventy-six publications were misrepresented. Misrepresentations included citations of nonexistent articles in actual journals and nonauthorship of existing articles. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that publications listed on postgraduate applications should be scrutinized carefully. Copies of cited publications should be required by residency programs before applications are considered complete. The importance of professionalism needs to be emphasized in the curricula of medical schools. Residency training programs should develop guidelines regarding misrepresentation.

Authorship↗