SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Brachial Plexus Block”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMedDate not supplied

False aneurysm of the axillary artery following brachial plexus block.

Brachial plexus blockade is a commonly used technique for providing surgical anesthesia for the upper extremity. Although various approaches have been described, the axillary approach is the safest and most frequently used. Most complications associated with axillary nerve block are related to local or systemic anesthetic toxicity, bleeding, infection, and nerve damage. A case of false aneurysm of the axillary artery following axillary nerve block is reported. The possible occurrence of this complication should be kept in mind to avoid permanent neurologic sequelae.

Aged↗

PubMedDate not supplied

A comparison of the lateral and posterior approach for brachial plexus block.

BACKGROUND: Brachial plexus block by the posterior approach described by Pippa is not widely used in contrast to the lateral approach of Winnie. We compared the clinical efficacy of both approaches in a randomized prospective study. METHODS: Eighty patients, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II, scheduled for surgery of the shoulder or upper arm were randomized in 2 groups: lateral (Winnie, n = 40) or posterior approach (Pippa, n = 40). A single injection of ropivacaine 7.5 mg/mL, 0.5 mL/kg, was made after obtaining a motor response in the distribution of the axillary nerve at a current below 0.5 mA (2 Hz, 0.1 millisecond). Onset and distribution of analgesia and motor block were assessed at 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, and 60 minutes after the local anesthetic injection. Complete block was defined as anesthesia in all dermatomes C3-C6 at 60 minutes after injection. RESULTS: The posterior approach provided complete block in 36 patients (90%) and the lateral approach in 33 patients (83%). Corresponding motor block was similar in both approaches, but the block procedure time was faster in the posterior approach (6.2 [5.2-7.2] minutes v 8.4 [7.1-10.2] minutes; P < .001). Surgical success rate (posterior 95% v lateral 93%) and side effects were similar in both approaches. One complication (thoracic epidural block) was seen using the lateral approach, whereas none occurred in the posterior approach. There was no difference in patient satisfaction scores of the 2 approaches, which were equally high in both groups (posterior 98% v lateral 95%). CONCLUSION: Both approaches are comparable regarding clinical efficacy for anesthesia of the shoulder and upper arm.

Adult↗

PubMed1987

Postoperative pain relief and bupivacaine plasma levels during continuous interscalene brachial plexus block.

Interscalene brachial plexus block was performed on 40 patients for prophylactic pain relief after shoulder surgery. A dose of 1.25 mg/kg of 0.5% bupivacaine was injected for the block (Group 1) and continued with an infusion of 0.25% bupivacaine 0.25 mg/kg/h (Group 2). If the postoperative analgesia was insufficient, the patients received i.m. oxycodone 0.15 mg/kg. In Group 1, one patient managed without oxycodone supplementation during the 24-h observation period compared with eight patients in Group 2 (P less than 0.01). The rest of the patients received 3.8 +/- 1.6 doses (Group 1) and 2.5 +/- 1.2 doses (Group 2) of oxycodone (P less than 0.05). At 30 min, the mean bupivacaine plasma concentration was 1.0 microgram/ml in Group 1 and 0.9 microgram/ml in Group 2. The mean plasma level of bupivacaine increased from 0.7 microgram/ml after 180 min to 1.1 micrograms/ml (P less than 0.01) after 24 h of infusion, providing some evidence of accumulation during infusion. The dizziness and confusion experienced by three patients could be associated with the local anaesthetic, as they obtained relief after the infusion was stopped.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1998

[Comparison of transarterial technique and paresthesia technique of axillary brachial plexus block].

Axillary brachial plexus blocks were established in 40 patients using transarterial technique (n = 20) or paresthesia technique (n = 20). Sensory and motor blockades of nerves supplying the upper extremity were compared at 10, 20 and 30 minutes after the injection of local anesthetics (1.5% plain mepivacaine 40 ml). Sensory blockades of the radial nerve and axillary nerve were significantly higher with transarterial technique than paresthesia technique. The incidence of analgesia of the radial nerve at 30 min was 100% with transarterial technique and 70% with paresthesia technique. Sensory blockades of the other nerves and motor blockades of all nerves did not show any significant differences between the two techniques. Proximal and distal spreads of the local anesthetic-contrast medium mixture within the axillary neurovascular sheath were studied in 20 patients. No statistically significant difference was observed in the spread of contrast agent between the two techniques. Transarterial technique is a recommendable method for hand surgery and especially indicated for the surgery of the area supplied by the radial nerve.

Adult↗

PubMed1993

[Shoulder surgery using a plexus block: for or against. Against].

Brachial plexus block is an alternative and elegant procedure for shoulder surgery. Three main concerns have to be considered when this technique is planed. Firstly, large amounts of local anaesthetic solution are necessary to achieve complete blockade of the region especially when the deeper tissues of the shoulder are concerned by the procedure. Secondly interscalenic cervical plexus block produces homolateral phrenic paralysis and may impair respiratory function in patients at risk or when supplemental IV drugs are administered. Thirdly, when nerve lesions of different mechanisms including plexus block itself occur, the origin of the lesion may be difficulty related to its cause. Indications of cervical block are therefore to be considered cautiously when shoulder surgery is performed.

Brachial Plexus↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Area of paresthesia as determinant of sensory block in axillary brachial plexus block.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Paresthesia is widely considered a useful indicator for locating components of the brachial plexus using the axillary approach. While establishing axillary brachial plexus blocks, the authors attempted to correlate the area of paresthesia with the effectiveness of the sensory block. METHODS: Axillary brachial plexus blocks were established in 222 consecutive adult patients scheduled for elective surgery of the hand or forearm. After paresthesia was elicited in the distribution of one of the three terminal nerves of the hand (median, radial, or ulnar nerve), 30 microliters 1.5% mepivacaine without epinephrine was injected after advancing an indwelling catheter. Sensory block of each terminal nerve was assessed 20 minutes after the injection. RESULTS: The median and radial nerves were blocked with the highest reliability (87% and 93%, respectively) after paresthesia was elicited in the areas supplied by the corresponding nerves. The ulnar nerve was blocked most reliably ( > 85%) after the elicitation of paresthesia in its area of distribution as well as when no paresthesia was induced. The most reliable block of the musculocutaneous nerve (72%) was achieved after paresthesia was induced in the area supplied by the median nerve. CONCLUSION: Eliciting paresthesia at the nerve supplying the area of a planned surgical incision is a reliable determinant of successful axillary brachial plexus block.

Adult↗

PubMed1998

An attempt to prevent spread of local anaesthetic to the phrenic nerve by compression above the injection site during the interscalene brachial plexus block.

The brachial plexus was identified by electrical stimulation before interscalene block with 30 mL 0.5% bupivacaine and adrenaline 1:200,000. During injection, compression was applied with a finger proximal to the injection site. Spirometric measurements were made before the block, and then at 5 min, 10 min, 20 min and 4 h after the injection. Diaphragmatic excursion was measured radiographically before the block, and at 15 min and 4 h afterwards. In 25 patients studied, spirometric measurements decreased. Twenty minutes after the injection, the forced vital capacity was 27% less, forced expiratory volume at 1 s 34% less and peak expiratory flow rate 15% less (all P < 0.05). Right diaphragmatic excursion decreased from 4.5 cm (SD 1.2 cm) to 1.8 cm (0.6 cm) at 15 mins and to 1.1 cm (0.6 cm) at 4 h (P < 0.05). Identification of the plexus by electric stimulation combined with finger compression above the injection site did not prevent diaphragmatic paresis.

Adrenergic Agonists↗

PubMed1989

[Parascalene brachial plexus block].

The supraclavicular brachial plexus block originated by Kulenkampff is useful but accompanies the danger of injury to the lung, i.e. pneumothorax, because the needle is directed caudad. Reviewing the anatomy of the brachial plexus in cadavers, we have found that the parascalene brachial plexus block originated by Vongvises is safer than Kulenkampff's method. We modified this block as follows: (1) An assistant pulls lightly the affected upper extremity caudad. (2) A 23-gauge 35 mm needle is inserted at right angles to the clavicle and directed cephalad at an angle of 0-30 degrees. One hundred and eighty four ASA I and II patients were operated under this block. Their ages ranged from 11 to 77, and there were 31 patients whose cervical spinal cord had been injured. Our success rate was 92%. The only complication we encountered was Horner's syndrome which occurred in 20% of our cases. None of our patients showed clinical symptoms of pneumothorax, hematoma, epidural as well as subarachnoideal block, recurrent nerve paralysis or phrenic nerve paralysis.

Brachial Plexus↗

PubMed1986

[Brachial plexus block in children. Approach through the brachial canal].

This study included 35 children (average age: 8 years) undergoing surgery of the upper limb under brachial plexus block. The brachial plexus was approached by the brachial canal route, which is a simple, rapid and efficient way (34 were successful). The main advantage of this technique was the avoidance, in most children, of general anaesthesia as a complement. In addition, postoperative analgesia was satisfactory in all cases. In spite of large doses and volumes of lidocaine and bupivacaine used with this technique, no complication was observed.

Adolescent↗

PubMedDate not supplied

The effects of arm position on central spread of local anesthetics and on quality of the block with axillary brachial plexus block.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Spread of local anesthetic solution in axillary brachial plexus block is thought to be influenced by the position of the arm and the use of compression maneuvers. We investigated how these two factors affected central local anesthetic spread and block quality. METHODS: Radiographic spread of local anesthetic was studied in 80 adult patients. They received mepivacaine mixed with contrast agent through an indwelling catheter with the arm abducted to either 0 or 90 degrees , and with or without local digital compression. Central and peripheral spread of the contrast agent was evaluated with anteroposterior radiographs of the axilla. Block quality was studied in a separate series of 70 adult patients. They received mepivacaine with the arm abducted 0 degrees or 90 degrees . The degree of sensory and motor block was assessed 20 minutes after the injection. RESULTS: Arm position at 0 degrees abduction promoted central spread of the contrast agent. Although digital compression suppressed peripheral spread effectively, it did not improve the central spread of the solution. Sensory block was comparable in all terminal nerves of the arm in both arm positions, whereas motor block of the radial nerve was promoted with no abduction. CONCLUSIONS: The central spread of local anesthetics is facilitated by injection without abduction of the arm but not by the use of compression at the injection site. This, however, did not alter the quality of the block.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Levobupivacaine and ropivacaine in the infraclavicular brachial plexus block.

AIM: Infraclavicular brachial plexus block were first described by Raj, yet this block remained underutilized despite theoretical advantages. The aim of this prospective, randomized study was to compare equipotent doses of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine. METHODS: For this prospective, randomized study we have enrolled, after informed consent, 30 patients of both sexes, ASA status I-II, who were going to receive surgery to the forearm or hand with tourniquet position on the arm. The infraclavicular plexus block was performed by using vertical technique. The block was performed with 30 mL of levobupivacaine 0.5% or ropivacaine 0.75%. RESULTS: No differences were reported between 2 groups in terms of demographic data. The onset-time for motor block was greater for ropivacaine group (p<0.05); the sensitive block was longer in levobupivacaine group (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The long duration of sensory block associated with the with good analgesia, less toxicity and the pharmacodynamic properties of levobupivacaine include this new local anaesthetic as a valid choice respect other local anaesthetic for infraclavicular plexus block.

Amides↗

PubMed1991

Plasma concentrations of bupivacaine and two of its metabolites during continuous interscalene brachial plexus block.

An interscalene brachial plexus block was performed via a catheter with 20-28 ml of 0.75% bupivacaine plus adrenaline for surgery of the shoulder region in 12 patients. Constant infusion of 0.25% bupivacaine 0.25 mg kg-1 h-1 was continued for 24 h. During surgery light general anaesthesia, without analgesics, was maintained. Plasma concentrations of total and unbound (free fraction) bupivacaine, desbutylbupivacaine (DBB), 4-hydroxybupivacaine (4-OHB) and alpha 1-acid glycoprotein (AAG) were measured at predetermined intervals during the continuous block. The greatest mean plasma concentrations of bupivacaine were measured at 30 min (1.63 (SD 0.55) micrograms ml-1) and 60 min (1.38 (0.48) micrograms ml-1). There was a small but statistically significant increase in the plasma concentration of bupivacaine between 12 and 24 h of infusion. The mean unbound concentration of bupivacaine in plasma decreased from 0.044 (0.015) microgram ml-1 (3.6 (1.1)% of total bupivacaine concentration) at 3 h to 0.023 (0.011) micrograms ml-1 (2.1 (1.0)%) at 24 h. The AAG concentration in plasma increased by 38% in 24 h. The metabolites DBB and 4-OHB were detectable in plasma from 30 min, with a gradual increase during infusion. At 24 h the mean concentrations of DBB and 4-OHB were 0.33 (0.22) micrograms ml-1 and 0.13 (0.04) micrograms ml-1, respectively. There were no toxic reactions during the blocks.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Pain relief after arthroscopic shoulder surgery: a comparison of intraarticular analgesia, suprascapular nerve block, and interscalene brachial plexus block.

In this prospective, randomized, blinded study, we assessed the analgesic efficacy of interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB), suprascapular nerve block (SSB), and intraarticular local anesthetic (IA) after arthroscopic acromioplasty. One-hundred-twenty patients were divided into 4 groups of 30. In Group SSB, the block was performed with 10 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine. In Group IA, 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine was administered intraarticularly at the end of surgery. In Group ISB, the block was performed with 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine. A control group was included for comparison. General anesthesia was administered to all patients. Patients were observed during the first 24 h. Pain scores, supplemental analgesia, satisfaction scores, and side effects were recorded at 4 and 24 h. No significant difference was observed between the IA and control groups. When compared with these groups, Groups SSB and ISB had significantly lower pain scores. At 4-h follow-up, better pain relief on movement was noted in Group ISB than in Group SSB. When compared with controls, a significant reduction in morphine consumption and a better satisfaction score were noted only in Group ISB. We conclude that ISB is the most efficient analgesic technique after arthroscopic acromioplasty. SSN block would be a clinically appropriate alternative.

Adult↗

PubMed1983

Continuous axillary brachial plexus block.

Continuous axillary brachial plexus block was performed in 597 patients undergoing prolonged operations on the hand. The technique required placement of a 5 cm 23 gauge teflon intravenous catheter in the axillary perivascular sheath. Lidocaine 1.5 per cent or mepivicaine 1.5 per cent (20-40 ml) were used for the initial block dose. Surgery was completed in 77.2 per cent of patients (460) with the axillary block alone while in 19.1 per cent of patients (114) supplementary narcotic administration or additional regional blocks were required. In 3.7 per cent of patients (22) the technique was considered a complete failure. Complications included local anaesthetic toxic reactions (2.85 per cent, 17 cases), nerve injury (0.50 per cent, three cases) and one case of major haematoma formation. The advantages of this technique and the possible complications are discussed.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Phrenic nerve block caused by interscalene brachial plexus block: effects of digital pressure and a low volume of local anesthetic.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB) is associated with phrenic block and diaphragmatic paralysis when high volumes (40-50 mL) of local anesthetic are injected. The goal of our study was to test if a low volume of local anesthetic administered while maintaining proximal digital pressure might more selectively block the brachial plexus and decrease the frequency of phrenic nerve block. METHODS: Twenty healthy patients undergoing ISB for orthopedic surgery of the upper extremity were randomly allocated to receive either 20 mL 1.5% mepivacaine while proximal digital pressure to the site of puncture was performed, or 40 mL 1.5% mepivacaine without digital pressure. Spirometry and clinical data were evaluated at baseline, 10, and 90 minutes after accomplishing the block and after the motor and sensory block resolved. Diaphragmatic excursion during deep inspiration was also evaluated 90 minutes after the block was performed, with the patient in the sitting position. RESULTS: Interscalene brachial plexus block produced diaphragmatic paralysis in all patients included in the study, as demonstrated by the pulmonary function testing and the chest radiograph. No significant differences were found in any of the parameters studied. At 10 minutes, baseline functional residual capacity had diminished by 34 +/- 10% in the 40 mL group and 37 +/- 13% in the 20 mL group. Maximum cephalad sensory dermatome level was also similar in both groups, being C 3 or above in all patients. Ipsilateral hemidiaphragmatic motion was similar in both groups (3.2 +/- 2.3 cm in the 40 mL group and 2.6 +/- 1.7 cm in the 20 mL group). However, in no case was dyspnea manifested. CONCLUSIONS: Decreasing the volume of local anesthetic and applying proximal digital pressure to the site of injection is not effective in reducing the cervical block spread and the frequency or intensity of diaphragmatic paralysis during interscalene ISB.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Applying cervical spine anatomy to interscalene brachial plexus blocks.

BACKGROUND: The interscalene brachial plexus block (ISBPB) is a most reliable and commonly performed technique for regional anesthesia of the upper extremity. It has widespread clinical applicability, ranging from use for shoulder surgery as well as diagnostic and therapeutic uses in pain management. Traditional methods described for performing the ISBPB involve identifying surface anatomy landmarks. Unfortunately, in patients with less than ideal landmarks (those with short, thick necks and those lacking adequate muscle tone in the neck area) it becomes increasingly challenging to identify these landmarks. As a result there is greater uncertainty in accurately locating the brachial plexus, and consequently greater risk in performing the block. METHODS: A simple new approach to the interscalene brachial plexus block is described, utilizing the bony anatomy of the cervical spine as a landmark for directing the needle to the correct position, a nerve stimulator, and a confirmatory injection of a test dose of anesthetic solution to enhance accuracy. In addition, by correctly implementing this technique, the block may be performed by a sole operator. RESULTS: This simple approach has proven to be clinically effective in more than 2,000 blocks of the brachial plexus during the past 4 years. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that this technique represents a safe, reproducible, and highly successful method for use by anesthesiologists and pain physicians alike.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2004

The radial nerve should be blocked before the ulnar nerve during a brachial plexus block at the humeral canal.

PURPOSE: The brachial plexus block through the humeral canal as described by Dupré is indicated in hand and forearm surgery. This block requires a multi-stimulation technique that emphasizes the necessity of a rigorous and safe technique. Nerve injury associated with regional anesthesia can entail significant morbidity for patients. Thus, we investigated the brachial block sequence in terms of unintended nerve stimulation as a surrogate of potential nerve injury. METHODS: Sixty patients were randomly allocated in two groups of 30. In Group I the radial nerve was blocked before the ulnar nerve. In Group II the ulnar nerve was blocked before the radial nerve. During the radial nerve approach we recorded, if present, an ulnar nerve response. During the ulnar nerve approach we recorded, if present, a radial nerve response. RESULTS: In Group I while looking for the radial nerve, in 50% of the cases, an ulnar motor response was recorded. In Group II while looking for the ulnar nerve, a radial motor response was recorded in 10% of the cases. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that the radial nerve should be blocked before the ulnar nerve when performing a brachial plexus block at the humeral canal.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2002

Ultrasonographic assessment of topographic anatomy in volunteers suggests a modification of the infraclavicular vertical brachial plexus block.

BACKGROUND: The infraclavicular vertical brachial plexus block, first described by Kilka and coworkers, offers a more proximal spread of anaesthesia for the upper extremity than the classic axillary approach. In this technique, the puncture site is defined as lying at the exact centre of an infraclavicular line (k) between the jugular fossa and the ventral process of the acromion. Our study was designed to determine whether the point so defined (P) corresponds with the optimal puncture site determined sonographically (S) and to develop an improved prediction model. METHOD: High-resolution ultrasonography was carried out in 59 volunteers to visualize the plexus. Sonography-derived distances and morphometric measurements were used to test accuracy and calculate multiple regressions. RESULTS: We found a clear trend towards a more lateral puncture site. In women, S was significantly (P<0.001) lateral (8 mm) to P. The overall accuracy of the infraclavicular vertical brachial plexus block technique was not sufficient to predict the optimal puncture site reliably. Our resulting improved prediction model is valid for both sexes and is based not just on the centre point but on the absolute length of k (22-22.5 cm). We found that for every 1 cm decrease in k the optimal puncture site moved 2 mm laterally from the exact centre of k, and for every 1 cm increase in k it moved 2 mm medially. CONCLUSIONS: The suggested modification should help to increase the success rate of the infraclavicular vertical brachial plexus block while decreasing the rate of potentially severe complications, although individual ultrasonographic guidance is to be recommended whenever possible.

Adolescent↗