PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “CRANIOSYNOSTOSES”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

[On the effect of mutations of the fibroblast growth factor receptors as exemplified by three cases of craniosynostoses].

PURPOSE: Craniosynostoses are premature ossifications of cranial sutures. They occur isolated and syndromic. Syndromic craniosynostoses are mainly associated with mutations of the Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptors (FGFR) 1 - 3. This paper gives an overview of the etiology and pathophysiology of isolated and syndromic craniosynostoses and discusses the molecular genetic results in 21 index cases (19 seemingly isolated craniosynostoses, 2 cases with a clinical diagnosis of Crouzon's syndrome). METHOD: Mutation analysis in exons of the FGFR 1 - 3 known to be preferentially affected in craniosynostoses was performed on DNA samples from peripheral blood and bone specimen excised at the time of surgery to correct the craniosynostosis. RESULTS: In a girl with seemingly isolated plagiocephaly we identified a P250L (749C-->T) mutation in FGFR3. Her mother showed minor signs of craniosynostosis when the family was re-evaluated. She was shown to carry the same mutation. In two patients with suspected Crouzon's syndrome 2 different mutations were detected at the same nucleotide (1025G-->A or C) and confirmed the clinical diagnosis. No mutation was found in 18/19 seemingly isolated craniosynostosis cases. CONCLUSION: In contrast to syndromic forms isolated craniosynostoses are rarely associated with mutations in FGFR. The affection of further family members is a strong indication of involvement of FGFR mutations. Because of variable expressivity, parents should be examined carefully in isolated craniosynostoses to identify minor signs.

Adult↗

Management of craniosynostoses.

Although it is currently thought that surgery is indicated mainly for cosmetic reasons in isolated craniosynostoses, the functional aspects of the treatment must not be underestimated. Prospective studies on intracranial pressure and mental evolution of these children have shown that there were functional consequences in a significant proportion of cases even of single suture fusion. The frequency of increased intracranial hypertension and the risk of mental impairment depend on the age of the child and the type of craniosynostosis. In nonsyndromic cases, the higher risks are observed in multisutural craniosynostoses (brachycephaly, oxycephaly). In syndromic cases, the risk of intracranial hypertension is higher in Crouzon syndrome, and Apert syndrome carries the higher risk of mental retardation. The study of a personal series of 2,137 craniosynostoses shows that the functional and the cosmetic results are better after early surgery, and that the operative risks are not higher in infants than in older children.

Craniosynostoses↗

[Cephalometric studies on X-ray pictures to evaluate postoperative cranial growth of children with craniosynostoses].

OBJECTIVE: A preoperative CT scan seems indispensible for the evaluation of the bones and soft tissue in children with craniosynostoses. Regular postoperative follow-up is limited because of general anaesthesia and radiation exposure. Therefore, cranial growth of these children has hardly been examined so far. A method is needed to replace CT for this indication and to allow differentiated growth analysis besides clinical inspection. METHODS: 15 children (7 trigonocephalies, 4 plagiocephalies, 4 syndromal craniosynostoses) were operated on using a standardized bilateral fronto-orbital advancement. Using conventional pre- and postoperative skull roentgenograms, a craniometric analysis according to the modified method of Schmid et al. [13] was carried out. RESULTS: A supernormal opening of the frontal angle (the forehead area) and an increase of length of the frontal base were found. Skull height and skull width were positively influenced; the growth of the dorsal skull base remained retarded in length postoperatively. There was metrically identifiable reorganization of areas distant from operation area. Results were validated by comparison with normal subjects and patient populations known from the published literature. CONCLUSION: The presented method is easy, safe and exposure-reduced, and is able to assess the growth of different skull areas by means of distance and angle measurements. It should be used regularly in routine postoperative control of craniosynostoses. CT examinations should be limited to special questions of the soft tissue.

Age Factors↗

Phenotypic diversity in patients with craniosynostoses unrelated to Apert syndrome: the role of fibroblast growth factor receptor gene mutations.

OBJECT: The goal of this study was to elucidate the genotype-phenotype relationship in syndromic craniosynostoses by analyzing the mutations of the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) gene and its clinical manifestations in patients, particularly those in atypical cases. METHODS: Twenty patients with craniosynostoses unrelated to Apert syndrome were enrolled in this study. The phenotypes indicated the following syndromes: 12 patients with unrelated Crouzon syndrome, including nine sporadic and three familial cases; two with sporadic Pfeiffer syndrome; and one with Antley-Bixler syndrome. The Crouzon phenotype was subdivided into three clinical forms: regular, top, and bottom ones. Two patients who demonstrated craniofacial anomalies and bilateral elbow joint contractures were categorized as having an unspecified craniosynostosis. Three cases of unclassifiable cloverleaf skull malformation were also analyzed. Fourteen mutations of the FGFR2 gene were identified in these patients; seven of the 10 cysteine-related mutations were substitutions of codon 342 in the third immunoglobulin-like domain of this gene. The phenotypes of these seven cases were three of regular Crouzon, two of unspecified craniosynostosis, and one each of top Crouzon and unclassifiable cloverleaf skull malformation. In addition, four of the seven patients were found to have the same genotype (Cys342Arg). The phenotypes of these patients, however, were quite variable, ranging from regular Crouzon to unclassifiable cloverleaf skull malformation. CONCLUSIONS: The phenotypes of patients with craniosynostoses unrelated to Apert syndrome proved quite variable, even in cases in which patients demonstrated the same genotype. In view of the phenotypic diversity evident in cases in which the same mutation in the FGFR2 gene is present, it is possible that other disease-modifying genetic factors exist to control the abnormal gain-of-function that accompanies FGFR signaling.

Adolescent↗

[Radiometric study of postoperative development of skull shape and cranial volume in children with craniosynostoses].

Preoperative CT diagnostics seem indispensible for evaluation of hard and soft tissue situation in children with craniosynostoses. Regular postoperative control is limited because of general anaesthesia and radiation exposure. Therefore, cranial growth of these children is hardly metrically examined. A method is looked for to replace CT for this indication and to allow differentiated analysis of skull shape and intracranial volume. 15 children (7 trigonocephalies, 4 plagiocephalies, 4 syndromal craniosynostoses) were operated on using a standardized bilateral frontoorbital advancement. Using conventional pre- and postoperative skull roentgenograms, a craniometric analysis of skull length, height and broadth according to the modified method of Ebel [9] and Schmid et al. [22] was carried out for assessment of the skull shape and the intracranial volume. Skull shape and volume showed good development (depending on the synostosis form). The bilateral frontoorbital advancement proved to be an effective operation method. Validation of results was given by comparison with normal and patient populations known from the published literature. The presented easy, safe and exposure-reduced method of analysis should be used regularly in preoperative diagnostics and routine postoperative control of craniosynostoses.

Cephalometry↗

[Diagnosis and treatment of craniosynostoses: the usefulness of CT combined with 3-dimensional reconstruction].

Craniosynostoses are craniocerebral and craniofacial dysmorphic states, characterized by early closure of one or more cranial sutures. In this pathology the perpendicular growth of the bone to the involved suture is disturbed (Virchow's theory). Craniosynostoses can be divided into: 1) single-suture synostoses (scaphocephaly, plagiocephaly, trigonocephaly), 2) multiple-suture synostoses (brachycephaly, oxycephaly) and 3) craniofacial dysostoses. From 1976 to 1987, 63 children with craniosynostosis were studied in our Institute. All patients underwent radiologic and neuroradiologic research with CT scans both before and after surgery; in the past year three-dimensional reconstructions of CT images were also employed. Major advantages of 3-DCT have been obtained in craniofacial malformations. In fact, this technique helps reduce surgical risks and allows the surgeon to evaluate partial results and to make eventual corrections in the last phase. The processing of images is useful to simulate the operation, thus allowing the surgeon to take the best therapeutic choice by computer. This technique is especially useful for postoperative follow-up. In craniosynostoses, early surgical treatment (within the first 6-8 months of life) is necessary in order to obtain excellent functional and cosmetic results.

Cranial Sutures↗

Perspectives on craniofacial asymmetry. V. The craniosynostoses.

The craniosynostoses are both etiologically and pathogenetically heterogeneous and many syndromes have been delineated. The present paper highlights well-known craniosynostoses that can present asymmetrically. These include plagiocephaly resulting from premature unilateral synostosis of the coronal or lambdoid sutures. Apert syndrome, and Saethre-Chotzen syndrome.

Acrocephalosyndactylia↗

Molecular and cellular bases of syndromic craniosynostoses.

Premature fusion of cranial sutures underlies the clinical condition of 'craniosynostosis', a common human disorder that occurs in both nonsyndromic and syndromic forms. The subgroup of syndromic craniosynostoses usually associates limb abnormalities and facial dysmorphism to skull distortion. Over the past decade, some of the genes causing these phenotypes have been identified. Among these, the gene encoding FGFR2, one of four members of the fibroblast growth factor receptor(FGFR) family, has been shown to account for several severe conditions including Apert, Pfeiffer, Crouzon, Beare-Stevenson and Jackson-Weiss syndromes. Two other FGFRs, FGFR1 and FGFR3, also account for craniosynostoses of variable severity [Pfeiffer, Crouzon with acanthosis nigricans (a pre-malignant skin disorder), and Muenke syndromes]. By contrast,Saethre-Chotzen syndrome and craniosynostosis (Boston-type) arise from mutations in the Twist and muscle segment homeobox 2 (MSX2) transcription factors, respectively. Whereas most FGFR mutations are likely to cause ligand independent activation of the receptor, leading to an upregulation of signaling pathways, mutations in the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factor Twist appear to induce loss of protein function. This review will summarise and discuss some of the cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in normal and abnormal craniofacial development, focusing on the possible interactions between the different factors controlling membranous ossification.

Craniofacial Abnormalities↗

Diagnostic imaging in the management of craniosynostoses.

Craniosynostoses are the most frequent craniofacial malformations. However, with a prevalence of 3-6 cases per 10,000 live births they are amongst the rarely seen diseases and their definite diagnosis thus poses a challenge to the physician. When an abnormal calvarial configuration is detected, a radiological evaluation is necessary to characterize the deformity and to guide the corrective surgical procedure. The demand for clear diagnostic criteria is justified by the severity of the disease and the possible consequences of delayed diagnosis. In addition to the clinical signs (deformation of the head), conventional skull X-rays show typical radiological alterations and are used for basic diagnostics. Diagnostic tests that may be performed to confirm the diagnosis and assess the extent of the problem, include computed tomography (CT), 3D-CT, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, and ultrasonography. In the present review we will describe the most important clinical and radiological characteristics of craniosynostosis by means of clinical, radiological and operative situs examples.

Craniosynostoses↗

Upper airway obstruction in the syndromal craniosynostoses.

This series of consecutive cases details the prevalence and management of upper airway obstruction in the syndromal craniosynostoses (Crouzon, Apert and Pfeiffer syndromes). Upper airway obstruction presents more frequently in Crouzon and Pfeiffer syndrome when presenting early and during the intermediate years. Those patients with Apert syndrome appear relatively free of this problem. Management has been directed toward increasing the size of the nasopharyngeal space by soft tissue alterations (uvulopalatopharyngoplasty, soft palatal split and adenotonsillectomy) with success. Le Fort III advancement osteotomy has been reserved for those more extreme cases, again with objective airway improvement. These techniques have removed the necessity for the progression to tracheostomy in these cases.

Adenoidectomy↗

Functional treatment of craniosynostoses during childhood.

The aim of this article was to present a treatment strategy for complex craniosynostoses, such as Apert syndrome and Crouzon's disease, based on the author's experience of over 16 years. The most favourable results of primary decompression have been achieved by the radical osteoclastic procedure described by Powiertowski. Subsequent frontal advancement and Le Fort III osteotomy are necessary in these patients when they reach 6-10 years of age. Orthopaedic treatment with a Delaire mask should be started immediately after the operation to achieve optimal growth of the skull base with anterior rotation of the maxilla and posterior rotation of the mandible, which leads to a much better result.

Acrocephalosyndactylia↗

Advances in the management of the craniosynostoses.

The spectacular beginning of craniofacial surgery in the modern era involved a case of craniosynostosis. Progress from that time to the present in the development of our understanding of this disease process and its management reflects the wider progress in the development and institutionalization of the discipline of craniofacial surgery. Complex surgical interventions have led the way to multidisciplinary units that have developed a greater understanding of the pathology and natural history of the craniosynostoses. New technologies have been developed to further advance the surgical techniques and these can now be evaluated by the institutions that have spawned them. This paper deals with the development of the discipline, the current status of the management of craniosynostosis, both syndromal and non-syndromal, and discusses the technological advances including imaging, distraction osteogenesis and the current status of genetic investigations.

Adolescent↗

Remarks on the surgical treatment of the craniosynostoses.

Technical aspects and results of a surgical procedure for craniosynostoses are exposed. Fragmentation-recomposition of the anterior part of the cranial vault in cases of brachi-, acro-, turri- and trigono-cephaly gives both an effective decompression and a satisfactory cosmetic result.

Adolescent↗

Pitfalls in counselling: the craniosynostoses.

We describe three families to highlight the variability of expression and penetrance that can occur in the craniosynostoses. In two of the families, gene carriers were only identified in retrospect by looking at photographs of other family members. In the third family, identical twins were initially thought to be discordant for sagittal craniosynostosis until early skull x rays were examined and both were found to be affected. The dilemmas faced when counselling these families are discussed.

Adult↗

Pleiotropic features of syndromic craniosynostoses correlate with differential expression of fibroblast growth factor receptors 1 and 2 during human craniofacial development.

Mutations in FGFR1, -2, and -3 are linked to five human craniosynostosis syndromes. In addition to premature fusion of cranial sutures, nonskeletal manifestations in skin, and teeth together with CNS abnormalities, reflect widespread effects of these mutations. To understand this pleiotropy, we have assessed craniofacial FGFR1 and -2 expression in the human embryo from 6 wk postfertilization. We found that both genes are expressed in sheets of condensed mesenchyme before overt chondrogenic differentiation and that distinct patterns of expression are established by 8 wk. Thus, FGFR2(BEK) is expressed evenly throughout developing cartilage and bone, whereas FGFR1 transcripts predominate in perichondria and periostea. Complementary patterns of FGFR1 and FGFR2(BEK and KGFR) expression are also observed in the enamel epithelium and papilla mesenchyme of the tooth germ, at a stage when morphogenetic tissue interactions ensue. Both genes are expressed in the cortical layer of the brain, but expression levels vary significantly within the choroid plexus and wall of the fourth ventricle. Similarly, tissue-specific differences in receptor expression are found in both the skin and salivary glands. These expression data are consistent with the pleiotropic manifestations of syndromic craniosynostoses and provide the basis for a new paradigm to explain the associated CNS problems.

Case-Control Studies↗

[Spiral CT evaluation of the craniosynostoses].

Craniosynostoses are defined as the premature closure of one or more sutures of the cranial bones. The resulting craniofacial deformities may be associated with neurologic complications owing to the disproportion between the growing brain and the limited content of the intracranial cavity. Plain skull radiographs are often contributive to the diagnosis. However, they may not be sufficient to detect early cases and to properly evaluate the more complex cases. Computed tomography has been proved to be more efficient in the pretherapeutic evaluation. The authors present here their results in the spiral computed tomographic evaluation of primary and syndromic craniosynostosis, based on a prospective series of 26 patients. The radiologic findings are presented. They have been found here to be similar to those previously described on sequential acquisitions. Spiral computed tomography was found to provide better information than did plain radiographs in 5 cases. The value of the helical acquisition as well as tridimensional reconstructions are discussed.

Child, Preschool↗

[Etiological and pathogenetic mechanisms in development of craniosynostoses in children].

Craniosynostoses belong to a heterogenous group of diseases characterized by a preterm closing of cranial sutures. The symptoms may be nonsyndromal, incomplete syndromal and syndromal. Most popular are now hereditary and genetic theories of its development. The attention is focused on the factors of fibroblast growth and receptors to these factors located on osteoblasts. Gene mutation results in alteration of protein receptor structure, increased osteoblast activity and production of great amount of osteoinducing factors, collagen, acceleration of mineralization, enhancing osteogenesis in the area of cranial sutures with their preterm synostosizing (craniosynostosis).

Child↗

Foster-type modification of the Knapp procedure for anomalous superior rectus muscles in syndromic craniosynostoses.

PURPOSE: To describe the surgical management of anomalous superior rectus muscles in patients with syndromic craniosynostoses. METHODS: Retrospectively reviewed were case notes of 3 patients with vertical deviations that were thought to have anomalous superior rectus muscles. RESULTS: All 3 patients had hypotropia preoperatively, and 2 had coexisting exotropia. Two patients exhibited massive subconjunctival fibrosis intraoperatively, but none had undergone previous strabismus surgery, although they had undergone craniofacial procedures. Orbital imaging (either computed tomographic or magnetic resonance imaging scans) confirmed an absent or thinned superior rectus muscle in all 3 patients. All 3 underwent a Knapp procedure with appropriate recession and resection of the transposed horizontal rectus muscles if indicated. A nonabsorbable suture was placed in the sclera at the upper border of each horizontal rectus muscle to draw this border closer to the vertical midline, approximately 16 to 18 mm from the limbus (Foster-type modification). In each case, the hypotropia and upgaze were improved but not completely normalized. CONCLUSIONS: A Foster-type modification of the Knapp procedure satisfactorily corrected the hypotropia in these patients. Orbital imaging can confirm the presence of an anomalous superior rectus muscle. The massive subconjunctival fibrosis may be explained by the type of previous craniofacial surgery the patients had undergone.

Adolescent↗