PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Cabergoline”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Cabergoline in the treatment of early Parkinson's disease: results of the first year of treatment in a double-blind comparison of cabergoline and levodopa. The PKDS009 Collaborative Study Group.

Cabergoline is a potent D2 receptor agonist with a half-life of 65 hours that may provide continuous dopaminergic stimulation administered once daily. In this study, we randomized de novo Parkinson's disease (PD) patients to treatment with increasing doses of cabergoline (0.25 to 4 mg/d) or levodopa (100 to 600 mg/d) up to the optimal or maximum tolerated dose. Decreases of > 30% in motor disability (Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Factor III) versus baseline were considered indicative of clinical improvement. If 30% improvement was not achieved, levodopa/ carbidopa could be added on an open basis. Of the 208 patients entered in the cabergoline group, 175 remained in the study for 1 year at a mean dose of 2.8 mg/d; in the levodopa group, 176 of the 205 patients entered were still on study after 1 year at a mean dose of 468 mg/d. The proportion of patients requiring additional levodopa/carbidopa increased in the cabergoline group from 18% at 6 months to 38% at 1 year versus 10% (p = 0.05) at 6 months and 18% (p < 0.01) at 1 year in the levodopa group. The proportion of patients showing clinical improvement did not differ significantly between the two groups, or between the subgroups on monotherapy, at any endpoint. Irrespective of levodopa/carbidopa addition, 81% of patients in the cabergoline group and 87% of patients in the levodopa group were clinically improved at 1 year (p = 0.189); the corresponding figures for the subgroup on monotherapy were 79% in the cabergoline-treated patients and 86% in the levodopa-treated patients (p = 0.199). The mean difference versus baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Factor III scores in patients who remained on monotherapy up to 1 year was 12.6 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.8, 14.3) in the cabergoline group and 16.4 (95% CI: 14.8, 18.0) in the levodopa group. Adverse events occurred in 76% of patients on cabergoline and in 66% of patients on levodopa. The severity profile for reported events was similar for the two agents. The results of this study indicate that cabergoline treatment for up to 1 year is only marginally less effective than levodopa in the proportion of patients who can be treated in monotherapy. More than 60% of de novo PD patients could be managed on cabergoline alone up to 1 year. In the patients in whom levodopa/carbidopa was needed, the combination therapy provided efficacy similar to that obtained with levodopa alone, with a relevant sparing of levodopa.

Aged↗

A comparison of cabergoline and bromocriptine in the treatment of hyperprolactinemic amenorrhea. Cabergoline Comparative Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Cabergoline is a long-acting dopamine-agonist drug that suppresses prolactin secretion and restores gonadal function in women with hyperprolactinemic amenorrhea. We designed a study to compare its safety and efficacy with those of bromocriptine, which has been the standard therapy. METHODS: A total of 459 women with hyperprolactinemic amenorrhea were treated with either cabergoline (0.5 to 1.0 mg twice weekly) or bromocriptine (2.5 to 5.0 mg twice daily), administered in a double-blind fashion for 8 weeks and subsequently in an open fashion for 16 weeks, during which adjustments in the dose were made according to the response. Of the 459 women, 279 had microprolactinomas, 3 had macroprolactinomas, 1 had a craniopharyngioma, 167 had idiopathic hyperprolactinemia, and the remainder had an empty sella. Clinical and biochemical status was assessed at 2-week intervals for 8 weeks and monthly thereafter for a total of 6 months, with an additional assessment at 14 weeks. RESULTS: Stable normoprolactinemia was achieved in 186 of the 223 women treated with cabergoline (83 percent) and 138 of the 236 women treated with bromocriptine (59 percent, P < 0.001). Seventy-two percent of the women treated with cabergoline and 52 percent of those treated with bromocriptine had ovulatory cycles or became pregnant during treatment (P < 0.001). Amenorrhea persisted in 7 percent of the cabergoline-treated women and 16 percent of the bromocriptine-treated women. Adverse effects were recorded in 68 percent of the women taking cabergoline and 78 percent of those taking bromocriptine (P = 0.03); 3 percent discontinued taking cabergoline, and 12 percent stopped taking bromocriptine (P < 0.001) because of drug intolerance. Gastrointestinal symptoms were significantly less frequent, less severe, and shorter-lived in the women treated with cabergoline. CONCLUSIONS: Cabergoline is more effective and better tolerated than bromocriptine in women with hyperprolactinemic amenorrhea.

Adolescent↗

Dose-dependent suppression of serum prolactin by cabergoline in hyperprolactinaemia: a placebo controlled, double blind, multicentre study. European Multicentre Cabergoline Dose-finding Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: Dopamine agonists have a well established place in the treatment of hyperprolactinaemic disorders but their use is associated with a high incidence of adverse effects. We have investigated the biochemical efficacy and side-effect profile of a range of doses of the novel, long-acting dopamine agonist, cabergoline, in suppressing prolactin (PRL) in hyperprolactinaemic women. DESIGN: Multicentre, prospective, randomized, placebo controlled and double blind. PATIENTS: One hundred and eighty-eight women with hyperprolactinaemia secondary to microprolactinoma (n = 113), idiopathic disease (n = 67), empty sella syndrome (n = 7) or following failed surgery for a macroprolactinoma (n = 1). MEASUREMENTS: Weekly assessment of adverse symptoms, blood pressure and pulse, serum PRL, blood count, liver and renal function. RESULTS: Patients received either placebo (n = 20) or cabergoline 0.125 (n = 43), 0.5 (n = 42), 0.75 (n = 42) or 1.0 mg (n = 41) twice weekly for 4 weeks. The five treatment groups were comparable in age (mean 31.8, range 16-46 years), diagnosis, previous therapy, and pretreatment serum PRL. PRL was suppressed to below half the pretreatment level in 5, 60, 90, 95 and 98% and normalized in 0, 30, 74, 74 and 95% of patients taking placebo or cabergoline 0.125, 0.5, 0.75 or 1.0 mg twice weekly respectively (Armitage's test, chi 2 = 39.3, P < 0.01). Cabergoline therapy (all doses) restored menses in 82% of the amenorrhoeic women not previously treated with dopamine agonists. Adverse events were recorded in 45% of patients in the placebo group and in 44, 50, 50 and 58% of those taking 0.125, 0.5, 0.75 and 1.0 mg cabergoline twice weekly (Armitage's test, P > 0.05). Over 95% of reported symptoms were relatively trivial, most frequently transient nausea, headache, dizziness, fatigue and constipation. More severe adverse events, interfering significantly with the patients' lifestyle, occurred in 13 (7.7%) patients taking cabergoline; treatment withdrawal was necessary in only one case. No adverse effects were detected on blood pressure or haematological or biochemical parameters. CONCLUSIONS: We have shown a linear dose-response relationship for cabergoline in the treatment of hyperprolactinaemia in the range 0.125-1.0 mg twice weekly, with normalization of PRL in up to 95% of cases and acceptable tolerability throughout the dose range.

Adolescent↗

Single dose cabergoline versus bromocriptine in inhibition of puerperal lactation: randomised, double blind, multicentre study. European Multicentre Study Group for Cabergoline in Lactation Inhibition.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of a single dose of 1 mg of cabergoline with that of bromocriptine 2.5 mg twice daily for 14 days in the inhibition of puerperal lactation. DESIGN: Prospective, randomised, double blind, parallel group, multicentre study. SETTING: University of hospital departments of obstetrics and gynaecology in different European countries. SUBJECTS: 272 puerperal women not wishing to lactate (136 randomised to each drug). INTERVENTIONS: Women randomised to cabergoline received two 0.5 mg tablets of cabergoline and one placebo tablet within 27 hours after delivery and then placebo twice daily for 14 days. Those randomised to bromocriptine received 2.5 mg of bromocriptine and two placebo tablets within 27 hours and then 2.5 mg of bromocriptine twice daily for 14 days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Success of treatment (complete or partial) according to milk secretion, breast engorgement, and breast pain; rebound symptomatology; serum prolactin concentrations; and number of adverse events. RESULTS: Complete success was achieved in 106 of 136 women randomised to cabergoline and in 94 of 136 randomised to bromocriptine and partial success in 21 and 33 women respectively. Rebound breast symptomatology occurred respectively in five and 23 women with complete success up to day 15 (p less than 0.0001). Serum prolactin concentrations dropped considerably with both drugs from day 2 to day 15; a prolactin secretion rebound effect was observed in women treated with bromocriptine. cabergoline and 36 receiving bromocriptine (p = 0.054), occurring most during the first treatment day. CONCLUSION: A single 1 mg dose of cabergoline is at least as effective as bromocriptine 2.5 mg twice daily for 14 days in preventing puerperal lactation. Because of the considerably lower rate of rebound breast activity and adverse events and the simpler administration schedule cabergoline should be the drug of choice for lactation inhibition.

Adult↗

The efficacy and tolerability of long-term cabergoline therapy in hyperprolactinaemic disorders: an open, uncontrolled, multicentre study. European Multicentre Cabergoline Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: We assessed the efficacy and safety of the new, long-acting dopamine agonist drug cabergoline during long-term therapy of hyperprolactinaemia. DESIGN: Open, prospective, multicentre study. PATIENTS: One hundred and sixty-two females with either a microprolactinoma (n = 100), idiopathic hyperprolactinaemia (n = 54), empty sella syndrome (n = 7) or residual hyperprolactinaemia after surgery for a macroprolactinoma (n = 1). All had previously been treated with cabergoline or placebo for 4 weeks as part of a dose-finding study. MEASUREMENTS: Menstrual pattern, adverse symptoms, blood pressure and pulse, serum PRL, blood count, liver and renal function were assessed after one month and subsequently at two-monthly intervals. RESULTS: Treatment was started at doses of 0.25 mg (n = 3), 0.5 mg (n = 8), 1 mg (n = 150) or 2 mg (n = 1) per week, given either as a single weekly dose (n = 8) or divided into twice-weekly doses (n = 154), and was continued for at least 49 weeks in 123 patients. Final treatment doses ranged from 0.25 mg fortnightly to 2 mg twice weekly: most patients finished the study taking 0.5 mg once (n = 31) or twice (n = 77) weekly. Stable normalization of PRL levels was achieved in 138 subjects (85%), in 129 of whom the effective dose was < 1 mg per week. In the subset of 114 patients completing 49 weeks of therapy and having dose adjustments according to the protocol, the biochemical success rate was 92%. Fifty-nine of the 65 previously amenorrhoeic women (91%) and 44 of the 49 (90%) who were previously oligomenorrhoeic resumed regular menses and/or became pregnant during the study. Adverse events were reported in 64 patients (39.5%). In 84% of cases with adverse events, the symptoms were of mild or moderate severity and most occurred during the first few weeks of therapy; five patients (3%) discontinued treatment because of poor tolerance. The most frequent symptoms were dizziness (13% of patients), headache (13%), nausea (10%) and weakness and/or fatigue (10%). Of 27 patients who had previously been poorly tolerant of other dopamine agonists, 17 (63%) did not experience any side-effects and only one was intolerant of cabergoline. No adverse haematological or biochemical effects were detected except for a slight downward trend in haemoglobin which may have been related to the resumption of regular menses in previously amenorrhoeic or oligomenorrhoeic women. A mild hypotensive effect was observed, mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures falling by 5 and 4 mmHg respectively during treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The results provide evidence for the long-term effectiveness and safety of cabergoline in the treatment of hyperprolactinaemia. Its ability to normalize PRL and restore gonadal function compares favourably with reported data on reference compounds while its tolerability profile and simple administration schedule offer potential advantages in terms of patient acceptability.

Adult↗

Treatment of lactating sows with the dopamine agonist Cabergoline: effects on LH and prolactin secretion and responses to challenges with naloxone and morphine.

This study was conducted to examine the effects of chronic administration of a long-acting dopamine agonist, Cabergoline, on LH and prolactin secretion during lactation in the sow. The effect of the administration of the opioid antagonist naloxone and the agonist morphine in Cabergoline treated animals was also evaluated. In Part I of the experiment, 16 sows were treated as either CONT sows (n = 4; control, no treatment); CAB sows (n = 4; treated with Cabergoline from days 10 to 26 of lactation); CAB + NAL sows (n = 4; received Cabergoline treatment and naloxone challenges); CAB + MORP sows (n = 4; treated with Cabergoline and morphine challenges). Plasma LH and prolactin concentrations were measured in blood samples taken from all sows during 6-h periods at days 12, 19 and 26 of lactation. To extend the results at the most critical response period at day 26, another 11 sows were allocated in Part II to either Control (n = 3), Cabergoline (n = 4) or Cabergoline and morphine (n = 4) treatments as for Part I, but the effect of treatments were only confirmed in a single period of sampling at day 26 of lactation. Cabergoline treatment alone increased (P < 0.001) mean plasma LH concentrations at day 26 but not at days 12 and 16 of lactation. In contrast, naloxone challenges given in the presence of Cabergoline treatment increased (P < 0.05) mean LH at days 12 and 19 of lactation but not at day 26. Morphine challenges in the presence of Cabergoline treatment decreased (P < 0.05) mean LH concentrations only at day 26 of lactation, but did not completely reverse the effect of Cabergoline. No treatment differences in plasma oestradiol-17 beta were detected at any time. Plasma prolactin decreased (P < 0.001) in response to treatment with Cabergoline but there were no additional effects of naloxone or morphine. These data provide evidence for the existence of dopaminergic and opioidergic regulation of LH secretion in lactation in the sow and the relative influence of these systems changes as lactation progresses. Furthermore, the data suggest that the stimulatory effect of Cabergoline treatment on LH secretion in late lactation may be mediated by its effects on an inhibitory opioidergic mechanism. Finally, the data provide conclusive proof that prolactin does not directly influence LH secretion or estrogenic activity of the ovary during lactation in the sow.

Analysis of Variance↗

Cabergoline. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic potential in the treatment of hyperprolactinaemia and inhibition of lactation.

Cabergoline is a synthetic ergoline which shows high specificity and affinity for the dopamine D2 receptor. It is a potent and very long-acting inhibitor of prolactin secretion. Prolactin-lowering effects occur rapidly and, after a single dose, were evident at the end of follow up (21 days) in puerperal women, and up to 14 days in patients with hyperprolactinaemia. In the only comparative study to date, cabergoline 0.5 to 1.0 mg twice weekly was more effective than bromocriptine 2.5 to 5.0 mg twice daily in the treatment of hyperprolactinaemic amenorrhoea, restoring ovulatory cycles in 72% of women and normalising plasma prolactin levels in 83%, compared with 52 and 58%, respectively, for bromocriptine. In the prevention of puerperal lactation, a single dose of cabergoline 1.0mg was as effective as bromocriptine 2.5mg twice daily for 14 days. A significantly lower incidence of rebound lactation in the third postpartum week was seen with cabergoline. Unpublished data suggest cabergoline 0.25mg twice daily for 2 days is effective in suppressing established puerperal lactation in about 85% of women. Nausea, vomiting, headache and dizziness are characteristic adverse events of the dopaminergic ergot derivatives. Cabergoline appears to be better tolerated than bromocriptine in both patients with hyperprolactinaemia and postpartum women. Most patients intolerant of other ergot derivatives can tolerate cabergoline. Bromocriptine use in the puerperium has been associated with an increased risk of serious thromboembolic events. However, there are no such reports with cabergoline and whether these events will become associated with other dopaminergic agents is unknown. The teratogenic potential of cabergoline has not been extensively investigated in humans. Ten congenital abnormalities have been reported in 199 cabergoline-associated pregnancies. Although there is no pattern to these abnormalities, the limited experience with cabergoline in pregnancy means the drug cannot be considered as a first-line therapy for the treatment of infertility associated with hyperprolactinaemia. At this stage of its development, cabergoline will prove useful in patients with hyperprolactinaemia who have failed treatment with, or are intolerant of, other dopamine agonists such as bromocriptine. If drug treatment is required for the prevention or suppression of puerperal lactation, cabergoline offers significant advantages over bromocriptine and should become the drug treatment of first choice for this indication.

Administration, Oral↗

Cabergoline in the treatment of hyperprolactinemia: a study in 455 patients.

Cabergoline is a new long-acting dopamine agonist that is very effective and well tolerated in patients with pathological hyperprolactinemia. The aim of this study was to examine, in a very large number of hyperprolactinemic patients, the ability to normalize PRL levels with cabergoline, to determine the effective dose and tolerance, and to assess the effect on clinical symptoms, tumor shrinkage, and visual field abnormalities. We also evaluated the effects of cabergoline in a large subgroup of patients with bromocriptine intolerance or -resistance. We retrospectively reviewed the files of 455 patients (102 males and 353 females) with pathological hyperprolactinemia treated with cabergoline in 9 Belgian centers. Among these patients, 41% had a microadenoma; 42%, a macroadenoma; 16%, idiopathic hyperprolactinemia; and 1%, an empty sella. The median pretreatment serum PRL level was 124 microg/L (range, 16-26,250 microg/L). A subgroup of 292 patients had previously been treated with bromocriptine, of which 140 showed bromocriptine intolerance and 58 showed bromocriptine resistance. Treatment with cabergoline normalized serum PRL levels in 86% of all patients: in 92% of 244 patients with idiopathic hyperprolactinemia or a microprolactinoma and in 77% of 181 macroadenomas. Pretreatment visual field abnormalities normalized in 70% of patients, and tumor shrinkage was seen in 67% of cases. Side effects were noted in 13% of patients, but only 3.9% discontinued therapy because of side effects. The median dose of cabergoline at the start of therapy was 1.0 mg/week but could be reduced to 0.5 mg/week once control was achieved. Patients with a macroprolactinoma needed a higher median cabergoline dose, compared with those with idiopathic hyperprolactinemia or a microprolactinoma: 1.0 mg/week vs. 0.5 mg/week, although a large overlap existed between these groups. Twenty-seven women treated with cabergoline became pregnant, and 25 delivered a healthy child. One patient had an intended abortion and another a miscarriage. In the patients with bromocriptine intolerance, normalization of PRL was reached in 84% of cases, whereas in the bromocriptine-resistant patients, PRL could be normalized in 70%. We confirmed, in a large-scale retrospective study, the high efficacy and tolerability of cabergoline in the treatment of pathological hyperprolactinemia, leaving few patients with unacceptable side effects or inadequate clinical response. Patients with idiopathic hyperprolactinemia or a microprolactinoma, on average, needed only half the dose of cabergoline as those with macroprolactinomas and have a higher chance of obtaining PRL normalization. Cabergoline also normalized PRL in the majority of patients with known bromocriptine intolerance or -resistance. Once PRL secretion was adequately controlled, the dose of cabergoline could often be significantly decreased, which further reduced costs of therapy.

Adenoma↗

Dopamine receptor affinities in vitro and stereotypic activities in vivo of cabergoline in rats.

An ergot alkaloid derivative, cabergoline, and its metabolites were investigated for their affinities for dopamine D1 and D2 receptors in rat striatum in vitro in comparison with those of bromocriptine and pergolide. The affinity for D1 receptors was in the following order: pergolide > des-dimethylaminopropyl cabergoline (FCE21904) > cabergoline > or = bromocriptine > or = des-methyl cabergoline (FCE27395) > or = des-ethylcarbamoyl cabergoline (FCE21590). From the effects of GTP on these affinities for the D1 receptor, cabergoline, some of its metabolites, and pergolide were characterized as agonists in contrast to bromocriptine which was classified as an antagonist. The affinity for D2 receptors was ranked as follows: pergolide > or = cabergoline > or = FCE27395 > or = FCE21904 > bromocriptine > FCE21590 > carboxylic acid-type derivative of cabergoline (FCE21589). The affinity of each compound for the D2 receptor was much higher than that for the D1 receptor. The selectivity of cabergoline for D2 receptor was higher than those of bromocriptine and pergolide. Furthermore, these ergot alkaloids were investigated for eliciting stereotypy after subcutaneous administration to normal rats. Pergolide potently induced stereotypy at doses of 0.5 and 1.0 mg/kg, cabergoline slightly induced it only at a high dose of 2.0 mg/kg, whereas bromocriptine did not induce it at any of the doses tested, 10-40 mg/kg. These results suggest that pharmacological properties of cabergoline for the D1 and D2 receptors differ from those of bromocriptine and pergolide.

Animals↗

Control of red fox (Vulpes vulpes) fertility with cabergoline: dose response and timing of intervention.

Cabergoline, a potent dopamine agonist and inhibitor of prolactin secretion, was investigated as a potential fertility control agent in the red fox ( Vulpes vulpes). Sixty silver fox vixens were selected randomly and artificially inseminated. Cabergoline was fed to groups of 12 vixens in a minced beef ration either as a single dose of 25, 50 or 100 microg kg(-1), or a dose of 50 microg kg(-1) that was repeated 2 days later (2 x 50 microg kg(-1)). Four foxes from each group of 12 were given cabergoline at day 28, day 35 or day 48 after artificial insemination, and a control group of four foxes was used as a comparison for each dose day. In a separate trial, two groups of five foxes were selected randomly from the farm population and fed 100 microg kg(-1) of either cabergoline or a placebo each day from day 42 to day 46 of pregnancy. Foxes that received single doses of cabergoline of 100 microg kg(-1) or 2 x 50 microg kg(-1) aborted at day 28, but the same doses did not result in abortions when administered on days 35 and 48. Although lactation was not terminated in groups that received a single or double dose of cabergoline, increased post-natal cub mortality was associated with cabergoline administration. Growth of cubs between 4 and 8 weeks of age was not inhibited in vixens that received cabergoline. Doses of 100 microg cabergoline kg(-1) administered each day from day 42 to day 46 resulted in abortions and terminated lactation. The capacity of single doses of cabergoline to cause abortions in the red fox during mid- rather than late pregnancy is contrary to reported observations for the domestic dog. This finding indicates that luteotrophic support of the corpus luteum by prolactin may be more important at mid-pregnancy in the red fox. The results of this study support previous field observations that cabergoline delivered in bait affects the reproductive success of vixens and may be a practical adjunct to the lethal control of wild red foxes in Australia.

Abortion, Induced↗

Cabergoline for levodopa-induced complications in Parkinson's disease.

BACKGROUND: Long term levodopa therapy in Parkinson's disease is associated with the development of motor complications including abnormal involuntary movements and a shortening response to each dose (wearing off phenomenon). It is thought that dopamine agonists can reduce the duration of immobile off periods and the need for levodopa therapy whilst maintaining or improving motor impairments and only minimally increasing dopaminergic adverse events. OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of adjuvant cabergoline therapy versus placebo in patients with Parkinson's disease, already established on levodopa and suffering from motor complications. SEARCH STRATEGY: Electronic searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. Handsearching of the neurology literature as part of the Cochrane Movement Disorders Group's strategy. Examination of the reference lists of identified studies and other reviews. Contact with Pharmacia Upjohn Limited. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials of cabergoline versus placebo in patients with a clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease and long-term complications of levodopa therapy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data was abstracted independently by the authors and differences settled by discussion. The outcome measures used included Parkinson's disease rating scales, levodopa dosage, off time measurements and the frequency of withdrawals and adverse events. MAIN RESULTS: Cabergoline has been compared with placebo in two phase II (6 - 12 weeks) and one phase III randomised controlled trials (24 weeks). These were double-blind, parallel group, multicentre studies including 268 patients with Parkinson's disease and motor complications. The reduction of 1.14 hours (WMD; 95% CI -0.06, 2.33; p = 0.06) in off time in favour of cabergoline was not statistically significant. Inadequate data on dyskinesia was collected either on rating scales or as adverse event reporting to allow a conclusion to be drawn. A small but statistically significant advantage of cabergoline over placebo was seen in one study for UPDRS ADL (part II) score and UPDRS motor score. No such advantage was seen in one other study due to small numbers of patients and the comparatively low doses of cabergoline used. No significant differences in Schwab and England scale were seen in two studies. Levodopa dose reduction was significantly greater with cabergoline (WMD 149.6 mg/d; 95% CI 94.1, 205.1; p < 0.00001). There was a trend towards more dopaminergic adverse events with cabergoline but this did not reach statistical significance at the p < 0.01 level. However, there was a trend towards fewer withdrawals from cabergoline. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: In the management of the motor complications seen in Parkinson's disease, cabergoline can be used to reduce levodopa dose and modestly improve motor impairment and disability with an acceptable adverse event profile. These conclusions are based on, at best, medium term evidence.

Antiparkinson Agents↗

Clinical experience with cabergoline in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease treated with levodopa.

The clinical efficacy of the long-acting dopamine agonist cabergoline as an adjunct to levodopa has been investigated in controlled and uncontrolled studies in > 1500 patients with advanced Parkinson's disease and motor complications. Four of these studies (including 2 comparisons with placebo and 2 with bromocriptine), which used similar methodology (including study design, blindness, selection criteria, treatment modalities and duration) and measurements of efficacy and safety, are reviewed. Compared with placebo, cabergoline 2 to 10 mg/day (median 5 mg/day) induced a significantly higher percentage decrease in the number of 'off' hours (18 vs 45%) in a preliminary phase II study that included 37 patients with severe motor fluctuations. This was not associated with an increase in dyskinesia in either treatment group. In a subsequent phase III placebo-controlled study (n = 188 patients with motor fluctuations), treatment with cabergoline 0.5 to 5 mg/day (median 3.5 mg/day) achieved a statistically significant decrease in levodopa dosage compared with placebo (18 vs 3%) and improved the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale scores for activities of daily living in a greater number of patients (23 vs 4%). Comparisons of cabergoline with bromocriptine have been conducted in 750 patients stabilised on levodopa therapy; one study was conducted in patients without, and the other in patients with, previous exposure to dopamine agonists. Cabergoline was administered once daily at doses ranging from 0.5 to 6 mg, and bromocriptine was given at a dosage of 5 to 40 mg/day divided into 3 administrations. A combined analysis of the response rates obtained in the 2 studies found cabergoline to be at least as effective and well tolerated as bromocriptine, with a trend in favour of cabergoline in terms of response rate and number of 'off' hours. The majority of adverse events in this patient population were those associated with levodopa therapy, as shown by the high frequency of adverse events in the placebo group (68%). Both cabergoline and bromocriptine showed a comparable incidence of adverse events, with CNS and gastrointestinal events being the most common. Thus, the potential advantages of cabergoline include improved patient compliance as a result of its once-daily administration, and an increased threshold for the development of dyskinesia as a result of the levodopa sparing effect of cabergoline.

Antiparkinson Agents↗

Assessment of cabergoline as a reproductive inhibitor in coyotes (Canis latrans).

The efficacy of three oral formulations (gelatin capsule, tablet, oil base) and five dosages (50, 100, 250, 500, 1000 microg) of cabergoline to disrupt reproduction in coyotes (Canis latrans) was evaluated. The type of formulation used had no effect on plasma progesterone and prolactin concentrations or on mean litter size. No adverse side effects (for example, vomiting, anorexia, diarrhoea) were observed despite the use of doses of up to 20 times the therapeutic dose used for domestic dogs and cats. All coyotes treated with 50, 100, 250 and 500 microg cabergoline whelped, but plasma progesterone concentrations in these coyotes were lower (P < or = 0.07) than in control animals at day 7 after treatment. Ten of 11 females treated with 1000 microg cabergoline whelped, but progesterone concentrations in these coyotes were lower than in control animals up to day 14 after treatment (P < or = 0.04). Dosages of 1000 microg cabergoline decreased blood serum prolactin (P < or = 0.10) and progesterone (P < or = 0.06) concentrations, but apparently failed to decrease progesterone below the threshold necessary to maintain pregnancy in all but one animal. However, progressive inhibition of prolactin and progesterone with increasing doses of cabergoline indicated that higher dosages might be effective in coyotes. Survival of pups born to cabergoline-treated females was not different (P < 0.001) from that of pups born to control females, but mean litter size was smaller for females treated with cabergoline (P < or = 0.073) than for the control females. Although all cabergoline treatments in this study were ineffective at preventing reproduction in coyotes, progressive inhibition of prolactin and progesterone with increasing dosages of cabergoline indicates that higher doses might be effective in preventing reproduction in coyotes. However, the physiological differences from other canine species in dopamine D2 receptors and mechanisms of luteal support may ultimately prevent the use of cabergoline for reproductive control in coyotes.

Abortifacient Agents, Steroidal↗

Cabergoline versus bromocriptine for levodopa-induced complications in Parkinson's disease.

BACKGROUND: Long term levodopa therapy in Parkinson's disease is associated with the development of motor complications including abnormal involuntary movements and a shortening response to each dose (wearing off phenomenon). It is thought that dopamine agonists can reduce the duration of immobile off periods and the need for levodopa therapy whilst maintaining or improving motor impairments and only minimally increasing dopaminergic adverse events. OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of adjuvant cabergoline therapy versus bromocriptine in patients with Parkinson's disease, already established on levodopa and suffering from motor complications. SEARCH STRATEGY: Electronic searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. Handsearching of the neurology literature as part of the Cochrane Movement Disorders Group's strategy. Examination of the reference lists of identified studies and other reviews. Contact with Pharmacia Upjohn Limited. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials of cabergoline versus bromocriptine in patients with a clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease and long-term complications of levodopa therapy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were abstracted independently by the authors and differences settled by discussion. The outcome measures used included Parkinson's disease rating scales, levodopa dosage, off time measurements and the frequency of withdrawals and adverse events. MAIN RESULTS: Cabergoline has been compared with bromocriptine in five randomised, double-blind, parallel group studies including 1071 patients. Only one of the phase II studies was medium term (36 weeks), the others all being short term (12 -15 weeks). The non-significant difference in off time reduction produced by cabergoline compared with bromocriptine was 0.29 hours/day in favour of the former (weighted mean difference; 95% CI -0.10, 0.68; p = 0.15). Dyskinesia reported as an adverse event was significantly increased with cabergoline compared with bromocriptine (Peto odds ratio 1.57; 95% CI 1.05, 2.35; p = 0.03). Motor impairment and disability were measured in four of the studies using the UPDRS rating scale but the small differences in UPDRS ADL (part II) and motor (part III) scores were not statistically significant in any study. Similarly, no significant difference in Schwab and England score was seen. The number of patients rated as much or very much improved on a clinician's global impression scale was similar with both agonists. Levodopa dose reduction was no different between cabergoline and bromocriptine. There was more confusion with cabergoline (Peto odds ratio 2.02; 95% CI 1.09, 3.76; p = 0.03). Otherwise, dopaminergic adverse events were comparable with these agonists and no significant difference in all cause withdrawal rate was found. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Cabergoline produces similar benefits to bromocriptine in off time reduction, motor impairment and disability ratings, and levodopa dose reduction over the first three months of therapy. Dyskinesia and confusion were increased with cabergoline but otherwise the frequency of adverse events and withdrawals from treatment were similar with the two agonists.

Antiparkinson Agents↗

Inhibitory effect of cabergoline on the development of estrogen-induced prolactin-secreting adenomas of the pituitary.

Cabergoline 1-[(6-allylergolin-8 beta-yl)carbonyl]-1-[3-(dimethylamino) propyl]-3-ethylurea is a recently developed ergot derivative with a long-lasting dopamine agonist action. We now studied the ability of cabergoline to counteract the development of a prolactin-secreting tumor (prolactinoma) induced in female rats by long-term administration of high doses of estrogens. The effect of cabergoline was compared to that of bromocriptine. Cabergoline (0.6 mg/kg p.o.) had a marked and sustained prolactin-lowering effect in freely moving female rats, its effect still being present 3 days after a single dose. Bromocriptine, at a dose 5-fold higher (3 mg/kg s.c.), induced a strong and short-lasting prolactin inhibitory effect which, however, had completely disappeared 24 h post-injection. Intermittent administration of cabergoline (0.6 mg/kg p.o. every 3 days), starting from the first day of estrogen treatment, completely counteracted the development of the prolactinoma, as judged by the weight of the pituitary and the stimulating effect of estrogens on plasma prolactin and mitotic rate and DNA synthesis of pituitary cells. These effects of cabergoline were shared by a 5-fold higher dose of bromocriptine (3 mg/kg s.c.) given daily. The potent anti-tumorigenic effect of cabergoline, coupled to a sustained prolactin-lowering effect, the most prolonged ever seen with an ergot derivative, makes cabergoline a most suitable drug for the treatment of human macroprolactinomas.

Adenoma↗

In vivo interaction of cabergoline with rat brain dopamine receptors labelled with [3H]N-n-propylnorapomorphine.

Cabergoline is a potent dopaminergic agent that interacts with agonists and antagonists of dopamine receptors in vitro. We studied the binding of [3H]N-n-propylnorapomorphine ([3H]NPA) to dopamine receptors after i.v. and oral administration of cabergoline to determine whether cabergoline crosses the blood-brain barrier; bromocriptine was used as a reference drug. Cabergoline and/or its active metabolite(s) did cross the blood-brain barrier and reach dopamine receptors. Comparative time-course analysis of the regional inhibition of [3H]NPA binding showed that cabergoline was more potent than bromocriptine in inhibiting [3H]NPA binding and that it occupied the receptor for longer. These effects were observed in all areas of the rat brain studied (striatum, olfactory tubercles, adeno- and neurohypophysis, thalamus and hypothalamus). Further studies in the striatum and adenohypophysis showed that cabergoline receptor occupancy was dose-dependent and still detectable 72 h after i.v. administration of the drug. While cabergoline was more potent in the striatum than in the adenohypophysis when administered i.v., the reverse was observed after its oral administration. Cabergoline was equally potent in the adenohypophysis after oral and i.v. administration, as determined 1 and 8 h later.

Administration, Oral↗

Clinical and pharmacokinetic evaluation of L-dopa and cabergoline cotreatment in Parkinson's disease.

Previous investigations on the mutual pharmacokinetic influence of L-dopa and dopamine agonists in Parkinson's disease (PD) have shown controversial results. Two studies of the possible clinical and pharmacokinetic interaction between L-dopa and cabergoline were performed in 10 patients with de novo PD and 12 patients with fluctuating PD. In the first study (de novo patients), cabergoline was administered at increasing dosages until the maximum dosage of 2 mg/day once a day for 8 weeks; subsequently L-dopa (250 mg/day) was added. Blood levels of cabergoline were assayed in two different days, before starting L-dopa, and 1 week thereafter. In the second 8-week study (fluctuating patients), cabergoline was added to the current L-dopa therapy (maximum dosage 4 mg/day once a day). Blood levels of L-dopa were measured in two different days, before cabergoline was added, and at the end of the study. In both studies motor performance was evaluated by means of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (motor examination) and the Clinical Global Impression Scale; on-off diaries of daily motor condition also were filled by fluctuating patients. In patients with de novo PD, cabergoline pharmacokinetic parameters were unmodified by the adjunct of L-dopa, except that the time to reach the peak concentration (Tmax) significantly increased after L-dopa. In patients with fluctuating PD, no modification of L-dopa pharmacokinetics was observed before and after cabergoline coadministration. Clinical evaluations confirmed that cabergoline is effective in the treatment of advanced PD as well as in the management of de novo patients.

Aged↗

Cabergoline in the treatment of acromegaly: a study in 64 patients.

Cabergoline is a new, long acting, dopamine agonist that is more effective and better tolerated than bromocriptine in patients with hyperprolactinemia. Because dopamine agonists still have a place in the medical management of acromegaly, cabergoline might be a useful treatment. We, therefore, evaluated the effect of long term administration of cabergoline in a large group of unselected acromegalic patients. Sixty-four patients were included in a multicenter, prospective, open labeled study. A subgroup of 16 patients had GH-/PRL-cosecreting pituitary adenomas. Cabergoline was started at a dose of 1.0 mg/week and was gradually increased until normalization of plasma insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) levels, occurrence of unacceptable side-effects, or a maximal weekly dose of 3.5 mg (7.0 mg in 1 case) was reached. Treatment with cabergoline suppressed plasma IGF-I below 300 micrograms/L in 39% of cases and between 300-450 micrograms/L in another 28%. With pretreatment plasma IGF-I concentrations less than 750 micrograms/L, a suppression of IGF-I below 300 micrograms/L was obtained in 53% of cases, and a suppression between 300-450 micrograms/L was obtained in another 32%. By contrast, with pretreatment plasma IGF-I concentrations above 750 micrograms/L, only 17% of cases showed a suppression of IGF-I below 300 micrograms/L, and there was IGF-I suppression between 300-450 micrograms/L in another 21%. In GH-/PRL-cosecreting adenomas, 50% of cases suppressed plasma IGF-I levels below 300 micrograms/L, and another 31% did so between 300-450 micrograms/L, in contrast to only 35% and 27%, respectively in GH-secreting adenomas. Similar results were obtained concerning the secretion of GH. Tumor shrinkage was demonstrated in 13 of 21 patients, with a mass reduction by more than half in 5 GH-/PRL-cosecreting adenomas. Except for slight gastrointestinal discomfort and orthostatic hypotension in a few patients at the beginning of therapy, cabergoline treatment was well tolerated. Only 2 patients stopped medication because of nausea. The weekly dose of cabergoline ranged between 1.0-1.75 mg. A further increase in the dose was only effective in 1 GH-/PRL-cosecreting adenoma. The results of this study suggest that cabergoline is an effective, well tolerated therapy that should be considered in the management of acromegaly, especially if the pituitary adenoma cosecretes GH and PRL or if pretreatment plasma IGF-I levels are below 750 micrograms/L.

Acromegaly↗