SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Cancer screening”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2025

Circulating microRNA panels for multi-cancer detection and gastric cancer screening: leveraging a network biology approach.

BACKGROUND: Screening tests, particularly liquid biopsy with circulating miRNAs, hold significant potential for non-invasive cancer detection before symptoms manifest. METHODS: This study aimed to identify biomarkers with high sensitivity and specificity for multiple and specific cancer screening. 972 Serum miRNA profiles were compared across thirteen cancer types and healthy individuals using weighted miRNA co-expression network analysis. To prioritize miRNAs, module membership measure and miRNA trait significance were employed. Subsequently, for specific cancer screening, gastric cancer was focused on, using a similar strategy and a further step of preservation analysis. Machine learning techniques were then applied to evaluate two distinct miRNA panels: one for multi-cancer screening and another for gastric cancer classification. RESULTS: The first panel (hsa-miR-8073, hsa-miR-614, hsa-miR-548ah-5p, hsa-miR-1258) achieved 96.1% accuracy, 96% specificity, and 98.6% sensitivity in multi-cancer screening. The second panel (hsa-miR-1228-5p, hsa-miR-1343-3p, hsa-miR-6765-5p, hsa-miR-6787-5p) showed promise in detecting gastric cancer with 87% accuracy, 90% specificity, and 89% sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: Both panels exhibit potential for patient classification in diagnostic and prognostic applications, highlighting the significance of liquid biopsy in advancing cancer screening methodologies.

Neoplasms↗

PubMed2026

AI Health message intervention: The role of message customization and message source in breast cancer screening among women of color.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the effectiveness of breast cancer screening messages with varying levels of customization (generic, targeted, and tailored) and to compare AI-generated versus human-generated messages. METHODS: A between-subjects experimental design with a control condition was employed. Message content followed a standardized structure and varied by level of customization: generic, targeted (demographic-based), and tailored (perceived susceptibility- and barrier-based). Messages were developed by either the authors or GenAI (ChatGPT-4o). A total of 391 participants recruited via Prolific were randomly assigned to five groups (generic, targeted-human, targeted-AI, tailored-human, and tailored-AI). Self-efficacy, behavioral intentions, attitudes, and message believability were measured using different scales. RESULTS: Customized (tailoring and targeting) health messages performed comparably to generic messages in shaping positive health outcomes. GenAI-generated messages also produced outcomes comparable to those of human-generated messages under standardized conditions. Significant negative indirect effects through message believability for the human-tailored condition was found relative to the generic condition. CONCLUSIONS: GenAI may be a useful tool for developing and customizing scalable health messages. Its effectiveness depends not only on customization but also on maintaining message quality, including readability, clarity, coherence, naturalness, and credibility. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: GenAI may support health practitioners in developing customized and scalable breast cancer messages. However, professional review remains necessary to ensure that the message is culturally appropriate, responsive to patient concerns, and suitable for use alongside patient-provider communication.

Humans↗

PubMed2024

Cost-effectiveness of population-wide genomic screening for Lynch Syndrome and polygenic risk scores to inform colorectal cancer screening.

PURPOSE: Genomic screening to identify individuals with Lynch Syndrome (LS) and those with a high polygenic risk score (PRS) promises to personalize colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Understanding its clinical and economic impact is needed to inform screening guidelines and reimbursement policies. METHODS: We developed a Markov model to simulate individuals over a lifetime. We compared LS+PRS genomic screening with standard of care (SOC) for a cohort of US adults at age 30. The Markov model included health states of no CRC, CRC stages (A-D), and death. We estimated incidence, mortality, and discounted economic outcomes of the population under different interventions. RESULTS: Screening 1000 individuals for LS+PRS resulted in 1.36 fewer CRC cases and 0.65 fewer deaths compared with SOC. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $124,415 per quality-adjusted life year; screening had a 69% probability of being cost-effective using a willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000/quality-adjusted life year . Setting the PRS threshold at the 90th percentile of the LS+PRS screening program to define individuals at high risk was most likely to be cost-effective compared with 95th, 85th, and 80th percentiles. CONCLUSION: Population-level LS+PRS screening is marginally cost-effective, and a threshold of 90th percentile is more likely to be cost-effective than other thresholds.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

HPV Testing Versus Cytology for Cervical Cancer Screening Among Women 50 Years and Older: Evidence From the HPV FOCAL Randomized Controlled Trial.

Evidence on the comparative effectiveness of HPV testing versus cytology specifically in women aged ≥ 50 years who are approaching screening cessation remains limited. This analysis included 6471 women aged ≥ 50 at baseline screening in the HPV FOCAL randomized clinical trial. Women were randomly allocated to receive cytology (Control Group, n = 3248, 50.19%) or HPV testing (Intervention Group, n = 3223, 49.81%) at baseline, with co-testing at 48-month exit. We calculated incidence rates and risk ratios for CIN2+ detection over follow-up and compared missed lesions at exit by screening method. At the 48-month exit, CIN2+ detection was lower among HPV baseline-negative women than among those in the cytology group (1.61/1000 [95% CI, 0.52-3.76] vs. 3.15/1000 [95% CI, 1.51-5.78]; risk ratio, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.11-0.91]), reflecting higher baseline detection with HPV testing and fewer prevalent lesions at exit. Even with cytology re-screening at 2 years, 50% of CIN2+ cases were missed compared to 30% with HPV testing. After adjusting for age, education, smoking status, and lifetime sexual partners, the hazard ratio for CIN2+ comparing HPV to cytology was 0.44 (95% CI, 0.22-0.88). Among women aged ≥ 50 years, HPV primary screening was more effective than cytology at detecting CIN2+ lesions and was associated with a continued lower subsequent risk following a negative HPV test, supporting its use in cervical cancer screening programs in this age cohort.

Aged↗

PubMed2026

The 'Prostate Cancer Screening for People at Genetic Risk of Aggressive Disease' (PATROL) study.

BACKGROUND: Inherited (germline) pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants (gPVs) in key genes associated with increased risk of prostate cancer (PCa) now warrant more attentive PCa screening per National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines-e.g., BRCA2, HOXB13, ATM, BRCA1, MSH2, MSH6, CHEK2 and TP53. However, the optimal early detection strategy for gPV carriers, including use of age-adjusted PSA thresholds and prostate imaging may be refined. and as a means to investigate novel biomarkers. STUDY DESIGN: 'Prostate Cancer Screening for People at Genetic Risk of Aggressive Disease' (PATROL) is a multicentre, prospective early detection study for individuals at increased risk for PCa due to carrying a gPV in a PCa risk gene. ENDPOINTS: The primary endpoint is to determine the positive predictive value of pre-defined age-directed prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level thresholds and prostate-specific imaging, e.g., multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for clinically significant PCa on biopsy for individuals at risk of PCa due to a gPV. Exploratory endpoints include characterising clinicopathological characteristics of PCa and patient-reported outcomes. Biospecimens will be collected to evaluate emerging clinical and research biomarkers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Key eligibility includes: individuals aged ≥40 years who carry a gPV in an eligible gene, who have no prior diagnosis of PCa, do not have another active malignancy, and provide informed consent. Study procedures include annual physical examination and PSA. Imaging with MRI is optional at baseline and recommended if the PSA level is above the protocol-recommended PSA level threshold. Participants will be offered prostate biopsy for any clinical concern, PSA level >1.0 ng/mL if aged <50 years; PSA level >1.5 ng/mL if aged 50-59 years; PSA level >2.0 ng/mL if aged ≥60 years. If PCa is diagnosed, clinical care is determined by the participant and treating physician. If opting for active surveillance, study procedures will be collected annually for 10 years or until definitive treatment. If definitive treatment, study procedures will be collected for an additional 1 year. Long-term clinical outcomes will be collected annually until the study closes.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Colonoscopy and fecal immunochemical testing versus usual care in diagnostic colorectal cancer screening: the SCREESCO randomized controlled trial.

There is a need to quantify the benefits and harms of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening using primary colonoscopy or fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) compared with usual care with no screening. Guidelines recommend screening in individuals aged 50-75 years using colonoscopy or FIT, and many screening programs use one-sample biennial FIT. Here we compare incidence of diagnosed CRCs and gastrointestinal and cardiovascular events between screening and usual care during the diagnostic phase of the SCREESCO trial. A randomized block method (no masking) assigned 278,280 individuals aged 60 years to once-only colonoscopy, 2 rounds of two-stool FIT with a low cutoff (10 μg g-1 feces) or usual care (control group) in a ratio of 1:6 for colonoscopy versus control and 1:2 for FIT versus control. In the analysis, 31,113 individuals were in the primary colonoscopy arm and 60,267 were in the FIT arm, and there were 186,671 primary colonoscopy controls, of whom 120,521 were also controls for comparison with the FIT arm. After a median follow-up of 4.8 years, the incidence rate of CRC was 107.9 in the colonoscopy arm and 99.9 in controls per 100,000 person-years (incidence rate ratio (IRR): 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.91-1.28) and 96.0 in the FIT arm and 103.9 in controls (IRR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.81-1.05). Rates of stage I-II CRC were higher in the colonoscopy arm (IRR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.09-1.74) and in the FIT arm (IRR: 1.19, 95% CI: 0.99-1.43) versus controls. Rates of cardiovascular and gastrointestinal events were slightly higher in the intervention arms during the first year and were subsequently more similar to controls. Our findings of an increase in CRC detection implies a benefit of screening while the increase in adverse events suggests some initial harm. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02078804 .

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Exploring an Intermediate Colorectal Cancer Screening Test Based on Stool Proteomics and Machine Learning for Optimizing the Selection of Patients for Colonoscopy Identified From FIT.

The fecal immunochemical test (FIT) for detecting fecal occult blood, used alone or in combination with other stool biomarkers, has been demonstrated to be effective in the context of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs. However, FIT yields a significant proportion of false positives leading to unnecessary colonoscopies. In this study, we have investigated whether leftover FIT stool samples could be repurposed for proteomics analysis as a triage step for patients before recommending colonoscopy. High-throughput mass spectrometry analyses on a set of 141 FIT-positive samples (50 controls with no lesion, 45 with advanced adenomas and 46 with CRC) in combination with machine learning tools were used. Results showed that with a specificity ≥90%, a large proportion of the false FIT positives could be identified thus providing an efficient strategy for reducing unnecessary colonoscopies. Furthermore, CRC cases were also precisely predicted to be true positives, thus providing an approach for prioritizing patients for colonoscopy. In conclusion, this study demonstrates the feasibility of using proteomics for analysis of leftover FIT stool samples as an intermediate step to triage patients selected for colonoscopy in CRC screening programs.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Artificial intelligence-supported double reading in European population breast cancer screening: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective programs.

BACKGROUND: Most European population mammography screening programs rely on double reading with arbitration, a model that delivers mortality benefit but is increasingly challenged by radiologist workload, variable specificity, and interval cancers. Artificial intelligence (AI) is being evaluated to support or optimize these established European screening pathways. PURPOSE: To synthesize prospective or program-embedded evaluations of AI conducted within European-style population screening programs and to estimate exploratory program-level absolute risk differences (RDs) per 1000 examinations for cancer detection rate (CDR) and recall. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a prespecified, focused evidence synthesis of three large studies embedded within routine population screening programs operating under European-relevant workflows: MASAI (randomized AI-supported risk triage within a national program), ScreenTrustCAD (prospective paired-reader evaluation with AI as an independent reader in a double-reading framework), and PRAIM (nationwide decision-referral implementation). Outcomes were harmonized as AI-control RDs per 1000 examinations. Random-effects pooling used Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman models. For the paired-reader design, sensitivity analyses applied a Kish effective sample-size approach across plausible within-examination correlations (ρ = 0.3-0.8). Positive predictive value (PPV) and workflow/time outcomes were summarized descriptively. RESULTS: Across 597,419 examinations, the pooled CDR RD was +0.9 per 1000 (95% CI -0.0 to +1.8; I2 ≈ 12%), consistent with a modest directional increase with borderline statistical uncertainty. The pooled recall RD was -0.6 per 1000 (95% CI -3.1 to +2.1; I2 ≈ 41-43%), indicating no consistent recall increase across screening programs. Where reported, PPV was higher with AI-supported screening. Efficiency signals included 44.3% fewer total readings in MASAI and shorter reading times for AI-normal examinations in PRAIM; in PRAIM, a program-level safety-net mechanism recovered 204 cancers that would otherwise have been missed. CONCLUSION: In European population screening programs characterized by double reading and arbitration, prospective program-embedded evidence suggests that AI integration may yield a small absolute increase in cancer detection (≈1/1000) without a consistent increase in recall, alongside improved PPV and efficiency signals. These findings suggestAI primarily as a complementary reader within European screening workflows, with implementation requiring explicit quality assurance and monitoring of interval cancers and stage distribution.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Fecal immunochemical tests from population-based colorectal cancer screening programs support prospective microbiome cohorts.

BACKGROUND: Large, prospective cohorts are needed to research the gut microbiome's role in colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. We evaluated the gut microbiome leveraging residual fecal immunochemical tests (FIT) from a CRC screening program in Turin, Italy, and conducted one of the largest population-based case-control studies across the adenoma-carcinoma sequence to date. METHODS: We extracted DNA from residual FIT stool, used whole-genome shotgun sequencing, and included those with CRC (N = 44), advanced adenomas (N = 269), early adenomas (N = 134), and FIT-negative controls (N = 478). Alpha diversity, beta diversity, and species, gene, and pathway relative abundances were estimated. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate associations of these metrics with colorectal neoplasms. RESULTS: Alpha diversity was mostly inversely associated with colorectal neoplasms, particularly early adenomas (OR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.25-0.80; P = 0.01). Presence of oral pathogens, including Parvimonas micra, was associated with higher odds of CRC. Furthermore, Escherichia coli and Bacteroides fragilis were strongly associated with higher odds of all colorectal neoplasms. Several genes and pathways were associated with colorectal neoplasms. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings align with smaller studies of the gut microbiome and colorectal neoplasms, supporting that CRC screening programs provide opportunities to prospectively study the gut microbiome's association with cancer risk in large populations.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Radiology considerations for the PREMIUM study: a multicenter randomized controlled trial of abbreviated MRI versus ultrasound for liver cancer screening in cirrhosis.

This paper describes the rationale and radiology considerations in the implementation of the Preventing Liver Cancer Mortality through Imaging with Ultrasound versus MRI (PREMIUM) study. PREMIUM is a multicenter, randomized controlled trial sponsored by the Department of Veterans Affairs comparing dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) abbreviated MRI (aMRI) plus serum AFP versus ultrasound (US) plus serum AFP for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screening in patients with cirrhosis. PREMIUM aims to randomize 4,700 participants across over 47 Veterans Affairs Medical Centers to semiannual surveillance for up to eight years, with HCC-related mortality as the primary endpoint. To date, 35 sites have been activated with 1,085 patients randomized. To ensure uniform implementation and reporting of per-protocol screening, the PREMIUM Radiology Workgroup developed standardized imaging protocols, structured LI-RADS-based reporting templates, and a centralized training program for radiologists and technologists. They also perform ongoing quality control on both scans and reports. The aMRI protocols utilize multiphasic post-contrast imaging to allow LI-RADS scoring. A non-contrast-enhanced aMRI protocol is available for participants who develop renal impairment or contrast allergy during the study. US protocols conform to US LI-RADS standards. Structured reporting promotes consistency in documentation of findings, visualization scores, and follow-up recommendations. A centralized Image Repository was established, incorporating advanced de-identification methods to remove metadata and pixel-embedded protected health information from imaging files. More than 20,000 curated liver MRI and US exams are anticipated, supporting both trial outcomes and future radiomics and artificial intelligence research. PREMIUM aims to determine whether screening for HCC with a DCE aMRI protocol reduces HCC-related mortality and also facilitates ancillary studies utilizing the Image Repository.

Abbreviated MRI↗

PubMed2026

Author Correction: Colonoscopy and fecal immunochemical testing versus usual care in diagnostic colorectal cancer screening: the SCREESCO randomized controlled trial.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Published Erratum↗

PubMed2024

Value of HCC surveillance in a landscape of emerging surveillance options: Perspectives of a multi-stakeholder modified Delphi panel.

HCC surveillance is recommended by liver professional societies but lacks broad acceptance by several primary care and cancer societies due to limitations in the existing data. We convened a diverse multidisciplinary group of cancer screening experts to evaluate current and future paradigms of HCC prevention and early detection using a rigorous Delphi panel approach. The experts had high agreement on 21 statements about primary prevention, HCC surveillance benefits, HCC surveillance harms, and the evaluation of emerging surveillance modalities. The experts agreed that current data have methodologic limitations as well as unclear generalizability to Western populations. Although a randomized clinical trial of surveillance versus no surveillance is unlikely feasible, they concurred that alternative designs, such as a comparison of 2 surveillance modalities, could provide indirect evidence of surveillance efficacy. The panel acknowledged the presence of surveillance harms, but concurred the overall value of surveillance appears high, particularly given a greater emphasis on benefits over harms by both patients and clinicians. The experts underscored the importance of a framework for measuring both benefits and harms when evaluating emerging surveillance strategies. The panel acknowledged performance metrics of emerging methods may differ from other cancer screening programs given differences in populations, including higher risk of cancer development and competing risk of morality, and differences in diagnostic workflow in patients at risk of HCC. These data provide insights into the perceived value of HCC surveillance in an era of emerging blood- and imaging-based surveillance strategies.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Estimating the heritability of longitudinal rate-of-change: genetic insights into PSA velocity in prostate cancer-free individuals.

Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is widely used for prostate cancer screening. While the genetics of PSA levels have been studied to enhance screening accuracy, the genetic basis of PSA velocity, the rate of PSA change over time, remains unclear. The Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial, a large, randomized study with longitudinal PSA data (15,260 cancer-free males, averaging 5.34 samples per subject) and genome-wide genotype data, provides a unique opportunity to estimate PSA velocity heritability. We developed a mixed model to jointly estimate the heritability of PSA levels at age 54 and PSA velocity. To accommodate the large dataset, we implemented 2 efficient computational approaches: a partitioning and meta-analysis strategy using average information restricted maximum likelihood (AI-REML) and a fast restricted Haseman-Elston (REHE) regression method. Simulations showed that both methods yield unbiased estimates of both heritability metrics, with AI-REML providing smaller variability in the estimation of velocity heritability than REHE. Applying AI-REML to PLCO data, we estimated heritability at 0.32 (s.e. = 0.07) for baseline PSA and 0.45 (s.e. = 0.18) for PSA velocity. These findings reveal a substantial genetic contribution to PSA velocity, supporting future genome-wide studies to identify variants affecting PSA dynamics and improve PSA-based screening.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Profile of the BREATHE cohort for risk-based breast screening in Singapore.

The BREAst screening Tailored for HEr (BREATHE) study was established to pilot a personalised, risk-based breast cancer screening programme for a multi-ethnic Asian population. Between October 2021 and December 2023, 4592 women aged 35-59 were enrolled (73% response rate). Follow-up from February 2022 to June 2024 included 4112 participants (8.6% loss to follow-up). Data collected encompassed demographics, lifestyle factors, reproductive risks, breast cancer awareness, screening behaviours, programme satisfaction, mammography outcomes (density and recall status), and genotype data. Above-average breast cancer risk increased with age: 2% in women aged 35-39, 31% in 40-49, and 42% in 50-59. Findings suggests that women valued the knowledge of their breast cancer risk and were motivated to attend mammography. The BREATHE study confirms the feasibility and acceptability of a personalised risk-based screening programme in a multi-ethnic Asian population, highlighting the value of tailored protocols to improve early detection and outcomes. Further details are available in the study protocol and online at https://blog.nus.edu.sg/breathe/ .

Humans↗

PubMed2026

MULTIPREVENT: Integrated screening for smoking-related multimorbidity using low-dose chest computed tomography.

OBJECTIVES: Tobacco consumption, combined with individual genetic predispositions, contributes to an age-dependent risk not only for lung cancer but also for other non-communicable diseases (NCDs) such as cardiovascular disease (CVD), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), osteoporosis, and diabetes. The MULTIPREVENT project aims to validate whether low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) of the chest, combined with simple biomarkers, functional tests, and genomic profiling, can serve as an effective tool for comprehensive health assessment and risk prediction of multimorbidity in adults. STUDY DESIGN: The study is based on a prospective epidemiological design involving 3000 participants from the MOLTEST-BIS lung cancer screening cohort (2016-2018). These participants, aged 50-79 years (during MOLTEST-BIS) and with a smoking history of at least 30 pack-years, will undergo two follow-up assessments in 2025-2027 and 2030-2032. METHODS: Each follow-up includes LDCT, spirometry, standardized blood pressure measurement, anthropometric evaluation, biomarker assessment (lipid profile, lipoprotein(a), glycated haemoglobin), and health-related questionnaires. Genetic profiling will be performed using the Illumina Infinium Global Screening Arrays approach to identify inherited predispositions to major NCDs. All data, clinical, imaging (including radiomics), molecular, and genetic, will be integrated through machine learning algorithms to develop AI-based risk prediction models. RESULTS: The MULTIPREVENT study is expected to generate a wide range of scientific, clinical, and infrastructural results that will serve as a foundation for future public health initiatives in integrated prevention. CONCLUSIONS: By linking imaging and biochemical markers, genetic susceptibility, and clinical parameters within a longitudinal design, MULTIPREVENT will establish data-driven, AI-supported prevention strategies aimed at reducing morbidity and mortality among adults exposed to tobacco. The project will also serve as a model for population-based multimorbidity prevention programs.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Non-invasive screening in hereditary cancer: a randomized controlled trial to test cell-free DNA-based early detection in the CHARM consortium.

Individuals with hereditary cancer syndromes are born with germline genetic variants that significantly increase their lifetime risk of developing multiple cancers. Cancer rates and overall mortality can be reduced with intensive surveillance to facilitate early cancer detection. However, participating in diagnostic imaging and endoscopy surveillance programs is often time-consuming, overwhelming, inconvenient, and anxiety-inducing. To improve this, multi-cancer early detection tests are being developed using cell-free DNA (cfDNA) sequencing analysis to detect cancers with more sensitivity than conventional screening methods. Our community (the CHARM consortium: Cell-free DNA in Hereditary And high-Risk Malignancies) has been exploring the use of cfDNA sequencing in hereditary cancer, and has launched the CHARM2 prospective randomized controlled trial, which is enrolling 1000 participants with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Lynch syndrome, Li-Fraumeni syndrome, Neurofibromatosis type 1 and Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer to improve equitable access, early detection and surveillance for high-risk individuals. All participants will have screening as per conventional syndrome-specific surveillance recommendations. Half the participants (experimental cohort) will also have cfDNA analysis at least three times a year, with abnormal results triggering dedicated clinical imaging and diagnostic evaluation, and heightened surveillance. Vetted by our patient advisors, validated patient-reported outcome and experience measures assessing participant psychosocial outcomes, engagement, and test preferences will be administered to both arms. Our goal is to inform if and how cfDNA analysis could be implemented into routine clinical care and offer a path to equitable and more convenient cancer screening for all high-risk Canadians.

Female↗

PubMed2026

A reanalysis of the Hitachi cohort study evaluating the effectiveness of low-dose CT screening for lung cancer.

The effectiveness of low-dose thoracic computed tomography (CT) screening for lung cancer for non-smokers or light smokers has been unclear. The results of the Hitachi cohort study performed by the conventional multivariable analysis suggested the reduction of lung cancer mortality by thoracic CT screening, but also revealed the lower all-cause mortality in the CT group, which indicated the existence of self-selection bias. Because the background of the subjects in the CT screening group and that in the X-ray screening group were very different, it is critical to adjust appropriately the confounding factors. In this brief report, we describe a re-evaluation of the results of the Hitachi Cohort Study performed by using more flexible methods, propensity score matching and inverse probability weighting.

epidemiology/public health↗

PubMed2026

Liquid biopsy: a new window on the BRCA genes.

The Breast Cancer Susceptibility Gene (BRCA)-associated tumors represent a constantly evolving and intriguing scenario in oncology, in which the availability of novel systemic treatment, mainly including the poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, has enabled an improved survival benefit in clinical subgroups. The expanding regulatory approvals of PARP inhibitors have inevitably reshaped the clinical indications for BRCA testing, moving the BRCA1/2 profiling from the traditional and preventive workflows to therapeutic paths. Despite advances in technology and treatment, substantial limitations remain in current genetic and genomic tools for the detection of deleterious BRCA1/2 variants. Germline and tumor tissue testing provide only a snapshot of a patient's disease, failing to capture the dynamic and longitudinal aspects of tumor clonal evolution. In this scenario, liquid biopsy (LB) profiling of BRCA1/2 genes, primarily as circulating tumor DNA, represents a highly active area of research potentially affecting many aspects of cancer screening, diagnosis, and monitoring in individuals who are carriers of BRCA1/2 deleterious variants. Beyond the attractive potential to surrogate the tumor tissue testing, to overcome the cancer spatial and temporal heterogeneity, and to monitor the tumor mutational profile over time, accurately detecting all clinically relevant BRCA genetic variants and epigenetic modifications using LB remains technically challenging.

BRCA1/2↗