SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Carboplatin”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2001

Carboplatin alone vs carboplatin plus epidoxorubicin as second-line therapy for cisplatin- or carboplatin-sensitive ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to analyze the benefit/toxicity profile of a second-line treatment with carboplatin alone or carboplatin plus another non-cross-resistant drug (epidoxorubicin) in ovarian cancer patients sensitive to cisplatin-based chemotherapy at first-line treatment. METHODS: We conducted a randomized clinical trial. Women with epithelial ovarian cancer FIGO Stage II--IV who had a complete or partial response to first-line treatment with cisplatin or carboplatin-based regiments and subsequently progressed or relapsed more than 6 months after discontinuation of first-line treatment were eligible for the study. A total of 190 subjects entered the study. They were randomly allocated to either 300 mg/m(2) of carboplatin every 28 days for five cycles (95 patients) or 120 mg/m(2) of epidoxorubicin and 300 mg/m(2) of carboplatin every 28 days for five cycles (95 patients). RESULTS: A complete response was reported, respectively, in 32 (36%) women allocated to carboplatin alone and in 28 (31.8%) of those allocated to carboplatin plus epidoxorubicin. The corresponding figures for partial response were 18 (20.2%) and 26 (29.9%). Comparing the frequency of complete response, partial response, no change, and progression, the differences between the two groups were not significant (chi(2)(3) 5.10, P = 0.16). The median duration of response was 16 months in the carboplatin alone and 20 months in the carboplatin plus epidoxorubicin group (P = not significant). The 3-year percentage of survival was 29% in the carboplatin alone and 42% in the carboplatin plus epidoxorubicin group; this difference was not statistically significant. The frequency of leukopenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia grade 3-4 was higher in the epidoxorubicin plus carboplatin than in the carboplatin alone group. Alopecia G3 was present in 88% of women treated with epidoxorubicin plus carboplatin. CONCLUSIONS: The general results of this study do not show any marked differences in response to second-line treatment among women treated with single-agent (carboplatin) or multiagent (carboplatin plus epidoxorubicin) schedules. Toxicity, particularly hematological, was more relevant in women treated with the multiagent schedule.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

A single 24-hour plasma sample does not predict the carboplatin AUC from carboplatin-paclitaxel combinations or from a high-dose carboplatin-thiotepa-cyclophosphamide regimen.

PURPOSE: It has been observed that the area under the free carboplatin concentration in plasma ultrafiltrate versus time curve (AUC) is related to toxicity and tumour response. For this reason, it can be important to measure the carboplatin AUC and subsequently adjust the dose to achieve a predefined target AUC. The use of limited sampling strategies enables relatively simple measurement and calculation of actual carboplatin AUCs. METHODS: We studied the performance of a limited sampling model, based on a single 24-h sample (the Ghazal-Aswad model). in 52 patients who received carboplatin in two different chemotherapy regimens (a carboplatin-paclitaxel combination and a high-dose carboplatin-thiotepa-cyclophosphamide combination). RESULTS: The measured mean AUC in our population was 4.1 min x mg/ml (median 3.9, range 1.9 6.3, SD 1.0 min x mg/ml). With the limited sampling model, the predicted mean AUC was 4.4 min x mg/ml (median 4.2, range 2.4-8.4, SD 1.2 min x mg/ml). Statistical analysis revealed that the model was slightly biased (MPE%, 6.5%), but imprecise (RMSE%, 20.6%) in our study population. CONCLUSION: Although easy and attractive to use, the Ghazal-Aswad formula is not precise enough to predict the carboplatin AUC, and needs to be evaluated prospectively in other patient populations.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1997

Randomized trial of carboplatin plus amifostine versus carboplatin alone in patients with advanced solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: To test the hypothesis that the cytoprotectant amifostine attenuates the thrombocytopenia produced by carboplatin, the authors performed a randomized trial comparing treatment with carboplatin alone versus the combination of amifostine and carboplatin. METHODS: Patients with refractory or carboplatin-sensitive malignancies were randomized to receive either carboplatin, 500 mg/m2 alone or carboplatin, 500 mg/m2 in conjunction with 2 doses of amifostine of 910 mg/m2 each. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients with a variety of malignancies were entered on this study. One patient withdrew from each arm prior to the administration of any therapy, leaving 30 evaluable patients treated with carboplatin alone and 23 treated with the combination of amifostine and carboplatin. For 82 cycles of therapy with amifostine plus carboplatin, the median platelet nadir was 127 x 10(9)/L while the median platelet nadir was 88 x 10(9)/L over the 80 courses of therapy with carboplatin alone (P = 0.023). The median platelet nadir after the first cycle of therapy was 144 x 10(9)/L for patients treated with amifostine plus carboplatin and 85 x 10(9)/L for patients treated with carboplatin alone (P = 0.24). The median survival for 9 patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma treated with carboplatin alone was 39 weeks whereas the median survival for 12 such patients treated with amifostine plus carboplatin was 52 weeks (P = 0.116). CONCLUSIONS: These data support the hypothesis that amifostine attenuates the myelosuppression of carboplatin. Additional studies of amifostine in combination with carboplatin-containing chemotherapy regimens are warranted.

Adult↗

PubMed2026

Daily low-dose carboplatin or weekly carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel for concurrent chemoradiotherapy in older patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (JCOG1914): A randomized phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Daily low-dose carboplatin with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy is the standard treatment for older patients with unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) in Japan. METHODS: This open-label phase 3 trial was conducted at 38 institutions in Japan. Patients aged ≥ 75 years with LA-NSCLC were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive daily carboplatin (30 mg/m2) or weekly carboplatin (area under the curve, 2 mg·min/mL) plus nab-paclitaxel (30 mg/m2) with thoracic radiotherapy. Durvalumab maintenance therapy was recommended after treatment completion. The primary endpoint was overall survival, which was used to assess the non-inferiority of weekly carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel compared to daily low-dose carboplatin. RESULTS: From December 2020 to March 2024, 124 patients were enrolled (carboplatin arm, 61 and carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel arm, 63). In the planned interim analysis, the Bayesian predictive probability indicating the non-inferiority of carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel compared with carboplatin in the final analysis was 8.0%, leading to early study termination for futility. The median overall survival was not estimable in the carboplatin arm; the estimated value in the carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel arm was 26.1 months (hazard ratio, 1.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.79-3.11; p = 0.200). Two treatment-related and seven non-cancer-related deaths occurred in the carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel arm. Patients in the carboplatin arm had better quality of life than those in the carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel arm at 6 weeks (odds ratio, 0.39; 95% confidence interval, 0.18-0.81; p = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Daily low-dose carboplatin with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy remains the standard treatment for older patients with unresectable LA-NSCLC in Japan.

Humans↗

PubMed2005

Sequential gemcitabine-carboplatin followed by paclitaxel-carboplatin in the first-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: A phase II study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility and efficacy of sequential gemcitabine-carboplatin followed by paclitaxel-carboplatin in the first-line treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer, with the response rate as the primary endpoint. METHODS: After primary laparotomy, 56 patients with FIGO Stages III-IV disease were given 4 cycles of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 d1,8 and carboplatin AUC5 (44 patients) or AUC6 (12 patients) d1 q3wk followed by 4 cycles of paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 d1 and carboplatin AUC5/6 q3wk. Of the tumors, 43 were serous, 6 clear cell, 4 endometrioid, and 3 anaplastic type. Thirty-seven (66.1%) of the patients were suboptimally debulked. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients were evaluable for response by CA-125 criteria, and 46 (98%) responded. Thirty patients (after gemcitabine-carboplatin) and 24 (after paclitaxel-carboplatin) were evaluable for response by CT (RECIST criteria), respectively. After the four gemcitabine-carboplatin cycles, the objective response rate was 83% (6 CR, 19 PR). Following completion of the whole sequential regimen, 7 patients showed a CR and 15 a PR, respectively, giving a response rate of 92%. The median progression-free survival was 12.8 months after a median follow-up of 19 months (range 7-35 months). The median overall survival has not been reached yet. The main toxicity was neutropenia as 139/221 (62.9%) of the gemcitabine-carboplatin cycles and 92/181 (50.8%) of the paclitaxel-carboplatin cycles, respectively, were associated with Grades 3-4 neutropenia. Neutropenia was reported as a serious adverse event in 5.7% of the cycles, and G-CSF support was needed in 18.4% of the cycles. Only the gemcitabine-carboplatin cycles were associated with a marked thrombocytopenia (32.1% Grades 3-4). Of the other side effects, marked allergy occurred in 14/52 (27%) exposed to paclitaxel. A total of 14 patients discontinued the treatment prematurely: 3 due to lack of efficacy, 1 due to protocol violation, and 10 due to toxicity (4 allergic reactions to paclitaxel, 3 complicated neutropenias, 1 fever, and 2 unspecified toxicities). The mean relative dose intensities were: gemcitabine 84.0%, paclitaxel 85.4%, and carboplatin 96.5%. Of the gemcitabine-carboplatin cycles and paclitaxel-carboplatin cycles, 32% and 38% were delayed, respectively. Gemcitabine d8 dose had to be omitted in 8% of the cycles. CONCLUSION: The sequential regimen of gemcitabine-carboplatin followed by paclitaxel-carboplatin is feasible in chemotherapy-naive ovarian cancer. Although its use is associated with a marked neutropenia, the neutropenia is manageable.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Paclitaxel plus carboplatin versus standard chemotherapy with either single-agent carboplatin or cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in women with ovarian cancer: the ICON3 randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Previously, we have shown that the combination of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (CAP) and single-agent carboplatin produce similar survival and progression-free survival rates in women with ovarian cancer. Subsequently, paclitaxel combined with platinum has become a widely accepted treatment for the disease. We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of paclitaxel plus carboplatin with a control of either CAP or carboplatin alone. METHODS: Between February, 1995, and October, 1998, we enrolled 2074 patients from 130 centres in eight countries. Women were randomly assigned paclitaxel plus carboplatin or control, the control (CAP or single-agent carboplatin) being chosen by the patient and clinician before randomisation. The primary outcome measure was overall survival. Secondary outcomes were progression-free survival and toxicity. Analysis was by intention to treat. FINDINGS: With a median follow-up of 51 months, 1265 patients had died, and survival curves showed no evidence of a difference in overall survival between paclitaxel plus carboplatin and control (hazard ratio 0.98, 95% CI 0.87-1.10, p=0.74). The median overall survival was 36.1 months on paclitaxel plus carboplatin and 35.4 months on control (difference 0.7 months, 95% CI -3.6 to 4.7). 1538 patients had progressive disease or died, and again, Kaplan-Meier curves showed no evidence of a difference between the groups (hazard ratio 0.93, 95% CI 0.84-1.03, p=0.16). Median progression-free survival was 17.3 months on paclitaxel plus carboplatin and 16.1 months on control (difference 1.2 months, 95% CI -0.5 to 2.8). Paclitaxel plus carboplatin caused more alopecia, fever, and sensory neuropathy than carboplatin alone, and more sensory neuropathy than CAP. CAP was associated with more fever than paclitaxel plus carboplatin. INTERPRETATION: Single-agent carboplatin and CAP are as effective as paclitaxel plus carboplatin as first-line treatment for women requiring chemotherapy for ovarian cancer. The favourable toxicity profile of single-agent carboplatin suggests that this drug is a reasonable option as first-line chemo therapy for ovarian cancer.

Aged↗

PubMed1987

Platinum analogue combination chemotherapy: cisplatin and carboplatin--a phase I trial with pharmacokinetic assessment of the effect of cisplatin administration on carboplatin excretion.

Cisplatin (NSC 119875) and carboplatin (NSC 241240) are platinum (II) analogues with very different spectra of toxicity. Cisplatin dose is limited by nausea and vomiting, renal dysfunction, and dose-related peripheral neuropathy, whereas carboplatin is myelosuppressive. There are also clinical and laboratory data that suggest that these drugs may not be completely cross-resistant. Therefore, the following phase I trial of combination therapy with cisplatin and carboplatin was undertaken. Since carboplatin toxicity is enhanced in the presence of renal impairment, carboplatin excretion was also evaluated in selected patients at the maximum tolerated dose. Thirty-three patients received 50 mg/m2 cisplatin and doses of carboplatin between 160 mg/m2 and 400 mg/m2. Sequential 20-minute infusions of carboplatin and then cisplatin were able to be administered at the standard doses of carboplatin (320 and 400 mg/m2) with thrombocytopenia to the degree expected if carboplatin alone had been given. However, 280 mg/m2 carboplatin followed by 25 mg/m2 cisplatin/d X 3 caused unexpectedly severe thrombocytopenia in seven of eight patients (median platelet nadir 45,000/microL; range, 12 to 321,000/microL; nadir was less than 90,000 in seven of eight patients). In three patients treated with 280 mg/m2 carboplatin plus 25 mg/m2/d X 3 cisplatin, pharmacokinetics of carboplatin were compared during consecutive monthly cycles without and with cisplatin. Modestly increased areas under the curve (AUC) for carboplatin (15% and 35%) with cisplatin were seen in the two patients who experienced more pronounced platelet suppression with combination therapy. No other limiting or unusual toxicity was seen with this combination. Responses, primarily in "platinum responsive" tumors, were seen. The combination of cisplatin plus carboplatin is feasible and merits further study.

Anemia↗

PubMed2004

Phase III randomized trial of docetaxel-carboplatin versus paclitaxel-carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy for ovarian carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy with a platinum agent and a taxane (paclitaxel) is considered the standard of care for treatment of ovarian carcinoma. We compared the combination of docetaxel-carboplatin with the combination of paclitaxel-carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy for stage Ic-IV epithelial ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer. METHODS: We randomly assigned 1077 patients to receive docetaxel at 75 mg/m2 of body surface area (1-hour intravenous infusion) or paclitaxel at 175 mg/m2 (3-hour intravenous infusion). Both treatments then were followed by carboplatin to an area under the plasma concentration-time curve of 5. The treatments were repeated every 3 weeks for six cycles; in responding patients, an additional three cycles of single-agent carboplatin was permitted. Survival curves were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and hazard ratios were estimated with the Cox proportional hazards model. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 23 months, both groups had similar progression-free survival (medians of 15.0 months for docetaxel-carboplatin and 14.8 months for paclitaxel-carboplatin; hazard ratio [HR] docetaxel-paclitaxel = 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.83 to 1.13; P = .707), overall survival rates at 2 years (64.2% and 68.9%, respectively; HR = 1.13, 95% CI = 0.92 to 1.39; P = .238), and objective tumor (58.7% and 59.5%, respectively; difference between docetaxel and paclitaxel = -0.8%, 95% CI = -8.6% to 7.1%; P = .868) and CA-125 (75.8% and 76.8%, respectively; difference docetaxel-paclitaxel = -1.0%, 95% CI = -7.2% to 5.1%; P = .794) response rates. However, docetaxel-carboplatin was associated with substantially less overall and grade 2 or higher neurotoxicity than paclitaxel-carboplatin (grade > or =2 neurosensory toxicity in 11% versus 30%, difference = 19%, 95% CI = 15% to 24%; P<.001; grade > or =2 neuromotor toxicity in 3% versus 7%, difference = 4%, 95% CI = 1% to 7%; P<.001). Treatment with docetaxel-carboplatin was associated with statistically significantly more grade 3-4 neutropenia (94% versus 84%, difference = 11%, 95% CI = 7% to 14%; P<.001) and neutropenic complications than treatment with paclitaxel-carboplatin, although myelosuppression did not influence dose delivery or patient safety. Global quality of life was similar in both arms, but substantive differences in many symptom scores favored docetaxel. CONCLUSIONS: Docetaxel-carboplatin appears to be similar to paclitaxel-carboplatin in terms of progression-free survival and response, although longer follow-up is required for a definitive statement on survival. Thus, docetaxel-carboplatin represents an alternative first-line chemotherapy regimen for patients with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Gemcitabine plus carboplatin compared with carboplatin in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer: an intergroup trial of the AGO-OVAR, the NCIC CTG, and the EORTC GCG.

PURPOSE: Most patients with advanced ovarian cancer develop recurrent disease. For those patients who recur at least 6 months after initial therapy, paclitaxel platinum has shown a modest survival advantage over platinum without paclitaxel; however, many patients develop clinically relevant neurotoxicity, frequently resulting in treatment discontinuation. Thus, an alternative regimen without significant neurotoxicity was evaluated by comparing gemcitabine plus carboplatin with single-agent carboplatin in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer patients. METHODS: Patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer were randomly assigned to receive either gemcitabine plus carboplatin or carboplatin alone, every 21 days. The primary objective was to compare progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Three hundred fifty-six patients (178 gemcitabine plus carboplatin; 178 carboplatin) were randomly assigned. Patients received a median of six cycles in both arms. With a median follow-up of 17 months, median PFS was 8.6 months (95% CI, 7.9 to 9.7 months) for gemcitabine plus carboplatin and 5.8 months (95% CI, 5.2 to 7.1 months) for carboplatin. The hazard ration (HR) for PFS was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.58 to 0.90; P = .0031). Response rate was 47.2% (95% CI, 39.9% to 54.5%) for gemcitabine plus carboplatin and 30.9% (95% CI, 24.1% to 37.7%) for carboplatin (P = .0016). The HR for overall survival was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.75 to1.23; P = .7349). While myelosuppression was significantly more common in the combination, sequelae such as febrile neutropenia or infections were uncommon. No statistically significant differences in quality of life scores between arms were noted. CONCLUSION: Gemcitabine plus carboplatin significantly improves PFS and response rate without worsening quality of life for patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Carboplatin-paclitaxel- and carboplatin-docetaxel-induced cytotoxic effect in epithelial ovarian carcinoma in vitro.

BACKGROUND: The combination of paclitaxel and cisplatin is standard for patients with newly diagnosed epithelial ovarian carcinoma. The role of another taxane, docetaxel, currently is being studied. Due to its milder nonhematologic toxicity carboplatin increasingly is being substituted for cisplatin in taxane-based combinations. The purpose of this study was to compare the combination of carboplatin-paclitaxel with carboplatin-docetaxel in ovarian carcinoma in vitro, and to assess the type of interaction, if any. METHODS: Sensitivity to carboplatin and the concomitant use of a taxane and carboplatin was studied in 4 ovarian carcinoma cell lines using the 96-well plate clonogenic assay. Chemosensitivity was expressed as the IC50 value (i.e., the drug concentration causing 50% inhibition of clonogenic survival). IC50 values were obtained from dose-response curves after fitting the data to the linear quadratic equation. Synergism was studied by the area under the survival curve ratios (AUC ratios), obtained by numeric integration. The AUC ratio and the surviving fraction (SF) value after the administration of taxane alone were compared using the Student t test for paired data. RESULTS: The IC50 values for carboplatin were between 0.5-1.6 microgram/mL; there was only a 3.2-fold difference between individual cell lines. Carboplatin administered concomitantly with a taxane had either an additive or supra-additive growth inhibitory effect on all four ovarian carcinoma cell lines. A supra-additive effect occurred after simultaneous exposure of the cells to carboplatin at all tested paclitaxel concentrations in three of four cell lines (UT-OC-3, UT-OC-5, and SK-OV-3). The carboplatin-docetaxel combination had a supra-additive effect at the two highest docetaxel concentrations in two cell lines (UT-OC-4 and UT-OC-5) and at the highest docetaxel concentration in the other two cell lines (UT-OC-3 and SK-OV-3). CONCLUSIONS: Carboplatin has a synergistic effect when used with paclitaxel or docetaxel. A supra-additive effect is achieved with a wider range of paclitaxel concentrations than docetaxel concentrations.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

PubMed2003

Successful administration of carboplatin in patients with clinically documented carboplatin hypersensitivity.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to evaluate the tolerance and effectiveness of carboplatin rechallenge using a prolonged desensitizing carboplatin infusion regimen in patients with clinically documented moderate-severe carboplatin hypersensitivity. METHOD: Patients admitted for carboplatin infusion were identified by computerized pharmacy records and retrospectively analyzed. RESULT: Thirty-three patients with recurrent ovarian (N = 27), peritoneal (N = 4), tubal (N = 1), and cervical (N = 1) cancer treated with a prolonged desensitizing carboplatin infusion regimen were identified. The patients had received a median of 10 courses of carboplatin (range 3-33) before developing the moderate-severe hypersensitivity reaction. Two hundred and fifteen courses (median 5, range 1-52) were administered. Twenty-nine patients (88%) were successfully rechallenged while four had a recurrent moderate-severe carboplatin hypersensitivity precluding further administration. Despite initial tolerance of the infusion schedule moderate-severe carboplatin hypersensitivity recurred in 3 additional patients (9%) after two, three, and six subsequent courses. Objective responses to therapy were seen in 22 of 28 evaluable patients (79%). CONCLUSIONS: A prolonged desensitizing carboplatin infusion regimen is tolerated in the majority of patients with clinically documented moderate-severe carboplatin hypersensitivity. Objective response rates seem acceptable with this schedule.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Carboplatin skin testing: a skin-testing protocol for predicting hypersensitivity to carboplatin chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: A high incidence of moderate to severe hypersensitivity reactions (HRs) is noted in patients who have been treated with multiple courses of carboplatin. Presently, there is no reliable way to predict which patients may be at risk for this potentially severe adverse reaction. We developed a skin-test protocol to identify patients at high risk for HR to carboplatin chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing more than seven courses of carboplatin received a 0.02-mL intradermal injection of an undiluted aliquot of their planned carboplatin infusion 1 hour before each course of the agent. A positive skin test was prospectively defined as that resulting in a wheel of at least 5 mm with a surrounding flare. We recently reported a 27% incidence of HRs in patients receiving more than seven courses of carboplatin. These patients served as historical controls for the current study. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients with recurrent ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma receiving carboplatin were skin tested. Thirteen of 47 patients (28%) manifested a positive skin test at a median of nine total courses of carboplatin (range, eight to 17 courses). This rate of skin-test positivity was not significantly different from the incidence of documented HR reported in a historical control group (P =.89), suggesting comparable populations. A negative skin test accurately predicted the absence of HR in 166 of 168 courses of chemotherapy. Only two of 47 patients (4%) experienced a HR after a negative skin test. Thus, administering carboplatin only to patients with a negative skin test may result in a significant reduction in HRs relative to historical controls (P =.002). CONCLUSION: An easily performed skin test appears to predict patients in whom carboplatin may be safely administered. Treatment modifications based on the results of skin testing may reduce the incidence of HRs in patients receiving repeated courses of carboplatin.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

PubMed2003

Treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer: a retrospective analysis of women treated with single-agent carboplatin originally treated with carboplatin and paclitaxel. The Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center experience.

OBJECTIVE: There is no standard treatment for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). As there are no curative options, many oncologists choose to treat women who recur with carboplatin, particularly if they are deemed to have platinum-sensitive disease. However, particularly in the era of platinum-taxane treatment as primary therapy, the utility of this treatment has not been established, nor is it clear whether the results of single-agent treatment are equivalent to that of combination therapy. We sought to determine the outcomes for patients with platinum-sensitive EOC who were treated with carboplatin-taxane therapy and received single-agent carboplatin (C) as second chemotherapy. In addition, we sought to compare these results to the outcomes in women who received carboplatin and paclitaxel (C + T) at first relapse. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified 24 patients using our electronic institutional database with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of ovarian cancer that had a complete response to platinum-paclitaxel chemotherapy, relapsed greater than 6 months after treatment, and received single-agent carboplatin as second-line chemotherapy. We performed a subsequent comparison between a subgroup of this cohort and one that met the same inclusion criteria but received C + T at relapse between January 1998 and December 2000. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were evaluable for response, and all were available for analysis of survival end points. For evaluable patients, the overall response rate was 39% (complete, 11%; partial, 28%). Twenty-two percent had stable disease. Six (25%) patients experienced a hypersensitivity reaction, including 1 who required hospitalization. The median overall survival was 22 months. The 2-year overall survival rate was 49%. Stratification by treatment-free interval (TFI) showed a 25% for a TFI between 6 and 12 months and 43% for a TFI > 12 months. When a subgroup of these women (18/24) was compared to a cohort that received C + T (29), the combination was associated with a higher complete and overall response rate, 7 and 36% for C versus 45 and 71% for C + T (P = 0.02). The overall survival in women who received C was 26 months versus 42 months in the women who received C + T (P < 0.02). CONCLUSION: Carboplatin as a single agent is effective therapy for recurrent ovarian cancer in women who recur following treatment with carboplatin and paclitaxel, and the treatment-free interval predicts response to single-agent carboplatin. However, our secondary analysis suggests that carboplatin and paclitaxel may produce a higher response rate and a survival benefit compared to C alone. This supports the conclusions of ICON4, which recently reported both overall and progression-free survival benefits with C + T over C in women with platinum-sensitive recurrent disease.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Dose response and time course of carboplatin-induced micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes in the cat: implications for combination carboplatin chemotherapy.

The dose response and time course of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes (mPCE) in cat peripheral blood induced by various doses (150-250 mg/m2) of carboplatin in vivo was determined. The data indicate that carboplatin produced a significant (p < 0.05) dose-dependent increase in the number of mPCE over baseline values; however, the times following carboplatin administration when mPCE were first observed differed significantly (p < 0.05) between the three carboplatin dose groups. mPCE were present in significantly greater numbers (p < 0.05) on smears at an earlier time interval following a single carboplatin dose of 150 mg/m2 than for a dose of either 200 or 250 mg/m2. The peak number of mPCE occurred on days 7, 14 and 17.5 following administration of a carboplatin dose of 150, 200 and 250 mg/m2, respectively. The pattern of time course delay following carboplatin administration suggests that the block of erythropoietic stem cells in G2 is dose dependent. Indeed, the administration of carboplatin arrested the cell cycle in the G2 phase and, at higher doses, diminished the number of cycling erythroid precursor cells. mPCE were apparent in blood smears only after recovery from this arrest and resumption of replication. This observation has implications for the scheduling of carboplatin administration when used in combination with other anticancer drugs.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Successful carboplatin desensitization in patients with proven carboplatin allergy.

BACKGROUND: Carboplatin is one of the most useful and well tolerated cytotoxic drugs for gynecologic malignancies. Hypersensitivity to carboplatin is not rare among patients receiving multiple recurrent treatments with this drug. The aim of the current study was to offer a safe and convenient carboplatin desensitization strategy to patients with a proven allergic reaction to this drug. METHODS: Patients with an immediate objective allergic reaction to carboplatin were skin tested with the drug. A 6-hour carboplatin desensitization protocol was administered to the patients with a carboplatin-positive skin test on each of the following treatment courses. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients with an allergic reaction to carboplatin and a positive skin test were included in the current study. Twenty patients (86.9%) were desensitized. One patient developed a mild urticarial rash. Nineteen patients tolerated 80 desensitization courses uneventfully. CONCLUSIONS: The data presented a successful desensitization protocol for individuals with a proven allergic reaction to carboplatin. The protocol was safe and convenient and offered an effective therapeutic strategy to patients who required this drug.

Adult↗

PubMed1991

Carboplatin in non-small cell lung cancer: review of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trial and comparison with other carboplatin trials.

Clinical trials evaluating carboplatin as a single agent or as a component of combination regimens in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients are reviewed in this report. Response rates for carboplatin varied from 9% to 20% in four trials testing carboplatin 400 mg/m2 as a single daily dose or given over 3 days. In one of these trials carboplatin treatment was associated with a modest but significant survival benefit, and in all of the trials severe toxicity was minimal. In a randomized trial comparing carboplatin/etoposide to cisplatin/etoposide, no significant differences were observed in response rates or survival duration, but there was a trend for less toxicity with carboplatin/etoposide. Other investigators have evaluated carboplatin in two-drug combination therapy with vinblastine, cisplatin, or etoposide in phase II trials. Response rates have ranged from 9% to 17%, suggesting that these particular combinations were not more effective than carboplatin alone. Providing palliation for stage IV NSCLC patients continues to be a major challenge. The low toxicity and modest activity observed with carboplatin suggest that further evaluation of carboplatin is warranted in stage IV NSCLC patients.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

PubMed2003

Initial experience with a novel desensitization strategy for carboplatin-associated hypersensitivity reactions: carboplatin-hypersensitivity reactions.

PURPOSE: Carboplatin hypersensitivity is an increasingly recognized toxicity in individuals receiving >6 cumulative courses of this important antineoplastic agent. We wished to determine if a novel multi-pronged approach to re-treating patients with a high risk for this potentially serious side effect could permit the safe delivery of this class of cytotoxic drugs. METHODS: Five patients with gynecologic malignancies who had either experienced a documented carboplatin hypersensitivity reaction ( n =4) or had a "positive" carboplatin skin test ( n =1), received a multi-drug oral regimen administered over several days which was designed to block known mediators of anaphylaxis. Four of these individuals subsequently underwent treatment with either cisplatin or carboplatin employing a "dose escalation" desensitization schema. RESULTS: Four patients underwent successful treatment with either cisplatin or carboplatin (3, 4, 5, 6+ total additional courses) without any further evidence of hypersensitivity. CONCLUSION: In this preliminary report of a limited patient population, we have demonstrated the ability to safely deliver a platinum agent to individuals with either documented carboplatin hypersensitivity, or a high risk for this potentially serious toxicity of carboplatin. Further exploration of this novel management strategy in a larger group of patients is indicated.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

PubMed2001

Superiority of high-dose platinum (cisplatin and carboplatin) compared to carboplatin alone in combination chemotherapy for small-cell lung carcinoma: a prospective randomised trial of 280 consecutive patients.

PURPOSE: A prospective randomized trial in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) was performed to determine if intensification of the platinum dose by giving cisplatin and carboplatin in combination to patients with SCLC yields higher response rates and survival, than carboplatin alone in a combination chemotherapy regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between September 1992 and October 1997, 280 patients were included in a two armed prospective randomized trial, stratified by stage of disease, LDH and performance status. The treatment was in arm A: three courses induction chemotherapy with carboplatin (AUC = 4, day 1), cisplatin (35 mg/m2, days 2 and 3), teniposide (50 mg/m2, day 1-5), vincristine (1.3 mg/m2, day 1) every four weeks, followed by cyclophosphamide (3 g/m2, day 84), 4-epirubicin (4-epidoxorubicin) (150 mg/m2, day 112), and finally one course cisplatin, carboplatin, teniposide and vincristine, (days 140-144). Arm B also comprised a total of six courses, identical to those in arm A except for omission of cisplatin. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the overall treatment outcome for A vs. B, in terms of response rates (72% in both arms), complete response rates (40% and 34%, respectively), or median survival (314 days and 294 days, respectively). However, for patients with limited disease both the CR rate (54% vs. 37%, P < 0.05), overall survival (log-rank test, P < 0.05), and the two-year survival rate (11% vs. 6%, P < 0.05) were higher in the high-dose platinum arm compared to the carboplatin alone arm. CONCLUSIONS: The intensification of platinum dose (cisplatin plus carboplatin) in combination chemotherapy significantly increased the complete response rate, overall survival and number of two-year survivors among SCLC patients with limited disease compared to combination therapy with carboplatin alone, suggesting that a more aggressive treatment to this category of patients is worthwhile, while no difference in treatment outcome was observed for patients with extensive disease.

Adult↗