PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Cecostomy”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Introducer method of percutaneous endoscopic cecostomy and antegrade continence enema by use of the Chait Trapdoor cecostomy catheter in patients with adult neurogenic bowel.

BACKGROUND: Previous reports on percutaneous endoscopic cecostomy (PEC) for the delivery of antegrade continence enema (ACE) in adults have been presented in the form of case reports. Heretofore the tubes used in the pull method of PEC have been thick bolster catheters. The author performed PEC by using the introducer method (IM) with 10 F Chait Trapdoor cecostomy catheters (CTCC) in adult cases. OBJECTIVE: Report author experience with a new method of PEC in adults. DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: Single institution in Japan. PATIENTS: Five patients with bowel obstruction and 15 patients with chronic severe constipation. INTERVENTIONS: The interventions were the pull method or IM of PEC and drainage or ACE. In 5 cases, PEC was performed by the pull method with the use of an 18 F to 24 F bolster catheter for decompression of dilated intestine. In 15 patients with chronic constipation, PEC was performed with the IM method using a balloon catheter (11 F or 15 F) and CTCC. ACE was performed every other day. RESULTS: PEC was successful and effective (decompression and evacuation) in all patients. In patients with IM of PEC, 5 patients were placed with a 15 F balloon catheter and 10 patients were placed with an 11 F balloon catheter. Immediate bleeding occurred in 1 case. Balloon rupture occurred during the first month or on average at the 1 month period. Nine of 10 patients who had the 11 F catheters were changed to CTCC. The advantages of CTCC were prevention of accidental balloon rupture, decreased leakage and granulation tissue, and ease of exchange compared with bolster catheter. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective, single-institution. CONCLUSIONS: PEC with IM is a safe and useful method. CTCC is advantageous on a long-term basis for ACE.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Percutaneous endoscopic cecostomy in adults: a case series.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous cecostomy is used to treat recurrent colonic pseudoobstruction or obstipation in children and adults with multiple medical comorbidities. Percutaneous endoscopic cecostomy is a potentially attractive alternative to surgical or fluoroscopic cecostomy placement. A few reports describe percutaneous endoscopic cecostomy for management of these problems in children, whereas there are no large series of percutaneous endoscopic cecostomy in adult patients describing the indications, complications, and outcomes. OBJECTIVE: Report our experience with percutaneous endoscopic cecostomy in adults. DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: Single tertiary referral center in the United States. PATIENTS: Five patients with recurrent colonic pseudoobstruction and 2 with chronic refractory constipation. INTERVENTIONS: Percutaneous endoscopic cecostomy. RESULTS: Eight cases of percutaneous endoscopic cecostomy were performed from May 2001 through October 2005: 6 for colonic pseudoobstruction and 2 for chronic constipation. Seven of 8 cases were successful and resulted in clinical improvement. One patient required surgical removal of the percutaneous endoscopic cecostomy tube at 4 days for fecal spillage resulting in peritonitis despite successful tube placement for chronic constipation. Removal of the cecostomy tube occurred in 3 of 6 cases of pseudoobstruction (the other 3 remain in place). In the other patient with chronic constipation, clinical improvement occurred, but the patient died of underlying illness 21 days after placement. No other serious complications occurred. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective, single-center study. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous endoscopic cecostomy is a viable alternative to surgically or fluoroscopically placed cecostomy in a select group of patients with recurrent colonic pseudoobstruction or chronic intractable constipation.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Cecostomy is a useful surgical procedure: study of 113 colonic obstructions caused by cancer.

PURPOSE: There is a large choice of treatment for obstructing carcinoma of the left colon. We report our experience of tube cecostomy as the initial treatment for obstructing colonic carcinoma followed by elective resection. METHODS: From 1975 to 1995, 113 patients presenting with colonic obstruction caused by cancer were initially treated by tube cecostomy. RESULTS: The cecostomy was performed under local anesthesia in 26 cases (23 percent) and general anesthesia in 87 cases (77 percent). In the postoperative period 15 patients died (13 percent) and 26 (23 percent) had wound infection in the area around the cecostomy. A second operation performed on the 98 surviving patients comprised 74 left colonic resections with anastomosis, 9 without anastomosis (Hartmann's operation), 1 right colectomy, 3 total colectomies eliminating the cecostomy, 3 internal bypasses, and 8 proximal lateral colostomies. Surgical closure of the cecostomy was performed during six of the second operations. No deaths occurred from any of the second operations. The cecostomy closed spontaneously in 78 patients (89 percent). In ten cases (11.4 percent) a third operation was performed to close the cecostomy, without mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Comparison our cecostomy results with published studies of proximal diverting loop colostomies for the same indications showed comparable mortality after the first operation. Cecostomy decrease mortality of the second operation. This retrospective study suggests that cecostomy is a useful and less invasive surgical procedure for patients presenting with colonic obstruction caused by cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Is tube cecostomy safe in the surgery of Hirschsprung's disease?

The use of concomitant tube cecostomy remains an option for decompression after distal large-bowel surgery but has been criticised because of a reported high complication rate. Two hundred and three patients who underwent a Soave endorectal pull-through procedure for Hirschsprung's disease (1974-1990) were evaluated. Operative technique included a modified sutured Soave endorectal pull-through procedure and a Stamm tube cecostomy utilising a large-lumen catheter. One hundred and twenty patients who had a modified two-stage procedure plus concomitant tube cecostomy were compared with 83 patients who underwent a three-stage procedure with colostomy cover. Early postoperative complications occurred in 8 patients (6.6%) in whom cecostomies were performed. A distal cuff abscess developed in 1 patient (0.8%), an anastomotic leak in 1 (0.8%) and 3 patients (2.5%) had colo-anal stenosis. The cecostomy tube dislodged in 2 patients and 1 required operative closure of a faecal fistula at the cecostomy site. Colonic venting was adequate and little nursing care was required. In 2 instances colonic distension developed after cecostomy clamping. Decompression was achieved by opening the cecostomy tube; this resulted in relief of symptoms and a good subsequent recovery. In contrast, there were 11 postoperative complications in the 83 patients undergoing a three-stage procedure (13.2%). In 2 patients (2.4%) an anastomotic leak occurred and 5 distal cuff abscesses (6%), 3 (3.6%) early strictures and 1 (1.2%) neorectal retraction developed. The use of a concomitant tube cecostomy with a two-stage Soave procedure is an effective and safe means of providing proximal colonic venting and did not add to mortality or morbidity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Cecostomy↗
PubMed1995

Cecostomy. Therapeutic indications and results.

PURPOSE: The role and effectiveness of catheter tube cecostomy as a means of colonic decompression are not clearly defined. Our aim was to clarify the clinical indications, functional performance, and concomitant morbidity associated with tube cecostomy. METHOD: This was a retrospective chart review of patients receiving catheter tube cecostomy at the Mayo Clinic over an 11-year period. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients (median age, 69 years) had catheter tube cecostomy placement. Clinical indications for tube cecostomy were colonic pseudo-obstruction, distal colonic obstruction, cecal perforation, cecal volvulus, preanastomotic decompression, and miscellaneous usage. Operation was emergent in 43 (64 percent) patients and elective in 24 (36 percent) patients. Tube cecostomy was the primary procedure in 47 (70 percent) patients and complimentary in 20 (30 percent) patients. Minor complications were seen in 30 patients (45 percent), including pericatheter leak, superficial wound infection, tube occlusion, skin excoriation, premature tube dislodgement, colocutaneous fistula, and ventral hernia. No patient required reoperation for tube-related morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Catheter tube cecostomy is of therapeutic value in select clinical situations including refractory colonic pseudo-obstruction, cecal volvulus, cecal perforation, or distal colonic obstruction. Proper patient selection, careful tube placement, and vigilant postoperative tube care should provide adequate function with minimal morbidity.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Percutaneous endoscopic cecostomy: a case series.

BACKGROUND: There are few reports of percutaneous endoscopic cecostomy in adult patients. METHODS: All cases of acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (n = 2) and neurogenic bowel (n = 3) in adults in which percutaneous endoscopic cecostomy was performed were reviewed retrospectively. OBSERVATIONS: Percutaneous endoscopic cecostomy was a definitive treatment. In 1 of the 2 patients with acute colonic pseudo-obstruction, the percutaneous endoscopic cecostomy tube was clamped and subsequently removed 10 weeks after placement; in the other patient with acute colonic pseudo-obstruction, the percutaneous endoscopic cecostomy tube remains in place. In 2 of the 3 patients with neurogenic bowel, the percutaneous endoscopic cecostomy tube continues to function well; the third patient did well for 6 months and then died of underlying comorbid disease. There was no mortality or need for surgical intervention for any patient. Complications occurred in 2 patients; 1 developed transient fever and leukocytosis and 1 had self-limited bleeding during anticoagulation. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous endoscopic cecostomy is a safe and effective treatment for both acute colonic pseudo-obstruction and neurogenic bowel when aggressive albeit conservative treatment is unsuccessful.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1993

Diagnostic laparoscopy and laparoscopic cecostomy for colonic pseudo-obstruction.

Marked cecal dilatation due to colonic psuedo-obstruction (Ogilvie's syndrome) is most often treated by colonoscopic decompression. When this fails, cecostomy is usually indicated if the bowel is not infarcted. We describe a new technique of laparoscopy-guided percutaneous cecostomy using T-fasteners to retract and anchor the cecum to the anterior abdominal wall and using a Foley catheter as a cecostomy tube. We performed this procedure successfully in a patient with colonic pseudo-obstruction who had marked cecal dilatation that could not be decompressed by colonoscopy. Laparoscopic inspection showed that the cecum was viable, and a laparoscopic cecostomy was placed. This procedure can be performed easily and safely and with much less morbidity than laparotomy and open cecostomy.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Colonic manometry as predictor of cecostomy success in children with defecation disorders.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to define the predictive value of colonic manometry and contrast enema before cecostomy placement in children with defecation disorders. METHODS: Medical records, contrast enema, and colonic manometry studies were reviewed for 32 children with defecation disorders who underwent cecostomy placement between 1999 and 2004. Diagnoses included idiopathic constipation (n = 13), Hirschsprung's disease (n = 2), cerebral palsy (n = 1), imperforate anus (n = 6), spinal abnormality (n = 6), and anal with spinal abnormality (n = 4). Contrast enemas were evaluated for the presence of anatomic abnormalities and the degree of colonic dilatation. Colonic manometry was considered normal when high-amplitude propagating contractions (HAPC) occurred from proximal to distal colon. Clinical success was defined as normal defecation frequency with no or occasional fecal incontinence. RESULTS: Colonic manometry was done on 32 and contrast enema on 24 patients before cecostomy. At follow-up, 25 patients (78%) fulfilled the success criteria. Absence of HAPC throughout the colon was related to unsuccessful outcome (P = .03). Colonic response with normal HAPC after bisacodyl administration was predictive of success (P = .03). Presence of colonic dilatation was not associated with colonic dysmotility. CONCLUSION: Colonic manometry is helpful in predicting the outcome after cecostomy. Patients with generalized colonic dysmotility are less likely to benefit from use of antegrade enemas via cecostomy. Normal colonic response to bisacodyl predicts favorable outcome.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Percutaneous cecostomy: updates in technique and patient care.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the authors' 7-year experience with the percutaneous cecostomy procedure and the long-term outcome of the procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Since 1994, 163 tube cecostomies for fecal incontinence were performed in patients aged 2-23 years and who weighed 8-72 kg (mean, 32.2 kg). Underlying conditions included spina bifida (n = 106), imperforate anus (n = 53), Klippel-Feil deformity (n = 1), cerebral palsy (n = 1), Hirschsprung disease (n = 1), and paraplegia (n = 1). Ventriculoperitoneal shunts were present in 85 (52%) of the 163 patients. The authors have followed up 124 (76%) of the 163 cecostomy patients. Information regarding enema technique, satisfaction with the procedure, postprocedure problems, and long-term outcome of the procedure was obtained by interviewing either the patients or the parents. RESULTS: Tube placement was successful in all patients. One hundred ten (89%) of the 124 patients experienced a substantial decrease in the frequency of soiling accidents. The vast majority of patients expressed satisfaction with the procedure; 117 (94%) of the 124 patients rated the cecostomy procedure as better than the bowel control procedure used before. Late complications of the procedure included granulation tissue and accidentally dislodged tubes. Four patients elected to have their tubes removed for aesthetic and tube management reasons. There was no mortality related to the procedure, although one patient died of pneumonia 5 years later. CONCLUSION: The percutaneous cecostomy procedure is a safe and effective method for treating fecal incontinence.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1984

Tube cecostomy and staged resection for obstructing carcinoma of the left colon.

Over a 17-year period, all patients presenting with acute obstruction of the left colon due to carcinoma were treated by emergency tube cecostomy. There were 57 patients aged between 35 and 93 years. After the decompressive procedure, eight died, 34 had complications, and eight were left with permanent cecostomies. Forty-one underwent secondary procedures of which 35 had resections. Seven patients died postoperatively and 15 had complications. Of the 34 survivors, in 23 the cecostomy closed spontaneously, and 11 had operative cecostomy closure. Of the latter, four died postoperatively, and nine had complications. Thus, 30 survived the entire treatment program. Reasons for the high morbidity and mortality are discussed. Comparison is made with other forms of treatment in the literature. A treatment program is suggested, using tube cecostomy for poor-risk patients and primary resection without anastomosis for patients in better condition.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

The button cecostomy for management of fecal incontinence.

The antegrade continence enema (ACE), administered through a continent cutaneous appendicocecostomy, has been used to successfully achieve reliable evacuation and fecal continence in patients with myelomeningocele. However, as originally described, it is not suitable in patients without an appendix or those requiring urologic reconstruction with appendix. We report the use of a standard gastrostomy button in the cecum to create a continent cecostomy in five patients with fecal incontinence. Four underwent simultaneous urologic reconstruction, including two artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantations. At a mean of 28 months' follow-up, all five patients are continent of stool. One ACE button has been converted to an ileal Malone cecostomy at the patient's request. Complications included one appendiceal phlegmon requiring exploration and three superficial wound infections, one at a cecostomy site, responsive to antibiotics and local care. There were no AUS infections. The button cecostomy is an effective alternative to standard ACE procedures. It is particularly useful in those who require creation of an appendicovesicostomy for attainment of urinary continence.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Cecostomy in children with defecation disorders.

Administration of antegrade enemas through a cecostomy is a therapeutic option for children with severe defecation disorders. The purpose of this study is to report our 4-year experience with the cecostomy procedure in 31 children with functional constipation (n = 9), Hirschsprung's disease (n = 2), imperforate anus (n = 5), spinal abnormalities (n = 8), and imperforate anus in combination with tethered spinal cord (n = 7). Data regarding complications, antegrade enemas used, symptoms, and quality of life were retrospectively obtained. Placement of cecostomy tubes was successful in 30 of 31 patients. Soiling episodes decreased significantly in children with functional constipation (P = 0.01), imperforate anus (P < 0.01), and spinal abnormalities (P = 0.04). Quality of life improved in patients with functional constipation and imperforate anus. No difference in complications was found between percutaneous and surgical placement. Use of antegrade enemas via cecostomy improved symptoms and quality of life in children with a variety of defecation disorders.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Therapeutic cecostomy tubes in infants with imperforate anus and caudal agenesis.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Caudal agenesis is indicative of a poor prognosis for achieving normal bowel function in children with high imperforate anus (HIA). Complications with impaction, soiling, megarectosigmoid, and adverse responses to rectal enemas are inevitable and associated with long-term psychosocial dysfunction. In an attempt to avoid these outcomes, the authors began a prospective evaluation in these high-risk patients of skin level cecostomy tubes placed in infancy. METHODS: Between October 1997 and March 2001, 8 infants with variants of caudal agenesis underwent presumptive therapeutic placement of a cecostomy tube in conjunction with colostomy closure (n = 7) and anal transposition (n = 1). Mean age at time of cecostomy placement was 16 months. Efficacy of daily irrigations with individually modified electrolyte solutions has been evaluated over the subsequent 1 to 41 months with a mean follow-up of 22 months. RESULTS: Effective daily colonic evacuation was achieved in 7 infants. Transient episodes of incomplete emptying often associated with soiling were resolved with adjustments in solution contents and volume. No patient has required admission for impaction, and only 1 patient has required rectal enemas. There have been no major complications, and minor problems with cramping, granulation tissue, and site discomfort quickly resolved. One patient with anal anastamotic stricture consistently has not responded to antegrade irrigation and continues to require intermittent rectal enemas and anal dilation. Attempts to wean the irrigations occur as the infants grow older and are able to participate in toilet training; however, in this preschool population, tapering of the frequency has been tolerated only transiently. CONCLUSIONS: Antegrade enemas via a cecostomy device are highly effective for bowel management in infants with HIA and caudal agenesis. They can be placed with minimal morbidity at the time of initial reconstruction or colostomy closure. Consideration of this procedure in all infants with HIA may be indicated.

Anus, Imperforate↗
PubMed2001

Percutaneous colonoscopic cecostomy for management of chronic constipation in children.

BACKGROUND: Chronic constipation and encopresis are common problems in children with spina bifida and anorectal anomalies. Commonly used therapies include complicated bowel regimens and antegrade continence enemas delivered via surgically placed appendicostomies and radiologically placed cecostomies. METHODS: A technique is described for percutaneous placement of cecostomies for the delivery of continence enemas or venting. RESULTS: Percutaneous cecostomies were placed in 12 patients. Improvement in bowel management occurred in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous endoscopic cecostomy is a safe and effective method for the treatment of intractable constipation.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Controlled transperitoneal percutaneous cecostomy as a therapeutic alternative to the endoscopic decompression for Ogilvie's syndrome.

Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction, the so-called Ogilvie's syndrome, results in massive colonic dilation without mechanical obstruction. In most cases, a conservative treatment with or without endoscopic decompression is sufficient. In rare cases of relapses or failures, a cecostomy has to be performed. A surgical cecostomy is associated with high morbidity and mortality. However, a percutaneous cecostomy could be an interesting alternative treatment. We report the case of a 67-yr-old male with colonic pseudoobstruction for which both the conservative and the endoscopic treatments were unsuccessful. A percutaneous cecostomy was performed, and for the first time in this indication, a transperitoneal access was used with the help of nylon T-fasteners.

Aged↗
PubMed1991

[Is cecostomy still current for emergency relief of the colon?].

The policy of treatment in patients with acute obstruction of the left colon remains controversial. One-stage emergency colectomy and primary anastomosis is usually recommended. Is a multiple-stage approach with primary blowhole cecostomy still a valuable solution? This retrospective analysis of 117 patients with emergency cecostomies shows an overall perioperative mortality and morbidity which are favourable compared with those reported in series of similar cases treated by one-stage procedures. In all patients the colon obstruction was treated effectively by the cecostomy. Only two of the stoma-related complications required operative intervention. The second operation was performed after a mean interval of 12 days. The low perioperative mortality of 2.1% shows, that the time was successfully used to optimize the perioperative conditions. It is concluded that patients with a very poor risk may profit by preliminary decompression by blowhole cecostomy.

Aged↗