PubMed HealthSearch

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Ceftazidime/avibactam”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Rapid replacement of blaKPC variant in ST11 carbapenem-resistant and hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae contributed to ceftazidime/avibactam resistance during severe in vivo infection.

OBJECTIVES: Hypervirulent ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI)-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (Kp) has emerged; however, its dynamic within-host evolution and competitive features are uncharacterized. This study aimed to clarify the systematic microevolution characteristics of the rapid transformation of blaKPC variants during long-term infection. METHODS: Thirty-nine Kp strains were isolated from a single patient with severe recurrent osteomyelitis during a 2-year period. Whole-genome sequencing and in vitro evolution assay was performed. Microbiological characteristics were examined through antimicrobial susceptibility testing, plasmid stability, growth curve, in vitro competition and Galleria mellonella larvae lethality assays. RESULTS: Among all the clinical Kp isolates, 37 were carbapenem-resistant Kp (CRKP), including 25 CAZ-/AVI-resistant Kp. All isolates belonged to the ST11-K47. During in vivo evolution, the blaKPC variant and its amplification emerged. Twenty-four isolates (24/39, 61.5%) harboured a novel blaKPC variant, blaKPC-144. All five Kp isolates carried blaKPC-2 in 2021. Surprisingly, 24 blaKPC-144-harbouring isolates (70.6%, 24/34) and 10 blaKPC-2-harboring isolates were identified in 2023, indicating rapid changing of blaKPC. Kp4 carried two copies of blaKPC-2, and Kp10-1 exhibited a 1.94-fold increase in the blaKPC-144 copy number. Similarly, in vitro, the blaKPC copy number increased upon exposure to low CAZ/AVI concentrations. However, at higher concentrations (4/1 mg/L), the blaKPC copy number increased significantly, and blaKPC mutations emerged simultaneously. The competition assay indicated that the blaKPC-144-harboring isolates exhibited a superior competitive capacity. CONCLUSIONS: The blaKPC amplification and mutation emerged simultaneously or sequentially during in vivo and in vitro evolution. Kp isolates harbouring blaKPC-144, conferring resistance to CAZ/AVI, exhibited a competitive advantage, promoting the rapid replacement of blaKPC-2.

Klebsiella pneumoniae

Mechanisms of resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam in mutants derived in vitro from Klebsiella pneumoniae producing OXA-48-like enzymes.

OBJECTIVES: To generate in vitro ceftazidime-avibactam-resistant mutants derived from Klebsiella pneumoniae producing OXA-48 or OXA-48 derivatives OXA-131 and OXA-232 carbapenemases, to define their antimicrobial susceptibility phenotype and to analyse mutations potentially involved in resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam. METHODS: Mutants were obtained by plating overnight bacterial cultures on Mueller-Hinton agar plates containing increasing concentrations of ceftazidime-avibactam (0.5/4-32/4 mg/L). MICs were determined using Sensititre™ DKMNG panels. Whole-genome sequencing of 8 parental strains and 31 mutant derivatives was performed with Illumina. RESULTS: All parental strains were susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam (MIC ≤ 0.5/4-2/4 mg/L) and either susceptible or resistant to meropenem (MIC 0.5 to >16 mg/L) and imipenem (MIC ≤ 0.5 to >16 mg/L). MICs of ceftazidime-avibactam for the mutants increased up to 4 to >16 mg/L, while MICs of meropenem and imipenem for most mutants either increased up to >16 mg/L or remained unchanged. Whole-genome sequencing of the mutants identified alterations in genes coding for proteins related to AcrAB-TolC (AcrB, AcrR), PBPs (PBP2, PBP3), porins (OmpK36, EnvZ) or the stress or stringent responses (RseB, CpxA, SpoT). No mutations were detected in genes coding for OXA-48-like enzymes or other β-lactamases. CONCLUSIONS: Ceftazidime-avibactam can select in vitro mutants of OXA-48-like carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae resistant to this combination and, in some cases, also to carbapenems. No mutations related to ceftazidime-avibactam resistance were found in genes coding OXA-48-like enzymes, but they were detected in genes related to active efflux, PBPs, permeability or proteins of the stress and stringent responses.

Ceftazidime

Characterization of ertapenem-resistant Enterobacterales in Canadian hospitals: 17 years of the CANWARD study (2007-23).

OBJECTIVES: To review phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of ertapenem-resistant Enterobacterales isolates identified by the CANWARD study from 2007 to 2023. METHODS: Bacterial isolates were collected as part of the CANWARD surveillance study from 2007 to 2023. CLSI M7 broth microdilution antimicrobial susceptibility testing (12th edition, 2024) was performed. MICs were interpreted by CLSI M100 breakpoints (34th edition, 2024). WGS was performed to identify antimicrobial resistance markers. RESULTS: Only 134 (0.7%) of the 19 642 Enterobacterales were ertapenem-resistant. Carbapenemase producing Enterobacterales (CPE) accounted for 17.9% (n = 24) of ertapenem-resistant isolates and were predominantly Klebsiella pneumoniae (54.2%) and Escherichia coli (20.8%). KPC was the most common carbapenemase identified (62.5%). K. pneumoniae ST834, ST16 and ST258, and E. coli ST131 were the most frequent STs detected. CPE percent resistant values ranged from 20.8% to 25.0% for ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam. Most non-CPE ertapenem-resistant isolates were Enterobacter spp. (51.8%), E. coli (15.5%) and K. pneumoniae (10.9%). Non-CPE STs were most commonly E. cloacae ST108, ST50 and ST133, and E. coli ST131. Non-CPE percent resistant values ranged from 2.7% to 4.5% for ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam. At least one of an AmpC, an ESBL or porin alternations were observed in most non-CPE isolates. CONCLUSIONS: In Canada, ertapenem-resistant Enterobacterales remain uncommon (0.7%). CPE isolates demonstrated higher percent resistant values for multiple antimicrobial classes and harboured more antimicrobial resistance genes than non-CPE isolates. Continued monitoring for ertapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, particularly CPE, is important given their associated multidrug resistance to both established and newer agents.

Ertapenem

"One Health"-based epidemiological investigation reveals the emergence of carbapenem-resistant Morganella spp. across diverse ecological niches.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the prevalence, genomic relatedness, and resistance characteristics of carbapenemase-gene-positive Morganella spp. (CRM) across human, animal, fly, and aquatic sources. METHODS: A total of 163 Morganella isolates were collected from humans (n=124), animals (n=5), flies (n=21), aquatic environment (n=13) across 13 provinces or municipalities during 2018-2024. A subset of 71 representative isolates was subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), whole-genome sequencing and conjugation experiments. RESULTS: Among 163 isolates, 18 were carbapenemase-gene-positive: 15 carried blaNDM-1 alone, two carried blaKPC-2 alone, and one carried both genes. They were recovered from humans, flies, and hospital sewage. Five isolates carried blaPER-4; four carbapenemase-negative carriers were resistant to both ceftazidime/avibactam and aztreonam/avibactam. The aac(3)-IV gene was associated with high apramycin MICs and was most frequent in animal- and fly-derived isolates. Phylogenetic analysis showed diverse lineages, with limited low-SNP links between human and urban-river isolates. blaNDM-1 was transferred successfully from 11 of 16 donor isolates. CONCLUSION: CRM occur across multiple One Health niches. The findings highlight environmental and non-human reservoirs as potential contributors to their dissemination and identify blaPER-4 and aac(3)-IV as resistance-associated genes requiring further study.

Animal

Antimicrobial resistance among agents of hospital-acquired lower respiratory tract infection in the UK and Ireland: trends from 2008/2009 to 2018/2019.

OBJECTIVES: To survey trends in antimicrobial resistance among the pathogens of hospital-acquired lower respiratory tract infection (HA-LRTI), which causes significant mortality and morbidity, particularly among ventilated patients. METHODS: The BSAC Surveillance collected quotas of major HA-LRTI pathogens from sentinel sites from 2008/09 (October to September) to 2018/19. MIC testing was by BSAC agar dilution. Resistance mechanisms were inferred from synergy tests, interpretive reading and PCR. RESULTS: Target numbers of Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacterales-dominated by Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp.-were reliably collected. Acinetobacter spp. collections were small, reflecting low incidence. Resistance rates fell or fluctuated, with no major rises. Notable declines included: (i) a fall in the proportion of MRSA among S. aureus from c. 40% to 10%; (ii) a halving, since 2012/13, in 'triple-resistance' to carbapenems, aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones among Acinetobacter baumannii sensu stricto, from c. 24% to 9%; (iii) reductions in AmpC-associated cephalosporin resistance among Enterobacter cloacae and Serratia isolates, and (iv) falls in fluoroquinolone resistance among Enterobacterales, except Klebsiella pneumoniae. Resistance rates in P. aeruginosa remained low, though higher than in bacteraemia. Cephalosporin resistance in E. coli and K. pneumoniae was largely ESBL associated and, unlike AmpC-associated resistance in Enterobacter and Serratia spp., did not decline notably. Except for OXA-23 in A. baumannii, carbapenemases remained extremely rare. Antistaphylococcal oxazolidinones, tigecycline, ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam and ceftobiprole retained uneroded activity. CONCLUSIONS: From 2008/09 to 2018/19, there were no major rises in resistance among the principal agents of HA-LRTI; for several important organisms/resistance combinations there were notable declines.

Humans

Single unscreened carrier triggered ICU outbreak of a KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae which acquired in vivo resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam, and cefiderocol.

BACKGROUND: Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales are a major cause of healthcare-associated outbreaks in intensive care units (ICUs), where unrecognized carriers can drive silent transmission. We report an ICU outbreak caused by KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and the within-host emergence of resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam and cefiderocol in the index case. METHODS: Four ICU patients with five K. pneumoniae isolates identified between July and August 2023 were investigated. Phenotypic, genomic and functional analyses were performed to determine the clonal relatedness of the isolates and elucidate the mechanisms underlying resistance evolution. RESULTS: All isolates belonged to ST512, confirming dissemination of a single high-risk clone. The first isolate recovered from the index patient was susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam and cefiderocol, but a later isolate obtained during ceftazidime-avibactam therapy acquired resistance to both agents. Genomic analysis revealed a novel KPC variant (KPC-270) carrying a 19-amino-acid duplication. When expressed in Escherichia coli, KPC-270 conferred ceftazidime-avibactam resistance, but it did not fully reproduce the meropenem or cefiderocol phenotype. Efflux inhibition substantially reduced meropenem and cefiderocol MICs in the resistant isolate, and avibactam partially restored cefiderocol activity, supporting multifactorial mechanism. CONCLUSION: This outbreak illustrates how unrecognized multidrug-resistant carriage in the index patient facilitated the nosocomial dissemination of a high-risk ST512 K. pneumoniae clone, followed by rapid resistance evolution during ceftazidime-avibactam therapy. Resistance was multifactorial, involving the novel KPC-270 variant and efflux activity contributing to ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem and cefiderocol resistance.

Cefiderocol