PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Centric Relation”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2000

Mandibular centricity: centric relation.

Centric relation can be a confusing term because it continues to evolve in meaning. This article presents a discussion of the historical aspects of centric relation. Guidelines to decide when to use centric relation in clinical dentistry are included.

Centric Relation↗
PubMed1977

Comparison of Myo-Monitor centric position to centric relation and centric occlusion.

Twenty dentulous subjects were selected at random. A Hight tracer, fixed on the labial surface of the teeth by special clutches, was used to indicate a record of centric relation and centric occlusion. The Myo-Monitor centric position was recorded and compared to centric occlusion and centric relation in anteroposterior and lateral dimensions. This study indicated that: 1. Myo-Monitor centric position is always anterior to centric relation, with an average of 3.8 min. 2. Myo-Monitor centric position is always anterior to centric occlusion, with an average of 1.8 mm. 3. In 18 of 20 subjects, the Myo-Monitor registration was to the right or to the left side of the line between centric relation and centric occlusion. 4. In all subjects, centric occlusion was an average of 2.2 mm. anterior to centric relation.

Adult↗
PubMed1980

Radiographic study of condylar position in centric relation and centric occlusion.

The present study was conducted to compare the spatial relationship of the condyles to their fossae in the centric occlusion and centric relation positions. Right and left TMJ radiographs were obtained on 40 young adults in the two positions. Direct measurments of the anterior, posterior, and superior spaces between the condyles and their fossae were made on the radiographs. Results were statistically analyzed; the following findings and conclusions were derived: (1) In the centric relation position, both condyles were placed more posteriorly and superiorly in their fossae than in the centric occlusion position. (2) In the centric occlusion position, both condyles were symmetrically placed in their fossae with equal spatial distances anteriorly and posteriorly. (3) Greater spatial differences existed between the centric occlusion and centric relation positions on the left side, which was the orbiting (balancing)side in most subjects. (4) Further studies are needed to develop a more physiologic approach for correctly relating the mandible to the maxillae when reconstructing the occlusion in both dentulous and edentulous patients.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

A three-dimensional comparison of condylar position changes between centric relation and centric occlusion using the mandibular position indicator.

The mandibular position indicator (MPI) was used to compare condylar position between centric relation (CR) and centric occlusion (CO) for 107 patients before orthodontic treatment. The MPI data were examined to determine frequency, direction, and magnitude of CO-CR difference; and data were analyzed for possible correlation to the patient's Angle classification, ANB angular measurement, age, or gender. Only one patient (0.9%) had no measurable CO-CR difference in all three spatial planes. Six subjects (5.6%) showed a shift in condylar position in the transverse plane without a measurable difference in the sagittal plane. Twenty patients (18.7%) experienced a superoinferior (SI) or anteroposterior (AP) condylar displacement of at least 2.0 mm on one or both sides; 17 (15.9%) displayed a transverse shift at the level of the condyles of 0.5 mm or greater. No statistical difference was found between the 31 patients with Class I malocclusions and 72 patients with Class II malocclusions when comparing the amount or direction of CO-CR change. The amount of CO-CR difference was nearly identical for right and left sides with the amount of SI displacement (x = 0.84 mm) consistently greater than AP displacement (x = 0.61 mm). Only weak correlations were found between movements of right and left condyles. The average transverse CO-CR difference was 0.27 mm. Patient age, ANB angle, gender, or Angle classification cannot be used to predict frequency, magnitude, or direction of CO-CR changes at the level of the condyles.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

The difference in condylar position between centric relation and centric occlusion in pretreatment Japanese orthodontic patients.

This study investigates the differences in condylar position between centric relation (CR) and centric occlusion (CO) in Japanese orthodontic patients before treatment. We employed 150 consecutive cases (age range: 6-57 years) for the study. Dental casts were mounted on a Panadent articulator with a power centric CR bite record. The differences in condylar position between CR and CO in all three spatial planes were measured using the Panadent Condyle Position Indicator (CPI). The subjects were divided into groups by age, gender, mandibular plane angle or angle classification. No significant differences in the magnitude of CPI measurements were found among the groups. The three-dimensional distances of condylar displacement on both sides were almost identical, and the superoinferior displacement (S-I) was greater (P < .0001) than the anteroposterior displacement (A-P). The S-I was greater (P = .02) on the left side than on the right side, while the A-P displacement was smaller (P < .0001) on the left side than that on the right side. Significant condylar displacement (2.0 mm for S-I and A-P, 0.5 mm for the lateral displacement, L) was found frequently in L (31.3%), S-I, and A-P, in that order. Fifty-eight (38.7%) of the subjects had significant displacement in L, S-I, or A-P. Moreover, Angle Class III subjects tended to have significant condylar displacement toward the left side. The results suggest that orthodontists should be aware of a high incidence of condylar displacement in Japanese orthodontic patients and measure condylar displacement before the start of comprehensive orthodontic treatment to unmask real jaw relationships and avoid possible misdiagnoses.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1981

Effect of different centric relation registrations on the pantographic representation of centric relation.

A study was designed to determine the effect of three different centric relation recording methods on the pantographic representation of centric relation. A modified pantograph was used as the measuring instrument. Variances for each method were established on one subject, and variance of location of centric relation was established on two different subjects. Mean differences between recording methods and centric relation were established on three subjects. Wax was found to be the least reliable material tested and the least accurate for recording centric relation.

Acrylic Resins↗