PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1999

An easy and effective method of cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: laparoscopic cholecystocholangiography.

BACKGROUND: There is ample evidence that the incidence of operative cholangiography has declined since the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. It has been suggested that one of the reasons for this decline is the technical difficulty of cystic duct catheterization. A method of cholangiography which does not require such catheterization has been developed by others. This paper examines the ease and effectiveness of operative cholangiography performed by direct puncture of the gall-bladder. METHODS: A retrospective study was made of the records of 380 consecutive patients who underwent attempted laparoscopic cholecystectomy. After exclusion of patients in whom laparoscopic cholecystectomy was abandoned in favour of open cholecystectomy and those patients in whom operative cholangiography was not attempted, the records of 325 patients were available to the study. The operation notes of each patient were studied to determine whether, in the operator's opinion, a successful cholangiogram had been obtained. RESULTS: There were 290 patients in whom cholangiography was attempted using direct gall-bladder puncture (cholecystocholangiography (CCC)). There were 35 patients in whom cholangiography was attempted via cystic duct cannulation (CDC). Cholecystocholangiography was successful in 86% of those cases in which it was attempted. Cystic duct cannulation was successful in 83% of those cases in which it was attempted. CONCLUSION: Cholecystocholangiography is a valid alternative to cystic duct catheterization in its ability to achieve intra-operative cholangiography in the setting of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Evaluation of the biliary tree during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: laparoscopic ultrasound versus intraoperative cholangiography: a prospective study of 150 cases.

From November 1994 to March 1996, 150 patients treated by laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included in a prospective study, to compare intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) and laparoscopic ultrasonography (LU). The biliary tree was successively explored by these two methods in the routine detection of common bile duct stones. The feasibility of LU was 100%. Cholangiography was performed only in 125 cases (83%). The time taken for LU was significantly shorter (11.6 vs. 17.6 minutes, p = 0.0001). In this study, common bile duct stones were found in 14 cases (9%). For their detection, results were comparable to LU and IOC. For LU, sensitivity was 80% and specificity 99%; and for IOC, 78 and 97%, respectively. Both examinations combined had a 100% sensitivity and specificity. Laparoscopic ultrasonography failed to recognize the intrapancreatic part of the common bile duct in 25 cases (17%) and did not show anatomic abnormalities detected by IOC. It did, however, detect other unsuspected intraabdominal abnormalities. Although LU is safe, repeatable, and noninvasive, a considerable learning curve is necessary to optimize its efficacy. Comparison of relative cost must be undertaken.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

[Peroperative investigation of the common bile duct during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Laparoscopic ultrasonography versus cholangiography. A prospective study of 150 cases].

From November 1994 to March 1996, 150 patients treated by laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included in a prospective study, in order to compare intraoperative cholangiography and laparoscopic ultrasound. The biliary tree was successively explored by the two methods in the systematic detection of common bile duct stones. The feasibility of laparoscopic ultrasound was 100 per cent. Cholangiography was performed in only 125 cases (83 per cent). The duration of the laparoscopic ultrasound exam was significantly shorter (11.6 vs 17.6 minutes, p = 0.0001). In this study, common bile duct stones were found in 14 cases (9 per cent). The detection rates with laparoscopic ultrasound and intraoperative cholangiography were similar. For laparoscopic ultrasound, sensitivity was 80 per cent and specificity was 99 per cent, versus 78 per cent and 97 per cent for cholangiography, respectively. The combination of the 2 examinations had a 100 per cent sensitivity and specificity. Laparoscopic ultrasound failed to recognize the intrapancreatic part of the bile duct (25 cases: 17 per cent), did not show anatomical abnormalities detected by cholangiography, but detected unsuspected digestive lesions. Laparoscopic ultrasound is safe repeatable, and non invasive, but a learning curve is necessary to increase this efficacy. Comparison of cost must be evaluated.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

[The comparison of conventional open cholecystectomy, laparoscopic cholecystectomy and minor-incision cholecystectomy].

To study the clinical value of minor incision for cholecystectomy, compared conventional open cholecystectomy (300 patients, group A), alparoscopic cholecytectomy (300 patients, group B), and minor-incision cholecystectomy (300 patients, group C) with regard to duration (day) of operation, amount of intraoperative bleeding, complications, time (day) of gastrointestinal function recovery, intravenous infusion, and expense and time (day) of hospitalization. The results showed that the operating time, amount of bleeding, duration of intravenous infusion, time of gastrointestinal function recovery and hospitalization in group A were significantly different from those in group B and C (P < 0.05), but the incidence in group A was lower than that in group B. The operating time, amount of intraoperative bleeding, and the time of gastrointestinal function recovery and intravenous infusion in group B were similar to those in group C, but there was a high rate of intraoperative and postoperative complication in group B (1.66%). There was no complication in group C (P < 0.05). Comparison of the effects among group A, B and C showed that it was superior in group C to those in group A and B.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

A new technique for laparoscopic cholecystectomy--retrograde laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an analysis of 81 cases.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: A new technique of laparoscopic cholecystectomy is presented here. This new method, retrograde laparoscopic cholecystectomy (RLC) from fundus to cystic duct downward, may have advantages when exposure of the cystic duct and the common duct are difficult and therefore hazardous. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We carried out laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 173 patients; RLC was performed in 81, The operative procedure is as follows: first, the cystic duct and artery are exposed at the junction of the ampulla. The cystic duct is clipped, and the artery is divided. Removal of the gallbladder is then started from the fundus to cystic duct downward. After the gallbladder has been dissected from the liver bed, the cystic duct is double-clipped and divided. This approach provides better visualization of the gallbladder, cystic duct, and common duct, with less chance of common duct injury, due to clear identification of the ductal system, without the need for intraoperative cholangiography. RESULTS: Eighty-one RLCs were performed without severe complications, either immediate or late. The mean operating time was 23 minutes shorter in RLC than in the usual laparoscopic cholecystectomy, because intraoperative cholangiography was used much less often. CONCLUSION: RLC appears to be a safe procedure, and does not affect the conventional method.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Contraindications and complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a commonly performed procedure for the removal of symptomatic gallstones. Compared with open cholecystectomy, laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with less postoperative pain, earlier discharge from the hospital and a more rapid recovery. However, there are specific contraindications to the procedure, including empyema of the gallbladder, gangrenous cholecystitis, coagulopathy, portal hypertension and peritonitis. Complications from laparoscopic cholecystectomy include common duct injury, bleeding, bile leakage and wound infection. An understanding of these issues allows the family physician to more appropriately select patients for laparoscopic removal of the gallbladder.

Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic↗
PubMed2000

Mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: We set out to assess the safety and efficacy of mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy (MLC) in uncomplicated situations. METHODS: MLC was performed on 30 consecutive selected patients (< 60 years old, ASA I-II, uncomplicated cholecystectomy) with one 12-mm and three 3-mm ports. The total operating time, conversion rate, degree of postoperative pain, duration of postoperative hospital stay, complications, and cosmetic results were all reviewed and compared with 30 cases of consecutive conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). RESULTS: None of the patients in either group required conversion to open cholecystectomy. No complications were observed. The operating time and duration of hospital stay were similar in both groups. The level of postoperative pain was lower in the MLC group (p < 0.001). More patients in the MLC group expressed satisfaction with the cosmetic result (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: MLC was shown to be feasible in uncomplicated situations. Furthermore, it was associated with less pain and produced better cosmetic results than conventional LC. Randomized studies are still needed to confirm these findings.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus elective open cholecystectomy.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has essentially replaced open cholecystectomy as the procedure of choice for gallbladder disease. This rapid shift to laparoscopic cholecystectomy, however, has resulted more from marketing forces than from prospective clinical trials. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the first 486 laparoscopic cholecystectomies at two institutions were studied. These results were then compared to the results of the last 6 months of elective open cholecystectomy cases prior to the introduction of laparoscopic surgery. The age, sex, height, and weight were similar in both groups. The mean operative time was 78.8 +/- 1.8 min for laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 62.7 +/- 2.6 min for open cholecystectomy (p < 0.01). The mean time for tolerating a regular diet was 1.23 +/- 0.04 days in the laparoscopic group versus 2.44 +/- 0.07 days in the open group (p < 0.01). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients required only oral pain medications by a mean of 1.22 +/- 0.03 days postoperatively compared to 2.55 +/- 0.07 days postoperatively for those undergoing open cholecystectomy (p < 0.01). The mean length of hospitalization was 1.58 +/- 0.07 days for laparoscopic patients and 3.55 +/- 0.11 days for open patients (p < 0.01). Thirty-one patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were converted to open cholecystectomy (6.4%). The most common reasons for conversion to open cholecystectomy were acute inflammation, adhesions, and bleeding. For the laparoscopic patients, the morbidity rate was 8.4% and the mortality rate 0.2% (1 death). In the open cholecystectomy group the morbidity rate was 8.0% and there were no deaths. The most troublesome complication in laparoscopic cholecystectomies continues to be bile leaks and bile duct injuries.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Anesthesia, General↗
PubMed1994

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography following laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the preferred method of treatment for symptomatic choledocholithiasis. Since its introduction there has been an increase in postoperative diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The aim of this study was to assess the indications and results of ERCP following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Sixty-one patients had an ERCP following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Two broad groups were identified: Group 1 (35 patients) had filling defects (consistent with stones) noted on operative cholangiography, which were not successfully flushed or extracted at the time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Group 2 consisted of patients who developed problems following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Nine patients had post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy pain with abnormal liver function tests (LFT), four of whom had common bile duct (CBD) injuries and three had CBD stones. Eleven patients had post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy pain with a normal diameter common bile duct on ultrasound and normal LFT; only one had a CBD stone. Five patients with a persisting bile leak following laparoscopic cholecystectomy had an ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy. In three the leak ceased, while two required subsequent open surgery to drain bile collections and ligate the cystic duct. One patient presented with an episode of transient jaundice but had a normal ERCP. There were six post-ERCP complications; three patients had mild pancreatitis, two had a minor haemorrhage and one an asymptomatic duodenal perforation. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy was most valuable for the management of retained stones and the diagnosis and management of post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy pain in association with abnormal LFT. The diagnostic yield was low (9%) when the LFT were normal.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy with lasers or cautery is a feasible, effective, and worthwhile operative procedure that is subject to morbidity and mortality. There is unequivocal evidence that the complication incidence is directly related to the training and experience of the surgeon, applicability of basic principles of gallbladder and common duct surgery, and preventive measures toward iatrogenic injuries in gallbladder surgery. Continued and sustained investigation in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, technological developments in equipment, and the continued education of the surgeon in the applicability and use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, intraoperative cholangiography, and choledocholithotomy are essential. At the St Francis Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 1009 laparoscopic cholecystectomies with lasers or cautery were performed between March 1989 and October 1991. There were 32 (3%) abandoned laparoscopic cholecystectomies with alternative open cholecystectomy. There were six extrahepatic ductal injuries and a complication incidence of 10.9%. The mortality rate was 0.38%. The average length of stay was 2 days. In comparison with standard cholecystectomy, laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a competitive and superior procedure in selected circumstances.

Bile Ducts↗
PubMed1993

[The indications and results of laparoscopic cholecystectomy].

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was successfully achieved in 93% of the patients, who required removal of the gallbladder, in our institution. Other reports have also shown that more than 90% of patients who required cholecystectomy, were candidates for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Serious complications occurred in 2.1% of our series and in 2-4% of the literature. The complications included bile duct injury (around 0.5%) and visceral injury (0.2-0.4%). The incidence of complications resulting from technical failure seems to be higher in laparoscopic cholecystectomy than in conventional cholecystectomy but is acceptable for initial experience. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy will become the standard therapy of gallstone for its effectiveness and less invasiveness.

Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic↗
PubMed1994

Diagnosis and management of bile leaks following laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is now the standard of care for the elective management of gallstone disease. Recent studies have shown the morbidity of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to be similar to that of open cholecystectomy. Postoperative bile leaks have been recognized to be a troublesome problem following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. We present a retrospective review of 854 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy at a single institution. Records were reviewed of all patients identified as having postoperative bile leaks. Between January 1990 and April 1991, we have cared for, or been referred, 15 patients with postlaparoscopic cholecystectomy bile leaks (9/854, 1.1% index patients and 6 referred). The location of bile leakage was determined to be the common bile duct (CBD) in two, cystic duct in five, and small accessory ducts located close to the gallbladder bed in the remaining eight. Most patients presented in the first week following laparoscopic cholecystectomy (mean 4.3 +/- 0.7 days, range 2-10) with worsening abdominal pain (13/13, 100%), nausea, and low-grade fever (mean 99.6 +/- 0.3 degrees F, range 96.8-102.2). Eleven of fifteen (66.7%) patients underwent technectium-99m imidodiacetic acid scanning (Tc-99m IDA) to determine the presence of a possible bile leak. All eleven scans were positive, indicating the presence of a bile leak. Thirteen patients underwent endoscopic cholangiography confirming the presence of biliary leakage (the remaining two patients underwent prompt laparotomy). Five patients were taken to the operating room for management of their leaks (two with common bile duct injuries, two cystic duct leaks, one accessory duct leak).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Feasibility of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: an evaluation of 35 robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomies.

Laparoscopic surgery offers patients distinct benefits but is not without its disadvantages to surgeons in terms of maneuverability and visualization. Robotic telemanipulation systems were introduced with the objective of providing a solution to the problems in this field of surgery. The feasibility of robot-assisted surgery was assessed by performing 35 laparoscopic cholecystectomies with the da Vinci robotic system. Time necessary for system setup and operation was recorded, as were complications, technical problems, postoperative hospital stay, morbidity, and mortality. Thirty-four of 35 cholecystectomy procedures were completed laparoscopically with the da Vinci system. Technical problems occurred in three cases, resulting in one intraoperative complication (a minilaparotomy caused by the loss of an instrument part). Median hospitalization was 2 days. There were no postoperative deaths or morbidity within 30 days after surgery. System setup time decreased as the experience of the operating team increased. Operating times were comparable with those reported for standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Robot-assisted surgery was repeatedly proven as a safe and feasible approach to laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Diagnosis and management of biliary complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become the operation of choice for symptomatic cholelithiasis. However, this operation may result in serious biliary complications. Our aims were to review our experience with biliary complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and to document the mechanisms of the injuries and the techniques of managing these complications. We treated 20 patients with biliary complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Symptomatic collections of bile (bilomas) were present in five patients. One of these patients underwent operative ligation of an accessory bile duct in the gallbladder bed, whereas the others had percutaneous or endoscopic therapy. In the remaining 15 patients (of whom 13 were referred from other hospitals), injuries to the major bile ducts were managed by combined radiologic, endoscopic, and operative therapies. In 10 of these patients (67%), the mechanism of injury was the misidentification of the common bile duct as the cystic duct. In 3 of 15 patients, a noncircumferential injury to the lateral aspect of the common bile duct occurred. The Bismuth levels of the remaining bile duct injuries were type I in 3, type II in 4, type III in 3, and type IV in 2. Early outcome of therapy for these bile duct injuries has been favorable. One patient was lost to follow-up, and 2 died of nonbiliary causes, whereas 12 patients are alive and well with normal serum liver enzyme levels at 4 to 19 months postoperatively (mean: 14 months). The most common cause of major bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy is mistaking the common bile duct for the cystic duct. Most bilomas can be managed successfully with noninvasive methods. Coordinated efforts by radiologists, endoscopists, and surgeons are necessary to optimize the management of patients with major bile duct injury, suggesting that patients with biliary complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy should be referred to specialty centers for optimal care.

Abdominal Pain↗