SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Cilazapril”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1992

Does the new angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor cilazapril prevent restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty? Results of the MERCATOR study: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Multicenter European Research Trial with Cilazapril after Angioplasty to Prevent Transluminal Coronary Obstruction and Restenosis (MERCATOR) Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Cilazapril is a novel angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor with antiproliferative effects in the rat model after balloon injury. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial to assess the effect of cilazapril in angiographic restenosis prevention after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Patients received cilazapril 2.5 mg in the evening after successful PTCA and 5 mg b.i.d. for 6 months or matched placebo. In addition, all patients received aspirin for 6 months. Coronary angiograms before PTCA, after PTCA, and at 6-month follow-up were quantitatively analyzed. In 94% of 735 recruited patients, PTCA was successful and all inclusion and exclusion criteria were met. For the per-protocol analysis, quantitative angiography after PTCA and at follow-up was available in 595 patients who complied with the treatment regimen (309 control, 286 cilazapril). The mean difference in minimal coronary lumen diameter between post-PTCA and follow-up angiogram (primary end point) was -0.29 +/- 0.49 mm in the control group and -0.27 +/- 0.51 mm in the cilazapril group. Clinical events during 6-month follow-up, analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis, were ranked according to the most serious clinical event ranging from death (control, two; cilazapril, three), nonfatal myocardial infarction (control, eight; cilazapril, 5), coronary revascularization (control, 51; cilazapril, 53), or recurrent angina requiring medical therapy (control, 67; cilazapril, 68) to none of the above (control, 224; cilazapril, 212). There were no significant differences in ranking. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition with cilazapril in a dose of 5 mg b.i.d. does not prevent restenosis and does not favorably influence the overall clinical outcome after PTCA.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗

PubMed1993

A comparison of the efficacy of cilazapril versus cilazapril plus hydrochlorothiazide in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. Inhibace General Practice Study Group.

The efficacy of cilazapril monotherapy and in combination with hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg was compared in a multicentre, double blind, randomised parallel group study in 87 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension over 8 weeks. After a 2 week single blind placebo run-in period, patients received either 2.5 mg cilazapril or 2.5 mg cilazapril plus 12.5 mg hydrochlorothiazide once daily. At Week 4 the cilazapril dose was increased from 2.5 mg to 5.0 mg if the mean sitting diastolic blood pressure was greater than 90 mmHg or had not decreased by more than 10 mmHg. After 8 weeks treatment 72% of patients responded to 2.5 mg cilazapril increasing to 88% with cilazapril 5.0 mg. For cilazapril plus hydrochlorothiazide, 83% responded to 2.5 mg cilazapril increasing to 96% on 5.0 mg cilazapril. The high response rate to low dose cilazapril monotherapy and hydrochlorothiazide combination therapy has important implications for minimising the cost of therapy with ACE inhibitors.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1991

Clinical pharmacodynamic studies with cilazapril and a combination of cilazapril and propranolol.

We evaluated the degree of inhibition of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE), principally by cilazapril, by assessing the blood pressure response to a continuous infusion of increasing doses of angiotensin I, and assessed the possible pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between cilazapril and propranolol in healthy volunteers and patients with mild to severe essential hypertension. The specificity of the angiotensin I infusion method was verified when a single dose of cilazapril 30mg antagonised the increase in diastolic blood pressure induced by angiotensin I but did not influence the response to angiotensin II. Using this method, we showed that single oral doses of cilazapril 4 mg, captopril 25 mg and enalapril 10mg shifted the angiotensin I dose-effect curve to the right and determined a pharmacological half-life of about 4 hours for cilazapril. Increasing single oral doses (1.25, 3.75, 10 and 30mg) of cilazapril reduced diastolic blood pressure dose-dependently and shifted the angiotensin I dose-response curves to the right. The dose representing 50% inhibition of ACE activity (apparent Ki-dose) was about 0.6mg, 3 hours after cilazapril administration. Cilazapril and propranolol did not exhibit any clinically significant pharmacokinetic interaction in healthy volunteers; each drug reduced diastolic and systolic blood pressure by about 7 mm Hg, and this was doubled by the combination. Cilazapril had no significant effect on heart rate, in patients with essential hypertension whereas both propranolol and the combination of cilazapril and propranolol reduced it. Monotherapy with each drug reduced blood pressure, and combined administration enhanced the antihypertensive effect.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adolescent↗

PubMed1998

Quality of life in chronic heart failure: cilazapril and captopril versus placebo. Cilazapril-Captopril Multicentre Group.

OBJECTIVE: To measure quality of life (QOL) in patients with mild to moderate heart failure treated with angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors cilazapril or captopril. DESIGN: Randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, parallel groups trial. SUBJECTS: 367 patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) heart failure class II (62%), III (36%) or IV (1%). METHODS: Patients were randomised to receive cilazapril 1 mg daily (n = 191) or captopril 25 mg three times daily (n = 90) for 24 weeks, or placebo for 12 weeks followed by cilazapril 1 mg daily for a further 12 weeks (n = 86). If patients had not responded after four weeks cilazapril was increased to 2.5 mg daily and captopril to 50 mg three times daily. QOL was assessed at baseline, 12, and 24 weeks using the sickness impact profile (SIP), the profile of mood states (POMS), the Mahler index of dyspnoea-fatigue, and a health status index (HSI). RESULTS: The physical dimension of the SIP averaged 7 units at baseline and improved after 12 weeks by 2.24 units in the cilazapril group, 2.38 units in the captopril group, and 1.51 units in the placebo group. The difference between drug and placebo was therefore 0.73 units (95% CI -0.86 to 2.32) for cilazapril, and 0.87 units (95% CI -0.96 to 2.70) for captopril, with small non-significant effect sizes (a statistical method for estimating the importance of a treatment related change) of 0.12 and 0.14. Similar results were observed for the total POMS and HSI scores. Although QOL improved more on the ACE inhibitors than on placebo, the effect sizes were not significant (< or = 0.26). CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in QOL in mild to moderate heart failure were small when treated with cilazapril or captopril compared with placebo.

Adult↗

PubMed1995

Effect of high dose angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on restenosis: final results of the MARCATOR Study, a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of cilazapril. The Multicenter American Research Trial With Cilazapril After Angioplasty to Prevent Transluminal Coronary Obstruction and Restenosis (MARCATOR) Study Group.

OBJECTIVES: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to assess the effect of low and high dose angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition with cilazapril on angiographic restenosis prevention after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. BACKGROUND: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors possess antiproliferative effects in animal models of vascular injury. However, a recent clinical trial using low dose cilazapril, a long-acting angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, failed to prevent restenosis. METHODS: Patients received either cilazapril (1 or 2.5 mg in the evening after successful coronary angioplasty, then 1, 5 or 10 mg twice daily for 6 months) or matched placebo. All patients received aspirin for 6 months. Coronary angiograms before and after angioplasty and at 6-month follow-up were quantitatively analyzed. In addition, the clinical, procedural and angiographic factors associated with restenosis were determined with the use of stepwise logistic analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1,436 patients with a successful coronary angioplasty were recruited. As assessed by an intention-to-treat analysis, the mean difference in minimal coronary lumen diameter (mean +/- 1 SD) between the postangioplasty and follow-up angiogram at 6 months (primary end point) was -0.35 +/- 0.51 for the placebo group and -0.37 +/- 0.52, -0.45 +/- 0.52 and -0.412 +/- 0.53, respectively, for the 1-, 5- and 10-mg twice daily cilazapril groups (p = NS). Clinical events during follow-up did not differ among the four study groups. Multivariate analysis revealed only six variables as independent predictors of the loss of minimal lumen diameter: duration of angina < 6 months, history of myocardial infarction, minimal lumen diameter before and after angioplasty as well as a proximal lesion location and reference diameters. Traditional risk factors for atherosclerosis did not relate to restenosis. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition with cilazapril in high as well as low dosages does not prevent restenosis and does not favorably influence the overall clinical and angiographic outcome after coronary angioplasty. Few factors are predictive of restenosis.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗

PubMed1995

Cilazapril with adjunctive hydrochlorothiazide. Analysis of safety and efficacy in hypertensive patients not responding to cilazapril alone.

Experience is presented from clinical trials conducted during the development of cilazapril (CLZ) for the treatment of hypertension, in which hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) was added to the treatment regimen in patients whose blood pressures did not normalize [sitting diastolic blood pressure (SDBP) < or = 90 mm Hg] in response to CLZ alone. In 906 mild-to-moderate hypertensives (SDBP = 95-114 mm Hg), adjunct therapy with 12.5-25 mg HCTZ added to 5 mg CLZ provided an additional 3-9 mm Hg reduction in SDBP and increased the normalization rate by 13-27%. Additional efficacy of the combination occurred without any compromise in safety (assessed in 1,189 mild-to-moderate and 99 severe hypertensives and in 9 normal healthy volunteers). Long-term treatment with CLZ and adjunctive HCTZ was well tolerated. The majority of clinical and laboratory adverse events were mild to moderate and not serious; only 5.7% of the mild-to-moderate hypertensives and 3.3% of the severe hypertensives withdrew from the studies due to adverse events and/or intercurrent illness. Therefore, given that the addition of HCTZ to CLZ appears to improve efficacy with no additional safety risk, combining CLZ with HCTZ appears to be a rational clinical choice for patients whose blood pressures do not normalize on CLZ monotherapy.

Blood Pressure↗

PubMed1995

Comparison of the effects of cilazapril and captopril versus placebo on exercise testing in chronic heart failure patients: a double-blind, randomized, multicenter trial. The Cilazapril-Captopril Multicenter Group.

In order to compare directly the efficacy of two different angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in terms of clinical status and exercise capacity, 443 patients with chronic heart failure (New York Heart Association classes II-IV) were randomized into a 24-week double-blind study to receive cilazapril (CLZ) 1-2.5 mg once daily (n = 221), captopril (CPT) 25-50 mg three times daily (n = 108), or placebo (PLA) for 12 weeks followed by CLZ 2.5 mg (n = 114) in addition to their standard heart failure therapy. The majority were New York Heart Association functional class II (56-62%), and the most frequent etiology of chronic heart failure was coronary heart disease (35-42%), followed by dilative cardiomyopathy (approximately 28%). Both ACE inhibitors prolonged the exercise tolerance test duration at all visits, and the effect at week 12 (CLZ 62.2 +/- 7.5 s; CPT 73.1 +/- 10.7 s) was significantly greater than after PLA (28.1 +/- 12.2 s; p = 0.011 and p = 0.005, respectively). Furthermore, the distance walked during 6 min increased at all visits with ACE inhibitors (NS vs. PLA). CLZ was more effective in patients with the most impaired physical ability at baseline as defined by exercise tolerance test duration < or = 6 min (p = 0.0036 at week 12 and p = 0.0150 at week 24) and by walking test < or = 400 m (p = 0.0004 at week 12 and p = 0.0009 at week 24). Similar results were obtained with CPT for the walking test (p = 0.0369 at week 12 and p = 0.0142 at week 24).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗

PubMed1995

Effect of cilazapril on vascular restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.

BACKGROUND: In experimental studies using cilazapril, the strongest inhibition of neointima formation was obtained when treatment was initiated 6 days before injury. The MERCATOR trial showed no reduction in restenosis with cilazapril given after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). The purpose of this study is to determine whether previous administration of cilazapril could prevent restenosis. METHODS: A total of 167 patients were randomly and prospectively assigned to the cilazapril group or the control group. In the cilazapril group, 78 patients received a 2 mg dose of cilazparil daily, starting 7 days before PTCA and continuing for 6 months. Only 128 patients (cilazapril 56, control 72) completed the study because 39 dropped out. Coronary angiograms were evaluated by the quantitative coronary angiogram (QCA) system. RESULTS: There were no differences between the two groups of patients with regard to baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics. QCA analysis (cilazapril 66 lesions, control 101 lesions): the loss at follow-up in minimal lumen diameter was 0.36 +/- 0.57 mm in the cilazapril group and 0.57 +/- 0.75 mm in the control group (P < 0.05). Restenosis rate: in the cilazapril group, 16 of 56 patients (28.6%) had restenosis in contrast to 36 of 72 patients (50.0%) in the control group (P < 0.02). When vessel restenosis was evaluated, 16 of 63 vessels (25.4%) demonstrated restenosis in the cilazapril group, in contrast to 41 of 82 vessels (50.0%) in the control group (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment using cilazapril 7 days before PTCA significantly reduced the rate of restenosis. These data suggest that previous administration of cilazapril might be important for preventing restenosis.

Aged↗

PubMed1989

Efficacy of cilazapril compared with hydrochlorothiazide in the treatment of mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. Multicentre Study Group.

The effect of cilazapril, a new inhibitor of angiotensin-converting enzyme, in a dosage of 2.5 or 5 mg once daily, was compared with that of hydrochlorothiazide 25 or 50 mg in 169 patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Blood pressure at entry was 158/103 mm Hg (cilazapril) and 160/103 mm Hg (hydrochlorothiazide). Cilazapril 2.5 mg caused a decrease in blood pressure of 14.7 +/- 2.3/12.6 +/- 1.2 mm Hg compared with a decrease of 12.6 +/- 2.2/10.2 +/- 1.2 mm Hg with hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg. Those patients who required an increase of dosage to the higher level then showed decreases of 15.0 +/- 2.1/14.3 +/- 1.2 (cilazapril) and 19.7 +/- 1.9/13.3 +/- 1.2 hydrochlorothiazide. All decreases in blood pressure were statistically significant but were not statistically different from each other. Fifty-one percent of patients reached a sitting diastolic blood pressure of 90 mm Hg or less receiving 2.5 mg of cilazapril and an additional 28 percent of patients reached this goal receiving 5 mg. The figures for patients receiving hydrochlorothiazide were comparable: 36 and 35 percent. Twenty-one adverse events remotely, possibly, or probably related to therapy were reported with cilazapril and 32 with hydrochlorothiazide. Three patients withdrew from cilazapril because of mild angioedema, headaches, and chest pain, respectively, and three patients withdrew from hydrochlorothiazide treatment because of fatigue, dizziness, and gastric hemorrhage. Hydrochlorothiazide caused a decrease in potassium levels and an increase in levels of cholesterol, uric acid, urea and - gamma cilazapril had no adverse biochemical effects. Cilazapril lowered blood pressure to the same extent as hydrochlorothiazide. Young patients had better responses to cilazapril than to hydrochlorothiazide. It is concluded that cilazapril is an effective and safe drug for patients with mild to moderate hypertension.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2006

Effects of Cilazapril on atrial electrical, structural and functional remodeling in atrial fibrillation dogs.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor on long-term atrial electrophysiologic and structural remodeling are still unclear. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of Cilazapril on atrial electrical, structural, and functional remodeling in atrial fibrillation (AF) dogs induced by chronic rapid atrial pacing. METHODS: Twenty dogs were randomly divided into sham-operated group (n = 6), control group (n = 7), and Cilazapril group (n = 7). One thin silicon plaque containing 4 pairs of electrodes was sutured to each atrium. A pacemaker was implanted in a subcutaneous pocket and attached to a screw-in epicardial lead in the right atrial appendage. The dogs in control group and Cilazapril group were paced at 400 beats per minute for 6 weeks. The dogs in Cilazapril group received Cilazapril (0.5 mg x kg(-1) x d(-1)) 1 week before rapid atrial pacing until pacing stop. Before and after 6-week rapid atrial pacing, atrial effective refractory period (AERP) at 8 sites, AERP dispersion, intraatrium conduction time, inducibility, and duration of AF were measured. Transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiographic examinations included left atrium (LA) maximal volume, LA minimal volume, LA ejection fraction, left atrial appendage (LAA) maximal volume, LAA minimal volume, LAA ejection fraction, LAA maximal forward flow velocity, and LAA minimal backward flow velocity were performed. Atrial collagen volume fraction was analyzed by Masson staining. RESULTS: After 6-week rapid atrial pacing, although there was no significant difference in AERP shortening and AERP rate adaptation reduction between the control group and the Cilazapril group, the inducibility and duration of AF were found to be dramatically lower in the Cilazapril group than those in the control group (AF inducibility, 65.7% vs 95.7%, P < .05; AF duration, 531.5 +/- 301.2 vs 1432.2 +/- 526.5 s, P < .01). The post-tachycardia intraatrium conduction times after 6 weeks with Cilazapril were significantly shorter than those in the control group. Cliazapril could partially prevent AERP dispersion increase induced by chronic rapid atrial pacing. Compared with the control group, the LA and LAA volumes were significantly smaller; LA ejection fraction, LAA ejection fraction, LAA maximal forward flow velocity, and LAA minimal backward flow velocity were dramatically higher in the Cilazapril group. The Cilazapril group had a significantly lower percentage of interstitial fibrosis than the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Cilazapril can suppress structural and functional remodeling and prevent the induction and promotion of AF in chronic rapid atrial pacing dogs.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors↗

PubMed1989

A review of the preclinical cardiovascular pharmacology of cilazapril, a new angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor.

1. Cilazapril is the monoethyl ester prodrug form of the di-acid cilazaprilat, a new angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor. Cilazaprilat has an IC50 of 1.9 nM as an inhibitor of rabbit lung ACE in vitro making it one of the most potent ACE inhibitors currently available. Studies on a wide range of other enzymes show that the inhibition is highly specific. 2. An oral dose of 0.1 mg kg-1 cilazapril evoked the same maximum degree of plasma ACE inhibition (approximately 76%) in the rat as 0.25 mg kg-1 enalapril. Cilazapril (0.25 mg kg-1 p.o.) inhibited plasma ACE by greater than 95%. The rate of recovery of ACE activity was slower with cilazapril (5-6% h-1) than with enalapril (10% h-1). 3. In anaesthetised rats cilazaprilat was equipotent with ramiprilat and slightly more potent (1.5x) than enalaprilat as an inhibitor of the angiotensin I pressor response. 4. Following oral administration to conscious rats and intravenous administration to anaesthetised dogs, cilazapril was 2-4.5x more potent than enalapril as an ACE inhibitor. 5. In cats cilazapril (0.1 and 0.3 mg kg-1 p.o.) dose dependently decreased plasma ACE activity and the angiotensin pressor response. Peak effects occurred at 2 h after dosing and plasma ACE inhibition was maintained at greater than or equal to 50% for up to 18 h. Mean arterial pressure was also decreased dose dependently with a peak effect at 3-4 h. 6. Daily oral dosing of cilazapril (30 mg kg-1 p.o.) to spontaneously hypertensive rats evoked a progressive and prolonged (24 h) antihypertensive response with a maximum decrease in systolic blood pressure of 110 mm Hg. 7. Cilazapril (10 mg kg-1 p.o. twice daily for 3.5 days) progressively decreased blood pressure in volume depleted renal hypertensive dogs. The maximum fall in systolic pressure was 39 +/- 6 mm Hg. 8. Haemodynamic studies in open chest anaesthetised dogs showed that the hypotensive response to intravenous cilazapril was accompanied by a reduction in total peripheral resistance. Small decreases in cardiac output and myocardial contractile force were seen at high doses. 9. Cilazapril had no adverse effect on cardiovascular reflexes. There was no impairment of the baroreflex in rats. Exercise-induced tachycardia and pressor responses in conscious cats were unchanged. 10. Cilazapril is exceptionally well absorbed by the oral route (98% in rats).

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors↗

PubMed1989

Clinical pharmacology of cilazapril.

In clinical pharmacology studies cilazapril, after its bioactivation to cilazaprilat, was characterized as a potent, reversible angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor with a terminal half-life of 30 to 50 hours consistent with saturable binding to ACE. Despite the arterial vasodilation, only slight increases in heart rate were found. Cilazapril had no acute effect on cardiovascular reflexes. Cilazapril increased effective renal plasma flow slightly. Glomerular filtration rate remained unaltered. A close and steep correlation between cilazaprilat plasma concentration and ACE inhibition was found. The potency of cilazaprilat, defined as the concentration of cilazaprilat causing 50 percent ACE inhibition, was approximately 1 ng/ml plasma. In short-term studies in hypertensive patients, it appeared that more than 90 percent of plasma ACE inhibition is needed to obtain blood pressure reduction. The result of various dose-response studies established the indirect relationship between dose, plasma concentration of the drug, and the blood pressure response and identified the dose producing maximal effect (i.e., 5 mg). Cilazapril had relatively long-lasting effects on ACE inhibition. In patients with severe chronic renal impairment or hepatic failure, the duration of ACE inhibition of cilazapril was prolonged. In these patients a reduction of the dose and/or less frequent dosing is recommended. There was no clinically relevant interaction of cilazapril with food or furosemide. The effects of hydrochlorothiazide on sodium and chloride excretion were potentiated by cilazapril. An additive effect of propranolol and nitrendipine on the blood pressure response to cilazapril was observed. An interaction with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and cilazapril might occur, potentially reducing the blood pressure lowering effect. In general cilazapril was well tolerated.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors↗

PubMed1988

Effects of nitrendipine and cilazapril alone or in combination on hemodynamics and regional blood flows in conscious spontaneously hypertensive rats.

Nitrendipine and cilazapril are two new antihypertensive drugs with different mechanisms of action. Nitrendipine is a calcium antagonist of the dihydropyridine class which decreases directly the smooth muscle tone. Cilazapril is a new long-lasting inhibitor of angiotensin-converting enzyme which suppresses the peripheral vasoconstrictor effect of angiotensin I by inhibiting its transformation in angiotensin II. The goal of the present study was to assess the effects on hemodynamics and regional blood flows (measured with radioactive microspheres) of cilazapril and nitrendipine given alone or in combination. Cilazapril (3 mg/kg) and nitrendipine (0.3 mg/kg) were given intravenously to conscious spontaneously hypertensive rats first alone, then in combination. Both cilazapril and nitrendipine decreased mean arterial pressure to the same extent. Cilazapril increased regional blood flow only in the kidney without changing total cardiac output. In contrast, nitrendipine increased regional blood flow in nearly every organ and markedly enhanced total cardiac output. Cilazapril redistributed the cardiac output distribution toward the kidney, and nitrendipine did not change the cardiac output distribution. The combination of both nitrendipine and cilazapril produced a stronger antihypertensive effect than each drug alone. The peripheral vasodilatation with the combination was not as marked as with nitrendipine alone but was associated with the same redistribution of the cardiac output toward the kidney as with cilazapril. We conclude that after acute intravenous administration the combination of cilazapril and nitrendipine produced hemodynamic effects which cannot be induced by each drug used alone. Such a therapeutic profile may be useful in patients with high blood pressure or heart failure.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors↗

PubMed1989

Effects of ACE inhibition with cilazapril on splanchnic and systemic haemodynamics in man.

1. There is recent experimental evidence that the renin-angiotensin-system may play an essential role in producing splanchnic vasoconstriction. However, controversy exists as to the influence of ACE inhibition on splanchnic haemodynamics in man. We therefore investigated whether cilazapril, a structurally new and long-acting ACE inhibitor, interacts with angiotensin I-dependent changes in splanchnic haemodynamics in man, using an experimental model. 2. The effects of cilazapril on angiotensin I-induced splanchnic and systemic haemodynamics were studied in seven normotensive men using the hepatic venous catheter technique (indocyanine-green dye), right-heart catheterisation (thermodilution method), intra-arterial blood pressure monitoring and systolic time-intervals. Dose-responses to angiotensin I were determined under control conditions and 60 min after ACE inhibition with 5 mg oral cilazapril. Angiotensin I was infused intravenously at constant rates in an increasing dose-sequence until systolic blood pressure was greater than 30 mm Hg. 3. ACE inhibition with cilazapril did not change basal splanchnic or systemic haemodynamics to any relevant extent. The angiotensin I dependent increase in systemic and pulmonary resistance and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure was attenuated by cilazapril, as indicated by the shift of the dose-response curves to the right. In the splanchnic vascular bed angiotensin I dose-dependently increased splanchnic vascular resistance and also wedge hepatic venous pressure and decreased splanchnic blood flow. These angiotensin I induced haemodynamic changes were clearly suppressed by cilazapril. The angiotensin I dose needed to produce a 30% increase in splanchnic vascular resistance, given as mean and s.e. mean, was 1.7 +/- 0.3 micrograms min-1 during control-trials vs 7.3 +/- 1.3 micrograms min-1 after ACE inhibition with cilazapril (P less than 0.001). 4. We conclude that, in man, the influence of cilazapril on acute angiotensin I-mediated haemodynamic responses is present in the splanchnic vascular bed, and that the overall effects of cilazapril are consistent with both arterial and venous effects of the ACE inhibitor. Cilazapril effectively counteracts angiotensin I-induced splanchnic vasoconstriction.

Adult↗

PubMed1992

Cilazapril: an overview of its efficacy and safety in hypertension.

Cilazapril is a new once-daily angiotensin-converting (ACE) enzyme inhibitor which has been administered to 4,500 patients with mainly mild to moderate essential hypertension in a multinational clinical research program. Sitting diastolic blood pressure was reduced by about 9 mm Hg from baseline (p less than 0.01) after 4 weeks of treatment with cilazapril 1.25-10 mg/day in double-blind placebo-controlled studies. Total responder rates to cilazapril were usually 50-60% compared with 30% to placebo. Adding hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg/day to cilazapril 5.0 mg/day increased the total responder rate from 52 to 71%. Double-blind dose titration studies for 8 weeks showed that cilazapril 2.5-5 mg/day possessed equivalent efficacy to usual therapeutic regimens of sustained release propranolol, captopril, hydrochlorothiazide, atenolol and enalapril, Cilazapril did not affect heart rate. During long-term open administration for 52 weeks, or longer, cilazapril, either alone or in combination with hydrochlorothiazide, effectively maintained control of blood pressure. Treatment of patients with severe hypertension with cilazapril plus hydrochlorothiazide achieved a total responder rate of 73%. Adverse events were mostly observed within the first 8-16 weeks of treatment, with headache, dizziness, fatigue, nausea, cough and chest pain being the most frequent. Non-life-threatening angioedema, facial edema and mild hypotension occurred in less than or equal to 0.2% of patients, and orthostatic hypotension was reported in 2%. Abnormal laboratory test values were rarely found with cilazapril treatment. Of the 2.3% of patients with elevated serum creatinine, at any time point during the study and irrespective of outcome on continuation with cilazapril therapy, about two thirds had prior renal impairment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adolescent↗

PubMed1991

Clinical pharmacology of cilazapril.

In clinical pharmacology studies, cilazapril, after its bioactivation to cilazaprilat, was characterised as a potent, reversible angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor with a terminal half-life of 30 to 50 hours, which is consistent with saturable binding to ACE. Despite the arterial vasodilatation, only slight increases in heart rate occurred during cilazapril administration. Cilazapril had no acute effect on cardiovascular reflexes, and increased effective renal plasma flow slightly. Glomerular filtration rate remained unaltered. A close positive correlation was found between the cilazaprilat plasma concentration and degree of ACE inhibition. The potency of cilazaprit, defined as the concentration of cilazaprilat causing 50% inhibition of ACE, was approximately 1 microgram/L plasma. In short term studies in patients with hypertension, it appeared that more than 90% inhibition of plasma ACE was needed to obtain blood pressure reduction. Results of various dose-response studies established the indirect relationship between dose, the plasma concentration of the drug, and the blood pressure response, and identified the dose producing the maximal effect to be 5mg. Cilazapril inhibited ACE for a relatively long period which was extended in patients with severe chronic renal impairment or hepatic failure. In these patients a reduction of the dose and/or less frequent administration is recommended. There was no clinically relevant interaction of cilazapril with food, furosemide (frusemide), digoxin or coumarins. The effects of hydrochlorothiazide on sodium and chloride excretion were potentiated by cilazapril, and an additive effect of propranolol and nitrendipine on the blood pressure response to cilazapril was observed. An interaction with indomethacin and cilazapril might occur, potentially reducing the blood pressure-lowering effect of cilazapril. In general, cilazapril was well tolerated.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors↗

PubMed1991

Dose-finding study of cilazapril (Inhibace) in patients with uncomplicated essential hypertension.

Cilazapril, an angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor with a long half-life, effectively reduced sitting diastolic blood pressure in patients with uncomplicated essential hypertension at dosages of 2.5, 5.0, and 10.0 mg/day, evaluated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. After a four-week placebo run-in period, 235 patients received either cilazapril or placebo for four weeks. At the end of the treatment period, significant decreases from baseline in sitting diastolic blood pressure were seen in all four groups (mean decreases of 3.3 mm Hg with placebo and 6.4, 9.2 and 8.3 mm Hg with 2.5, 5.0 and 10.0 mg cilazapril, respectively). The cilazapril groups had significantly greater blood pressure reductions than did the placebo group (p less than or equal to 0.02). The 5.0 mg cilazapril dose was significantly more effective than the 2.5 mg dose (p less than 0.03). The response rate was notably greater in the cilazapril treatment groups than in the placebo group (placebo, 27.5%; 2.5 mg cilazapril, 42.9%; 5.0 mg cilazapril 62.5%; 10.0 mg cilazapril, 50.0%). Cilazapril was well tolerated at all three dosages.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Cilazapril prevents hypertension in spontaneously hypertensive rats.

Chronic daily administration of cilazapril (1 X 10 mg/kg/day p.o., from age 4 to 14 weeks) to young spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) prevented the development of hypertension. The antihypertensive effect of a single dose of cilazapril persisted greater than 24 h. Discontinuation of long-term treatment resulted in an increase of systolic arterial blood pressure (SAP) to control hypertensive levels within 4 days. Following 10 weeks of drug administration, comparative hemodynamic studies were carried out on age-matched (14 weeks) control SHR and cilazapril-treated SHR. Cilazapril-treated SHR had a significantly lower mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and total peripheral vascular resistance than did control SHR. The antihypertensive effect of cilazapril was not associated with changes in heart rate (HR). The myocardial performance parameters, cardiac output, and stroke volume, were similar in treated and control SHR, suggesting that the antihypertensive effect of cilazapril following chronic administration to SHR is mainly due to a reduction in peripheral vascular resistance. Vasopressor responses to angiotensin I were significantly lower in cilazapril-treated SHR than in control SHR. By contrast, pressor responses to angiotensin II and a high dose of norepinephrine (1.0 microgram/kg i.v.) were significantly enhanced. Isoproterenol elicited a fall in blood pressure in both groups, the extent of which was dependent upon the magnitude of basal blood pressure levels. Chronic cilazapril treatment resulted in a reduction of heart weight, suggesting that the drug may prevent development of cardiac hypertrophy in SHR. Kidney and adrenal weights were unaffected by the chronic treatment. Specific renin activities (SRA) in tissues of SHR were increased by factors of 20 (plasma) or 2 (kidney and adrenal) following cilazapril administration.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors↗