SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1992

Evaluation of new anti-infective drugs for the treatment of chancroid. Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Food and Drug Administration.

Chancroid is a mucocutaneous infection caused by Haemophilus ducreyi that produces ulcerative lesions and enhances the efficiency of transmission of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Confirmation of infection by culture of H. ducreyi is essential in therapeutic trials. Minimal inhibitory concentrations of antibiotics for the isolate should be determined by agar dilution. Patients should be evaluated by appropriate laboratory tests for syphilis, infection with herpes simplex virus, gonorrhea, and (in North America) infection with Chlamydia trachomatis. The clinical history of the disease should be recorded and ulcers, buboes, and lymphadenitis mass described. Whenever possible, study participants also should be tested for HIV infection. Randomized, prospective, double-blind, active-control comparative clinical trials are preferred for evaluation of the safety and efficacy of new anti-infective drugs. Otherwise-healthy men and women should be enrolled in these studies. Patients with active syphilis or genital herpes should be excluded. Microbiological and clinical outcomes are paramount.

Anti-Infective Agents↗

PubMed1992

Evaluation of new anti-infective drugs for the treatment of uncomplicated gonorrhea in adults and adolescents. Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Food and Drug Administration.

Gonorrhea is among the most common sexually transmitted diseases. Treatment for uncomplicated gonorrhea should be efficacious in > or = 95% of cases. Because patients with gonococcal infections often have other sexually transmitted diseases concurrently, individuals enrolled in clinical trials of therapy for gonorrhea should also be evaluated for infection with Chlamydia trachomatis and for syphilis. Testing for other pathogens should be considered in light of the clinical presentation. The presence of gonococcal infection is defined by a positive culture of a specimen obtained from an appropriate mucosal site. Patients enrolled in clinical trials should be otherwise-healthy adults who agree to return for follow-up assessment. These patients should be stratified by gender and anatomic site of infection. The preferred study design is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, active-control comparison. In some circumstances, however, historical controls may suffice. The study drug must have an efficacy rate of > or = 95% in genital and rectal infections. Microbiological eradication, demonstrated by negative cultures of samples from all potentially infected mucosal sites at follow-up, is the sole determinant of efficacy.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1992

Evaluation of new anti-infective drugs for the treatment of sexually transmitted chlamydial infections and related clinical syndromes. Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Food and Drug Administration.

This guideline addresses clinical trials of new antimicrobial agents in the treatment of uncomplicated genital infections caused by Chlamydia trachomatis and of syndromes resembling chlamydial infections. The most common clinical manifestations of chlamydial infection are urethritis in men and mucopurulent cervicitis in women. However, many chlamydial infections are not associated with inflammatory symptoms or signs. Culture is the diagnostic standard for defining the presence of C. trachomatis, although nonculture tests may be used in screening patients for enrollment in clinical trials. Susceptibility testing for C. trachomatis is laborious and difficult to standardize; only a few clinical isolates need to be tested in vitro. Prospective, randomized, double-blind, active-control comparative studies are recommended. Eradication of C. trachomatis defines both microbiological success and overall cure for chlamydial infection, but clinical and nonmicrobiological laboratory criteria are paramount in assessing the therapeutic response in nonchlamydial urethritis or cervicitis.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

PubMed1992

Evaluation of new anti-infective drugs for the treatment of syphilis. Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Food and Drug Administration.

Syphilis is caused by Treponema pallidum, a spirochetal bacterium pathogenic only for humans. The clinical course of disease is divided into three stages interspersed by periods of latency. Penicillin remains the treatment of choice for all stages of infection; tetracycline or erythromycin may be used as therapeutic alternatives in defined circumstances. Patients enrolled in clinical trials should be evaluated clinically, microscopically, and serologically for the presence of the spirochete. All participants, after undergoing counseling and giving informed consent, should be tested for infection with human immunodeficiency virus. Specific criteria exist for diagnosis of syphilis and response to therapy. It may be desirable to perform a small, uncontrolled, open trial of a new anti-infective drug for the collection of preliminary evidence of efficacy. A larger-scale, randomized, active-control comparative clinical trial is necessary to prove efficacy.

Animals↗

PubMed1992

Evaluation of new anti-infective drugs for the treatment of selected infections of the skin and skin structure. Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Food and Drug Administration.

No method for classifying infections of the skin and skin structure is uniformly accepted. Therefore, each protocol for the evaluation of new anti-infective drugs must include definitions of the skin and skin-structure infections to be treated. Clinical findings may suggest the etiology. Cultures should be performed by the best available technique. Because the yield of pathogens from sites of skin and skin-structure infection is often low, monitoring of the clinical response to therapy is paramount. Randomized, double-blind, active-control comparative studies are needed, and maintenance of blinding is recommended, even with a change in the route of administration of the study and/or control drugs. The period of follow-up should be defined for each type of infection.

Anti-Infective Agents↗

PubMed1992

Evaluation of new anti-infective drugs for the treatment of osteomyelitis in adults. Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Food and Drug Administration.

Cases of osteomyelitis can be divided into four categories: acute hematogenous, vertebral, secondary to a contiguous focus of infection without vascular disease, and secondary to a contiguous focus of infection with vascular disease. Each category may be further divided into acute and chronic forms. Clinical symptoms persisting for > or = 10 days correlate roughly with the development of necrotic bone and chronic osteomyelitis. Patients enrolled in clinical trials should generally be > or = 12 years of age. Prior antimicrobial treatment does not exclude patients if the culture of a bone sample obtained at the time of enrollment yields pathogenic bacteria. Randomized, double-blind, active-control comparative studies are encouraged. Clinical outcome should be assessed during therapy and within 5-9 days, 4-6 weeks, and 11-13 months after completion of therapy. In the final assessment, clinical appraisal is paramount.

Adult↗

PubMed1992

Evaluation of new anti-infective drugs for the treatment of acute hematogenous osteomyelitis in children. Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Food and Drug Administration.

Most children with acute hematogenous osteomyelitis have no preceding illness. Their early symptoms are pain and fever. A bacterial etiology is established in approximately 75% of cases by needle aspiration of the affected site or blood culture. Clinical trials should be limited to cases of bacterial origin. The antimicrobial agents studied should be active against Staphylococcus aureus and streptococci. If children < 5 years of age are included, the drug should also be active against beta-lactamase-negative and -positive strains of Haemophilus influenzae. Randomized, prospective, double-blind comparative studies are preferable to open, evaluator-blinded trials. Clinical outcome is appraised by physical signs and symptoms. A successful microbiological outcome consists of presumptive eradication. The final assessment should be made 1 year after completion of therapy.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed1992

Evaluation of new anti-infective drugs for the treatment of infectious arthritis in adults. Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Food and Drug Administration.

This guideline describes clinical trials of new anti-infective drugs for the treatment of septic arthritis due to bacteria other than Neisseria gonorrhoeae in adults. Septic arthritis is associated with fever and with physical findings at the affected joint. Diagnosis is established by culture of synovial fluid. Treatment includes the administration of antimicrobial drugs and drainage of the joint by needle aspiration or surgery. Multicenter, randomized comparative clinical trials that are single-, double-, or evaluator-blinded should be performed. However, an open trial of a new antimicrobial agent with historical controls is acceptable. Patients should receive treatment for at least 2-3 weeks. After 5 days of antimicrobial therapy, synovial fluid should be sterile and clinical signs and symptoms should have diminished. Patients should be followed for 2-4 weeks after completion of therapy.

Adult↗

PubMed1992

Evaluation of new anti-infective drugs for the treatment of acute suppurative arthritis in children. Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Food and Drug Administration.

Diagnostic criteria for bacterial suppurative arthritis include the demonstration of an inflammatory exudate by aspiration of synovial fluid and the isolation of bacteria from cultures of synovial fluid and/or blood. Clinical manifestations include joint effusion, swelling, tenderness, and pain, with or without redness of the overlying skin. Management consists of antimicrobial therapy, measures designed to relieve symptoms, surgical drainage of infected fluid, and physical therapy. Studies of new anti-infective therapy should be limited to cases of bacterial origin. Prospective, randomized, double-blind, or evaluator-blinded, active-control comparative clinical trials should be performed. Clinical response is characterized as success (cure), failure, or indeterminate outcome. The most common successful microbiological outcome is presumptive eradication. Follow-up should continue for 1 year before the final assessment.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed1992

Evaluation of new anti-infective drugs for the treatment of infections of prosthetic hip joints. Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Food and Drug Administration.

Infections of a prosthetic hip are of three types: acute contiguous, chronic contiguous, and hematogenous. Acute contiguous infections result from contamination of the operative field at the time of surgery; clinical manifestations of infection become apparent within 6 months. Chronic contiguous infections are diagnosed 6-24 months postoperatively and are believed to be caused by intraoperative contamination. Hematogenous seeding of prosthetic joints accounts for infections that develop > or = 2 years after surgery. Fever and pain or dysfunction of the joint may be the only signs or symptoms of prosthetic hip joint infection. Definitive diagnosis is established by culture of a needle aspirate from the joint space or by intraoperative culture. Prospective, randomized, double-blind or evaluator-blinded, active-control comparative studies are preferable to open trials. Success rates 10-14 weeks after completion of a 4- to 6-week course of antimicrobial therapy should be > or = 90%.

Adult↗

PubMed1992

Evaluation of new anti-infective drugs for the treatment of acute bacterial meningitis. Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Food and Drug Administration.

Predisposing conditions for acute bacterial meningitis include prematurity, young age, management in an intensive care setting, low socioeconomic background, and crowded living conditions. Clinical findings vary with age and may be nonspecific (altered feeding behavior) or specific (Kernig and Brudzinski signs). Examination and culture of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are essential for diagnosis. Antigen identification in CSF, serum, or urine by latex agglutination or other techniques can be useful in the identification of the pathogen. Randomized, controlled studies with a single-, double-, or evaluator-blinded design are encouraged. Among neonates, infants, and children, CSF should be examined again 24-36 hours after initiation of therapy. Outcomes should be judged by both clinical and microbiological criteria. Assessment of microbiological outcome is paramount.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed1992

Evaluation of new anti-infective drugs for the treatment of cryptococcal meningitis. Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Food and Drug Administration.

Cryptococcus neoformans may infect persons with intact or compromised host defenses. Clinical manifestations generally correlate directly with the degree of immunosuppression. Treatment is prescribed on the basis of the severity of disease and the degree of immunosuppression. Cryptococcal meningitis is the most common clinical form of cryptococcal infection and the most amenable to study in clinical trials. The current standard of care for cryptococcal meningitis is therapy with amphotericin B. Despite clinical improvement and microbiological suppression of the organism at the completion of therapy, the microbiological outcome will be identified as presumptive persistence if treatment is continued. Patients should be observed for 1 year after completion of therapy before a final assessment is made.

Anti-Infective Agents↗

PubMed1992

Evaluation of new anti-infective drugs for the treatment of viral encephalitis. Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Food and Drug Administration.

Viral encephalitis may develop subsequent to viremia, via neuronal spread, or by arthropod vector. Diagnosis often requires invasive studies such as lumbar puncture and brain biopsy. This guideline addresses herpes simplex, rabies, and arbovirus infections of the central nervous system. Clinical trials should be designed according to the availability of approved therapeutic agents. Study designs with an active control (herpesvirus), a placebo control (arbovirus), or no control (rabies virus) are recommended. Outcome should be assessed 4-6 weeks, 4-6 months, and 11-13 months after the completion of therapy. For newborns with encephalitis, outcome should be assessed yearly through the age of 5 years. Assessment of clinical outcome is paramount.

Anti-Infective Agents↗

PubMed1992

Evaluation of new anti-infective drugs for the treatment of toxoplasma encephalitis. Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Food and Drug Administration.

Toxoplasma gondii is a protozoan that exists in three forms, all of which are potentially infectious for humans. After acute infection, cysts persist in the central nervous system and extraneural tissue. Human hosts with compromised immunity, particularly those with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, are vulnerable to reactivation and dissemination. The most common clinical expression of toxoplasma infection is encephalitis. The diagnosis is established by clinical presentation, computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging, and detection of antibodies to T. gondii in serum of patients positive for human immunodeficiency virus. Brain biopsy may be performed. Protocols may be developed for the evaluation of new regimens for the treatment of acute encephalitis, the suppression of disease after treatment, or the prevention of reactivation before the onset of clinical disease. Assessment of clinical outcome is paramount.

Anti-Infective Agents↗

PubMed1992

Evaluation of new anti-infective drugs for the treatment of febrile episodes in neutropenic patients. Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Food and Drug Administration.

The use of empirical antimicrobial therapy has significantly reduced the morbidity and mortality associated with untreated infections in febrile neutropenic patients. This guideline describes clinical trials of the safety and efficacy of new antimicrobial drugs in this population of patients. Fever and neutropenia should be precisely defined in each protocol. Patients should be randomized to treatment with a new or active-control drug regimen, stratified on the basis of type of cancer and age, and treated until resolution--as defined in the protocol--is attained. Outcome should be assessed both for cases with a defined microbial etiology and for those without. Final microbiological outcome is important for cases with identified pathogens, but clinical outcome is paramount.

Anti-Infective Agents↗

PubMed1992

Evaluation of new anti-infective drugs for the treatment of urinary tract infection. Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Food and Drug Administration.

The term urinary tract infection (UTI) encompasses a broad range of clinical entities that share one characteristic: a positive urine culture. Clinical manifestations and responses to therapy are diverse even when comparable numbers of a particular bacterial species are identified on urine culture. These guidelines include discussion of acute uncomplicated cystitis, acute uncomplicated pyelonephritis, and complicated infections of the urinary tract. It is proposed that the finding of > or = 10(3) cfu/mL of urine defines significant bacteriuria in acute uncomplicated cystitis, > or = 10(4) cfu/mL in acute uncomplicated pyelonephritis and UTI in men, and > or = 10(5) cfu/mL in complicated UTI. The preferred clinical study design is prospective, randomized, and controlled with an active agent. Ideally, treatment with antimicrobial agents should eradicate the infecting organism, bring about the resolution of clinical signs and symptoms, have few adverse effects, and prevent reinfection.

Adult↗

PubMed1992

Evaluation of new anti-infective drugs for the treatment of acute infectious diarrhea. Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Food and Drug Administration.

This guideline includes diarrhea causing infantile mortality in which a bacterial pathogen is recovered and for which oral rehydration therapy is an important component of care as well as traveler's diarrhea (with or without recovery of a pathogen). Diarrhea is defined as the passage of three or more unformed stools per day plus--in all patients except infants--one or more signs or symptoms of enteric infection. The preferred study design is prospective and randomized, with an active concurrent control and (when possible) blinding. Placebo-controlled trials may be performed if the severity of disease is judged by the investigator to be mild or moderate. It is desirable that both clinical and microbiological outcome be determined. Microbiological eradication is paramount.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed1992

Evaluation of new anti-infective drugs for the treatment of typhoid fever. Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Food and Drug Administration.

Typhoid fever is an acute febrile illness caused by Salmonella typhi. The evidence of blood-borne infection required for study entry includes clinical signs and symptoms plus confirmation of the presence of S. typhi in blood or other tissues or body fluids. The preferred study design is prospective and randomized with an active concurrent control. It is preferred that the investigator or an evaluator be blinded to therapy. In general, treatment should be administered for 2 weeks until it is demonstrated that a shorter course is as efficacious and as safe. Follow-up cultures of specimens from sites originally shown to be infected with S. typhi should be performed unless the diagnostic procedure places the patient at unnecessary risk.

Anti-Infective Agents↗