PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Combination therapy”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1992

Treatment of HIV infection: the antiretroviral nucleoside analogues. Nucleoside analogues: combination therapy.

Combination antiretroviral therapy is an important development in the management of HIV infection. AZT with ddC is the first such combination to be approved for clinical use. Several issues remain, however, including the precise clinical benefit and toxicity of combination therapy, its effect on drug resistance, and the development of ever more effective therapeutic strategies.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed1975

L-dopa therapy combined with peripheral decarboxylase inhibitor (MK-486) in Parkinsonism.

Eighteen patients with parkinsonism were treated with a combination of L-dopa and peripheral decarboxylase inhibitor, L-alphahydrazinomethyldopa (MK-486). Modification of L-dopa effect by MK-486 was also studied in parkinsonian patients as well as in cats. (1) Concentrations of dopa and dopamine in plasma and brain were measured in cats following intraperitoneal injection of L-dopa alone (100 mg/kg) or combined with MK-486 (10 mg/kg). Dopa levels in plasma and brain in the combination with MK-486 were three times as high as in L-dopa alone. Dopamine levels in caudate nucleus and putamen were increased nearly fourfold with the combination. (2) Plasma dopa and dopamine levels were measured in parkinsonian patients. Clinical pharmacological studies disclosed that a 1 : 10 ratio of MK-486 to L-dopa in dosage was preferable. (3) Maximum plasma dopa levels with the combination were four times those following L-dopa alone. Plasma dopa sustained a high level over a period of five hours. MK-486 markedly reduced plasma levels of dopamine. (4) There was no significant difference in dopa and dopamine levels in cerebrospinal fluid between L-dopa alone and a combination of MK-486, but dopamine levels in the CSF were still high at four hours after the combination of MK-486. (5) In clinical studies of eighteen patients with parkinsonism, the effectiveness of the combination therapy (mean dosage of L-dopa: 750 mg/day) was observed in all cases. Marked improvement was noted in 10 cases out of 15 (67%) with akinesia, in 12 cases out of 17 (71%) with rigidity and in six cases out of 14 (43%) with tremor. Maximum plasma dopa levels were higher in those cases with marked improvement, and were highest in patients with diskinesias as a side effect. (6) An addition of vitamin B6 did not show adverse effects. (7) Transient nausea and vomiting as a side effect, less severe than those experienced with L-dopa alone, were noted in five cases (28%). Dyskinesias in extremities, face, mouth and tongue were observed in six cases (33%). These dyskinesias were seen in a high percentage of cases with marked improvement and were never observed in the extremities contralateral to the side of thalamotomy.

Adult↗
PubMed1977

Drug therapy reviews: tricyclic antidepressant and monoamine oxidase inhibitor combination therapy.

Combinations of monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) and tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) are discussed with regard to general toxicity, drug interactions, animal studies, clinical reports, efficacy of combination therapy and usage conditions. Although MAOI-TCA combinations are usually considered contraindicated, informed opinion has shifted to cautious recommendation for the combination. Only refractory patients in whom less hazardous treatment has failed should be considered for combination therapy. The preferred dosage regimen is administration of the MAOI t.i.d. during the day and the entire TCA dose at bedtime. Patients should be informed of the immediate need for medical advice should side effects occur. It is concluded that the simultaneous administration of these agents is potentially efficacious and safe is carefully monitored and controlled.

Animals↗
PubMed1992

"Cocktail" therapy for acute pancreatitis: combined therapy of protease inhibitor, xanthine oxidase inhibitor and platelet activating factor antagonist in rat caerulein-induced pancreatis.

A supramaximal dose of caerulein (5 micrograms/kg.hr for 3.5 hours) caused an acute pancreatitis with marked hyperamylasemia and intense interstitial edema in rats. In this model of pancreatitis, the redistribution of lysosomal enzyme in acinar cells as well as the increased lysosomal and mitochondrial fragility were also observed. The combined therapy of a low molecular weight protease inhibitor, FOY, a synthetic platelet activating factor (PAF) antagonist, CV 6209, and a xanthine oxidase inhibitor, allopurinol produced more significant improvements in all the parameters examined than the therapy of any only one of these three agents, each only one therapy exerting a partial significant protective effect. These results indicate that several factors, such as unknown proteases activities, PAF and oxygen-derived free radicals may be involved in the pathogenesis of pancreatic injuries in this caerulein-induced pancreatitis. These results also suggest that such a combined therapy of different kinds of agents, whose therapeutic mechanisms are also different, is useful in the clinical treatment of acute pancreatitis.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1975

Sequential therapy compared with combination therapy in multiple myeloma.

A timed sequential chemotherapeutic regimen for multiple myeloma was desinged, based on plasma cell kinetics. A randomized study comparing this regimen with the combination of intermittent melphalan and prednisone was started after an adequate pilot study. Studies with tritiated thymidine labeling and mitotic indexes were performed on patients treated with sequential therapy. Of 13 patients treated with the combination therapy, the responses were as follows: two, objective improvement; nine, subjective improvement; and two, no responses. Of nine patients treated with sequential therapy, the responses in six patients who could have evaluations were as follows: one, objective improvement; two, subjective improvement; one, no response; one, with progressive disease; and one, cardiac death. The two studies showed differences in pertubation of cell kinetics of myeloma that may be related to exponential growth and immunoblobulin types.

Autoradiography↗
PubMed1992

[Familial hypercholesterolemia--intensive diet therapy combined with drug therapy].

The aim of the investigation was twofold: to study the effect of lovastatin, a potent inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase, alone and in combination with other lipid lowering drugs in an open 48 week single centre study, and to study if lipid lowering drugs influence adherence to diet in adult patients with familial hypercholesterolemia. Lovastatin monotherapy (80 mg daily) for 12 weeks reduced serum cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and triglycerides levels by 36%, 44% and 24% respectively. HDL-cholesterol level was increased by 12%. The addition of 16 g cholestyramine daily further increased the reduction of total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol levels by 17% and 24% respectively. Addition of 1 g probucol daily decreased total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and HDL-cholesterol levels by 9%, 5% and 27% respectively. Addition of omega-3-fatty acids (3.6 g daily) reduced total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and triglycerides levels by 10%, 12% and 20% respectively. Administration of potent lipid lowering agents did not influence adherence to a diet with a mean daily fat energy of 21% (CI: 20-22), cholesterol of 177 mg (CI: 157-196) and P/S ratio of 0.75 (CI: 0.66-0.84). A significant increase in liver enzymes was recorded in only one patient. One patient was withdrawn from the study because of myositis.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

[Combination therapy of doxifluridine (5'-DFUR) + cyclophosphamide (CPA) + tamoxifen (TAM) for advanced or recurrent breast cancer. Joint Research Group in the Osaka Area for Combination Therapy of 5'-DFUR with Other Drugs].

Outpatients with advanced and recurrent breast cancer were treated by a combination therapy of the following drugs: doxifluridine (5'-DFUR) orally administered at a dose of 1200 mg/day; cyclophosphamide (CPA) orally given at dose of 100 mg/day; and tamoxifen (TAM) orally given at dose of 20 mg daily. 5'-DFUR and CPA were administered on consecutive days 1-14, then discontinued for 14 days. The response rate was 44.8% including five CR and eight PR out of 29 complete cases. As for response cases in terms of the subject lesions, corresponding cases were chiefly found in soft tissue and the lung. As for the response rate with or without pretreatment, cases previously treated showed a higher response rate such as 42.9% indicating that the present therapy was effective in pretreatment cases. The main side effect was leukopenia, but not so severe. Few cases with diarrhea were found. Based on the above findings, the present treatment is conceivably a highly useful therapy, on an outpatient basis, for advanced and recurrent breast cancer, especially metastatic lesions of soft tissue and the lung.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1992

Mexiletine and propafenone: a comparative study of monotherapy, low, and full dose combination therapy.

The electrophysiological effects of combination therapy of mexiletine and propafenone were assessed using standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (standard ECG), signal-averaged ECG (SAECG), and ambulatory ECG in 31 patients with ventricular arrhythmias. All patients underwent mexiletine monotherapy (M-mono), propafenone monotherapy (P-mono), low dose combination therapy (low M+P), and full dose combination therapy (full M+P). Full M+P increased the PQ interval and QRS duration to the same extent as P-mono did. Low M+P increased PQ interval and QRS duration to a lesser extent than P-mono and full M+P did. P-mono and full M+P significantly decreased root mean square (RMS) and increased f-QRS in SAECG, while M-mono and low M+P showed only a weak trend. SAECGs with late potentials increased in number with treatments; 9 in predrug control, 11 on M-mono, 15 on P-mono, 10 on low M+P, and 14 on full M+P. The percent suppression of frequent premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) (> 1,000/day) with M-mono, P-mono, low M+P, and full M+P were 46.4 +/- 9.0, 56.6 +/- 10.4, 64.4 +/- 9.2, and 71.4 +/- 7.1, respectively, and those of frequent couplets (> 10/day) were 58.3 +/- 17.7, 62.6 +/- 23.6, 87.5 +/- 6.2, and 92.1 +/- 4.0, respectively. Thus, full dose combination of mexiletine and propafenone exhibited the maximum antiarrhythmic efficacy without enhancement of effects on standard ECG and SAECG. Low dose combination therapy showed better antiarrhythmic efficacy in association with lesser effects on standard ECG and SAECG compared with propafenone monotherapy.

Arrhythmias, Cardiac↗
PubMed1976

Herpes zoster: a combined therapy regimen.

A combined method of therapy for the routine management of herpes zoster in most all age groups is presented. The uniformly gratifying results of this treatment prompted this report. A total of 105 known cases of acute herpes zoster in which this regimen was employed during the past 15 years was analyzed in this study. Clinical observations before and after treatment are presented with discussion of clinical factors, treatment and conclusions.

Adult↗
PubMed1979

Increased survival with surgery alone vs. combined therapy.

Recent investigations have questioned the efficacy of a combined therapy regimen with irradiation. The purpose of this study was to compare the survivals with surgery alone versus combined therapy (pre-op irradiation) and to analyze any apparent differences to identify the source(s) of failure. Two and five-year determinate survivals for this group identify the source(s) of failure. Two and five-year determinate survivals for this group were found to be significantly better for surgery alone. There is no instance where combination therapy is found to be statistically superior. An analysis of treatment failures showed that distant metastases occurred at a greater rate in the combined therapy patients than they did with those treated by surgery alone. The advisability of combined therapy using preoperative irradiation with its increased cost and morbidity to the patient is questioned if it does not improve survival over surgery used as a single modality.

Female↗
PubMed2026

Pricing Combination Therapies: A Systematic Review of Value Attribution, Cost-Sharing Mechanisms and Policy Frameworks.

BACKGROUND: Combination therapies are increasingly central to modern pharmacotherapy, particularly in oncology and other high-burden diseases. However, pharmaceutical pricing and reimbursement systems remain largely designed for single-product-single-indication interventions. When multiple patented medicines are used together, especially when owned by different manufacturers, conventional pricing frameworks may struggle to align prices with the value of the combination while preserving incentives for innovation and timely patient access. OBJECTIVE: To identify, describe, and critically assess the methods, models, and policy frameworks proposed in the literature to establish prices for combination therapies, with particular attention to value attribution mechanisms, cost-sharing arrangements between manufacturers, and budget impact considerations. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and a pre-registered Open Science Framework protocol. Searches were performed in MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, EconLit, CRD databases, and grey literature sources for publications up to July 2025. Eligible studies analysed pricing approaches, economic models, reimbursement mechanisms, or policy frameworks relevant to combination therapies, including more recent multi-indication pricing literature. Given the heterogeneity of the literature, findings were synthesized using a structured narrative and thematic approach. RESULTS: Sixty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria. The literature was dominated by conceptual and policy analyses, with relatively few empirical or implementation-oriented studies. Value attribution emerged as the central methodological challenge in pricing combination therapies. Several complementary approaches were proposed to operationalise value attribution, including adaptations of indication- or pathway-based pricing, manufacturer cost-sharing arrangements, managed entry agreements, and outcome-based reimbursement mechanisms. Empirical evidence suggests that health systems continue to rely primarily on pragmatic and often partial solutions rather than fully specified pricing frameworks. A complementary review of the multi-indication pricing literature indicates that, although the two fields address different pricing problems, they share important methodological and institutional lessons that can inform the development of pricing frameworks for combination therapies. CONCLUSIONS: The literature provides a growing repertoire of conceptual approaches for pricing combination therapies but limited empirical evidence on implementation. Pricing frameworks should place value attribution at their core while combining complementary policy mechanisms adapted to national pricing and reimbursement systems. Lessons from multi-indication pricing provide a valuable foundation but require additional governance mechanisms to address value attribution, multi-manufacturer negotiation, and implementation challenges specific to combination therapies.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1979

[Factor analysis of the effectiveness of combined therapy in experimental leukemia].

The effectiveness of the combined therapy of leukemia P-388 with cyclophosphane and diazane was studied. The pattern of administering these substances was selected with due consideration of the cyclospecificity of their action. In a number of cases considerable synergism was observed, resulting in a cure of 100% of animals. Estimation of the effectiveness and the degree of synergism was made by the method of fractionation analysis, which allowed delineating some trends for providing the optimum combined therapy.

Animals↗
PubMed1979

Combination therapy for psoriasis. Psoralens plus long-wave ultraviolet radiation with betamethasone valerate.

In the treatment of psoriatic patients with psoralens plus long-wave ultraviolet radiation (PUVA), clearing of psoriatic lesions was obtained more quickly and with smaller doses of ultraviolet light when topically applied corticosteroid therapy was added. Twelve patients with symmetrical plaque-type psoriasis were given PUVA on one side of the body and PUVA plus betamethasone valerate on the other side in a paired comparison study. Ten of the patients had faster clearing of lesions on the side that was treated with PUVA and betamethasone than on the side treated with PUVA alone. The other two patients had equal clearing on both sides. All patients remained clear of lesions during maintenance with PUVA alone for at least five months after steroid therapy was discontinued. Combination therapy may save the patient time, expense, and unnecessary exposure to radiant energy.

Adult↗
PubMed1975

Colestipol, clofibrate, cholestyramine and combination therapy in the treatment of familial hyperbetalipoproteinaemia.

Fifty-seven patients, mean age 26 years, suffering from familial hyperbetalipoproteinaemia (Fredrickson type lla and llb), were treated on a low cholesterol, modified polyunsaturated fat diet for a period of 6-12 weeks prior to the introduction of drug therapy. No significant reduction in the serum levels of total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol or triglyceride was found. Fifty patients were then treated with colestipol for 6 weeks; total and LDL cholesterol decreased by 23%, but triglyceride levels were unaffected. During the following 6 weeks, placebo was administered, and total and LDL cholesterol returned to pretreatment levels. The patients were then randomly allocated into two groups of 16. The first group continued with clofibrate therapy, while the second group received cholestyramine. In the clofibrate group a reduction in total and LDL cholesterol of the order of 17% was noted, similar to cholestethat achieved in this group on colestipol. Triglyceride levels were 15% lower on clofibrate therapy than on colestipol. In the cholestyramine group, there was a 25% decrease in total and LDL cholesterol, compared with pretreatment levels. This reduction was similar to that found when colestipol was administered. Triglyceride values were significantly raised during cholestyramine therapy. Thirteen patients were then subjected to a 6-week period of combination therapy, either clofibrate or colestipol, or clofibrate and cholestyramine. Total and LDL cholesterol were reduced by 32% on combination therapy compared with 18% on colestipol and 23% on either clofibrate or cholestyramine alone. Furthermore, on combined therapy, triglyceride concentrations fell by 20% when compared with the levels found when colestipol, clofibrate or cholestyramine were administered on their own.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

[Combination therapy with pamidronate and calcitonin in hypercalcemic crisis caused by primary hyperparathyroidism].

Pamidronate (aminopropylidene diphosphonate, APD) is known to be an effective agent in lowering plasma calcium in cancer associated hypercalcaemia and in primary hyperparathyroidism. Combined therapy with pamidronate and calcitonin has proved efficient in the treatment of severe cancer-associated hypercalcaemia. A 66-year-old woman in hypercalcaemic crisis caused by primary hypreparathyroidism was successfully treated with this combined therapy. Albumin corrected plasma calcium was 5.26 mmol/l on arrival and the PTH level was very high. The combined therapy lowered the plasma calcium to normal and made it possible to perform elective parathyreoidectomy. A 5.8 g parathyroid adenoma was removed. It is recommended to consider combined therapy with pamidronate and calcitonin in the emergency management of hypercalcaemic crisis.

Aged↗
PubMed1992

Height prognosis of children with true precocious puberty and growth hormone deficiency: effect of combination therapy with gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist and growth hormone.

We evaluated height prognosis and therapeutic efficacy of long-term, combination therapy with gonadotropin releasing-hormone agonist and growth hormone (GH) in five children (three girls) with coexistent precocious puberty and GH deficiency. Their clinical characteristics and growth response were compared with those of 12 girls with idiopathic true precocious puberty and eight prepubertal GH-deficient children (one girl). Precocious GH-deficient subjects were older than the precocious GH-sufficient children (9.5 +/- 1.8 years vs 6.5 +/- 1.3 years; mean +/- SD), but bone ages were comparable (12 +/- 3.7 years vs 10 +/- 0.9 years); their chronologic age was similar to that of the prepubertal GH-deficient children (9.6 +/- 2.1 years), but bone age was significantly more advanced (6.9 +/- 2.3 years). The mean height velocity of the prepubertal GH-deficient children (3.8 +/- 1.5 cm/yr) was lower than that of the precocious GH-deficient subjects (6.7 +/- 1.6 cm/yr) and the precocious GH-sufficient children (9.5 +/- 2.9 cm/yr). Baseline adult height prediction z scores were significantly lower in the precocious GH-deficient children (-3.7 +/- 1.0) than in either the precocious GH-sufficient children (-2.2 +/- 1.0) or the prepubertal GH-deficient subjects (-1.5 +/- 0.8). During therapy with gonadotropin releasing-hormone agonist, growth rates slowed to an average of 3.7 cm/yr in the precocious GH-deficient children but increased after the addition of GH to 7.4 cm during the first year of combination therapy. After 2 to 3 years of combination therapy, height predictions increased an average of 10 cm, compared with an increase of 2.8 cm in the precocious GH-sufficient group treated with gonadotropin releasing-hormone agonist alone. We conclude that combination treatment with gonadotropin releasing-hormone agonist and GH improves the height prognosis of children with coexistent true precocious puberty and GH deficiency, but falls short of achieving normal adult height potential.

Age Determination by Skeleton↗