PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Curriculum--changes”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

The impact of a curriculum change on student attitude and ultimate professional behavior.

The longitudinal effects of curriculum changes on student attitude and the relationship between attitudes as students and behavior as a professionals in practice are explored in this paper. A curriculum change (treatment of handicapped patients) was planned, introduced, and its effects on student attitude and professional behavior monitored. Findings indicate that: (1) exposure to handicapping conditions significantly lowered student humanitarian attitudes about the treatment of handicapped patients, (2) involvement with handicapped, regardless of the type of involvement (i.e. clinical or supervising oral hygiene care), appears to adversely affect humanitarian attitudes of students regarding handicapped patients. (3) student estimation of their future behavior is not a reliable indication of their future behavior, and (4) changes in curriculum should not be evaluated from student attitudes alone.

Attitude↗

Curriculum change needed at Yale.

The United States Congress has recently passed an important bill entitled, The Health Professionals Assistance Act of 1976. It seeks to right physician maldistribution in the country and curtail the over specialization of medical practitioners. Quotas have been set in terms of the number of medical school graduates who must enter primary care training programs over the next few years. Failure to comply risks loss of the federal capitation grant of twenty-one hundred dollars per student or about one million dollars a year in Yale's case.The causes of physician maldistribution are discussed. Partial blame is ascribed to the medical schools themselves and recommendations are made for curriculum changes which if adopted may achieve better physician distribution without further government inroads into medical school affairs.

Connecticut↗

Internal medicine practice in transition. Implications for curriculum changes.

The curriculum for internal medicine needs to be changed to eliminate the dichotomy between training and practice. At the same time, changing medical needs and the actual conditions of medical practice must be taken into account. The new curriculum, at the very least, needs to emphasize the central position of general internists in health care delivery. To accomplish this, several subjects must be added to the curriculum, including additional training in ambulatory care, management of chronic disease, medical procedures, and the doctor-patient relationship. Learning to direct a coordinated health care team should also be included. A more definitive restructuring would require reorganizing medical centers around three major departments: primary care, subspecialty medicine, and surgery.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Family physician pathway and medical student career choice. Ten years after curriculum change at the University of Washington.

In 1968 the University of Washington School of Medicine initiated a new curriculum that included a family physician pathway. Six of these classes have now graduated. Two thirds of the planned strategies for the pathway were actually implemented. Approximately half of the students in each second-year class now choose this pathway. Ninety percent of those graduating have done so in the traditional four years. Seventy-three percent of those in the pathway actually pursued family practice training on graduation. Approximately one third of all University of Washington graduates now enter training for family practice, one third enter internal medicine, 10% enter surgical fields, and 8% enter pediatrics. These rates represent significant increases in the proportion of students entering directly into family practice, internal medicine, and pediatrics training.

Career Choice↗

Changing the curriculum for internal medicine residency training.

The academic leadership of internal medicine is considering fundamental changes in the curriculum for internal medicine residency training. The impetus to change the curriculum is derived from various socioeconomic changes during the past 10 years. These changes have resulted in a drastically shortened length of stay of patients in hospitals, an emphasis on outpatient care by reimbursement agencies, and a sharp decline in the numbers of U.S. medical graduates selecting careers in internal medicine. Curriculum change will mandate that we define the roles of general internists and subspecialists in the delivery of primary care and that we re-define how we train these two groups of internists. We must focus attention on the issue of service compared with education and must confront the issue of how best to train foreign medical graduates. Any curriculum change will also have to accommodate residents selecting careers in research in order to ensure an adequate supply of physician-scientists. Before implementing any change in curriculum, we must put into place a rigorous, prospective evaluation system. We must be able to accurately assess both positive and negative outcomes of these changes and make necessary midcourse corrections. The impetus for curriculum change in internal medicine will, it is hoped, ultimately benefit the public, the trainees, and the practice of internal medicine.

Ambulatory Care Facilities↗

An evaluation of undergraduate family care programs.

Evaluation of the many new family care programs (FCP), and others of similar intent, however defined, is as essential as determining the value of any other curriculum change. Replies to a questionnaire from 101 U.S. and 15 Canadian medical schools indicated that 80% of the former and 93% of the latter had FCPs; 35% and 29%, respectively, were not evaluating their program by any method. No single evaluative technique was used by more than 42% of the American medical schools. A review of the literature on FCPs frequently indicated that the conclusions that could be drawn about the programs were ambiguous. Students in the University of Cincinnati Medical Center FCPs elected family practice or pediatric internships significantly more often than did the FCP nonparticipants, but they indicated that the program had little effect on this choice, despite almost uniformly favorable testimonials. We discuss the possibility that FCPs may be educating the wrong students, that FCPs, if not reinforced in other clinical areas, may have few lasting effects on student attitudes or career choice, and that we may be asking the wrong questions, and with inadequate methods.

Adult↗

Attitudes of graduates toward occupational therapy education.

Recently graduated occupational therapists were surveyed to determine their perceptions of the adequacy of their professional training. Through a mailed questionnaire, therapists evaluated their undergraduate professional preparation based upon their clinical experiences since graduation. Additional suggestions were solicited regarding possible areas of curriculum change, and the survey gave special attention to the area of interpersonal skill development. Responses were examined for areas of commonality and possible use in curriculum planning and modification. Results indicated that recent graduates see a need for more and earlier patient contact, increased attention to the development of administrative and managerial skills, and courses designed to facilitate skills necessary for effective interpersonal relationships.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗