PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Cytosine Base Editor (CBE)”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Transgene-free genome editing in citrus and poplar trees using positive and negative selection markers.

Transgene-free genome editing of the gene of interest in citrus and poplar has been achieved by co-editing the ALS gene via transient transgene expression of an efficient cytosine base editor. CRISPR-Cas genome editing systems have been widely used in plants. However, such genome-edited plants are nearly always transgenic in the first generation when Agrobacterium-mediated transformation is used. Transgene-free genome-edited plants are valuable for genetic analysis and breeding as well as simplifying regulatory approval. It can be challenging to generate transgene-free genome-edited plants in vegetatively propagated or perennial plants. To advance transgene-free genome editing in citrus and poplar, we investigated a co-editing strategy using an efficient cytosine base editor (CBE) to edit the ALS gene to confer herbicide resistance combined with transient transgene expression and potential mobile RNA-based movement of CBE transcripts to neighboring, non-transgenic cells. An FCY-UPP based cytotoxin system was used to select non-transgenic plants that survive after culturing on 5-FC containing medium. While the editing efficiency is higher in poplar than in citrus, our results show that the CBE-based co-editing strategy works in both citrus and poplar, albeit with low efficiency for biallelic edits. Unexpectedly, the addition of the TLS mobile RNA sequence reduced genome editing efficiency in both transgenic and non-transgenic plants. Although a small fraction of escaping plants is detected in both positive and negative selection processes, our data demonstrate a promising approach for generating transgene-free base-edited plants.

Populus↗

Genome editing with programmable base editors in human cells.

Genome editing has garnered significant attention over the last decade, resulting in a massive expansion of the genome engineering toolbox. Base editors encompass a class of tools that enable installing single-nucleotide changes in genomic DNA without the use of double-strand breaks. With the ever-increasing development of new and/or improved base editor systems, it is easy to be overwhelmed by the abundance of options. Here, we provide clear guidance to facilitate the selection of a base editor and to design guide RNAs (gRNAs) to suit various needs. Additionally, we describe in detail how to generate gRNA plasmids, transfect various mammalian cell types, and evaluate editing efficiencies. Finally, we give alternative methods and troubleshooting tips for some common pitfalls encountered during base editing.

Humans↗

An advanced cytosine base editor enabled the generation of cattle with a stop codon in the β-lactoglobulin gene.

β-Lactoglobulin (BLG) is an allergen present in milk that can induce an acute immune response in certain individuals. The successful use of cytosine base editors (CBEs) can introduce stop codons into premature mRNA, thereby generating animals with disrupted genes that negatively regulate target traits. In this study, we employed a CBE system to target the major milk allergen BLG in bovine embryos, mammary epithelial cells, and live cattle. First, the precise single-base editing of the BLG gene in bovine embryos was achieved by designing an effective sgRNA to induce a c.61C > T substitution in the coding region, converting codon 21Gln (p.21Gln) to a premature stop codon. Sanger sequencing revealed an editing efficiency of 83.3% (20 out of 24 embryos), including two homozygous edits. Second, a bovine mammary epithelial cell line harboring BLG edits was constructed using the same CBE system. Sequencing showed that the designed sgRNA1 enabled the simultaneous conversion of three consecutive cytosines (c.59-61CCC > TTT) to thymines. At position c.61, single-cell clones exhibited monoallelic or biallelic editing (BLGc.61C > T), with monoallelic edits at positions c.59 and c.60 (CC > TT). Gene expression analysis confirmed that the BLGc.61C > T mutation effectively suppressed BLG expression at both the mRNA and protein levels, even in monoallelically edited cells. Finally, we successfully generated a heterozygous BLGc.61C > T single-base-edited dairy cow that despite its heterozygosity, showed significantly reduced BLG expression in the mammary epithelial cells and milk. Collectively, this study demonstrates the feasibility of using CBEs to disrupt BLG expression in dairy cows and provides a foundation for application in generating hypoallergenic dairy products.

Animals↗

Enhancing CRISPR-Cas12a base editing in plants with LbCas12a variants and introns.

Cytosine base editors (CBEs) and adenine base editors (ABEs) are powerful tools for precise genome editing in plants. Conventionally, such base editors are built upon the CRISPR-Cas9 systems where Cas9 nickases are used. To expand the base editing scope and minimize off-target effects, base editors derived from the CRISPR-Cas12a systems are desired. However, the use of deactivated Cas12a (dCas12a) in such base editors constrains the editing activity, preventing the wide use of Cas12a base editors for plant research and trait development. In this study, we demonstrate the use of an ABE based on the efficient LbCas12a-RRV variant to introduce herbicide-resistant mutations in OsACCase in rice. To improve Cas12a CBEs and ABEs, we inserted introns into the coding sequence of dLbCas12a-RRV. This intron-containing Cas12a-CBE shows substantial improvement in editing efficiency in rice, compared to the intron-less counterparts. By contrast, the improvement of ABE with the intron-containing dLbCas12a-RRV is very limited, partly due to the already high baseline editing efficiency of the intron-less dLbCas12a-RRV ABE. Testing of these base editors in poplar shows elevated C-to-T base editing by dLbCas12a-RRV-intron-CBE. For A-to-G editing, ABEs built upon dLbCas12a-RV and dLbCas12a-RRV variants showed significant improvement over ABEs derived from wild-type LbCas12a and the ttLbCas12a variant. The addition of introns to dLbCas12a-RRV does not further improve the base editing efficiency. With whole genome sequencing in rice, we evaluated genome editing specificities with these improved Cas12a base editors. Our analyses show that both intron-containing Cas12a CBE and ABE barely introduce guide RNA-dependent off-target mutations. However, they can generate guide RNA-independent off-target mutations, which are likely attributed to the high enzymatic activities of the deaminases. Collectively, our study demonstrates the successful use of a Cas12a base editor for trait development and reports improved Cas12a CBEs and ABEs for precise base editing in plants.

Oryza↗

RNA-DNA hybrid binding domain broadens the editing window of base editors.

Adenine base editors (ABEs) and cytosine base editors (CBEs) are prominent tools for precise genome editing but are hindered by limited editing activity at positions proximal to the protospacer adjacent motif (PAM). This study investigates the potential of enhancing base editors editing activity by fusing them with RNA-DNA hybrid binding domains (RHBDs). Specifically, fusing ABE8e with the RHBD of Homo sapiens RNaseH1 (RHBD1) significantly increased A-to-G editing efficiency in the PAM-proximal region (A9-A15) by up to 3.5-fold, while reducing off-target cytosine editing. Additionally, RHBD1 is compatible with ABEmax, BE4max, and dual base editor (eA&C-BEmax), enhancing their editing activity at the PAM-proximal bases. Notably, RHBD1-fused BE4max led to a 3.1-fold improvement in C-to-T editing efficiency at PAM-proximal region (C9-C12). Furthermore, we demonstrated that RHBD1-fused ABE8e could effectively edit disease-related single nucleotide variations (SNVs) in human cells and validated its efficacy in adult mouse liver. These findings highlight the significance of the RHBD in expanding editing window and the applicability of base editors for gene therapy and disease modeling.

Gene Editing↗