PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “DENTAL CAVITY LINING”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1992

Early in vitro marginal microleakage associated with different lining materials under Class II amalgam restorations.

The aim of this study was to determine which dental cavity lining material exhibited least microleakage when used under amalgam. Extracted premolar teeth, prepared with Class II cavities, had one of three lining materials (cavity varnish, zinc oxide-eugenol or light-cured glass-ionomer) placed. Following restoration the teeth were immersed in eosin and sectioned. Sections were subjected to image analysis measuring the linear leakage and area of spread into coronal dentine. Percentages in relation to restoration length and the area of crown dentine were calculated. Light-cured glass-ionomer cement liner significantly (P < 0.05) reduced all aspects of the microleakage parameters studied.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed2003

The effect of an additional flowable compomer layer on microleakage of Class V compomer restorations.

BACKGROUND: Polymerisation shrinkage and the associated stress on composite resins and surrounding structures have been regarded as a major cause of leakage and clinical failures in modern polymer restorations. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of an additional flowable compomer layer on the microleakage of Class V dental cavities, which were further filled with a compomer. METHOD: Cavities (32) were prepared in human premolars, conditioned with a non-rinsing agent (Prime & Bond NRC) and treated with the bonding agent (Prime & Bond NT). Sixteen of these cavities were then lined with a layer of flowable compomer (Dyract Flow, approximately 0.5 mm) and further filled with Dyract AP. The other 16 cavities were filled without the flowable compomer. The specimens were thermo-cycled in a 0.5% basic fuchsin solution, sectioned and evaluated for dye penetration using a scoring system of 0 to 4. RESULTS: Lower microleakage values were found at the enamel as well as at the dentine sides when a layer of Dyract Flow was used as a liner. Furthermore, significantly (p < 0.05) lower microleakage was found in enamel than in dentine for both layered and unlayered restorations. CONCLUSION: It can be concluded that a layer of flowable compomer (i.e. Dyract Flow) in a cavity under a compomer may be recommended to improve the marginal seal of a restoration.

Bicuspid↗
PubMed1990

Cermet cements.

Cermet ionomer cements are sintered metal/glass powders, which can be made to react with poly(acids). These new cements are significantly more resistant to abrasion than regular glass ionomer cements and are widely accepted as core build-up materials and lining cements. They can strengthen teeth and provide the clinician with an opportunity to treat early dental caries.

Cermet Cements↗
PubMed1978

What is happening to cavity toilet and lining?

There has been a swing toward using chemicals other than air and water for some areas of cavity preparation and cavity toilet. There also have been some new thoughts in the area of linings and bases. This is a discussion in clinical terms of the current concepts in the area between cutting of the cavity and insertion of the restoration.

Acid Etching, Dental↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Influence of flowable composite lining thickness on Class II composite restorations.

This in vitro study aimed to investigate the influence of flowable composite lining with different thicknesses on the marginal quality and internal porosity of Class II composite restorations. Thirty-two intact molars, each prepared with two box-only Class II cavities, were randomly divided into four groups: Group 1, P60 filling alone; Group 2, ultrathin flowable composite lining/co-cured with overlaying composite; Group 3, thin lining/pre-cured and Group 4, thick lining/pre-cured. The teeth were then thermocycled for 1500 cycles (between 5 degrees C and 60 degrees C) and dye immersed for 24 hours. Exterior surface replicas of these restorations were fabricated before and after thermocycling and examined by SEM to evaluate percentages of the five marginal patterns. Data was statistically evaluated using one-way ANOVA test. The teeth were subsequently sectioned longitudinally. The interface microleakage of cervical margin was measured as to the extent of dye penetration. Internal voids were separately recorded in the cervical interface and the cervical and occlusal halves of the restorations. Mann-Whitney test was applied to analyze the interface microleakage and internal voids. Results revealed that replicas of Group 4 presented the highest percentage of marginal openings both before and after thermocycling in SEM examination. Group 2 exhibited superior marginal quality in interface microleakage evaluation compared to the other groups, while Group 4 exhibited the worst. The pre-cured groups (Group 3 and 4) showed significant reduction in interface and cervical voids. Despite the reduction in interface voids, a thick lining may impair the marginal sealing, especially after thermocycling. It was concluded that a minimally thin flowable composite lining improved cavity adaptation and marginal sealing.

Analysis of Variance↗