PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “DENTIFRICES”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1997

A comparison of intraoral antimicrobial effects of stabilized stannous fluoride dentifrice, baking soda/peroxide dentifrice, conventional NaF dentifrice and essential oil mouthrinse.

The intraoral antimicrobial activity of four commercial oral products-conventional NaF dentifrice (Crest), baking soda/peroxide/NaF dentifrice (Mentadent), essential oil mouthrinse (Listerine) and SnF2 dentifrice (Crest Plus Gum Care)-have been compared in three test regimens. Formulations were compared for their ability to suppress the regrowth and apical extension of dental plaque following toothbrushing during thirty hours of non-brushing where products were used as oral rinses (30-hour plaque regrowth model). Formulations were also compared for their ability to suppress the colony-forming units (cfu) of facultative anaerobic bacteria sampled from buccal gingival surfaces following use (Gingival Surface Microbial Index-GSMI model). Lastly, formulations were compared for effects in suppressing the glycolytic metabolic activity and regrowth activity of in vivo-treated dental plaques sampled at various periods following topical use and incubated under controlled ex vivo conditions (Plaque Glycolysis and Regrowth-PGRM model). In thirty-hour plaque regrowth testing, the rank ordered antimicrobial efficacy of formulations followed SnF2 > essential oils > NaF = water = baking soda/peroxide. In GSMI testing, all formulations were shown to suppress the cfu of facultative anaerobic bacteria relative to baseline, although SnF2 treatment was observed to reduce bacterial levels to a significantly greater degree than NaF dentifrice or baking soda/peroxide dentifrice up to two hours following brushing. In PGRM testing, the SnF2 dentifrice provided significant inhibition of bacterial metabolism and regrowth following topical application when compared with the NaF dentifrice as control. The baking soda/peroxide dentifrice provided no reduction in either bacterial metabolism or regrowth in PGRM. Previous studies had demonstrated modest effects for essential oil rinse in reducing PGRM plaque regrowth, with no effects for this treatment on plaque metabolism. Overall, these results demonstrate that SnF2 dentifrice provides substantial intraoral antimicrobial effects. The essential oil mouthrinse also exhibits significant intraoral antimicrobial effects, albeit apparently less than SnF2 dentifrice. The baking soda/peroxide dentifrice did not produce any antimicrobial effects following in vivo use compared with conventional dentifrice. These results provide mechanistic rationale for the chemotherapeutic efficacy of SnF2 and essential oil formulations in reducing gingivitis, while providing no support for the expectation of clinical efficacy for formulations containing baking soda and peroxide.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

The comparative efficacy of stabilized stannous fluoride dentifrice, peroxide/baking soda dentifrice and essential oil mouthrinse for the prevention of gingivitis.

This double-blind parallel-design clinical study compared the efficacy of a stabilized stannous fluoride dentifrice (Crest Plus Gum Care), baking soda and peroxide (NaF) dentifrice (Mentadent), and essential oil mouthrinse (Listerine) to a conventional NaF dentifrice (Crest) for the control of plaque, gingivitis and gingival bleeding over six months. Following an initial baseline examination and stratification, subjects received a complete oral prophylaxis and were distributed assigned test products. Following three and six months, subjects re-visited the clinic for examinations. Evaluations at baseline and at 3 and 6 months included soft tissue status. Löe-Silness gingivitis/gingival bleeding, Silness-Löe plaque and dental stain. Results subsequent to six months of product use were as follows: At six months, the stabilized stannous fluoride dentifrice was observed to produce statistically significant 17.5% reductions in gingivitis and 27.5% reductions in gingival bleeding relative to the NaF dentifrice. The combination of sodium fluoride dentifrice and essential oil mouthrinse produced statistically significant reductions of 7.4% in gingivitis and 10.8% in plaque as compared with the NaF dentifrice. The stabilized stannous fluoride dentifrice produced statistically significant reductions in both gingivitis (10.8%) and gingival bleeding (23.0%) relative to the combination of sodium fluoride dentifrice and essential oil mouthrinse. The baking soda and peroxide (NaF) dentifrice did not provide reductions in gingivitis, plaque or gingival bleeding as compared with the conventional NaF dentifrice. The stabilized stannous fluoride dentifrice provided statistically significant reductions in gingivitis as compared with the baking soda and peroxide dentifrice following six months of use, and both the essential oil mouthrinse and stabilized stannous fluoride dentifrice provided statistically significant reductions in gingivitis as compared with the baking soda and peroxide dentifrice following three months of use. These results support: 1) the efficacy of stabilized stannous fluoride dentifrice and the combination of sodium fluoride dentifrice and essential oil mouthrinse for the prevention of gingivitis; 2) the superior activity of stabilized stannous fluoride dentifrice as compared with a combination of sodium fluoride dentifrice and essential oil mouthrinse for the control of gingivitis and gingival bleeding; and 3) the lack of efficacy for baking soda and peroxide dentifrice for the control of plaque, gingivitis and gingival bleeding as compared with conventional fluoridated dentifrice.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Comparison of the clinical anticaries efficacy of an 1100 NaF silica-based dentifrice containing triclosan and a copolymer to an 1100 NaF silica-based dentifrice without those additional agents: a study on adults in California.

Recent years have seen much work in the development of dentifrices containing the antimicrobial agent triclosan, a broad spectrum antibacterial agent manufactured for use in oral products by the Ciba-Geigy Corporation. Studies have shown that the incorporation of this agent into dental products, in combination with a PVM/MA copolymer (the non-proprietary designation for a polyvinylmethyl ether/maleic acid copolymer), can provide several important dental therapeutic benefits, including an antigingivitis effect. Much research on the therapeutic benefits of such dentifrices has been reported in the literature. The present study is a component of a large-scale program of clinical research to investigate the anticaries effectiveness of fluoride dentifrices containing 0.3% triclosan and 2.0% PVM/MA copolymer. The study included two treatment groups, each consisting of adults living within a 50 mile radius of Loma Linda, California, who were assigned to the use of one of the following sodium fluoride (NaF) dentifrices: 1) a dentifrice containing 0.3% triclosan and 2.0% PVM/MA copolymer in a 0.243% NaF/silica (1100 ppm F) base; or 2) a dentifrice containing 0.243% NaF/silica (1100 ppm F). Conducted in accordance with the guidelines for caries clinical studies published by the Council on Dental Therapeutics of the American Dental Association, the study employed clinical diagnostic criteria as described in the August, 1987 National Institute of Dental Research (NIH/NIDR) publication. Dental radiographs were not employed. Principal comparisons of the dentifrices tested were implemented through the construction of 90% confidence intervals for the ratio of mean 3-year caries increments, using Fieller's theorem. Of those subjects who met the initial inclusion/exclusion criteria for this study, 1,542 were available for the 36-month examination. DFS (resp., DFT) increments over this period were 2.07 (0.63) for the triclosan/copolymer dentifrice, and 2.16 (0.68) for the dentifrice without those additives. The confidence interval calculations for both incremental DFS and DFT support the conclusion that a dentifrice containing 0.3% triclosan and 2.0% PVM/MA copolymer in a 0.243% NaF/silica (1100 ppm F) base provides a level of anticaries efficacy which is "at least as good as" that provided by a dentifrice containing 1100 NaF/silica without those additive agents. As such, the results of this clinical study clearly indicate that the addition of triclosan and a copolymer to a 1100 NaF/silica dentifrice does not compromise its anticaries efficacy.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Comparison of the clinical anticaries efficacy of a 1500 NaF silica-based dentifrice containing triclosan and a copolymer to a 1500 NaF silica-based dentifrice without those additional agents: a study on adults in Israel.

Recent years have seen much work in the development of dentifrices containing the antimicrobial agent triclosan, a broad spectrum antibacterial agent manufactured for use in oral products by the Ciba-Geigy Corporation. Studies have shown that the incorporation of this agent into dental products, in combination with a PVM/MA copolymer (the non-proprietary designation for a polyvinylmethyl ether/maleic acid copolymer), can provide several important dental therapeutic benefits, including an antigingivitis effect. A considerable amount of the research on the therapeutic benefits of such dentifrices has been reported in the literature. The present study is a component of a large-scale program of clinical research to investigate the anticaries effectiveness of fluoride dentifrices containing 0.3% triclosan and 2.0% PVM/MA copolymer. The study included two treatment groups, each consisting of adults living near the Kiryat Gat area in Israel, who were assigned to the use of one of the following sodium fluoride (NaF) dentifrices: 1) a dentifrice containing 0.3% triclosan and 2.0% PVM/MA copolymer in a 0.331% NaF/silica (1500 ppm F) base; or 2) a dentifrice containing 0.331% NaF/silica (1500 ppm F). Conducted in accordance with the guidelines for caries clinical studies published by the Council on Dental Therapeutics of the American Dental Association, the study employed clinical diagnostic criteria as described in the August, 1987 National Institute of Dental Research (NIH/NIDR) publication. Dental radiographs were not employed. Principal comparisons of the dentifrices tested were implemented through the construction of 90% confidence intervals for the ratio of mean 3-year caries increments using Fieller's Theorem. Of those subjects who met the initial inclusion/exclusion criteria for this study, 1,296 were available for the 36-month examination. DFS (resp., DFT) increments over this period were 5.21 (1.30) for the triclosan/copolymer dentifrice, and 5.23 (1.39) for the dentifrice without those additives. The confidence interval calculations for both incremental DFS and DFT support the conclusion that a dentifrice containing 0.3% triclosan and 2.0% PVM/MA copolymer in a 0.331% NaF/silica (1500 ppm F) base provides a level of anticaries efficacy which is "at least as good as" that provided by a dentifrice containing 1500 NaF/silica, without those additive agents. As such, the results of this clinical study clearly indicate that the addition of triclosan and a copolymer to a 1500 NaF/silica dentifrice does not compromise its anticaries efficacy.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Clinical study to assess the stain removal efficacy of two tartar control dentifrices and a low abrasive dentifrice.

Significant differences in stain removal have been demonstrated in a laboratory study comparing two tartar control dentifrices: Platinum, containing 1.3% soluble pyrophosphate and 1.5% of a copolymer, and Crest Tartar Control, containing 5% soluble pyrophosphate. The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the same tartar control dentifrices, and a low abrasive dentifrice for their ability to reduce Peridex-induced stain. Eighty-five subjects were given Peridex (0.12% chlorhexidine digluconate) and a low abrasive dentifrice for 4 weeks. The 76 subjects with sufficient stain were stratified using the Lobene index on buccal and lingual surfaces of anterior teeth, and randomly assigned one of the three dentifrices for 8 weeks. At the end of the study, total stain evaluations were significantly lower in the Platinum dentifrice group (mean 0.84) compared to both Crest Tartar Control dentifrice (1.08) and the low abrasive dentifrice (1.09) at p<0.05 by ANOVA. In this 8-week clinical study, Platinum dentifrice was significantly more effective than Crest Tartar Control dentifrice or a low abrasive dentifrice in reducing Peridex-induced stain, and this finding correlates well with laboratory data on removal of tea and coffee stain.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Influence of socioeconomic level and dentifrice brand on the oral hygiene habits and the fluoride dentifrice ingestion.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of socioeconomic level and dentifrice brand on the brushing habits and the fluoride ingestion. The sample was composed of 124 Brazilian children aged 3-9 years, from different socioeconomic levels (SEL). It was used a crossover study with the children using two dentifrice brands: Tandy Uva/T (1,100 ppm NaF) and Super Branco/SB (1,500 ppm MFP). Each child brushed his/her teeth with both dentifrice brands with weekly intervals between the brushes. The oral hygiene habits considered in this study were the Dentifrice Amount Placed on toothbrush (ADP), Dentifrice Amount Ingested (ADI), Fluoride Amount Ingested (FAI) and Brushing Time (TB). The data obtained were submitted to ANOVA test. It was observed that there was influence of SEL on the ADP and TB. The high SEL children showed a higher ADP and TB. The dentifrice brand influenced significantly the ADP, ADI, AFI and TB; the dentifrice T showed a higher ADP, ADI, but a lower AFI and TB. The results showed a significant interaction between SEL and dentifrice brand as ADI, AFI and TB. Although the children ingested a higher amount of T dentifrice they ingested a higher amount of fluoride from the SB dentifrice.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed1991

The effect of an anticalculus dentifrice on calculus formation and gingival recession in Thai children and teenagers: one-year study. Study #2. An anticalculus dentifrice containing 1.3% soluble pyrophosphate and 1.5% of a copolymer.

A one-year, double-blind clinical study was conducted on a population of Thai children and teenagers to determine the effect of the twice daily use of an anticalculus dentifrice on supragingival calculus formation and gingival recession, as compared to the use of a placebo dentifrice and the continuation of customary oral hygiene procedures. The subjects were initially evaluated for calculus using the Volpe-Manhold procedure and for gingival recession using the GRT procedure of Volpe, Triratana, and Rustogi. All subjects received an oral prophylaxis and were assigned to the use of the following: (1) a placebo dentifrice containing 0.243% sodium fluoride in a silica base, (2) an anticalculus dentifrice containing 1.3% soluble pyrophosphate and 1.5% Gantrez copolymer in a 0.243% sodium fluoride/silica base, or (3) continuation of customary oral hygiene procedures. After six months, the subjects using the anticalculus dentifrice had 35.93% less supragingival calculus than the placebo dentifrice subjects, and 52.74% less supragingival calculus than the subjects who continued their regular/customary oral hygiene procedures. After one year, the subjects using the anticalculus dentifrice had 39.76% less supragingival calculus and 18.33% less gingival recession than the subjects using the placebo dentifrice. Also, after one year, the subjects using the anticalculus dentifrice had 57.86% less supragingival calculus and 16.55% less gingival recession than the subjects who continued their customary oral hygiene procedures. All reductions were statistically significant at the 99% level of confidence.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

A comparison of stabilized stannous fluoride dentifrice and triclosan/copolymer dentifrice for efficacy in the reduction of gingivitis and gingival bleeding: six-month clinical results.

This parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial directly compared the efficacy of two antimicrobial dentifrice formulations for the control of plaque, gingivitis and gingival bleeding during six months of use following a pre-test randomization period. Test antimicrobial dentifrices for the study included: a stabilized stannous fluoride formulation (Crest Plus Gum Care-currently marketed in U.S.) comprised of 0.454% SnF2 in a stabilized silica abrasive base; and a formulation containing triclosan (Colgate Total, currently marketed outside the U.S. in numerous countries) comprised of 0.30% triclosan. 2.0% Gantrez co-polymer and 0.243% NaF in a silica abrasive base. The control dentifrice was a conventional fluoride dentifrice comprised of 0.243% NaF in a silica abrasive base. Clinical evaluations included Turesky et al. plaque, Löe-Silness gingivitis and gingival bleeding, and Meckel stain. The stabilized stannous fluoride dentifrice exhibited significant efficacy in the reduction of both gingivitis (20.5%) and gingival bleeding (33.4%) after six months relative to the placebo control (p < 0.05). In direct comparison, the stabilized stannous fluoride dentifrice reduced gingivitis and gingival bleeding significantly relative to the triclosan/copolymer dentifrice (p < 0.05). These results establish: 1) the superior clinical efficacy of a stabilized stannous fluoride dentifrice relative to a triclosan/copolymer dentifrice in the chemotherapeutic control of gingivitis and gingival bleeding; 2) the important contribution of clinical test design/sensitivity in assessing the therapeutic efficacy of antimicrobial agents; and 3) the value of head-to-head comparative studies in establishing the therapeutic relevance of clinical effects of formulations for the reduction of gingivitis.

Adult↗
PubMed1978

[The periodontally prophylactic effect of the dentifrice "Silka". 1. The effect of the dentifrice "Silka" on the periodontium compared to other dentifrices from the DDR production].

As compared to a toothpaste without periodontal-prophylactic adjuncts, the commercially available silka toothpaste exerted a statistically significant beneficial effect on the chronically inflamed gingivae. Thus, a periodontal-prophylactic efficiency may be attributed to the Silka toothpaste.

Benzyl Compounds↗
PubMed1991

The effect of an anticalculus dentifrice on calculus formation and gingival recession in Thai children and teenagers: one-year study. Study #1. An anticalculus dentifrice containing 3.3% soluble pyrophosphate and 1.0% of a copolymer.

A one-year, double-blind clinical study was conducted on a population of Thai children and teenagers to determine the effect of the twice daily use of an anticalculus dentifrice on supragingival calculus formation and gingival recession, as compared to the use of a placebo dentifrice and the continuation of customary oral hygiene procedures. The subjects were initially evaluated for calculus using the Volpe-Manhold procedure and for gingival recession using the GRT procedure of Volpe, Triratana, and Rustogi. All subjects received an oral prophylaxis and were assigned to the use of 1) a placebo dentifrice containing 0.243% sodium fluoride in a silica base, 2) an anticalculus dentifrice containing 3.3% soluble pyrophosphate and 1.0% Gantrez copolymer--in a 0.243% sodium fluoride/silica base, or 3) continuation of customary oral hygiene procedures. After one year, the subjects using the anticalculus dentifrice had 37.01% less supragingival calculus and 25.09% less gingival recession than the subjects using the placebo dentifrice. Additionally, after one year, the subjects using the anticalculus dentifrice had 34.86% less supragingival calculus and 29.95% less gingival recession than the subjects who continued their customary oral hygiene procedures. All reductions were statistically significant at the 95% or greater level of confidence.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

An investigation of the transverse technique of dentifrice application to reduce the amount of fluoride dentifrice for young children.

PURPOSE: Recent studies have shown an increase in the prevalence of fluorosis. Consequently, recommendations for the use of a small quantity of fluoride dentifrice, 0.25 to 0.5 g or the equivalent of a "pea size" amount for children, have been made. This study evaluated a method of placing dentifrice in a transverse relation to the bristles (TT) and compares it to the standard technique used (ST) and to the "pea size" recommendation (PS). METHODS: The study was conducted in three phases: the first was in a laboratory setting using 22 commercial brands of children's toothbrushes; the second evaluated various recommendations with 240 mothers (Brazilian and Peruvian); and the third evaluated these recommendations in 135 Peruvian children (ages 4 to 6). RESULTS: The results showed that the mean quantity of dentifrice used with ST, PS, and TT was 0.58 g, 0.34 g, and 0.27 g for the mothers and 0.46 g, 0.29 g, and 0.24 g for the children, respectively. The average TT obtained through multiple weighing of 22 children's toothbrushes was 0.22 g. Both recommendations (PS and TT) reduced the amount of dentifrice used. However, TT also yielded a smaller variation range. Mothers and children learn easily and prefer TT. CONCLUSION: This technique could be recommended for young children in order to decrease the amount of fluoride dentifrice used, hence minimizing the potential inadvertent ingestion of fluoride dentifrice.

Brazil↗
PubMed1996

Comparison of 2 desensitizing dentifrices with a commercially available fluoride dentifrice in alleviating cervical dentine sensitivity.

Previous studies have demonstrated efficacy of desensitizing dentifrices containing strontium acetate/sodium fluoride (SrAc2F) and potassium chloride/sodium monofluorophosphate (KCl/MFP) in alleviating discomfort arising from cervical dentine sensitivity (CDS). The aim of this investigation, therefore, was to determine efficacy of a SrAc2F dentifrice compared with KCl/MFP and a commercially available fluoride dentifrice containing sodium fluoride/sodium monofluorophosphate (NaMFP). Fifty-six patients participated in a 2-center double-blind, 3-way comparative parallel 6-week clinical study. Patients were evaluated at 0, 2, and 6 weeks for tactile (Yeaple probe), air sensitivity (dental air syringe), and subjective perception of pain (VAS scores). Results for Yeaple probe scores (Wilcoxon tests) between 2 weeks and baseline were highly significant for KCl/MFP, significant for NaMFP and nonsignificant for SrAc2F; scores between 6 weeks and baseline were, however, highly significant for all groups. Subjective Yeaple probe VAS scores (paired t-tests) between 6 weeks and baseline were significant for all groups; significance was demonstrated in the KCl/MFP group between 2 weeks and baseline. Subjective air visual analogue scores (paired t-tests) between 2 weeks and baseline were highly significant for all groups. There were no significant differences between groups at any time point. The results of the study demonstrated that the commercially available fluoride-containing dentifrice was as effective as the 2 desensitizing dentifrices in alleviating CDS over time.

Acetates↗
PubMed2001

The comparative anticaries efficacy of a dentifrice containing 0.3% triclosan and 2.0% copolymer in a 0.243% sodium fluoride/silica base and a dentifrice containing 0.243% sodium fluoride/silica base: a two-year coronal caries clinical trial on adults in Israel.

The purpose of this two-year clinical study was to provide a comparison of the anticaries efficacy associated with two commercially available, American Dental Association-accepted dentifrices: Colgate Total Toothpaste, which contains 0.3% triclosan and 2% copolymer in a 0.243% sodium fluoride/silica base; and Crest Cavity Fighting Toothpaste with Fluoristat, which contains 0.243% sodium fluoride in a silica base. The study was conducted in harmony with the published 1988 American Dental Association guidelines for studies geared toward the comparison of fluoride dentifrices. The study employed a double-blind parallel-group design, and involved adults living in communities throughout Israel. Qualifying subjects were randomly assigned to the two treatment groups, with multiple subjects in the same household all assigned to the dentifrice randomly allocated to the first among them. Caries examinations were conducted in accordance with U.S. Food and Drug Administration guidelines for the clinical evaluation of drugs to prevent dental caries. Two calibrated examiners performed all of the measurements. After treatment assignment, study participants were instructed to brush their teeth at home with their assigned dentifrice at least twice daily. Brushing instructions were reinforced by indoctrination in proper oral hygiene techniques by dental professionals, supplemented by pamphlets supplied by the sponsor and yearly mailings to participants, emphasizing good oral hygiene and the need to ensure compliance with the study. Post-baseline examinations were performed after one year of product use, and again after two years of product use. Three-thousand, three-hundred and ninety-two (3,392) subjects completed this two-year study. For these subjects, the mean caries scores (DFS, decayed or filled surfaces) at baseline were 21.96 for the Colgate Total Toothpaste group, and 21.49 for the Crest Cavity Fighting Toothpaste with Fluoristat group. For caries increment after one year, the respective means were 1.37 for the Colgate Total Toothpaste group, and 1.56 for the Crest Cavity Fighting Toothpaste with Fluoristat group. After two years, the mean caries increments were 1.46 for the Colgate Total Toothpaste group, and 1.75 for the Crest Cavity Fighting Toothpaste with Fluoristat group. No statically significant difference was indicated between the treatment groups at baseline. However, for both the one-year and two-year increments, there was a statistically significant difference between treatment groups. Relative to the Crest Cavity Fighting Toothpaste with Fluoristat group, the Colgate Total Toothpaste group presented a 12.2% reduction in caries increment scores at one year, and a 16.6% reduction in caries increment scores at two years. In accordance with the procedures and standards provided by the published guidelines of the American Dental Association for the comparison of the anticaries efficacy of fluoride dentifrices, the results of this study support the conclusion that Colgate Total Toothpaste provides a superior level of coronal anticaries efficacy compared to Crest Cavity Fighting Toothpaste with Fluoristat.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

Antiplaque effects of dentifrices containing triclosan/copolymer/NaF system versus triclosan dentifrices without the copolymer.

A dentifrice containing triclosan/PVM/MA, Colgate Gum Protection Formula Toothpaste (GPF), was found to be highly effective against oral bacteria with minimal inhibitory concentration ranging from 0.3 to 5.35 micrograms/ml. A variety of in vitro model systems simulating oral environment were used to compare dentifrices containing triclosan/PVM/MA versus the dentifrices containing triclosan without PVM/MA, such as Crest Gum Health Toothpaste (CGH) and Neo-Mentadent P Toothpaste (N-MP). The uptake of triclosan on saliva-coated hydroxyapatite (HA) disks and buccal epithelial cells was significantly higher from the GPF versus the other dentifrices. Uptake on HA disks was 132 micrograms/disk versus 11 micrograms/disk from CGH; on buccal epithelial cells the uptake was 59 micrograms/2 x 10(5) cells with GPF versus 30.0 micrograms with CGH per same number of cells. The retained triclosan on the surfaces provided a sustained and higher antibacterial effect up to 4 hours post-treatment with GPF, but not with N-MP and CGH. In dynamic plaque model systems such as the chemostat or the controlled saliva flow system, GPF was significantly (P = 0.05) more effective than N-MP or CGH in reducing plaque thickness, protein and carbohydrate contents of plaque films. Collectively, the results of these microbiological and biochemical investigations indicate that the GPF has the potential to provide superior clinical efficacy versus the dentifrices without the copolymer.

Dental Plaque↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Enamel caries formation and lesion progression with a fluoride dentifrice and a calcium-phosphate containing fluoride dentifrice: a polarized light microscopic study.

The effects of a fluoride dentifrice (Colgate Total) and a calcium-phosphate containing fluoride dentifrice (Enamelon) on caries-like enamel lesion formation and progression were evaluated in vitro. One quarter from each tooth (n = 12) was assigned to one of the study groups: 1) control group [artificial saliva only]; 2) Colgate Total; and 3) Enamelon. The dentifrices were applied to the enamel windows (3 minutes, 3 time per day for 14 days). Following treatment, enamel lesions were created with an acidified gel. After lesion initiation, sections were obtained for polarized light microscopy. To evaluate lesion progression, enamel windows with caries-like lesions in each test group were treated again for 14 days, returned to acidified gels for lesion progression, and then sections were obtained for polarized light microscopy. Mean lesion depths (polarized light, water imbibition) were as follows: 1) Lesion Initiation: Control 109 +/- 19 microns, Colgate Total 76 +/- 14 microns, Enamelon 63 +/- 17 microns; 2) First Lesion Progression: Control 164; +/- 24 microns, Colgate Total 124 +/- 22 microns, Enamelon 110 +/- 19 microns; 3) Second Lesion Progression: Control 235 +/- 23 microns; Colgate Total 172 +/- 27 microns, Enamelon 153 +/- 18 microns. Both Colgate Total and Enamelon enhanced the resistance of sound enamel and caries-like enamel lesions to a continuous in vitro cariogenic challenge when compared with matched controls (P < .05, ANOVA, DMR). Enamelon provided a further reduction in lesion depth for all periods when compared with Colgate Total (P > .05, ANOVA, DMR). Addition of bioavailable calcium and phosphate ions to a fluoride dentifrice may improve the ability of enamel to resist caries initiation and subsequent lesion progression.

Analysis of Variance↗