PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “DENTURE LINERS”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1992

Comparison of bond strength of six soft denture liners to denture base resin.

The bond strength of six commercial soft denture liners was evaluated using a modified tensile test. The soft denture liners investigated were Prolastic, VinaSoft, Flexor, Molloplast-B, Novus, and Super-Soft. The samples were processed according to the manufacturers' instructions to cured denture base resin (polymethyl methacrylate; PMMA). The soft denture liners were 10 x 10 x 3 mm and were processed between two PMMA blocks. The samples were placed in tension until failure. The mode of failure, cohesive or adhesive, was also recorded. The results of this study showed that the bond strength is related to the components of the materials. Prolastic, VinaSoft, and Flexor had the lowest bond strength to cured PMMA and ranged from 9.6 to 11.3 kg/cm2. Super-Soft, Novus, and Molloplast-B demonstrated better bond strengths and ranged from 16.7 to 17.6 kg/cm2. The bond strength of Novus could be improved by using the recommended bonding agent and bonded Novus at 26.1 kg/cm2 had the highest bond strength of all materials tested.

Adhesiveness↗
PubMed2004

Relationship between plasticizer content and tensile bond strength of soft denture liners to a denture base resin.

The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of plasticizer content on the tensile bond strength of heat-cured acrylic soft denture liners to a denture base resin. Differences among materials were significant, except for 100 wt% Dibutyl Sebacate (DBS) and 80 wt% DBS of tensile bond strength. The bond strength of all materials to the denture base increased with an increase in thermal cycles significantly except for 40 wt% DBS. The tensile bond strength of soft denture liners to the denture base resin significantly decreased with an increase of plasticizer contents. Differences were found among the difference plasticizer contents in failure types between the denture base resin and soft denture liners. The results suggest that the tensile bond strengths of heat-cured acrylic soft denture liners to the denture base resin were lower with an increase in plasticizer content.

Acrylic Resins↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Effect of surface treatment on the bonding of an autopolymerizing soft denture liner to a denture base resin.

PURPOSE: This in vitro study evaluated the effects of surface treatments and thermocycling on the bonding of autopolymerizing silicone soft denture liner (Sofreliner) to denture base resin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The bonding surfaces of denture base cylinders were polished with 600-grit silicon carbide paper and pretreated with applications of Sofreliner Primer, Sofreliner Primer after air abrasion, Reline Primer, or Reline Primer after air abrasion. Failure loads and elongation at failure were measured after subjecting specimens to 0, 10,000, 20,000, and 30,000 thermocycles. Failure modes were assessed for all specimens. Seven specimens were fabricated for each of 16 groups, including four pretreatments and four thermocycle groups. RESULTS: Failure loads of the Sofreliner Primer group were significantly higher than those of the air-abrasion group up to 20,000 thermocycles; both groups showed cohesive failures of the soft denture liner. Failure loads of the Reline Primer group were significantly higher than with Reline Primer after air abrasion up to 10,000 thermocycles. Failure mode after 10,000 thermocycles was cohesive for the Reline Primer group and mixed cohesive/adhesive for Reline Primer after air abrasion. Failure loads of the Sofreliner Primer group were significantly higher than those of the Reline Primer group at each thermocycling interval. Elongation values decreased after 10,000 thermocycles for all groups. CONCLUSION: Air abrasion on the denture base resin surface was not effective in enhancing failure load. Cyclic thermal stress is one factor degrading the bond between soft denture liner and acrylic resin denture base.

Acrylic Resins↗
PubMed1992

Comparison of the physical properties of 11 soft denture liners.

Soft denture liners are an important treatment option for patients who have chronic soreness associated with their prostheses. The objective of this study is to determine the tensile strength, elongation, hardness, tear strength, and tear energy of eight plasticized polymers or copolymers, two silicones, and one polyphosphazene fluoroelastomer. Tests were made on samples that were stored in a humidor for 24 hours before testing. The range of data is as follows: tensile strength, 8 to 85 kg/cm2; percent elongation, 150% to 542%; hardness, 25 to 95 Shore-A units; tear energy, 1.43 x 10(6) to 40.4 x 10(6) ergs/cm2; tear resistance, 2.6 to 26.3 kg/cm. It can be concluded that (1) the data obtained can be useful in characterizing the performance of soft denture liners, (2) there is considerable variability in the physical/mechanical properties of soft denture liners, and (3) the required essential properties for soft denture liners are as yet not known.

Chemical Phenomena↗
PubMed2001

Effect of viscoelastic properties of resilient denture liners on pressures under dentures.

In order to evaluate the influence of viscoelastic properties of resilient denture liners on the pressures under dentures, a series of creep and stress relaxation tests were carried out using a simplified mandibular edentulous model and denture model. Two diaphragm pressure sensors were attached to the edentulous model so that they contacted the residual ridge and the buccal slope. The results may be summarized as follows: (i) The use of resilient denture liners is effective for stress relief under dentures. (ii) The thickness increase of each denture liners causes the effect of stress relaxation. (iii) The material exhibited viscoelastic behaviour after applying the stress and has the ability to distribute stress or stress relaxation. It is important to understand the viscoelastic behaviours of each resilient denture liner and choose the material according to the clinical situation. The information obtained should be useful to clinicians when they select materials for their patients.

Acrylic Resins↗
PubMed1994

Use of a new assay technique for quantification of antifungal activity of nystatin incorporated in denture liners.

Denture-induced stomatitis with concurrent candidal infection is the most commonly encountered intraoral abnormality among individuals who wear dentures. The institutionalized elderly demonstrate increased susceptibility and could benefit from its management with a fungicidal denture liner. As an integral part of the prosthesis, the efficacy of the fungicidal liner would be independent of patient compliance and/or nursing involvement and would provide a predictable therapeutic modality. In this study a "slant agar assay" was developed to evaluate the in vitro antimycotic activity of Visco-gel and Lynal liners impregnated with various concentrations of nystatin over a 14-day period in nonaqueous and aqueous environments. The results were as follows: preparations incorporating higher concentrations of nystatin resulted in greater inhibition of Candida albicans growth; Visco-gel liner-nystatin preparations exhibited a greater fungicidal activity than equivalent Lynal preparations; loss of potency by all of the reline-nystatin preparations consisted of an initial rapid loss between days 0 and 2, followed by a plateau during which the preparations gradually continued to lose inhibitory activity; and 1 million units of nystatin were necessary to maintain an adequate level of antifungal activity in an aqueous environment, where the liners demonstrated decreasing antifungal activity proportional to the duration of exposure to water.

Candida albicans↗
PubMed1997

[The effects of soft denture liners applied to complete dentures on masticatory functions].

The soft denture liner was applied to dentures for the edentulous patients with poor residual ridge and thin mucosa. It is useful for minimizing the soreness caused by the denture during mastication, however, its effect on masticatory functions has been rarely investigated. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of a soft liner applied to complete dentures on masticatory functions. Five edentulous volunteers who were satisfied with their new complete dentures took part in this study. The lower dentures were lined with a soft liner. Comparison of occlusal force, masticatory performance, masseter muscular activity, and mandibular movement were made between new dentures and relined dentures. The results of applying soft materials to lower dentures obtained by comparison with complete dentures using hard acrylic resin bases were follows: 1. Occlusal forces were significantly larger (p < 0.01). 2. Masticatory performance in chewing peanuts increased slightly. The number of strokes and time for masticating a peanut decreased significantly (p < 0.01). 3. Masticatory muscles functioned more rhythmically and mandibular movements became smoother. 4. Integrated EMGs per stroke of all patients was similar.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Compliance of resilient denture liners immersed in effervescent denture cleansers.

PURPOSE: Six resilient denture liners (RDL) were exposed to two immersion effervescent denture cleansers to evaluate change in compliance over a simulated 1 year time interval. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten samples of each material, Molloplast B, Mollosil, MPDS-SL, Permasoft, Softline, and Sofreliner were exposed to either Fixodent or Efferdent denture cleanser. A cyclic load was applied in a squarewave fashion to derive a load displacement curve to measure compliance at 0, 7, 30, 180, and 360 simulated days. RESULTS: All 12 of the material/cleanser combinations demonstrated a significant change in compliance at each time interval relative to baseline. Mollosil had the greatest increase in flexibility from baseline, and MPDS-SL had the smallest increase in flexibility. In general, chairside materials demonstrated greater change in compliance from baseline compared to laboratory materials. Materials subjected to Fixodent cleanser, when averaged over time, were significantly more flexible than materials exposed to Efferdent cleanser. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure of resilient soft liners to two common cleansers resulted in a significant increase in flexibility. This change in flexibility depended slightly, though significantly, on the type of cleanser, and appeared to be more significant with time. In general, chairside materials seemed to change more than laboratory-processed liners. The exception was Permasoft that was fabricated as a laboratory material but behaved like a chairside material. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The initiator of the polymerization reaction rather than the mode of polymerization may be more important in predicting a change in the flexibility of RDLs. Constituents within the oral environment may be more responsible for changes in RDL flexibility than denture cleansers.

Compliance↗
PubMed2001

Development of a nondestructive compliance test for resilient denture liners.

PURPOSE: Resilient denture liners are prescribed for patients who cannot adjust to hard-based dentures because of a thin mucosa or severe alveolar ridge resorption. A nondestructive test to evaluate compliance of new soft liner materials will be useful in clinical trials. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a nondestructive compliance testing technique designed to characterize long-term, silicone-based resilient denture liner materials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Samples of thicknesses of 1.1, 2.2, 3.3, and 4.4 mm of 2 materials (MPDS-SL [Lai Laboratories, Inc, Burnsville, MN] and Molloplast-B [Buffalo Dental, New York, NY]) were assessed for compliance using a closed-loop servohydraulic testing system, applying a 3 lb force following a squarewave pattern; force and position values were recorded using a storage oscilloscope. The oscilloscope values were analyzed using computer software to determine compliance values. The effect of material thickness was examined by testing wedges of the 2 materials. RESULTS: The testing technique used showed that differing thicknesses had significantly different compliance values (p <.0001). In the materials used to evaluate the technique, MPDS-SL behaved more elastically than did Molloplast-B (p <.0001). Material thicknesses beyond 2.2 mm did not increase compliance, although MPDS-SL had a steeper thickness-compliance curve than Molloplast-B. CONCLUSIONS: The method used to test compliance proved to be sufficiently sensitive to distinguish between 2 materials and between varying thicknesses. The sensitivity and nondestructive nature of this test show its suitability for clinical evaluation of resilient denture liners.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed1995

Bond strength of permanent soft denture liners bonded to the denture base.

The purpose of this study was to characterize denture and soft liner adhesion and to determine the adhesive and/or cohesive strength of different soft tissue liners bonded to the denture base by use of a new technique. Two groups of five permanent soft liners (dry or exposed to water for 6 months) were tested by use of a tensile mode to characterize the failure characteristics of soft liners bonded to denture base resin. The method differed from previous test methods because of the specimen's ability to align axially during the test. The results indicated significant differences in the bonding of liners to the denture base, and light-cure systems exhibited the greatest amount of stress needed for failure. Low bond strength was observed when the adhesion was poor or when the cohesive strength of the soft liner was low and lead to pure adhesive or cohesive failure. When both adhesive and cohesive bonds were strong, failure occurred at high stresses. Combinations of adhesive and cohesive failures (mixed mode) were also observed in intermediate cases.

Acrylic Resins↗
PubMed2005

Effect of storage duration on tensile bond strength of acrylic or silicone-based soft denture liners to a processed denture base polymer.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of storage duration on the tensile bond strength of acrylic and silicone-based denture base materials with liners either heat-cured or auto-cured. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The denture liners investigated were Vertex soft (acrylic-based, heat-cured), Coe soft (acrylic-based, auto-cured), Molloplast-B (silicone-based, heat-cured), and Mollosil plus (silicone-based, auto-cured). The soft liner specimens were 10 x 10 x 3 mm and were processed between two PMMA blocks. They were tested following immersion in water at 37 degrees C for 1 day, 1 week, and 1, 3, and 6 months. Tensile bond strength was measured using a universal testing machine (Testometric Micro 500) at a crosshead speed of 20 mm/min (n = 10 specimens per experimental group). Multiple ANOVA and Tukey HSD were used to analyse the data at a pre-set alpha of 0.05. RESULTS: The results indicate that the tensile bond strength of acrylic-based soft liners is greater than that of silicone-based materials. The bond strength of all lining materials decreases with storage duration; the decrease being greatest for the acrylic-based soft liners. The decrease in bond strength of the auto-cured materials is greater than that of the heat-cured products. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Comparison of the materials in this study indicates that the silicone-based, heat-cured soft liner is superior, based on the tensile bond strength property. Use of silicone-based, heat-cured soft liners may provide better clinical success over a long period. These laboratory results need to be verified by clinical testing.

Acrylic Resins↗
PubMed1992

Color stability of long-term soft denture liners.

The use of resilient denture liners in complete denture construction has become increasingly popular for providing comfort for denture wearers. The primary disadvantage of these materials is that the physical and mechanical properties change rapidly with time in a service environment. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the color stability of five commercially available soft denture liners as a function of accelerated aging. Color measurements were made before aging with a colorimeter and data processor. The samples were then weathered for 100 hours in an accelerated aging chamber in the presence of a xenon ultraviolet visible-light source, an intermittent water spray at 110 degrees F, and 90% humidity. After aging, color measurements were made again and color differences (delta E) were calculated. Results were statistically tested with analysis of variance and Scheffé intervals were calculated at 0.96. It was concluded that accelerated aging can be used to evaluate color stability of soft denture liners.

Acrylic Resins↗
PubMed1998

Setting and stress relaxation behavior of resilient denture liners.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Resilient denture liners are widely used for the patients who are not comfortable with correctly made conventional hard-based dentures because of thin and relatively nonresilient mucosa or severe alveolar resorption. There are several materials used for denture liners and the efficacy in their use is influenced by their viscoelastic properties. PURPOSE: This study evaluated the setting behavior and viscoelastic properties of various types of resilient denture liners and the changes in viscoelasticity with the passage of time. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Four types of resilient denture liners were used. Setting behavior of 5 autopolymerizing materials was evaluated with an oscillating rheometer. Stress relaxation tests were conducted to evaluate the viscoelastic properties of 9 materials and changes that occurred over time by means of Maxwell model analogies. RESULTS: Significant differences were found in the setting behavior of the autopolymerizing materials. The acrylic resin and fluoroethylene materials demonstrated viscoelastic properties and the silicone and polyolephin materials were found to be elastic. The acrylic resin materials exhibited the greatest changes in viscoelastic properties over time when compared with silicone, polyolephin, and fluoroethylene materials. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that it is important to select denture liner materials according to clinical situations because of the wide ranges of setting behavior, viscoelastic properties, and durability over time.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Effect of soft denture liner on stress distribution in supporting structures under a denture.

This study examined the effect of a soft denture liner on the distribution of stresses in the denture-supporting structures. Dentures without a linear and with three configurations of a soft liner were simulated by using a two-dimensional viscoelastic finite-element stress analysis. The stress intensity at functional force-bearing areas decreased when a soft denture liner was used. However, the stresses in the bone increased remarkably up to 3.0 seconds after loading. Because of the time-dependent effect of stresses applied to soft denture liners, denture patients who clench or brux may not benefit as greatly from soft denture liners. The study indicates that viscoelastic finite-element analysis is helpful for evaluating soft denture liners. Soft denture liners appear to be useful for improving the stress distribution in the supporting structures under dentures.

Alveolar Process↗
PubMed1998

Effectiveness of chlorine dioxide in disinfection on two soft denture liners.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Soft tissue denture liners frequently require replacement that necessitates complete removal from the denture base. A high speed lathe located in a "clean laboratory" is often used to facilitate removal of these materials, but it is unclear whether routine disinfection procedures reduce bacterial contamination sufficiently to prevent contamination of the laboratory. PURPOSE: The first phase of this study evaluated the effectiveness of 3-minute chlorine dioxide spray and immersion disinfection procedures on 2 denture liners (Coe Soft and Coe Comfort) and stainless steel specimens used as controls. The second phase evaluated the effectiveness of spray disinfection at time intervals of 1, 3, and 10 minutes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Specimens made of soft denture liners attached to acrylic resin bases (10 per group) were contaminated with Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Candida albicans. Colony-forming units were counted after different disinfection techniques were applied. Kruskal-Wallis 1-way analysis of variance on ranks and an all pairwise multiple comparison procedures (Dunn's method) were used to test for significant differences among test groups at the P <.05 level of significance. RESULTS: Chlorine dioxide was effective against nonporous stainless steel specimens but was inadequate for denture liners at the recommended 3-minute time of disinfection. The immersion technique was more effective than the spray technique, but the difference was not significant. Increasing the time of disinfection did not significantly reduce the numbers of microorganisms. CONCLUSION: Coe Soft and Coe Comfort denture liners should be removed before entering the laboratory. These materials contain sufficient viable bacteria after routine disinfection procedures to cause contamination of the "clean laboratory."

Aerosols↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Randomized controlled clinical trial for verifying the effect of silicone-based resilient denture liner on the masticatory function of complete denture wearers.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether application of permanent silicone-based resilient denture liner (SR) to mandibular complete dentures significantly improves patients' masticatory ability compared to conventional heat-activated acrylic resin (AR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight edentulous patients were randomly placed into 1 of 2 crossover groups (AR-SR/SR-AR) by using a random permuted block within strata method. The AR-SR group received AR denture treatments followed by SR denture treatments. The SR-AR group received treatments in the reverse sequence. The outcomes were classified by matiscatory performance, mandibular movement, electromyographic activity, and maximum occlusal force. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed in any of the baseline characteristic measurements between groups. SR denture wearers exhibited significantly higher masticatory performance than AR denture wearers. SR denture wearers exhibited a longer early-stage occluding period than AR denture wearers. There were no differences in electromyographic activity between the AR and SR groups. There were no significant differences in maximum occlusal force between the AR and SR groups. CONCLUSION: This study showed that the application of SR to mandibular complete dentures resulted in significant improvements to the patients' masticatory ability compared to AR.

Acrylic Resins↗